Article ; Online: Diagnostic performance of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in the clinical routine of a tertiary care hospital: Preliminary results from a single-center evaluation.
Journal of clinical laboratory analysis
2021 Volume 35, Issue 8, Page(s) e23906
Abstract: ... of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay from Roche Diagnostics in a tertiary care setting.: Methods ... assays. The index test was the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay. This electrochemiluminescence ... 39.9 was 100%, 44%, 8%, and 6%, respectively.: Conclusions: The Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay ...
Abstract | Background: This report describes a manufacturer-independent evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay from Roche Diagnostics in a tertiary care setting. Methods: In this single-center study, we used nasopharyngeal swabs from 403 cases from the emergency department and intensive care unit of our hospital. The reference standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2 was the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were recorded for positive RT-PCR assays. The index test was the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay. This electrochemiluminescence immunoassay produces results as cutoff index (COI) values, with values ≥1.00 being reported as positive. Results: Of the 403 cases, 47 showed positive results in RT-PCR assays. Of the 47 RT-PCR-positive cases, 12 showed positive results in the antigen assay. Of the 356 RT-PCR-negative cases, all showed negative results in the antigen assay. Thus, the antigen assay showed a sensitivity of 26% (95% CI, 14%-40%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 99%-100%). Analysis of the relationship between Ct values and COI values in the 47 RT-PCR-positive cases showed a correlation coefficient of -0.704 (95% CI, -0.824 to -0.522). The true-positive rate of the antigen assay for Ct values of 15-24.9, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, and 35-39.9 was 100%, 44%, 8%, and 6%, respectively. Conclusions: The Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay has a low sensitivity for detecting SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs. Hence, we decided to not use this assay in the clinical routine of our hospital. |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Antigens, Viral/analysis ; COVID-19/diagnosis ; COVID-19/virology ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing ; COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Nasopharynx/virology ; SARS-CoV-2/immunology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Viral Load | |||||
Chemical Substances | Antigens, Viral | |||||
Language | English | |||||
Publishing date | 2021-07-12 | |||||
Publishing country | United States | |||||
Document type | Evaluation Study ; Journal Article | |||||
ZDB-ID | 645095-7 | |||||
ISSN | 1098-2825 ; 0887-8013 | |||||
ISSN (online) | 1098-2825 | |||||
ISSN | 0887-8013 | |||||
DOI | 10.1002/jcla.23906 | |||||
Shelf mark |
|
|||||
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Zs.A 2471: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.