LIVIVO - Search results -

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 10

Search options

Article ; Online: Public acceptance of Covid-19 lockdown scenarios.

Gollwitzer, Mario / Platzer, Christine / Zwarg, Clarissa / Göritz, Anja S

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie

2020 Volume 56, Issue 4, Page(s) 551–565

Abstract: ... the intensity and/or the flexibility of distancing rules implied by different lockdown scenarios. Endorsement ... of and compliance with five specific lockdown scenarios were assessed in a large (N = 14,433) German ... of different lockdown scenarios. ...

Abstract	By mid-March 2020, most countries had implemented nationwide lockdown policies aimed at decelerating the spread of SARS-CoV-2. At that time, nobody knew how long these policies would have to remain in force and whether they would have to be extended, intensified or made more flexible. The present study aimed to illuminate how the general public in Germany reacted to the prospect of increasing the length, the intensity and/or the flexibility of distancing rules implied by different lockdown scenarios. Endorsement of and compliance with five specific lockdown scenarios were assessed in a large (N = 14,433) German sample. Results showed that lockdown length affected respondents' reactions much more strongly than intensity or flexibility. Additional analyses (i.e., mixture distribution modelling) showed that half of the respondents rejected any further extensions or intensifications, while 20% would endorse long-term strategies if necessary. We argue that policy-makers and political communicators should take the public's endorsement of and compliance with such scenarios into account, as should simulations predicting the effects of different lockdown scenarios.
MeSH term(s)	Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19/psychology ; Child ; Communicable Disease Control/methods ; Female ; Germany/epidemiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Public Health/methods ; Quarantine/methods ; Quarantine/psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult
Keywords	covid19
Language	English
Publishing date	2020-10-28
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article
ZDB-ID	1480995-3
ISSN	1464-066X ; 0020-7594
ISSN (online)	1464-066X
ISSN	0020-7594
DOI	10.1002/ijop.12721
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Full text online

Accessible to users with ZB MED library card

Order via subito

This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

Details ▾
- Full text online
- Order with fees

Article: Public acceptance of COVID-19 lockdown scenarios

Gollwitzer, Mario / Platzer, Christine / Zwarg, Clarissa / Göritz, Anja S.

International Journal of Psychology

2021 Volume 56, Issue 4, Page(s) 551–565

Title translation	Öffentliche Akzeptanz von Covid-19-Lockdown-Szenarien (DeepL)
Abstract	By mid-March 2020, most countries had implemented nationwide lockdown policies aimed at decelerating the spread of SARS-CoV-2. At that time, nobody knew how long these policies would have to remain in force and whether they would have to be extended, intensified or made more flexible. The present study aimed to illuminate how the general public in Germany reacted to the prospect of increasing the length, the intensity and/or the flexibility of distancing rules implied by different lockdown scenarios. Endorsement of and compliance with five specific lockdown scenarios were assessed in a large (N = 14,433) German sample. Results showed that lockdown length affected respondents' reactions much more strongly than intensity or flexibility. Additional analyses (i.e., mixture distribution modelling) showed that half of the respondents rejected any further extensions or intensifications, while 20% would endorse long-term strategies if necessary. We argue that policy-makers and political communicators should take the public's endorsement of and compliance with such scenarios into account, as should simulations predicting the effects of different lockdown scenarios.
Keywords	Bereitwilligkeit ; COVID-19 ; Compliance ; Körperliche Distanzierung ; Pandemics ; Pandemie ; Physical Distancing ; Prevention ; Preventive Health Behavior ; Prävention ; Präventives Gesundheitsverhalten ; Public Health ; Quarantine ; Quarantäne ; Öffentliche Gesundheit
Language	English
Document type	Article
ZDB-ID	1480995-3
ISSN	1464-066X ; 0020-7594
ISSN (online)	1464-066X
ISSN	0020-7594
DOI	10.1002/ijop.12721
Database	PSYNDEX

Full text online

Accessible to users with ZB MED library card

Order via subito

Details ▾
- Full text online
- Order with fees

Article: Public acceptance of Covid-19 lockdown scenarios

Gollwitzer, Mario / Platzer, Christine / Zwarg, Clarissa / Göritz, Anja S

Abstract	By mid-March 2020, most countries had implemented nationwide lockdown policies aimed at decelerating the spread of SARS-CoV-2. At that time, nobody knew how long these policies would have to remain in force and whether they would have to be extended, intensified or made more flexible. The present study aimed to illuminate how the general public in Germany reacted to the prospect of increasing the length, the intensity and/or the flexibility of distancing rules implied by different lockdown scenarios. Endorsement of and compliance with five specific lockdown scenarios were assessed in a large (N = 14,433) German sample. Results showed that lockdown length affected respondents' reactions much more strongly than intensity or flexibility. Additional analyses (i.e., mixture distribution modelling) showed that half of the respondents rejected any further extensions or intensifications, while 20% would endorse long-term strategies if necessary. We argue that policy-makers and political communicators should take the public's endorsement of and compliance with such scenarios into account, as should simulations predicting the effects of different lockdown scenarios.
Keywords	covid19
Publisher	WHO
Document type	Article
Note	WHO #Covidence: #893225
Database	COVID19

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Details ▾

Book ; Online: Public Acceptance of Covid-19 Lockdown Scenarios

Gollwitzer, Mario / Platzer, Christine / Zwarg, Clarissa / Göritz, Anja S.

2020

Abstract: ... the intensity, and/or the flexibility of distancing rules implied by different lockdown scenarios. Endorsement ... of and compliance with five specific lockdown scenarios were assessed in a large (N=14,433) German sample ... of different lockdown scenarios. ...

Abstract	By mid-March 2020, most countries had implemented nationwide lockdown policies aimed at decelerating the spread of SARS-CoV-2. At that time, nobody knew how long these policies would have to remain in force and whether they would have to be extended, intensified, or made more flexible. The present study aimed to illuminate how the general public in Germany reacted to the prospect of increasing the length, the intensity, and/or the flexibility of distancing rules implied by different lockdown scenarios. Endorsement of and compliance with five specific lockdown scenarios were assessed in a large (N=14,433) German sample. Results showed that lockdown length affected respondents’ reactions much more strongly than intensity or flexibility. Additional analyses (i.e., mixture distribution modeling) showed that half of the respondents rejected any further extensions or intensifications, while 20% would endorse long-term strategies if necessary. We argue that policy-makers and political communicators should take the public’s endorsement of and compliance with such scenarios into account, as should simulations predicting the effects of different lockdown scenarios.
Keywords	covid19
Publisher	Center for Open Science
Publishing country	us
Document type	Book ; Online
DOI	10.31234/osf.io/3a85z
Database	BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

Full text online

Full text

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article ; Online: Public Acceptance of Measures to Control Infectious Diseases Under Different Scenarios of Severity and Transmissibility.

Epstein, David / Pérez-Troncoso, Daniel / Ruiz-Adame, Manuel / Castañeda, José-Alberto

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

2024 Volume 27, Issue 5, Page(s) 562–569

Abstract: ... such as mask wearing, social distancing outdoors, lockdown, and isolation in severe disease scenarios. A highly ... outdoors, lockdown, and isolation of infected cases, close contacts, and the vulnerable. A scenario ... such as new variants of COVID-19, may be usefully informed by evidence about how acceptable they are likely ...

Abstract	Objectives: Public health measures to control future epidemic threats of contagious disease, such as new variants of COVID-19, may be usefully informed by evidence about how acceptable they are likely to be, and the circumstances that condition this acceptance. This study considers how the acceptability of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) might depend on scenarios about the severity and transmissibility of the disease. Methods: A telephone survey was conducted among a representative cross-sectional sample of the Spanish adult population. Each respondent was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 possible hypothetical scenarios about the severity and transmissibility of the disease. Participants' responses about the acceptability of 11 NPI under this scenario were analyzed using multivariate regression and latent class cluster analysis. Results: A high risk of severe disease increases the acceptability of mask wearing, social distancing outdoors, lockdown, and isolation of infected cases, close contacts, and the vulnerable. A scenario in which the disease is highly transmissible would increase the acceptability of NPI that restrict movement and isolation. Most respondents would broadly accept most NPI in situations when either the severity or transmissibility was high. Conclusions: This study showed that people are more willing to accept NPIs such as mask wearing, social distancing outdoors, lockdown, and isolation in severe disease scenarios. A highly transmissible disease scenario increases the acceptability of NPIs that isolate. A majority would broadly accept NPIs to counter public health emergencies, whereas 3% to 9% of the population would always be strongly against.
MeSH term(s)	Humans ; Male ; Adult ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/transmission ; Female ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Middle Aged ; Spain/epidemiology ; Communicable Disease Control/methods ; Young Adult ; Severity of Illness Index ; Aged ; Public Opinion ; Adolescent ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Public Health
Language	English
Publishing date	2024-02-23
Publishing country	United States
Document type	Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ZDB-ID	1471745-1
ISSN	1524-4733 ; 1098-3015
ISSN (online)	1524-4733
ISSN	1098-3015
DOI	10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.021
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Full text online

Accessible to users with ZB MED library card

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 5904: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

Details ▾

Article ; Online: Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the UK: a discrete choice experiment.

Loría-Rebolledo, Luis Enrique / Ryan, Mandy / Watson, Verity / Genie, Mesfin G / Sakowsky, Ruben Andreas / Powell, Daniel / Paranjothy, Shantini

BMJ open

2022 Volume 12, Issue 3, Page(s) e054155

Abstract: ... with introducing less strict lockdown restrictions. The acceptability of different restriction scenarios varies ... in England were willing to accept a higher increase in excess deaths to have less strict lockdown ... outcome measure: Adult's preferences for, and trade-offs between, type of lockdown restrictions, length ...

Abstract	Objective: To understand how individuals trade off between features of non-pharmaceutical interventions (eg, lockdowns) to control a pandemic across the four nations of the UK. Design: A survey that included a discrete choice experiment. The survey design was informed using policy documents, social media analysis and input from remote think-aloud interviews with members of the public (n=23). Setting: A nationwide survey across the four nations of the UK using an online panel between 29 October and 12 December 2020. Participants: Individuals who are over 18 years old. A total of 4120 adults completed the survey (1112 in England, 848 in Northern Ireland, 1143 in Scotland and 1098 in Wales). Primary outcome measure: Adult's preferences for, and trade-offs between, type of lockdown restrictions, length of lockdown, postponement of routine healthcare, excess deaths, impact on the ability to buy things and unemployment. Results: The majority of adults are willing to accept higher excess deaths if this means lockdowns that are less strict, shorter and do not postpone routine healthcare. On average, respondents in England were willing to accept a higher increase in excess deaths to have less strict lockdown restrictions introduced compared with Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, respectively. In all four countries, one out of five respondents were willing to reduce excess deaths at all costs. Conclusions: The majority of the UK population is willing to accept the increase in excess deaths associated with introducing less strict lockdown restrictions. The acceptability of different restriction scenarios varies according to the features of the lockdown and across countries. Governments can use information about trade-off preferences to inform the introduction of different lockdown restriction levels and design compensation policies that maximise societal welfare.
MeSH term(s)	Adolescent ; Adult ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; Humans ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Social Media ; Wales/epidemiology
Language	English
Publishing date	2022-03-08
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ZDB-ID	2599832-8
ISSN	2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
ISSN (online)	2044-6055
ISSN	2044-6055
DOI	10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054155
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Article ; Online: Italians locked down: people's responses to early COVID-19 pandemic public health measures.

Romano, Virginia / Ancillotti, Mirko / Mascalzoni, Deborah / Biasiotto, Roberta

Humanities & social sciences communications

2022 Volume 9, Issue 1, Page(s) 342

Abstract: ... implemented as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with Italian ... daily life during the lockdown, relationships with others, and public health issues. The aim was to gain ... tensions within the public health system. When tasked with imagining a scenario with saturated ...

Abstract	At the beginning of 2020, the widespread diffusion of SARS-CoV-2 rapidly became a worldwide priority. In Italy, the government implemented a lockdown for more than two months (March 9-May 18). Aware of the uniqueness of such an experience, we designed an online qualitative study focused on three main dimensions: daily life during the lockdown, relationships with others, and public health issues. The aim was to gain insights into people's experiences of, and attitudes toward, the changes caused by public health measures implemented as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with Italian residents. The interviewees were recruited through mediators using purposive sampling to obtain a balanced sample with respect to age, gender, education, and geographical residence. Interviews were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The lockdown affected a variety of aspects of people's life, resulting in a significant re-shaping of daily activities and relationships. These changes, which entailed both positive and negative aspects, were met with resilience. Even though public health measures were generally considered acceptable and adequate, they were also perceived to generate uncertainty and stress as well as to reveal tensions within the public health system. When tasked with imagining a scenario with saturated intensive care units and the need for selection criteria, respondents showed a tendency to dodge the question and struggled to formulate criteria. Media and news were found to be confusing, leading to a renewed critical attitude toward information. The findings shed some light on the impact of the lockdown on people's daily life and its effects on relationships with others. Furthermore, the study contributes to an understanding of people's reasons for, and capacity to respond to, emergency public health measures.
Language	English
Publishing date	2022-09-30
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article
ISSN	2662-9992
ISSN (online)	2662-9992
DOI	10.1057/s41599-022-01358-3
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article ; Online: Population preferences for non-pharmaceutical interventions to control the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: trade-offs among public health, individual rights, and economics.

Mühlbacher, Axel C / Sadler, Andrew / Jordan, Yvonne

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care

2022 Volume 23, Issue 9, Page(s) 1483–1496

Abstract: ... a large impact on choice decisions for or against specific lockdown scenarios. Individual income decreases ... to which the population is willing to accept certain lockdown measures, such as curfews, contact restrictions, lockdowns ... between three pandemic scenarios with different interventions and impacts of the Corona pandemic ...

Abstract	Problem: Policymakers must decide on interventions to control the pandemic. These decisions are driven by weighing the risks and benefits of various non-pharmaceutical intervention alternatives. Due to the nature of the pandemic, these decisions are not based on sufficient evidence regarding the effects, nor are decision-makers informed about the willingness of populations to accept the economic and health risks associated with different policy options. This empirical study seeks to reduce uncertainty by measuring population preferences for non-pharmaceutical interventions. Methods: An online-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit population preferences. Respondents were asked to choose between three pandemic scenarios with different interventions and impacts of the Corona pandemic. In addition, Best-worst scaling (BWS) was used to analyze the impact of the duration of individual interventions on people's acceptance. The marginal rate of substitution was applied to estimate willingness-to-accept (WTA) for each intervention and effect by risk of infection. Results: Data from 3006 respondents were included in the analysis. The DCE showed, economic effect of non-pharmaceutical measures had a large impact on choice decisions for or against specific lockdown scenarios. Individual income decreases had the most impact. Excess mortality and individual risk of infection were also important factors influencing choice decisions. Curfews, contact restrictions, facility closures, personal data transmissions, and mandatory masking in public had a lesser impact. However, significant standard deviations in the random parameter logit model (RPL) indicated heterogeneities in the study population. The BWS results showed that short-term restrictions were more likely to be accepted than long-term restrictions. According to WTA estimates, people would be willing to accept a greater risk of infection to avoid loss of income. Discussion: The results can be used to determine which consequences of pandemic measures would be more severe for the population. For example, the results show that citizens want to limit the decline in individual income during pandemic measures. Participation in preference studies can also inform citizens about potential tradeoffs that decision-makers face in current and future decisions during a pandemic. Knowledge of the population's preferences will help inform decisions that consider people's perspectives and expectations for the future. Survey results can inform decision-makers about the extent to which the population is willing to accept certain lockdown measures, such as curfews, contact restrictions, lockdowns, or mandatory masks.
MeSH term(s)	Humans ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Public Health ; Choice Behavior ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; Communicable Disease Control
Language	English
Publishing date	2022-02-09
Publishing country	Germany
Document type	Journal Article
ZDB-ID	2045253-6
ISSN	1618-7601 ; 1618-7598
ISSN (online)	1618-7601
ISSN	1618-7598
DOI	10.1007/s10198-022-01438-w
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Full text online

Accessible to users with ZB MED library card

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 5475: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

Details ▾

Article ; Online: The four weeks before lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a weekly serial cross-sectional survey on risk perceptions, knowledge, public trust and behaviour, 3 to 25 March 2020.

Betsch, Cornelia / Korn, Lars / Burgard, Tanja / Gaissmaier, Wolfgang / Felgendreff, Lisa / Eitze, Sarah / Sprengholz, Philipp / Böhm, Robert / Stollorz, Volker / Ramharter, Michael / Promies, Nikolai / De Bock, Freia / Schmid, Philipp / Renner, Britta / Wieler, Lothar H / Bosnjak, Michael

Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin

2021 Volume 26, Issue 42

Abstract: ... to new risk scenarios and radical behavioural restrictions.AimTo identify major drivers of acceptance ... BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, public perceptions and behaviours have had to adapt rapidly ... of protective behaviours during the 4-week transition from virtually no COVID-19 cases to the nationwide ...

Abstract	BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, public perceptions and behaviours have had to adapt rapidly to new risk scenarios and radical behavioural restrictions.AimTo identify major drivers of acceptance of protective behaviours during the 4-week transition from virtually no COVID-19 cases to the nationwide lockdown in Germany (3-25 March 2020).MethodsA serial cross-sectional online survey was administered weekly to ca 1,000 unique individuals for four data collection rounds in March 2020 using non-probability quota samples, representative of the German adult population between 18 and 74 years in terms of age × sex and federal state (n = 3,910). Acceptance of restrictions was regressed on sociodemographic variables, time and psychological variables, e.g. trust, risk perceptions, self-efficacy. Extraction of homogenous clusters was based on knowledge and behaviour.ResultsAcceptance of restrictive policies increased with participants' age and employment in the healthcare sector; cognitive and particularly affective risk perceptions were further significant predictors. Acceptance increased over time, as trust in institutions became more relevant and trust in media became less relevant. The cluster analysis further indicated that having a higher education increased the gap between knowledge and behaviour. Trust in institutions was related to conversion of knowledge into action.ConclusionIdentifying relevant principles that increase acceptance will remain crucial to the development of strategies that help adjust behaviour to control the pandemic, possibly for years to come. Based on our findings, we provide operational recommendations for health authorities regarding data collection, health communication and outreach.
MeSH term(s)	Adult ; COVID-19 ; Communicable Disease Control ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Germany/epidemiology ; Humans ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; Perception ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Trust
Language	English
Publishing date	2021-10-21
Publishing country	Sweden
Document type	Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ZDB-ID	1338803-4
ISSN	1560-7917 ; 1025-496X
ISSN (online)	1560-7917
ISSN	1025-496X
DOI	10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.42.2001900
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 5066: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

Details ▾
- See ZB MED holdings
- Order with fees

Article: The four weeks before lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

Eurosurveillance

A weekly serial cross-sectional survey on risk perceptions, knowledge, public trust and behaviour, 3 to 25 March 2020

2021 Volume 26, Issue 42, Page(s) No

Abstract: ... of acceptance of protective behaviors during the 4-week transition from virtually no COVID-19 cases ... Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, public perceptions and behaviors have had to adapt ... rapidly to new risk scenarios and radical behavioral restrictions. Aim: To identify major drivers ...

Title translation	Die vier Wochen vor dem Lockdown während der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland: Eine wöchentliche serielle Querschnittbefragung zu Risikowahrnehmungen, Wissen, öffentlichem Vertrauen und Verhalten, 3. bis 25. März 2020
Abstract	Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, public perceptions and behaviors have had to adapt rapidly to new risk scenarios and radical behavioral restrictions. Aim: To identify major drivers of acceptance of protective behaviors during the 4-week transition from virtually no COVID-19 cases to the nationwide lockdown in Germany (3-25 March 2020). Methods: A serial cross-sectional online survey was administered weekly to about 1,000 unique individuals for four data collection rounds in March 2020 using non-probability quota samples, representative of the German adult population between 18 and 74 years in terms of age x sex and federal state (n = 3,910). Acceptance of restrictions was regressed on sociodemographic variables, time and psychological variables, e.g. trust, risk perceptions, self-efficacy. Extraction of homogenous clusters was based on knowledge and behavior. Results: Acceptance of restrictive policies increased with participants' age and employment in the healthcare sector; cognitive and particularly affective risk perceptions were further significant predictors. Acceptance increased over time, as trust in institutions became more relevant and trust in media became less relevant. The cluster analysis further indicated that having a higher education increased the gap between knowledge and behavior. Trust in institutions was related to conversion of knowledge into action. Conclusion: Identifying relevant principles that increase acceptance will remain crucial to the development of strategies that help adjust behavior to control the pandemic, possibly for years to come. Based on our findings, we provide operational recommendations for health authorities regarding data collection, health communication and outreach.
Keywords	Age Differences ; Altersunterschiede ; Behavior Change ; Bildungsabschluss ; COVID-19 ; Disease Outbreaks ; Educational Attainment Level ; Gesundheitsverhalten ; Health Behavior ; Knowledge Level ; Krankheitsausbrüche ; Pandemics ; Pandemie ; Risikowahrnehmung ; Risk Perception ; Selbstwirksamkeit ; Self-Efficacy ; Trust (Social Behavior) ; Verhaltensänderung ; Vertrauen ; Wissensstand
Language	English
Document type	Article
ZDB-ID	1338803-4
ISSN	1560-7917 ; 1560-7917 ; 1025-496X
ISSN (online)	1560-7917
ISSN	1560-7917 ; 1025-496X
DOI	10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.42.2001900
Database	PSYNDEX

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 5066: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

Details ▾
- See ZB MED holdings
- Order with fees

To top

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito