LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article: Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos).

    Gómez, Victoria / Badillo, Raul J / Crook, Julia E / Krishna, Murli / Diehl, Nancy N / Wallace, Michael B

    Endoscopy international open

    2014  Volume 3, Issue 1, Page(s) E76–80

    Abstract: ... resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps).: Design: Randomized, pilot study ... 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold biopsy ... forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most of the endoscopists ...

    Abstract Background: The optimal method of diminutive polypectomy (< 6 mm) is unknown.
    Objective: To assess the rates of incomplete resection of diminutive polyps of the colon using three standard polyp resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps).
    Design: Randomized, pilot study.
    Settings: Single-center endoscopy center.
    Patients: PATIENTS undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies.
    Interventions: Polypectomy was performed using the method to which the patient was randomized. Following retrieval of the polyp, the polypectomy base was lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline and then excised using the cold snare device. If no tissue could be removed, then at least four cold biopsies using forceps of the remaining margin were obtained.
    Main outcome measures: Adequacy of resection of diminutive polyps, which was defined as no visible adenoma or hyperplastic tissue seen in the base tissue on histology.
    Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled (57 % male), the mean age was 60 (range 33 - 82), and 62 polyps were randomized from 37 patients. The mean polyp size was 3.6 mm (range 2 - 5 mm) and 37 polyps (60 %) were adenomatous. Overall incomplete polyp resection rate was 9 % (95 %CI 3 - 19 %), 5 of 37 (14 %) for adenomas. By the study arm, the incomplete resection rates were 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold biopsy forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most of the endoscopists did not feel that the saline lift cold snare method was feasible or appropriate.
    Limitations: Small sample size; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of the polyp base tissue was not routinely performed.
    Conclusions: Recruiting patients to a pilot study that randomized polyps to one of three common methods of polypectomy for diminutive polyps was feasible, and approximately 1 in 10 diminutive polyps found on colonoscopy were incompletely resected by standard polypectomy methods.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2014-11-19
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2761052-4
    ISSN 2196-9736 ; 2364-3722
    ISSN (online) 2196-9736
    ISSN 2364-3722
    DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1390789
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos)

    Gómez, Victoria / Badillo, Raul J. / Crook, Julia E. / Krishna, Murli / Diehl, Nancy N. / Wallace, Michael B.

    Endoscopy International Open

    2014  Volume 03, Issue 01, Page(s) E76–E80

    Abstract: ... resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps).: Design: : Randomized, pilot study ... rates were 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold ... biopsy forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most ...

    Abstract Background: The optimal method of diminutive polypectomy (< 6 mm) is unknown.
    Objective: : To assess the rates of incomplete resection of diminutive polyps of the colon using three standard polyp resection techniques (hot snare, cold snare, and cold biopsy forceps).
    Design: : Randomized, pilot study.
    Settings: : Single-center endoscopy center.
    Patients: : Patients undergoing routine outpatient colonoscopies.
    Interventions: : Polypectomy was performed using the method to which the patient was randomized. Following retrieval of the polyp, the polypectomy base was lifted by submucosal injection of normal saline and then excised using the cold snare device. If no tissue could be removed, then at least four cold biopsies using forceps of the remaining margin were obtained.
    Main outcome measures: : Adequacy of resection of diminutive polyps, which was defined as no visible adenoma or hyperplastic tissue seen in the base tissue on histology.
    Results: : A total of 60 patients were enrolled (57 % male), the mean age was 60 (range 33 – 82), and 62 polyps were randomized from 37 patients. The mean polyp size was 3.6 mm (range 2 – 5 mm) and 37 polyps (60 %) were adenomatous. Overall incomplete polyp resection rate was 9 % (95 %CI 3 – 19 %), 5 of 37 (14 %) for adenomas. By the study arm, the incomplete resection rates were 1 of 18 (6 %) for hot snare, 2 of 21 (10 %) for cold snare, and 2 of 18 (11 %) for cold biopsy forceps. The majority of polyp bases were removed with cold biopsy forceps since most of the endoscopists did not feel that the saline lift cold snare method was feasible or appropriate.
    Limitations: : Small sample size; endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of the polyp base tissue was not routinely performed.
    Conclusions: : Recruiting patients to a pilot study that randomized polyps to one of three common methods of polypectomy for diminutive polyps was feasible, and approximately 1 in 10 diminutive polyps found on colonoscopy were incompletely resected by standard polypectomy methods.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2014-11-19
    Publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publishing place Stuttgart ; New York
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 2761052-4
    ISSN 2196-9736 ; 2364-3722
    ISSN (online) 2196-9736
    ISSN 2364-3722
    DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1390789
    Database Thieme publisher's database

    More links

    Kategorien

To top