LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 37

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Neuropathic low back pain in clinical practice.

    Baron, R / Binder, A / Attal, N / Casale, R / Dickenson, A H / Treede, R-D

    European journal of pain (London, England)

    2016  Volume 20, Issue 6, Page(s) 861–873

    Abstract: ... the lidocaine 5% medicated plaster - may be effective options for the treatment of neuropathic low back pain ... Background and objective: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common chronic pain conditions ... component of low back pain raises the potential for the development of mechanism-based therapies. Open and ...

    Abstract Background and objective: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common chronic pain conditions. This paper reviews the available literature on the role of neuropathic mechanisms in chronic LBP and discusses implications for its clinical management, with a particular focus on pharmacological treatments.
    Databases and data treatment: Literature searches were performed in PubMed, key pain congresses and ProQuest Dialog to identify published evidence on neuropathic back pain and its management. All titles were assessed for relevant literature.
    Results: Chronic LBP comprises both nociceptive and neuropathic components, however, the neuropathic component appears under-recognized and undertreated. Neuropathic pain (NP) is challenging to manage. Many patients with chronic LBP have pain that is refractory to existing treatments. Typically, less than half of patients experience clinically meaningful analgesia with oral pharmacotherapies; these are also associated with risks of adverse effects. Paracetamol and NSAIDs, although widely used for LBP, are unlikely to ameliorate the neuropathic component and data on the use of NP medications such as antidepressants and gabapentin/pregabalin are limited. While there is an unmet need for improved treatment options, recent data have shown tapentadol to have efficacy in the neuropathic component of LBP, and studies suggest that the capsaicin 8% patch and lidocaine 5% medicated plaster, topical analgesics available for the treatment of peripheral NP, may be a valuable additional approach for the management of neuropathic LBP.
    Conclusions: Chronic LBP often has an under-recognized neuropathic component, which can be challenging to manage, and requires improved understanding and better diagnosis and treatment. WHAT DOES THIS REVIEW ADD?: Increased recognition and improved understanding of the neuropathic component of low back pain raises the potential for the development of mechanism-based therapies. Open and retrospective studies suggest that agents like tapentadol and topical analgesics - such as the capsaicin 8% patch and the lidocaine 5% medicated plaster - may be effective options for the treatment of neuropathic low back pain in defined patient groups.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-07
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1390424-3
    ISSN 1532-2149 ; 1090-3801
    ISSN (online) 1532-2149
    ISSN 1090-3801
    DOI 10.1002/ejp.838
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Neuropathic pain questionnaires for back pain, what do we know?

    Baranidharan, Ganesan / Bretherton, Beatrice / Comer, Christine / Duarte, Rui / Cromie, Kirsten

    Musculoskeletal science & practice

    2022  Volume 63, Page(s) 102714

    Abstract: ... as nociceptive. However, research suggests it may have neuropathic components. Neuropathic axial low back pain is ... always specific for neuropathic radiating low back pain, let alone neuropathic axial low back pain ... the percentage of patients identified as having neuropathic radiating low back pain may be dependent ...

    Abstract Introduction: Low back pain is a global public health concern, with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 84%. Axial low back pain refers to pain confined to an area in the low back and is different to radicular pain which radiates to extremities. Axial low back pain has traditionally been considered as nociceptive. However, research suggests it may have neuropathic components. Neuropathic axial low back pain is an unresolved, hotly contested topic due to controversies surrounding its aetiology, diagnosis, clinical course, prognosis and treatment options.
    Purpose: The reference standard for diagnosing neuropathic pain is by medical history and clinical assessment (i.e., sensory testing), with optional neuropathic screening tools and selective, further diagnostic tests when clinically needed. Neuropathic screening tools are not always specific for neuropathic radiating low back pain, let alone neuropathic axial low back pain. Additionally, not all have been validated for the English language (e.g., PainDETECT). Research also suggests the percentage of patients identified as having neuropathic radiating low back pain may be dependent on the combination of reference standards used.
    Implications: There is a need for research that works towards improving understanding of neuropathic axial low back pain and developing a standardised, validated and reliable system for assessing and identifying this condition. This body of research will promote earlier stratification and more rapid referral for appropriate treatment, and improve awareness, assessment and visibility of this condition amongst healthcare practitioners and in healthcare settings. This will lead to transformations in Pathways and health guidelines, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis ; Pain Measurement ; Back Pain ; Neuralgia/diagnosis ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-24
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2888772-4
    ISSN 2468-7812
    ISSN (online) 2468-7812
    DOI 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102714
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Diagnostic utility of diagnostic investigations to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain: protocol for a systematic review.

    Mistry, Jai / Walton, David M / Noblet, Tim / Bowling, Benjamin / Heneghan, Nicola R / Rushton, Alison B

    BMJ open

    2024  Volume 14, Issue 1, Page(s) e078392

    Abstract: Introduction: Neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain has gained increasing interest ... in contemporary research. Identification of neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain is essential to inform ... precision management. Diagnostic investigations are commonly used to identify neuropathic pain in low back ...

    Abstract Introduction: Neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain has gained increasing interest in contemporary research. Identification of neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain is essential to inform precision management. Diagnostic investigations are commonly used to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain; yet the diagnostic utility of these investigations is unknown. This systematic review aims to investigate the diagnostic utility of diagnostic investigations to identify neuropathic pain in low back-related leg pain.
    Methods and analysis: This protocol has been designed and reported in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Diagnostic Test Accuracy studies, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols checklist, respectively. The search strategy will involve two independent reviewers searching electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, AMED, Pedro), key journals (Spine, The Clinical Journal of Pain, PAIN, European Journal of Pain, The Journal of Pain, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice) and grey literature (British National Bibliography for report literature, OpenGrey, EThOS) from inception to 31 July 2023 to identify studies. Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic investigation to identify neuropathic pain in patients with low back-related leg pain will be eligible, studies not written in English will be excluded. The reviewers will extract the data from included studies, assess risk of bias (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) and determine confidence in findings (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines). Methodological heterogeneity will be assessed to determine if a meta-analysis is possible. If pooling of data is not possible then a narrative synthesis will be done.
    Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at relevant conferences and shared with the Patient Partner Advisor Group at Western University, Canada.
    Prospero registration number: CRD42023438222.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Leg ; Research Design ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Neuralgia/diagnosis ; Neuralgia/etiology ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis ; Meta-Analysis as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-29
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078392
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic low back pain? The low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium's international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations.

    Nijs, Jo / Kosek, Eva / Chiarotto, Alessandro / Cook, Chad / Danneels, Lieven A / Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, César / Hodges, Paul W / Koes, Bart / Louw, Adriaan / Ostelo, Raymond / Scholten-Peeters, Gwendolyne G M / Sterling, Michele / Alkassabi, Othman / Alsobayel, Hana / Beales, Darren / Bilika, Paraskevi / Clark, Jacqui R / De Baets, Liesbet / Demoulin, Christophe /
    de Zoete, Rutger M J / Elma, Ömer / Gutke, Annelie / Hanafi, Rikard / Hotz Boendermaker, Sabina / Huysmans, Eva / Kapreli, Eleni / Lundberg, Mari / Malfliet, Anneleen / Meziat Filho, Ney / Reis, Felipe J J / Voogt, Lennard / Zimney, Kory / Smeets, Rob / Morlion, Bart / de Vlam, Kurt / George, Steven Z

    The Lancet. Rheumatology

    2024  Volume 6, Issue 3, Page(s) e178–e188

    Abstract: The potential to classify low back pain as being characterised by dominant nociceptive, neuropathic ... that these low back pain phenotypes might respond differently to treatments; however, more research must be done ... before making specific recommendations. Accordingly, the low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium was ...

    Abstract The potential to classify low back pain as being characterised by dominant nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic mechanisms is a clinically relevant issue. Preliminary evidence suggests that these low back pain phenotypes might respond differently to treatments; however, more research must be done before making specific recommendations. Accordingly, the low back pain phenotyping (BACPAP) consortium was established as a group of 36 clinicians and researchers from 13 countries (five continents) and 29 institutions, to apply a modified Nominal Group Technique methodology to develop international and multidisciplinary consensus recommendations to provide guidance for identifying the dominant pain phenotype in patients with low back pain, and potentially adapt pain management strategies. The BACPAP consortium's recommendations are also intended to provide direction for future clinical research by building on the established clinical criteria for neuropathic and nociplastic pain. The BACPAP consortium's consensus recommendations are a necessary early step in the process to determine if personalised pain medicine based on pain phenotypes is feasible for low back pain management. Therefore, these recommendations are not ready to be implemented in clinical practice until additional evidence is generated that is specific to these low back pain phenotypes.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis ; Consensus ; Nociception ; Pain Measurement/methods ; Analgesics ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
    Chemical Substances Analgesics
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 2665-9913
    ISSN (online) 2665-9913
    DOI 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00324-7
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Neuropathic pain component and its association with time elapsed since pain onset in patients with low back pain.

    Kim, Hee Jung / Ban, Min Gi / Yoon, Kyung Bong / Yang, Yun Seok / Kim, Shin Hyung

    Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain

    2023  Volume 23, Issue 6, Page(s) 580–588

    Abstract: ... to identify factors associated with neuropathic pain component (painDETECT score ≥ 13) in low back pain ... sleep disturbance were significantly associated with a neuropathic component in low back pain.: Conclusion: Time ... in low back pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between neuropathic pain component and ...

    Abstract Background: Time elapsed since pain onset might affect the likelihood of neuropathic component in low back pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between neuropathic pain component and pain duration in patients with low back pain and to identify factors associated with neuropathic pain component.
    Methods: Patients with low back pain who received treatment at our clinic were enrolled. Neuropathic component was assessed using the painDETECT questionnaire at the initial visit. PainDETECT scores and the results for each item were compared according to pain duration category (< 3 months, 3 months to 1 year, 1 year to 3 years, 3 years to 10 years, and ≥ 10 years). A multivariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with neuropathic pain component (painDETECT score ≥ 13) in low back pain.
    Results: A total of 1957 patients, including 255 patients who reported neuropathic-like pain symptoms (13.0%), fully satisfied the study criteria for analysis. No significant correlation between painDETECT score and pain duration was observed (ρ = -0.025, p = 0.272), and there were no significant differences between median painDETECT score or trend of change in the proportion of patients with neuropathic component and the pain duration category (p = 0.307, p = 0.427, respectively). The electric shock-like pain symptom was frequently reported in patients with acute low back pain, and the persistent pain pattern with slight fluctuations was predominant in chronic low back pain. The pattern of attacks with pain between them was much less common in patients with pain for 10 years or longer. Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of lumbar surgery, severe maximum pain, opioid use, lumbosacral radiculopathy, and sleep disturbance were significantly associated with a neuropathic component in low back pain.
    Conclusion: Time elapsed since current pain onset did not correlate with neuropathic pain component in patients with low back pain. Therefore, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for this condition should be based on a multidimensional evaluation at assessment and not on pain duration alone.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis ; Low Back Pain/complications ; Neuralgia/diagnosis ; Neuralgia/epidemiology ; Neuralgia/complications ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Radiculopathy/complications ; Lumbosacral Region
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2151272-3
    ISSN 1533-2500 ; 1530-7085
    ISSN (online) 1533-2500
    ISSN 1530-7085
    DOI 10.1111/papr.13216
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: PEER simplified chronic pain guideline: Management of chronic low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care.

    Korownyk, Christina S / Montgomery, Lori / Young, Jennifer / Moore, Simon / Singer, Alexander G / MacDougall, Peter / Darling, Sean / Ellis, Kira / Myers, Jacqueline / Rochford, Candice / Taillefer, Marie-Christine / Allan, G Michael / Perry, Danielle / Moe, Samantha S / Ton, Joey / Kolber, Michael R / Kirkwood, Jessica / Thomas, Betsy / Garrison, Scott /
    McCormack, James P / Falk, Jamison / Dugré, Nicolas / Sept, Logan / Turgeon, Ricky D / Paige, Allison / Potter, Jen / Nickonchuk, Tony / Train, Anthony D / Weresch, Justin / Chan, Karenn / Lindblad, Adrienne J

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien

    2022  Volume 68, Issue 3, Page(s) 179–190

    Abstract: ... including low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care.: Methods: The guideline was ... for managing osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain; evidence of benefit is unclear for neuropathic pain ... Conclusion: This guideline for the management of chronic pain, including osteoarthritis, low back pain, and ...

    Abstract Objective: To develop a clinical practice guideline to support the management of chronic pain, including low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care.
    Methods: The guideline was developed with an emphasis on best available evidence and shared decision-making principles. Ten health professionals (4 generalist family physicians, 1 pain management-focused family physician, 1 anesthesiologist, 1 physical therapist, 1 pharmacist, 1 nurse practitioner, and 1 psychologist), a patient representative, and a nonvoting pharmacist and guideline methodologist comprised the Guideline Committee. Member selection was based on profession, practice setting, and lack of financial conflicts of interest. The guideline process was iterative in identification of key questions, evidence review, and development of guideline recommendations. Three systematic reviews, including a total of 285 randomized controlled trials, were completed. Randomized controlled trials were included only if they reported a responder analysis (eg, how many patients achieved a 30% or greater reduction in pain). The committee directed an Evidence Team (composed of evidence experts) to address an additional 11 complementary questions. Key recommendations were derived through committee consensus. The guideline and shared decision-making tools underwent extensive review by clinicians and patients before publication.
    Recommendations: Physical activity is recommended as the foundation for managing osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain; evidence of benefit is unclear for neuropathic pain. Cognitive-behavioural therapy or mindfulness-based stress reduction are also suggested as options for managing chronic pain. Treatments for which there is clear, unclear, or no benefit are outlined for each condition. Treatments for which harms likely outweigh benefits for all or most conditions studied include opioids and cannabinoids.
    Conclusion: This guideline for the management of chronic pain, including osteoarthritis, low back pain, and neuropathic pain, highlights best available evidence including both benefits and harms for a number of treatment interventions. A strong recommendation for exercise as the primary treatment for chronic osteoarthritic and low back pain is made based on demonstrated long-term evidence of benefit. This information is intended to assist with, not dictate, shared decision making with patients.
    MeSH term(s) Chronic Pain/therapy ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Low Back Pain/therapy ; Neuralgia/therapy ; Pain Management ; Primary Health Care
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-15
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 603565-6
    ISSN 1715-5258 ; 0008-350X
    ISSN (online) 1715-5258
    ISSN 0008-350X
    DOI 10.46747/cfp.6803179
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for neuropathic pain.

    Moore, R Andrew / Chi, Ching-Chi / Wiffen, Philip J / Derry, Sheena / Rice, Andrew S C

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

    2015  , Issue 10, Page(s) CD010902

    Abstract: ... with chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component or postherpetic neuralgia; 209 of these participants ... 42, only 16 had neuropathic pain. This represented only third tier evidence, and was of very low ... were involved in a study of an experimental NSAID not used in clinical practice, and of the remaining ...

    Abstract Background: Although often considered to be lacking adequate evidence, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the management of neuropathic pain. Previous surveys found 18% to 47% of affected people reported using NSAIDs specifically for their neuropathic pain, although possibly not in the United Kingdom (UK).
    Objectives: To assess the analgesic efficacy of oral NSAIDs for chronic neuropathic pain in adults, when compared to placebo or another active intervention, and the adverse events associated with its use in clinical trials.
    Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception to 29 May 2015, together with reference lists of retrieved papers and reviews, and an online trials registry.
    Selection criteria: We included randomised, double-blind studies of two weeks duration or longer, comparing any oral NSAID with placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain.
    Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently searched for studies, extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and examined issues of study quality. We did not carry out any pooled analysis.
    Main results: We included two studies involving 251 participants with chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component or postherpetic neuralgia; 209 of these participants were involved in a study of an experimental NSAID not used in clinical practice, and of the remaining 42, only 16 had neuropathic pain. This represented only third tier evidence, and was of very low quality. There was no indication of any significant pain reduction with NSAIDs. Adverse event rates were low, with insufficient events for any analysis.
    Authors' conclusions: There is no evidence to support or refute the use of oral NSAIDs to treat neuropathic pain conditions.
    MeSH term(s) Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage ; Back Pain/drug therapy ; Celecoxib/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Neuralgia/drug therapy ; Neuralgia, Postherpetic/drug therapy ; Pregabalin/therapeutic use ; Pyrazoles/therapeutic use ; Pyridazines/therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    Chemical Substances Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal ; GW406381X ; Pyrazoles ; Pyridazines ; Pregabalin (55JG375S6M) ; Celecoxib (JCX84Q7J1L)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2015-10-05
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review ; Systematic Review
    ISSN 1469-493X
    ISSN (online) 1469-493X
    DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD010902.pub2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Neuropathic low back pain.

    Audette, Joseph F / Emenike, Emmanuel / Meleger, Alec L

    Current pain and headache reports

    2005  Volume 9, Issue 3, Page(s) 168–177

    Abstract: In this discussion, we hope to advance a clinical approach to low back pain that is more in line ... for neuropathic low back pain. ... to neuropathic pain and cause common pain patterns seen in clinical practice. We also detail the available treatments ...

    Abstract In this discussion, we hope to advance a clinical approach to low back pain that is more in line with our modern understanding of neuropathic pain. We review the current understanding of normal and pathologic neuroanatomy of the lumbar spine and then outline how pathology in the different structures can lead to neuropathic pain and cause common pain patterns seen in clinical practice. We also detail the available treatments for neuropathic low back pain.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Chronic Disease ; Humans ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis ; Low Back Pain/etiology ; Low Back Pain/physiopathology ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/complications ; Spine/anatomy & histology ; Spine/pathology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2005-05-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2055062-5
    ISSN 1531-3433
    ISSN 1531-3433
    DOI 10.1007/s11916-005-0058-8
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Epidemiology of physician-diagnosed neuropathic pain in Brazil

    Udall M / Kudel I / Cappelleri JC / Sadosky A / King-Concialdi K / Parsons B / Hlavacek P / Hopps M / Salomon PA / DiBonaventura MD / Clark P / Santos Garcia JB

    Journal of Pain Research, Vol Volume 12, Pp 243-

    2019  Volume 253

    Abstract: ... painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), central neuropathic pain (CNP), chronic low back pain ... hospitals and pain clinics in São Paulo, Ceara, and Bahia and explore clinical characteristics by subtypes ... Objectives: Estimate the prevalence of neuropathic pain (NeP) among chronic pain patients attending Brazilian ...

    Abstract Margarita Udall,1 Ian Kudel,2 Joseph C Cappelleri,3 Alesia Sadosky,1 Kristen King-Concialdi,2 Bruce Parsons,1 Patrick Hlavacek,1 Markay Hopps,1 P Arline Salomon,4 Marco D DiBonventura,2 Patricia Clark,5,6 João Batista Santos Garcia7 1Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA; 2Health Outcomes Practice, Kantar Health, New York, NY, USA; 3Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA; 4Pfizer Inc, Bosques de las Lomas, Mexico; 5Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico; 6Faculty of Medicine UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico; 7Pain and Palliative Care Department, Federal University of Maranhão, Maranhão, Brazil Objectives: Estimate the prevalence of neuropathic pain (NeP) among chronic pain patients attending Brazilian hospitals and pain clinics in São Paulo, Ceara, and Bahia and explore clinical characteristics by subtypes: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), central neuropathic pain (CNP), chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component (CLBP-NeP), postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), post-traumatic neuropathic pain (PTN), and post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSN).Methods: Physicians screened patients reporting chronic pain for ≥3 months (n=2,118) for probable NeP, using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire and physician assessment, and reported their NeP subtype(s), symptoms, and medications. Identified NeP patients completed a questionnaire including treatment experiences, quality of life EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]), pain severity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scales. Descriptive analyses were performed by NeP subtype.Results: The prevalence of probable NeP was 14.5% (n=307). NeP patients were mostly female (80.5%), middle-aged (mean [M]=52.5, SD=13.9), and Pardo (44.3%). Of those diagnosed with an NeP subtype (n=209), the largest proportions were CLBP-NeP (36.8%), followed by pDPN (18.7%), CNP (17.7%), PTN (17.2%), PSN (13.4%), and PHN (3.3%). Across subtypes, the most widely reported symptoms were numbness (range: ...
    Keywords Neuropathic pain ; Brazil ; Quality of life ; Pain ; Work Productivity and Activity Impairment ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 616 ; 550
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Dove Medical Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Clinical indicators to identify neuropathic pain in low back related leg pain: a modified Delphi study.

    Mistry, Jai / Falla, Deborah / Noblet, Tim / Heneghan, Nicola R / Rushton, Alison

    BMC musculoskeletal disorders

    2020  Volume 21, Issue 1, Page(s) 601

    Abstract: Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) is common in patients presenting with low back related leg pain ... of this study was to achieve expert consensus on a list of clinical indicators to identify NP in low back ... to identify NP in low back related leg pain. This list of indicators provide some indication of the criteria ...

    Abstract Background: Neuropathic pain (NP) is common in patients presenting with low back related leg pain. Accurate diagnosis of NP is fundamental to ensure appropriate intervention. In the absence of a clear gold standard, expert opinion provides a useful methodology to progress research and clinical practice. The aim of this study was to achieve expert consensus on a list of clinical indicators to identify NP in low back related leg pain.
    Methods: A modified Delphi method consisting of three rounds was designed in accordance with the Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies recommendations. Recruitment involved contacting experts directly and through expressions of interest on social media. Experts were identified using pre-defined eligibility criteria. Priori consensus criteria were defined for each round through descriptive statistics. Following completion of round 3 a list of clinical indicators that achieved consensus were generated.
    Results: Thirty-eight participants were recruited across 11 countries. Thirty-five participants completed round 1 (92.1%), 32 (84.2%) round 2 and 30 (78.9%) round 3. Round 1 identified consensus (Kendall's W coefficient of concordance 0.456; p < 0.001) for 10 clinical indicators out of the original 14, and 9 additional indicators were added to round 2 following content analysis of qualitative data. Round 2 identified consensus (Kendall's W coefficient of concordance 0.749; p < 0.001) for 10 clinical indicators out of 19, and 1 additional indicator was added to round 3. Round 3 identified consensus for 8 indicators (Kendall's W coefficient of concordance 0.648; p < 0.001). Following completion of the third round, an expert derived consensus list of 8 items was generated. Two indicators; pain variously described a burning, electric shock like and/or shooting into leg and pain in association with other neurological symptoms (e.g. pins and needles, numbness, weakness), were found to have complete agreement amongst expert participants.
    Conclusions: Good agreement was found for the consensus derived list of 8 clinical indicators to identify NP in low back related leg pain. This list of indicators provide some indication of the criteria upon which clinicians can identify a NP component to low back related leg pain; further research is needed for stronger recommendations to be made.
    MeSH term(s) Consensus ; Delphi Technique ; Humans ; Leg ; Low Back Pain/diagnosis ; Neuralgia/diagnosis
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-09-08
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 1471-2474
    ISSN (online) 1471-2474
    DOI 10.1186/s12891-020-03600-y
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top