LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Implications of nonlinearity, confounding, and interactions for estimating exposure concentration-response functions in quantitative risk analysis.

    Cox, Louis Anthony

    Environmental research

    2020  Volume 187, Page(s) 109638

    Abstract: ... whether reducing exposure would reduce risk. We discuss statistical options for controlling for such threats, and ... pyroptosis of cells. Realistic dose-response modeling and risk analysis must confront the reality ... in biological exposure concentration-response (C-R) functions. These range from ultrasensitive molecular ...

    Abstract Recent advances in understanding of biological mechanisms and adverse outcome pathways for many exposure-related diseases show that certain common mechanisms involve thresholds and nonlinearities in biological exposure concentration-response (C-R) functions. These range from ultrasensitive molecular switches in signaling pathways, to assembly and activation of inflammasomes, to rupture of lysosomes and pyroptosis of cells. Realistic dose-response modeling and risk analysis must confront the reality of nonlinear C-R functions. This paper reviews several challenges for traditional statistical regression modeling of C-R functions with thresholds and nonlinearities, together with methods for overcoming them. Statistically significantly positive exposure-response regression coefficients can arise from many non-causal sources such as model specification errors, incompletely controlled confounding, exposure estimation errors, attribution of interactions to factors, associations among explanatory variables, or coincident historical trends. If so, the unadjusted regression coefficients do not necessarily predict how or whether reducing exposure would reduce risk. We discuss statistical options for controlling for such threats, and advocate causal Bayesian networks and dynamic simulation models as potentially valuable complements to nonparametric regression modeling for assessing causally interpretable nonlinear C-R functions and understanding how time patterns of exposures affect risk. We conclude that these approaches are promising for extending the great advances made in statistical C-R modeling methods in recent decades to clarify how to design regulations that are more causally effective in protecting human health.
    MeSH term(s) Air Pollution ; Bayes Theorem ; Environmental Exposure/analysis ; Humans ; Regression Analysis ; Risk
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-19
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 205699-9
    ISSN 1096-0953 ; 0013-9351
    ISSN (online) 1096-0953
    ISSN 0013-9351
    DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109638
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Implications of nonlinearity, confounding, and interactions for estimating exposure concentration-response functions in quantitative risk analysis

    Cox, Louis Anthony

    Environmental research. 2020 Aug., v. 187

    2020  

    Abstract: ... whether reducing exposure would reduce risk. We discuss statistical options for controlling for such threats, and ... pyroptosis of cells. Realistic dose-response modeling and risk analysis must confront the reality ... in biological exposure concentration-response (C-R) functions. These range from ultrasensitive molecular ...

    Abstract Recent advances in understanding of biological mechanisms and adverse outcome pathways for many exposure-related diseases show that certain common mechanisms involve thresholds and nonlinearities in biological exposure concentration-response (C-R) functions. These range from ultrasensitive molecular switches in signaling pathways, to assembly and activation of inflammasomes, to rupture of lysosomes and pyroptosis of cells. Realistic dose-response modeling and risk analysis must confront the reality of nonlinear C-R functions. This paper reviews several challenges for traditional statistical regression modeling of C-R functions with thresholds and nonlinearities, together with methods for overcoming them. Statistically significantly positive exposure-response regression coefficients can arise from many non-causal sources such as model specification errors, incompletely controlled confounding, exposure estimation errors, attribution of interactions to factors, associations among explanatory variables, or coincident historical trends. If so, the unadjusted regression coefficients do not necessarily predict how or whether reducing exposure would reduce risk. We discuss statistical options for controlling for such threats, and advocate causal Bayesian networks and dynamic simulation models as potentially valuable complements to nonparametric regression modeling for assessing causally interpretable nonlinear C-R functions and understanding how time patterns of exposures affect risk. We conclude that these approaches are promising for extending the great advances made in statistical C-R modeling methods in recent decades to clarify how to design regulations that are more causally effective in protecting human health.
    Keywords Bayesian theory ; dose response ; human health ; inflammasomes ; lysosomes ; pyroptosis ; quantitative risk assessment ; regression analysis ; research ; risk ; risk reduction
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2020-08
    Publishing place Elsevier Inc.
    Document type Article
    Note NAL-AP-2-clean
    ZDB-ID 205699-9
    ISSN 1096-0953 ; 0013-9351
    ISSN (online) 1096-0953
    ISSN 0013-9351
    DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109638
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top