LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article: Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.

    Riccò, Matteo / Ferraro, Pietro / Gualerzi, Giovanni / Ranzieri, Silvia / Henry, Brandon Michael / Said, Younes Ben / Pyatigorskaya, Natalia Valeryevna / Nevolina, Elena / Wu, Jianhong / Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi / Signorelli, Carlo

    Journal of clinical medicine

    2020  Volume 9, Issue 5

    Abstract: ... for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was ... rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific; (2 ... SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was ...

    Abstract SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in late December 2019 and, since then, has become a global pandemic. Timely and accurate COVID-19 laboratory testing is an essential step in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. To date, assays based on the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in respiratory samples are the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis. Unfortunately, RT-PCR has several practical limitations. Consequently, alternative diagnostic methods are urgently required, both for alleviating the pressure on laboratories and healthcare facilities and for expanding testing capacity to enable large-scale screening and ensure a timely therapeutic intervention. To date, few studies have been conducted concerning the potential utilization of rapid testing for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to explore the feasibility of rapid diagnostic tests in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. Based on ten studies, we computed a pooled sensitivity of 64.8% (95%CI 54.5-74.0), and specificity of 98.0% (95%CI 95.8-99.0), with high heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias. We can conclude that: (1) rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific; (2) few studies have been carried out to date; (3) the studies included are characterized by low numbers and low sample power, and (4) in light of these results, the use of available tests is currently questionable for clinical purposes and cannot substitute other more reliable molecular tests, such as assays based on RT-PCR.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-18
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2662592-1
    ISSN 2077-0383
    ISSN 2077-0383
    DOI 10.3390/jcm9051515
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data

    Riccò, Matteo / Ferraro, Pietro / Gualerzi, Giovanni / Ranzieri, Silvia / Henry, Brandon Michael / Said, Younes Ben / Pyatigorskaya, Natalia Valeryevna / Nevolina, Elena / Wu, Jianhong / Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi / Signorelli, Carlo

    Abstract: ... for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was ... rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific; (2 ... SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was ...

    Abstract SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in late December 2019 and, since then, has become a global pandemic. Timely and accurate COVID-19 laboratory testing is an essential step in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. To date, assays based on the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in respiratory samples are the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis. Unfortunately, RT-PCR has several practical limitations. Consequently, alternative diagnostic methods are urgently required, both for alleviating the pressure on laboratories and healthcare facilities and for expanding testing capacity to enable large-scale screening and ensure a timely therapeutic intervention. To date, few studies have been conducted concerning the potential utilization of rapid testing for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to explore the feasibility of rapid diagnostic tests in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. Based on ten studies, we computed a pooled sensitivity of 64.8% (95%CI 54.5-74.0), and specificity of 98.0% (95%CI 95.8-99.0), with high heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias. We can conclude that: (1) rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific; (2) few studies have been carried out to date; (3) the studies included are characterized by low numbers and low sample power, and (4) in light of these results, the use of available tests is currently questionable for clinical purposes and cannot substitute other more reliable molecular tests, such as assays based on RT-PCR.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #291377
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  3. Book ; Online: Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

    Matteo Riccò / Pietro Ferraro / Giovanni Gualerzi / Silvia Ranzieri / Brandon Michael Henry / Younes Ben Said / Natalia Valeryevna Pyatigorskaya / Elena Nevolina / Jianhong Wu / Nicola Luigi Bragazzi / Carlo Signorelli

    Journal of Clinical Medicine ; Volume 9 ; Issue 5

    A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data

    2020  

    Abstract: ... for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was ... SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was ... characterized by low numbers and low sample power, and (4) in light of these results, the use of available tests ...

    Abstract SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in late December 2019 and, since then, has become a global pandemic. Timely and accurate COVID-19 laboratory testing is an essential step in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. To date, assays based on the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in respiratory samples are the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis. Unfortunately, RT-PCR has several practical limitations. Consequently, alternative diagnostic methods are urgently required, both for alleviating the pressure on laboratories and healthcare facilities and for expanding testing capacity to enable large-scale screening and ensure a timely therapeutic intervention. To date, few studies have been conducted concerning the potential utilization of rapid testing for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to explore the feasibility of rapid diagnostic tests in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. Based on ten studies, we computed a pooled sensitivity of 64.8% (95%CI 54.5–

    74.0), and specificity of 98.0% (95%CI 95.8–

    99.0), with high heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias. We can conclude that: (1) rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific

    (2) few studies have been carried out to date

    (3) the studies included are characterized by low numbers and low sample power, and (4) in light of these results, the use of available tests is currently questionable for clinical purposes and cannot substitute other more reliable molecular tests, such as assays based on RT-PCR.
    Keywords SARS-CoV-2 ; COVID-19 ; point-of-care diagnostics ; rapid testing ; systematic review and meta-analysis ; real-world data ; covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-18
    Publisher Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
    Publishing country ch
    Document type Book ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies

    Matteo Riccò / Pietro Ferraro / Giovanni Gualerzi / Silvia Ranzieri / Brandon Michael Henry / Younes Ben Said / Natalia Valeryevna Pyatigorskaya / Elena Nevolina / Jianhong Wu / Nicola Luigi Bragazzi / Carlo Signorelli

    Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 9, Iss 1515, p

    A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data

    2020  Volume 1515

    Abstract: ... for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was ... rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific; (2 ... SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was ...

    Abstract SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in late December 2019 and, since then, has become a global pandemic. Timely and accurate COVID-19 laboratory testing is an essential step in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. To date, assays based on the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in respiratory samples are the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis. Unfortunately, RT-PCR has several practical limitations. Consequently, alternative diagnostic methods are urgently required, both for alleviating the pressure on laboratories and healthcare facilities and for expanding testing capacity to enable large-scale screening and ensure a timely therapeutic intervention. To date, few studies have been conducted concerning the potential utilization of rapid testing for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to explore the feasibility of rapid diagnostic tests in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. Based on ten studies, we computed a pooled sensitivity of 64.8% (95%CI 54.5–74.0), and specificity of 98.0% (95%CI 95.8–99.0), with high heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias. We can conclude that: (1) rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific; (2) few studies have been carried out to date; (3) the studies included are characterized by low numbers and low sample power, and (4) in light of these results, the use of available tests is currently questionable for clinical purposes and cannot substitute other more reliable molecular tests, such as assays based on RT-PCR.
    Keywords SARS-CoV-2 ; COVID-19 ; point-of-care diagnostics ; rapid testing ; systematic review and meta-analysis ; real-world data ; Medicine ; R ; covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher MDPI AG
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article: Accuracy of point-of-care diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgM/IgG) is heterogeneous

    Sacks, Henry S

    Ann Intern Med

    Abstract: ... for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data. J Clin Med. 2020 ... SOURCE CITATION: Riccò M, Ferraro P, Gualerzi G, et al. Point-of-care diagnostic tests ...

    Abstract SOURCE CITATION: Riccò M, Ferraro P, Gualerzi G, et al. Point-of-care diagnostic tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1515. 32443459.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #881505
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top