LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 6 of total 6

Search options

  1. Article: Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies.

    Fan, Jingchun / Gao, Ya / Zhao, Na / Dai, Runjing / Zhang, Hailiang / Feng, Xiaoyan / Shi, Guoxiu / Tian, Jinhui / Chen, Che / Hambly, Brett D / Bao, Shisan

    Frontiers in public health

    2020  Volume 8, Page(s) 477

    Abstract: Background: ...

    Abstract Background:
    MeSH term(s) Bibliometrics ; Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; Humans ; Language
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-14
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2711781-9
    ISSN 2296-2565
    ISSN 2296-2565
    DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00477
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies

    Fan, J. / Gao, Y. / Zhao, N. / Dai, R. / Zhang, H. / Feng, X. / Shi, G. / Tian, J. / Chen, C. / Hambly, B. D. / Bao, S.

    Front Public Health

    Abstract: ... in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during ... provinces, and institutions Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research articles and ... from both English and Chinese databases Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1 6 14, and CiteSpace V ...

    Abstract Background: As an emerging infectious disease, COVID-19 has garnered great research interest We aimed to explore the differences between English language and Chinese language Medical/Scientific journals publications, particularly aiming to explore the efficacy/contents of the literature published in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic Methods: Publications on COVID-19 research were retrieved from both English and Chinese databases Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1 6 14, and CiteSpace V software Network maps were generated to evaluate the collaborations between different authors, countries/provinces, and institutions Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research articles and reviews on COVID-19 were included in our study Most of the authors and institutions of the papers were from China before March 1st, 2020, however, the distribution of authors and institutions were mainly in developed countries or more wealthy areas of China The range of the keywords in English publications was more extensive than those in Chinese Traditional Chinese Medicine was seen more frequently in Chinese papers than in English Of the 143 articles published in English, 54 articles were published by Chinese authors only and 21 articles were published jointly by Chinese and other overseas authors Conclusions: The publications in English have enabled medical practitioners and scientists to share/exchange information, while on the other hand, the publications in the Chinese language have provided complementary educational approaches for the local medical practitioners to understand the essential and key information to manage COVID-19 in the relatively remote regions of China, for the general population with a general level of education
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #760886
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19

    Fan, Jingchun / Gao, Ya / Zhao, Na / Dai, Runjing / Zhang, Hailiang / Feng, Xiaoyan / Shi, Guoxiu / Tian, Jinhui / Chen, Che / Hambly, Brett D. / Bao, Shisan

    A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies

    2020  

    Abstract: ... in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during ... countries/provinces, and institutions. Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research ... from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace ...

    Abstract Background: As an emerging infectious disease, COVID-19 has garnered great research interest. We aimed to explore the differences between English language and Chinese language Medical/Scientific journals publications, particularly aiming to explore the efficacy/contents of the literature published in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Publications on COVID-19 research were retrieved from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace V software. Network maps were generated to evaluate the collaborations between different authors, countries/provinces, and institutions. Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research articles and reviews on COVID-19 were included in our study. Most of the authors and institutions of the papers were from China before March 1st, 2020, however, the distribution of authors and institutions were mainly in developed countries or more wealthy areas of China. The range of the keywords in English publications was more extensive than those in Chinese. Traditional Chinese Medicine was seen more frequently in Chinese papers than in English. Of the 143 articles published in English, 54 articles were published by Chinese authors only and 21 articles were published jointly by Chinese and other overseas authors. Conclusions: The publications in English have enabled medical practitioners and scientists to share/exchange information, while on the other hand, the publications in the Chinese language have provided complementary educational approaches for the local medical practitioners to understand the essential and key information to manage COVID-19 in the relatively remote regions of China, for the general population with a general level of education.
    Keywords COVID-19 ; Coronavirus ; covid19
    Subject code 001
    Language English
    Publishing country au
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19

    Fan, Jingchun / Gao, Ya / Zhao, Na / Dai, Runjing / Zhang, Hailiang / Feng, Xiaoyan / Shi, Guoxiu / Tian, Jinhui / Chen, Che / Hambly, Brett D. / Bao, Shisan

    Frontiers in Public Health

    A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies

    2020  Volume 8

    Keywords covid19
    Publisher Frontiers Media SA
    Publishing country ch
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 2711781-9
    ISSN 2296-2565
    ISSN 2296-2565
    DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00477
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19

    Jingchun Fan / Ya Gao / Na Zhao / Runjing Dai / Hailiang Zhang / Xiaoyan Feng / Guoxiu Shi / Jinhui Tian / Che Chen / Brett D. Hambly / Shisan Bao

    Frontiers in Public Health, Vol

    A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies

    2020  Volume 8

    Abstract: ... in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during ... countries/provinces, and institutions.Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research ... from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace ...

    Abstract Background: As an emerging infectious disease, COVID-19 has garnered great research interest. We aimed to explore the differences between English language and Chinese language Medical/Scientific journals publications, particularly aiming to explore the efficacy/contents of the literature published in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: Publications on COVID-19 research were retrieved from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace V software. Network maps were generated to evaluate the collaborations between different authors, countries/provinces, and institutions.Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research articles and reviews on COVID-19 were included in our study. Most of the authors and institutions of the papers were from China before March 1st, 2020, however, the distribution of authors and institutions were mainly in developed countries or more wealthy areas of China. The range of the keywords in English publications was more extensive than those in Chinese. Traditional Chinese Medicine was seen more frequently in Chinese papers than in English. Of the 143 articles published in English, 54 articles were published by Chinese authors only and 21 articles were published jointly by Chinese and other overseas authors.Conclusions: The publications in English have enabled medical practitioners and scientists to share/exchange information, while on the other hand, the publications in the Chinese language have provided complementary educational approaches for the local medical practitioners to understand the essential and key information to manage COVID-19 in the relatively remote regions of China, for the general population with a general level of education.
    Keywords bibliometric ; COVID-19 outbreaks ; SARS-CoV-2 ; English ; Chinese ; Public aspects of medicine ; RA1-1270 ; covid19
    Subject code 001
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Audio / Video ; Online: Image_1_Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19

    Jingchun Fan / Ya Gao / Na Zhao / Runjing Dai / Hailiang Zhang / Xiaoyan Feng / Guoxiu Shi / Jinhui Tian / Che Chen / Brett D. Hambly / Shisan Bao

    A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies.jpg

    2020  

    Abstract: ... in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during ... countries/provinces, and institutions. Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research ... from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace ...

    Abstract Background: As an emerging infectious disease, COVID-19 has garnered great research interest. We aimed to explore the differences between English language and Chinese language Medical/Scientific journals publications, particularly aiming to explore the efficacy/contents of the literature published in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Publications on COVID-19 research were retrieved from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace V software. Network maps were generated to evaluate the collaborations between different authors, countries/provinces, and institutions. Results: A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research articles and reviews on COVID-19 were included in our study. Most of the authors and institutions of the papers were from China before March 1st, 2020, however, the distribution of authors and institutions were mainly in developed countries or more wealthy areas of China. The range of the keywords in English publications was more extensive than those in Chinese. Traditional Chinese Medicine was seen more frequently in Chinese papers than in English. Of the 143 articles published in English, 54 articles were published by Chinese authors only and 21 articles were published jointly by Chinese and other overseas authors. Conclusions: The publications in English have enabled medical practitioners and scientists to share/exchange information, while on the other hand, the publications in the Chinese language have provided complementary educational approaches for the local medical practitioners to understand the essential and key information to manage COVID-19 in the relatively remote regions of China, for the general population with a general level of education.
    Keywords Mental Health Nursing ; Midwifery ; Nursing not elsewhere classified ; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health ; Aged Health Care ; Care for Disabled ; Community Child Health ; Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety ; Epidemiology ; Family Care ; Health and Community Services ; Health Care Administration ; Health Counselling ; Health Information Systems (incl. Surveillance) ; Health Promotion ; Preventive Medicine ; Primary Health Care ; Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified ; Nanotoxicology ; Health and Safety ; Medicine ; Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy ; bibliometric ; COVID-19 outbreaks ; SARS-CoV-2 ; English ; Chinese ; covid19
    Subject code 001
    Publishing date 2020-08-14T04:35:31Z
    Publishing country uk
    Document type Audio / Video ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top