LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 13

Search options

  1. Article: Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials.

    Geurtsen, W

    Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists

    2000  Volume 11, Issue 3, Page(s) 333–355

    Abstract: ... composite resins and 'adhesive' materials (e.g., resin-modified glass-ionomer cements [GICs] and dentin adhesives ... and for the profession, that the biological effects of resin-based filling materials be clarified ... for conventional composite resins, data reported on the release of substances from resin-based materials are scarce ...

    Abstract Increasing numbers of resin-based dental restorations have been placed over the past decade. During this same period, the public interest in the local and especially systemic adverse effects caused by dental materials has increased significantly. It has been found that each resin-based material releases several components into the oral environment. In particular, the comonomer, triethyleneglycol di-methacrylate (TEGDMA), and the 'hydrophilic' monomer, 2-hydroxy-ethyl-methacrylate (HEMA), are leached out from various composite resins and 'adhesive' materials (e.g., resin-modified glass-ionomer cements [GICs] and dentin adhesives) in considerable amounts during the first 24 hours after polymerization. Numerous unbound resin components may leach into saliva during the initial phase after polymerization, and later, due to degradation or erosion of the resinous restoration. Those substances may be systemically distributed and could potentially cause adverse systemic effects in patients. In addition, absorption of organic substances from unpolymerized material, through unprotected skin, due to manual contact may pose a special risk for dental personnel. This is borne out by the increasing numbers of dental nurses, technicians, and dentists who present with allergic reactions to one or more resin components, like HEMA, glutaraldehyde, ethyleneglycol di-methacrylate (EGDMA), and dibenzoyl peroxide (DPO). However, it must be emphasized that, except for conventional composite resins, data reported on the release of substances from resin-based materials are scarce. There is very little reliable information with respect to the biological interactions between resin components and various tissues. Those interactions may be either protective, like absorption to dentin, or detrimental, e.g., inflammatory reactions of soft tissues. Microbial effects have also been observed which may contribute indirectly to caries and irritation of the pulp. Therefore, it is critical, both for our patients and for the profession, that the biological effects of resin-based filling materials be clarified in the near future.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Biocompatible Materials/chemistry ; Biocompatible Materials/toxicity ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/toxicity ; Cells, Cultured/drug effects ; Composite Resins/chemistry ; Composite Resins/toxicity ; Dental Leakage/microbiology ; Dental Restoration, Permanent/adverse effects ; Dentin-Bonding Agents/toxicity ; Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology ; Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry ; Glass Ionomer Cements/toxicity ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Methacrylates/toxicity ; Mutagenicity Tests ; Polyethylene Glycols/toxicity ; Polymethacrylic Acids/toxicity ; Polyurethanes/toxicity ; Toxicity Tests
    Chemical Substances Biocompatible Materials ; Composite Resins ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; Methacrylates ; Polymethacrylic Acids ; Polyurethanes ; urethane dimethacrylate luting resin (125523-74-2) ; triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (14I47YJ5EY) ; Polyethylene Glycols (3WJQ0SDW1A) ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate (454I75YXY0) ; hydroxyethyl methacrylate (6E1I4IV47V)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2000
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1130962-3
    ISSN 1045-4411
    ISSN 1045-4411
    DOI 10.1177/10454411000110030401
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Biocompatibility of a bioceramic silicone-based sealer in subcutaneous tissue.

    Santos, João M / Pereira, Sara / Sequeira, Diana B / Messias, Ana L / Martins, João B / Cunha, Henrique / Palma, Paulo J / Santos, Ana C

    Journal of oral science

    2019  Volume 61, Issue 1, Page(s) 171–177

    Abstract: This study evaluated the biocompatibility of a new silicone-based sealer (GuttaFlow Bioseal) in rat ... satisfactory biocompatibility at day 30 after subcutaneous implantation. ... for inflammatory reaction, macrophage infiltrate, thickness of the fibrous capsule, and vascular changes ...

    Abstract This study evaluated the biocompatibility of a new silicone-based sealer (GuttaFlow Bioseal) in rat subcutaneous tissue and compared the results with those for GuttaFlow2 and AH Plus. Each of 16 Wistar rats received four subcutaneous tissue implants, namely, GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, AH Plus, and one empty polyethylene tube. Eight rats were euthanized at day 8 and the remaining eight at day 30. Histological sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and analysed with a light microscope. Scores were established for inflammatory reaction, macrophage infiltrate, thickness of the fibrous capsule, and vascular changes. Differences between groups were assessed by using the Friedman test with Bonferroni correction. Histological analysis showed that GuttaFlow Bioseal had the lowest inflammatory reaction of all tested sealers at day 8. At day 30, the silicone-based sealers had similar inflammation profiles, but inflammation scores were nonsignificantly higher for AH Plus than for the negative control. The inflammatory reaction decreased from day 8 to day 30 in all sealers. GuttaFlow Bioseal had the most macrophage infiltrate. Under the present experimental conditions, GuttaFlow Bioseal induced limited inflammatory reactions at days 8 and 30, and initial inflammatory reactions to GuttaFlow2 and AH Plus subsided within 30 days. All tested sealers exhibited satisfactory biocompatibility at day 30 after subcutaneous implantation.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; Ceramics ; Dimethylpolysiloxanes ; Drug Combinations ; Gutta-Percha ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Resin Cements ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Silicones/chemistry ; Subcutaneous Tissue/metabolism
    Chemical Substances Biocompatible Materials ; Dental Seal ; Dimethylpolysiloxanes ; Drug Combinations ; GuttaFlow ; Resin Cements ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Silicones ; Gutta-Percha (9000-32-2)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-03-28
    Publishing country Japan
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1434462-2
    ISSN 1880-4926 ; 1343-4934
    ISSN (online) 1880-4926
    ISSN 1343-4934
    DOI 10.2334/josnusd.18-0145
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: [Effect of root canal sealers on biocompatibility of human periodontal ligament cells].

    Hu, J / Zou, X Y / Zhuang, H / Gao, X J

    Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences

    2016  Volume 48, Issue 5, Page(s) 871–877

    Abstract: ... after 1 week group; (9) SBS extracted after 2 weeks group; (10) Dulbecco modified Eagle's medium/F12 ... sealers (ZOE), epoxy resin sealers (ERS) and silicone based sealers (SBS).: Methods: hPDLCs were ... on biocompatibility of human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLCs).The sealers included zinc oxide and eugenol based ...

    Abstract Objective: To compare the effects of three root canal sealers with respect to time on biocompatibility of human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLCs).The sealers included zinc oxide and eugenol based sealers (ZOE), epoxy resin sealers (ERS) and silicone based sealers (SBS).
    Methods: hPDLCs were primarily cultured,with the method combining of tissue explant and enzymatic digestion. The cells were then exposed to different extract fluids: (1) ZOE extracted for 24 h group ;(2) ZOE extracted for 1 week group;(3)ZOE extracted for 2 weeks group;(4) ERS extracted after 24 h group; (5) ERS extracted after 1 week group; (6) ERS extracted after 2 weeks group; (7) SBS extracted after 24 h group; (8) SBS extracted after 1 week group; (9) SBS extracted after 2 weeks group; (10) Dulbecco modified Eagle's medium/F12 (DMEM/F12) as negative control group. Cell morphology was observed under an inverted microscope.Cell proliferation was measured by methyl-thiazol-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) assay. ALP assay kit was used for measuring alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. Sealers of 2 weeks' setting time were then immersed in an osteogenic medium for examination of mineral nodules and calcium deposits.
    Results: Considering the relative growth rate(RGR),ZOE was severely to moderately cytotoxic(RGR:13.6%-39.9%), while ERS was slightly or not cytotoxic (RGR: 87.6%-95.3%).Only SBS did not show any cytotoxicity after setting (RGR: 91.8%-106.7%). The setting time influenced the cytotoxicity of ERS which decreased after 1 week. Considering the ALP activity,there was no difference between SBS group and control group (F=3.397,P=0.053). According to the results of calcium deposits, ZOE:D562 nm=0.180±0.050,ERS: D562 nm=2.968±0.201,SBS:D562 nm=3.623±0.039,Control:D562 nm=3.477±0.102,the ranking of ALP activity and calcium deposits was as follows: ZOE<ERS <SBS=Control.<br />Conclusion: The cytotoxicity of ZOE was the highest and persisted with time. The setting time had influence on the cytotoxicity of ERS. Only SBS did not show any cytotoxicity or inhibition of the mineral potential on hPDLCs, indicating which was more biocompatible than the others.
    MeSH term(s) Alkaline Phosphatase/drug effects ; Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology ; Biocompatible Materials/toxicity ; Cell Proliferation/drug effects ; Cell Shape/drug effects ; Epoxy Resins/pharmacology ; Epoxy Resins/toxicity ; Humans ; Materials Testing/methods ; Periodontal Ligament/cytology ; Periodontal Ligament/drug effects ; Primary Cell Culture ; Root Canal Filling Materials/pharmacology ; Root Canal Filling Materials/toxicity ; Silicones/pharmacology ; Time Factors ; Tooth Calcification/drug effects ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/pharmacology ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/toxicity
    Chemical Substances Biocompatible Materials ; Epoxy Resins ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Silicones ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement ; Alkaline Phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.1)
    Language Chinese
    Publishing date 2016--18
    Publishing country China
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 1671-167X
    ISSN 1671-167X
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Evaluation of the biocompatibility of root canal sealers on human periodontal ligament cells ex vivo.

    Jung, Susanne / Libricht, Viktor / Sielker, Sonja / Hanisch, Marcel R / Schäfer, Edgar / Dammaschke, Till

    Odontology

    2018  Volume 107, Issue 1, Page(s) 54–63

    Abstract: ... epoxy resin-based; Pulp-Canal-Sealer, zinc oxide eugenol containing). Human periodontal ligament cells (PDL ... The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of two comparatively new calcium ... MTA-Fillapex showed no biocompatibility in contact with PDL-cells at all. Freshly mixed AH Plus is ...

    Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of two comparatively new calcium silicate containing sealers (MTA-Fillapex and BioRoot-RCS) with that of two established sealers (AH-Plus, epoxy resin-based; Pulp-Canal-Sealer, zinc oxide eugenol containing). Human periodontal ligament cells (PDL-cells) were brought in contact with eluates from freshly mixed and set sealer. The sealers were mixed strictly according to the manufacturers' instructions and identically samples were produced. 1:1, 1:2, and 1:10 dilutions of sealers extract were used. Extracts from freshly mixed sealer were added to the PDL-cells on day one to simulate a clinical scenario. Subsequently, at 24 h, 7, 14, and 21 days extracts form set sealers were used for PDL-cell culturing. PDL-cell viability was analyzed by living-cell-count, MTT-assay, and living/dead-staining, cytotoxicity by LDH-assay, and changes by Richardson-staining. All data were statistically evaluated by one way ANOVA and a posthoc analysis with Bonferroni-Holm testing (p < 0.05). In contact with BioRoot-RCS a regeneration of the PDL-cells were observed over time. This sealer showed the lowest toxicity in a freshly mixed and set state (p < 0.05). MTA-Fillapex and Pulp-Canal-Sealer were cytotoxic in a fresh as well as in a set state, whereas AH-Plus was cytotoxic in a freshly mixed state, but not when the sealer was set. BioRoot-RCS is biocompatible and bioactive because it seems to have a positive influence on the PDL-cell metabolism. Pulp Canal Sealer and MTA-Fillapex showed no biocompatibility in contact with PDL-cells at all. Freshly mixed AH Plus is less biocompatible on PDL than in a set state.
    MeSH term(s) Aluminum Compounds/pharmacology ; Biocompatible Materials ; Calcium Compounds/pharmacology ; Cell Survival ; Cells, Cultured ; Drug Combinations ; Epoxy Resins/pharmacology ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Materials Testing ; Molar, Third ; Oxides/pharmacology ; Periodontal Ligament/cytology ; Polycarboxylate Cement/pharmacology ; Povidone/pharmacology ; Root Canal Filling Materials/pharmacology ; Silicates/pharmacology ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/pharmacology
    Chemical Substances Aluminum Compounds ; Biocompatible Materials ; Calcium Compounds ; Drug Combinations ; Epoxy Resins ; Oxides ; Polycarboxylate Cement ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Silicates ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement ; epoxy resin-based root canal sealer ; mineral trioxide aggregate ; Povidone (FZ989GH94E) ; calcium silicate (S4255P4G5M)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-07-23
    Publishing country Japan
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2092085-4
    ISSN 1618-1255 ; 1618-1247
    ISSN (online) 1618-1255
    ISSN 1618-1247
    DOI 10.1007/s10266-018-0380-3
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: In Vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a root canal filling material that expands on water sorption.

    Eid, Ashraf A / Nikonov, Sergey Y / Looney, Stephen W / Didato, Anthony / Niu, Li-na / Levin, Martin D / Rueggeberg, Frederick A / Pashley, David H / Watanabe, Ikuya / Tay, Franklin R

    Journal of endodontics

    2013  Volume 39, Issue 7, Page(s) 883–888

    Abstract: ... of MDPC-23 cells, in the presence of the root-filling materials, was evaluated by examining the changes ... 1 concentration (P < .05) but not at 1:10 or 1:100 concentration. Both materials induced minimal ... on the viability and mineralization potential of odontoblast-like cells.: Methods: The biocompatibility ...

    Abstract Introduction: CPoint is a polymeric endodontic point that takes advantage of water-induced, non-isotropic radial expansion to adapt to canal irregularities. This study evaluated the effects of CPoint on the viability and mineralization potential of odontoblast-like cells.
    Methods: The biocompatibility of CPoint and commercially available gutta-percha points was evaluated by using a rat odontoblast-like cell line (MDPC-23). Cell viability was evaluated with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, flow cytometry, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. The mineralization potential of MDPC-23 cells, in the presence of the root-filling materials, was evaluated by examining the changes in osteogenic gene marker expression (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction), alkaline phosphatase activity, alizarin red S assay, and transmission electron microscopy.
    Results: CPoint showed higher initial cytotoxicity compared with gutta-percha and Teflon (P < .05), which became nonsignificant after 4 immersion cycles. Significant differences were also found between eluents from CPoint and gutta-percha at 1:1 concentration (P < .05) but not at 1:10 or 1:100 concentration. Both materials induced minimal apoptosis-induced alteration in plasma membrane permeability, as evidenced by flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Compared with the Teflon negative control, CPoint and gutta-percha groups showed up-regulation of most osteogenic gene markers except for dentin sialophosphoprotein, which was down-regulated. Alkaline phosphatase activity and alizarin red assay for CPoint and gutta-percha were both significantly higher than for Teflon but not significantly different from each other (P > .05). Transmission electron microscopy showed discrete nodular electron-dense mineralization foci in all 3 groups.
    Conclusions: The in vitro biocompatibility of CPoint is comparable to gutta-percha with minimal adverse effects on osteogenesis after elution of potentially toxic components.
    MeSH term(s) Absorption ; Acrylic Resins/chemistry ; Acrylic Resins/toxicity ; Acrylonitrile/chemistry ; Acrylonitrile/toxicity ; Adsorption ; Alkaline Phosphatase/drug effects ; Animals ; Apoptosis/drug effects ; Biocompatible Materials/chemistry ; Biocompatible Materials/toxicity ; Calcification, Physiologic/drug effects ; Cell Differentiation/drug effects ; Cell Line ; Cell Membrane Permeability/drug effects ; Cell Survival/drug effects ; Extracellular Matrix Proteins/drug effects ; Gutta-Percha/chemistry ; Gutta-Percha/toxicity ; Materials Testing ; Microscopy, Electron, Transmission ; Nylons/chemistry ; Nylons/toxicity ; Odontoblasts/drug effects ; Osteogenesis/drug effects ; Phosphoproteins/drug effects ; Polytetrafluoroethylene/chemistry ; Polytetrafluoroethylene/toxicity ; Polyvinyls/chemistry ; Polyvinyls/toxicity ; Pyrrolidinones/chemistry ; Pyrrolidinones/toxicity ; Rats ; Root Canal Filling Materials/chemistry ; Root Canal Filling Materials/toxicity ; Sialoglycoproteins/drug effects ; Surface Properties ; Up-Regulation ; Water/chemistry
    Chemical Substances Acrylic Resins ; Biocompatible Materials ; CPoint ; Extracellular Matrix Proteins ; Nylons ; Phosphoproteins ; Polyvinyls ; Pyrrolidinones ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Sialoglycoproteins ; dentin sialophosphoprotein ; Water (059QF0KO0R) ; Gutta-Percha (9000-32-2) ; Polytetrafluoroethylene (9002-84-0) ; Alkaline Phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.1) ; Acrylonitrile (MP1U0D42PE)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 752412-2
    ISSN 1878-3554 ; 0099-2399
    ISSN (online) 1878-3554
    ISSN 0099-2399
    DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2013.03.003
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Physical properties and biocompatibility of an injectable calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer: in vitro and in vivo study.

    Lim, Eun-Su / Park, Young-Bae / Kwon, Young-Sun / Shon, Won-Jun / Lee, Kwang-Won / Min, Kyung-San

    BMC oral health

    2015  Volume 15, Issue 1, Page(s) 129

    Abstract: ... solubility, dimensional change, flow, and radiopacity of the materials were evaluated. Biocompatibility was ... of the tested materials was similar. The dimensional change and flow of Endoseal was significantly higher ... in comparison with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and a resin-based sealer (AHplus).: Methods: The pH ...

    Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the physical properties and biological effects of an experimentally developed injectable premixed calcium-silicate root canal sealer (Endoseal) in comparison with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and a resin-based sealer (AHplus).
    Methods: The pH, solubility, dimensional change, flow, and radiopacity of the materials were evaluated. Biocompatibility was evaluated on the basis of cell morphology and a viability test using MC3T3-E1 cells. For evaluate inflammatory reaction, the tested sealers were implanted into dorsal subcutaneous connective tissue of Sprague Dawley rats. After 7 days, the implants with the surrounding tissue were retrieved, and histological evaluation was performed.
    Results: Endoseal showed high alkalinity similar to that of MTA. The solubility of the tested materials was similar. The dimensional change and flow of Endoseal was significantly higher than that of other materials (P < 0.05). The radiopacity of Endoseal was lower than that of AHplus (P < 0.05). The biocompatibility was similar to those of MTA. Inflammatory reaction of Endoseal was similar with that of MTA, but lower than that of AHplus (P < 0.05).
    Conclusions: The present study indicates that Endoseal has favorable physical properties and biocompatibility. Therefore, we suggest that Endoseal has the potential to be used as a predictable root canal sealer.
    MeSH term(s) Aluminum Compounds ; Animals ; Calcium ; Calcium Compounds ; Dental Pulp Cavity ; Drug Combinations ; Materials Testing ; Oxides ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Silicates ; Solubility ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
    Chemical Substances Aluminum Compounds ; Calcium Compounds ; Drug Combinations ; Oxides ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Silicates ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement ; canals sealer ; mineral trioxide aggregate ; Calcium (SY7Q814VUP)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2015-10-21
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2091511-1
    ISSN 1472-6831 ; 1472-6831
    ISSN (online) 1472-6831
    ISSN 1472-6831
    DOI 10.1186/s12903-015-0112-9
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Biocompatibility of various root canal filling materials ex vivo.

    Scotti, R / Tiozzo, R / Parisi, C / Croce, M A / Baldissara, P

    International endodontic journal

    2008  Volume 41, Issue 8, Page(s) 651–657

    Abstract: Aim: To evaluate the biocompatibility of a resin-based endodontic filler (RealSeal) using ... change. After 72 h of incubation the eluate of the resin filler caused an increase in cellular viability ... Results: Eluates obtained after 24 h of incubation with the resin filler did not reduce ...

    Abstract Aim: To evaluate the biocompatibility of a resin-based endodontic filler (RealSeal) using the indirect cytotoxicity test.
    Methodology: Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured ex vivo. Pellets of the materials to be tested were incubated for 24, 48, and 72 h at 37 degrees C under sterile conditions to obtain their eluates. The fibroblasts were exposed to either diluted (50%) or undiluted eluates for 24 h. A culture medium with foetal calf serum was added to the control wells. Cell viability was estimated by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide method. The data concerning cell viability were statistically analyzed using one-way anova test and Bonferroni multiple comparisons test.
    Results: Eluates obtained after 24 h of incubation with the resin filler did not reduce cellular viability. An increase in cellular viability, as compared with control cells, was observed in the gutta-percha group. The undiluted eluate from the polyether material was cytotoxic, causing an 82 +/- 4% decrease in cellular viability. Eluates obtained after 48 h of incubation with the resin filler increased cellular viability, whereas the polyether significantly reduced viability. Gutta-percha did not cause any detectable change. After 72 h of incubation the eluate of the resin filler caused an increase in cellular viability, as did gutta-percha, whereas polyether caused a significant decrease.
    Conclusions: RealSeal resin filler was nontoxic in this laboratory model. Further investigations are necessary to verify its usefulness in clinical applications.
    MeSH term(s) Cell Survival/drug effects ; Cells, Cultured ; Composite Resins/adverse effects ; Fibroblasts/drug effects ; Gingiva/cytology ; Gingiva/drug effects ; Gutta-Percha/adverse effects ; Humans ; Root Canal Filling Materials/adverse effects
    Chemical Substances Composite Resins ; Real Seal composite resin ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; permadyne penta L ; Gutta-Percha (9000-32-2)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2008-08
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 603734-3
    ISSN 1365-2591 ; 0143-2885
    ISSN (online) 1365-2591
    ISSN 0143-2885
    DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01403.x
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: A comparative histological evaluation of the biocompatibility of materials used in apical surgery.

    Sousa, C J A / Loyola, A M / Versiani, M A / Biffi, J C G / Oliveira, R P / Pascon, E A

    International endodontic journal

    2004  Volume 37, Issue 11, Page(s) 738–748

    Abstract: ... and Z-100 light-cured composite resin. Thirty guinea-pigs, 10 for each material, divided ... Aim: To evaluate the biological properties of a variety of materials that could be used in apical ... was used to test the following materials: zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA ...

    Abstract Aim: To evaluate the biological properties of a variety of materials that could be used in apical surgery.
    Methodology: The intraosseous implant technique recommended by the FDI (1980) and ADA (1982) was used to test the following materials: zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and Z-100 light-cured composite resin. Thirty guinea-pigs, 10 for each material, divided into experimental periods of 4 and 12 weeks, received one implant on each side of the lower jaw symphysis. The connective tissue response alongside the lateral wall outside the cup served as a negative control for the technique. At the end of the observation periods, the animals were killed and the specimens prepared for routine histological examination to evaluate their biocompatibility.
    Results: The reaction of the tissue to the materials diminished with time. The ZOE cement was highly toxic during the 4-week experimental period, but this profile changed significantly after 12 weeks, when it showed biocompatible characteristics. MTA and Z-100 showed biocompatibility in this test model at both time periods.
    Conclusions: MTA and Z-100 composite were biocompatible at 4 and 12 weeks in this experimental model.
    MeSH term(s) Aluminum Compounds/toxicity ; Animals ; Apicoectomy ; Calcium Compounds/toxicity ; Composite Resins/toxicity ; Drug Combinations ; Guinea Pigs ; Implants, Experimental ; Oxides/toxicity ; Retrograde Obturation ; Root Canal Filling Materials/toxicity ; Silicates/toxicity ; Silicon Dioxide/toxicity ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/toxicity ; Zirconium/toxicity
    Chemical Substances Aluminum Compounds ; Calcium Compounds ; Composite Resins ; Drug Combinations ; Oxides ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Silicates ; Z100 composite resin ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement ; mineral trioxide aggregate ; Silicon Dioxide (7631-86-9) ; Zirconium (C6V6S92N3C)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2004-11
    Publishing country England
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 603734-3
    ISSN 1365-2591 ; 0143-2885
    ISSN (online) 1365-2591
    ISSN 0143-2885
    DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00861.x
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials.

    Schmalz, G

    European journal of oral sciences

    1998  Volume 106, Issue 2 Pt 2, Page(s) 696–706

    Abstract: ... of the test methods and materials used. Some components of composite resins/dentin adhesives and a resin ... being, it is not possible to rank dental filling materials in respect to their biocompatibility, and ... is still difficult to fulfill, especially for composite resin systems and related materials ...

    Abstract Non-amalgam filling materials may release substances which have been shown to be toxic in cytotoxicity tests and implantation studies. However, results from systemic toxicity tests do not indicate any unacceptable risk to the patient's general health, but data for non-amalgam dental filling materials are scarce in comparison to amalgam. Although estrogen-like effects of one fissure sealant have been claimed, no conclusions can be drawn at present for the patient from these in vitro data because of the limitation of the test methods and materials used. Some components of composite resins/dentin adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement were mutagenic mainly in in vitro tests. Due to the limitations of the test systems and the comparatively high concentrations needed to elicit the reactions, no unacceptable risk can yet be derived from those data for the patient. However, a no-touch technique is recommended for the dental personnel. As with amalgam, local reactions of the pulp are not expected with alternative filling materials, if the pulp tissue is not exposed and if bacterial penetration is avoided. The latter requirement is still difficult to fulfill, especially for composite resin systems and related materials in posterior teeth situations. Slight gingival reactions to alternative filling materials and to amalgams are mainly attributed to plaque accumulation. From all these data it can be concluded that, for the time being, it is not possible to rank dental filling materials in respect to their biocompatibility, and it is evident that biocompatibility must be considered to the same extent for both amalgams and commonly used or recommended alternative filling materials.
    MeSH term(s) Adhesives/adverse effects ; Adhesives/chemistry ; Bacteria/growth & development ; Biocompatible Materials/adverse effects ; Biocompatible Materials/chemistry ; Composite Resins/adverse effects ; Composite Resins/chemistry ; Dental Amalgam ; Dental Materials/adverse effects ; Dental Materials/chemistry ; Dental Plaque/physiopathology ; Dental Pulp/drug effects ; Dental Pulp/microbiology ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dentin-Bonding Agents/adverse effects ; Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry ; Estrogens/pharmacology ; Gingiva/drug effects ; Glass Ionomer Cements/adverse effects ; Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Mutagens/adverse effects ; Pit and Fissure Sealants/pharmacology ; Resin Cements/adverse effects ; Resin Cements/chemistry ; Risk Factors
    Chemical Substances Adhesives ; Biocompatible Materials ; Composite Resins ; Dental Materials ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Estrogens ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; Mutagens ; Pit and Fissure Sealants ; Resin Cements ; Dental Amalgam (8049-85-2)
    Language English
    Publishing date 1998-04
    Publishing country England
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1224820-4
    ISSN 1600-0722 ; 0909-8836
    ISSN (online) 1600-0722
    ISSN 0909-8836
    DOI 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos10602ii05.x
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Biocompatibility of resin-based materials used as pulp-capping agents.

    Costa, C A S / Oliveira, M F / Giro, E M A / Hebling, J

    International endodontic journal

    2003  Volume 36, Issue 12, Page(s) 831–839

    Abstract: Aim: To evaluate and compare the response of pulps of rats capped with resin-modified ... The following resin-based materials were applied as pulp-capping agents: G1, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V (CLB 2V ... Both resin-based materials promoted a large zone of cell-rich fibrodentine matrix deposition on the pulp horn ...

    Abstract Aim: To evaluate and compare the response of pulps of rats capped with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) or self-etching adhesive system.
    Methodology: Class I cavities were prepared on the occlusal surface of 54 maxillary first molars of 27 rats. Pulp exposure was performed on the cavity floor. The following resin-based materials were applied as pulp-capping agents: G1, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V (CLB 2V; Kuraray Co., Japan); G2, Vitrebond (VIT; 3M/ESPE, USA). In group 3 (control group), a calcium hydroxide/saline paste (CH; Labsynth, Brazil) was used. The cavities were restored with amalgam. After 7, 30 and 60 days, the animals were sacrificed and the jaws were processed for microscopic evaluation.
    Results: Despite the inflammatory response caused by the experimental and the control materials at 7 days, pulpal healing associated with calcified barrier formation was observed at 60 days following the pulp therapy. Both resin-based materials promoted a large zone of cell-rich fibrodentine matrix deposition on the pulp horn related to the pulp exposure site, which was larger to VIT than to CLB 2V specimens. Tertiary dentine underneath the fibrodentine matrix was deposited by a layer of elongated pulpal cells. The remaining pulpal tissue exhibited normal histological characteristics. In the control group, healing and dentine-bridge formation was observed at 30 days. Pulpal breakdown occurred only when bacterial infection occurred.
    Conclusion: Both experimental pulp-capping agents allowed pulpal healing characterized by cell-rich fibrodentine and tertiary dentine deposition as well as calcified barrier formation.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Calcium Hydroxide/toxicity ; Dental Pulp/drug effects ; Dental Pulp Capping/methods ; Dentin, Secondary/metabolism ; Glass Ionomer Cements/toxicity ; Male ; Materials Testing ; Methacrylates/toxicity ; Rats ; Resin Cements/toxicity ; Root Canal Filling Materials/toxicity
    Chemical Substances Clearfil Linerbond System ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; Methacrylates ; Resin Cements ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Vitrabond (126338-82-7) ; Calcium Hydroxide (PF5DZW74VN)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2003-10-29
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 603734-3
    ISSN 1365-2591 ; 0143-2885
    ISSN (online) 1365-2591
    ISSN 0143-2885
    DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00702.x
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top