LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 1 of total 1

Search options

Article ; Online: Balancing risks: making decisions for maternal treatment without data on fetal safety.

Minkoff, Howard / Ecker, Jeffrey

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

2021  Volume 224, Issue 5, Page(s) 479–483

Abstract: Challenges arise when treatment to improve maternal health brings the possibility of risk to fetal ... a child by delaying treatment brings clear and significant risks to fetal and/or neonatal outcomes ... that absent safety data bring. Consequently, if pregnant women choose to try new interventions and treatments ...

Abstract Challenges arise when treatment to improve maternal health brings the possibility of risk to fetal health. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is the most recent, but hardly the only, example. Because pregnant patients are often specifically excluded from trials of new therapies, this is often the dilemma that patients and providers face when considering new treatments. In this study, we used the COVID-19 vaccine as an exemplar to question the broader issue of how society, in general, and obstetricians, in particular, should balance obligations to pregnant women's right of access to new therapeutic agents with the physician's desire to protect the fetus from potential risks. We will argue that in almost all circumstances (with few exceptions, as will also be discussed), maternal benefit and respect for autonomy create the uncertainty that absent safety data bring. Consequently, if pregnant women choose to try new interventions and treatments, such as the COVID-19 vaccination, they should be offered those new regimens and their decision supported. In addition, we will argue that the right solution to avoid the dilemma of absent data is to include pregnant individuals in clinical trials studying new treatments, drugs, and other therapies. We will also discuss the basis for our opinion, which are mainstream obstetrical ethics, precedents in law (supreme court ruling that forbids companies to exclude women from jobs that might pose a risk to the fetus), and historic events (thalidomide). The ethical framework includes the supposition that sacrifice to improve fetal outcome is a virtue and not a mandate. Denying a pregnant patient treatment because of threats to their life can create absurd and paradoxical consequences. Either requiring abortion or premature delivery before proceeding with treatments to optimize maternal health, or risking a patient's own life and ability to parent a child by delaying treatment brings clear and significant risks to fetal and/or neonatal outcomes. With rare exceptions, properly and ethically balancing such consequential actions cannot be undertaken without considering the values and goals of the pregnant patient. Therefore, active participation of both the pregnant patient and their physician in shared decision making is needed.
MeSH term(s) COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects ; COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology ; Decision Making ; Female ; Humans ; Patient Safety ; Personal Autonomy ; Pregnancy ; SARS-CoV-2/immunology ; Vaccination/ethics
Chemical Substances COVID-19 Vaccines
Language English
Publishing date 2021-02-01
Publishing country United States
Document type Journal Article
ZDB-ID 80016-8
ISSN 1097-6868 ; 0002-9378
ISSN (online) 1097-6868
ISSN 0002-9378
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.025
Shelf mark
Um I Zs.152: Show issues Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

More links

Kategorien

To top