LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19.

    Richards, Adair D

    Journal of medical ethics

    2020  Volume 46, Issue 8, Page(s) 502–504

    Abstract: ... infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against ... Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-2021. Developing and ... such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees ...

    Abstract Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-2021. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase II and phase III trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods-that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
    MeSH term(s) Betacoronavirus ; Biomedical Research/ethics ; Biomedical Research/methods ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control ; Coronavirus Infections/virology ; Ethical Analysis ; Ethical Review ; Ethics Committees, Research ; Ethics, Research ; Guidelines as Topic ; Human Experimentation/ethics ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Intention ; Pandemics/ethics ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control ; Pneumonia, Viral/virology ; Research Design ; Research Personnel ; Research Subjects ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Vaccination ; Viral Vaccines ; Volunteers
    Chemical Substances COVID-19 Vaccines ; Viral Vaccines
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-27
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 194927-5
    ISSN 1473-4257 ; 0306-6800
    ISSN (online) 1473-4257
    ISSN 0306-6800
    DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106322
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19

    Richards, Adair D

    Journal of Medical Ethics

    2020  Volume 46, Issue 8, Page(s) 502–504

    Abstract: ... infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against ... Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020–2021. Developing and ... such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees ...

    Abstract Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020–2021. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase II and phase III trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods—that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
    Keywords Health Policy ; Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ; Issues, ethics and legal aspects ; Health(social science) ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher BMJ
    Publishing country uk
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 194927-5
    ISSN 1473-4257 ; 0306-6800
    ISSN (online) 1473-4257
    ISSN 0306-6800
    DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106322
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19

    Richards, Adair D

    J Med Ethics

    Abstract: ... infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against ... Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-2021. Developing and ... such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees ...

    Abstract Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-2021. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase II and phase III trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods-that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #433431
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  4. Book ; Online: Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19

    Richards, Adair D

    2020  

    Abstract: ... infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against ... Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020–2021. Developing and ... such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees ...

    Abstract Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020–2021. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase II and phase III trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods—that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
    Keywords Current controversy ; covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-01 00:00:00.0
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
    Publishing country us
    Document type Book ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Book ; Online: Ethical Guidelines for Deliberately Infecting Volunteers with COVID-19

    Richards, Adair D

    2020  

    Abstract: ... infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation.This article analyses arguments for and against ... Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-21. Developing and delivering ... such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees ...

    Abstract Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-21. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods – that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation.This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approvals processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher Center for Open Science
    Publishing country us
    Document type Book ; Online
    DOI 10.31235/osf.io/jb7gq
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top