LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Your last searches

  1. TI=Pharmacoepidemiology of QT interval prolonging drug administration in critically ill patients
  2. TI=Antibodies to SARS CoV 2 protect against re infection during outbreaks in care homes September and October 2020

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Pharmacoepidemiology of QT-interval prolonging drug administration in critically ill patients.

Freeman, Bradley D / Dixon, David J / Coopersmith, Craig M / Zehnbauer, Barbara A / Buchman, Timothy G

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety

2008  Volume 17, Issue 10, Page(s) 971–981

Abstract: ... with torsades de pointes in non-acutely ill patients. We examined patterns of QT-prolonging drug use in critically ill ... of critically ill patients. Prospective evaluation in the ICU environment is necessary to determine ... 2.9%) receiving QT-interval prolonging drugs. These individuals had a mean (+/-SE) age of 63.0 (+/-0 ...

Abstract Purpose: Commonly prescribed medications produce QT-prolongation and are associated with torsades de pointes in non-acutely ill patients. We examined patterns of QT-prolonging drug use in critically ill individuals.
Methods: An administrative critical care database was utilized to identify patients receiving drugs associated with QT-interval prolongation or torsades de pointes for > or = 24 hours.
Results: Data from 212 016 individuals collected over a 63-month period was examined to identify 6125 patients (2.9%) receiving QT-interval prolonging drugs. These individuals had a mean (+/-SE) age of 63.0 (+/-0.2) years, were predominately male (55.4%) and Caucasian (84.4%), and were exposed to QT-interval prolonging agents for a mean (+/-SE) 53.1 (+/-0.4)% of their ICU length of stay. Respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses were the most common reasons for ICU admission (17.2, 12.0%, respectively). The most frequently administered agents were amiodarone (23.5%), haloperidol (19.8%), and levofloxacin (19.7%); no other single agent accounted for more than 10% of QT-interval prolonging drugs prescribed. Coadministration of QT-prolonging drugs occurred in 1139 patients (18.6%). These patients had higher ICU mortality rate and longer ICU lengths of stay, compared to patients not receiving coadministered drugs (p < 0.001 for both). For patients receiving coadministered drugs, overlap occurred for 71.4 (+/-0.8)% of the time that the drugs were given. Amiodarone coadministration with antibiotics, haloperidol coadministration with antibiotics, and haloperidol coadministration with amiodarone, comprised 15.2, 13.7, and 9.4%, of all coadministered agents, respectively.
Conclusions: QT-prolonging drugs were used in a minority of critically ill patients. Prospective evaluation in the ICU environment is necessary to determine whether administration of these agents is associated with adverse cardiac events comparable to those reported in ambulatory patients.
MeSH term(s) Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use ; Critical Illness/epidemiology ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Humans ; Long QT Syndrome/drug therapy ; Long QT Syndrome/epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacoepidemiology/methods ; Torsades de Pointes/drug therapy ; Torsades de Pointes/epidemiology
Chemical Substances Cardiovascular Agents
Language English
Publishing date 2008-08-07
Publishing country England
Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
ZDB-ID 1099748-9
ISSN 1099-1557 ; 1053-8569
ISSN (online) 1099-1557
ISSN 1053-8569
DOI 10.1002/pds.1637
Shelf mark
Zs.A 3395: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top