LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: COVID-19 pandemic effect on early pregnancy: are miscarriage rates altered, in asymptomatic women?

    Rotshenker-Olshinka, Keren / Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander / Steiner, Naama / Rubenfeld, Eryn / Dahan, Michael H

    Archives of gynecology and obstetrics

    2020  Volume 303, Issue 3, Page(s) 839–845

    Abstract: ... of miscarriage.: Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic environment does not seem to affect early first-trimester ... Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic state on early, first ... in Montreal, Quebec, since the COVID-19 shut down, March 13 until May 6, 2020. Included: all women who came ...

    Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic state on early, first-trimester pregnancies.
    Methods: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a university-affiliated fertility center in Montreal, Quebec, since the COVID-19 shut down, March 13 until May 6, 2020. Included: all women who came for a first-trimester viability scan during the study period (Study group) and between March 1, 2019 and May 17, 2019, approximately one year prior (Control). The study population denied symptoms of COVID-19. We reviewed all first trimester scans. Early first-trimester pregnancy outcomes (Viable pregnancy, arrested pregnancy including biochemical pregnancy loss and miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy) were measured as total number and percentage. A multivariate analysis was performed to control for other potentially significant variables, as was a power analysis supporting sample size.
    Results: 113 women came for a first-trimester viability scan in the study period, and 172 in the control period (5-11 weeks gestational age), mean maternal age 36.5 ± 4.5 and 37.2 ± 5.4 years (p = 0.28). Viable clinical pregnancy rate was not different between the two groups (76.1 vs. 80.2% in the pandemic and pre-pandemic groups p = 0.41). No significant difference was seen in the total number of arrested pregnancies (defined as the sum of biochemical, 1st trimester miscarriages, and blighted ova) (22.1 vs. 16.9% p = 0.32), or in each type of miscarriage.
    Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic environment does not seem to affect early first-trimester miscarriage rates in asymptomatic patients.
    MeSH term(s) Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology ; Abortion, Spontaneous/virology ; Adult ; COVID-19/blood ; COVID-19/complications ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/psychology ; COVID-19 Serological Testing ; Female ; Humans ; Maternal Age ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pandemics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/blood ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnancy Trimester, First ; Quebec ; Retrospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-09
    Publishing country Germany
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 896455-5
    ISSN 1432-0711 ; 0932-0067
    ISSN (online) 1432-0711
    ISSN 0932-0067
    DOI 10.1007/s00404-020-05848-0
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: COVID-19 PANDEMIC EFFECT ON EARLY PREGNANCYARE MISCARRIAGE RATES ALTERED, IN ASYMPTOMATIC WOMEN?

    Olshinka, Keren Rotshenker / Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander / Steiner, Namaa / Rubenfeld, Eryn Sarah / Dahan, Michael H.

    Fertility and Sterility

    2020  Volume 114, Issue 3, Page(s) e530–e531

    Keywords Obstetrics and Gynaecology ; Reproductive Medicine ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Elsevier BV
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 80133-1
    ISSN 1556-5653 ; 0015-0282
    ISSN (online) 1556-5653
    ISSN 0015-0282
    DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.036
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: COVID-19 pandemic effect on early pregnancy: are miscarriage rates altered, in asymptomatic women?

    Rotshenker-Olshinka, Keren / Volodarsky-Perel, Alexander / Steiner, Naama / Rubenfeld, Eryn / H Dahan, Michael

    Arch. gynecol. obstet

    Abstract: ... of miscarriage. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic environment does not seem to affect early first-trimester ... PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic state on early, first ... in Montreal, Quebec, since the COVID-19 shut down, March 13 until May 6, 2020. Included: all women who came ...

    Abstract PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic state on early, first-trimester pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study conducted at a university-affiliated fertility center in Montreal, Quebec, since the COVID-19 shut down, March 13 until May 6, 2020. Included: all women who came for a first-trimester viability scan during the study period (Study group) and between March 1, 2019 and May 17, 2019, approximately one year prior (Control). The study population denied symptoms of COVID-19. We reviewed all first trimester scans. Early first-trimester pregnancy outcomes (Viable pregnancy, arrested pregnancy including biochemical pregnancy loss and miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy) were measured as total number and percentage. A multivariate analysis was performed to control for other potentially significant variables, as was a power analysis supporting sample size. RESULTS: 113 women came for a first-trimester viability scan in the study period, and 172 in the control period (5-11 weeks gestational age), mean maternal age 36.5 ± 4.5 and 37.2 ± 5.4 years (p = 0.28). Viable clinical pregnancy rate was not different between the two groups (76.1 vs. 80.2% in the pandemic and pre-pandemic groups p = 0.41). No significant difference was seen in the total number of arrested pregnancies (defined as the sum of biochemical, 1st trimester miscarriages, and blighted ova) (22.1 vs. 16.9% p = 0.32), or in each type of miscarriage. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic environment does not seem to affect early first-trimester miscarriage rates in asymptomatic patients.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #917115
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Covid-19 Pandemic Effect on Early PregnancyAre Miscarriage Rates Altered, in Asymptomatic Women?

    Olshinka, K. R. / Volodarsky-Perel, A. / Steiner, N. / Rubenfeld, E. S. / Dahan, M. H.

    Fertility and Sterility

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic state on early, 1st ... in that group Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic environment does not seem to affect early first-trimester ... in outcomes and α=5% The study group denied symptoms of COVID-19 Results: 113 women were scanned in the study ...

    Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic state on early, 1st trimester pregnancies, in light of a link described between war-induced stress and adverse pregnancy outcomes Design: Retrospective cohort study conducted in a University fertility center Materials and Methods: All 1ST trimester viability scans done since the COVID-19 shut down, March13-May 6, 2020 (Study group), and between March 1-May 17, 2019 (pre-pandemic Control), were reviewed Early 1st trimester pregnancy outcomes (Viable pregnancy, Arrested pregnancy including biochemical pregnancy loss and miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy (EP)) were measured A multivariate analysis was performed to control for significant confounders Power analysis revealed that a sample size of 58 patients per group has a 90% power with a 15% difference in outcomes and α=5% The study group denied symptoms of COVID-19 Results: 113 women were scanned in the study, and 172 in the control periods (5-11 weeks gestational age) The groups had similar demographics, gestational history, fertility diagnosis and treatment characteristics (Table) No significant differences were noted in the rate of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) Viable clinical pregnancy rates were not different between the groups (76 1% vs 80 2% in the pandemic and pre-pandemic groups p= 0 41) No significant difference was seen in number of 1st trimester miscarriage (14 2% vs 12 8% p=0 76), biochemical pregnancies (3 5% vs 1 7% p=0 34), or in total miscarriage rate (22 1% vs 16 9% p=0 32), nor in EP rates (0 9% vs 2 3% p=0 36) Mean serum TSH levels were higher in the control but fell in the normal range for both groups Use of donor sperm was higher in the control and may have favored lower miscarriage rates in that group Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic environment does not seem to affect early first-trimester miscarriage rates in asymptomatic patients [Formula presented]
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #882540
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top