LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Telehealth in Uro-oncology Beyond the Pandemic: Toll or Lifesaver?

    Rodler, Severin / Apfelbeck, Maria / Schulz, Gerald Bastian / Ivanova, Troya / Buchner, Alexander / Staehler, Michael / Heinemann, Volker / Stief, Christian / Casuscelli, Jozefina

    European urology focus

    2020  Volume 6, Issue 5, Page(s) 1097–1103

    Abstract: Background: Telehealth services are rapidly embraced in uro-oncology due to the current ... human dignity in uro-oncology.: Patient summary: We queried patients with genitourinary cancers treated ... of telehealth as a response to the pandemic and its sustainability in the future.: Design, setting, and ...

    Abstract Background: Telehealth services are rapidly embraced in uro-oncology due to the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
    Objective: To determine patients' perspective on adoption of telehealth as a response to the pandemic and its sustainability in the future.
    Design, setting, and participants: Following a COVID-19 outbreak, 101 patients with advanced genitourinary cancers are currently managed "virtually" for therapy administration at our tertiary care unit. They were surveyed about the current situation, and current and long-term employment of telehealth.
    Intervention: Rapid implementation of virtual patient management.
    Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Patients' perception of anxiety of COVID-19 and cancer, perspective on telehealth measures as a reaction to the current COVID-19 pandemic, and long-term acceptance were used as outcomes. Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test were performed.
    Results and limitations: Of 101 patients, 92 answered the questionnaire, with 71 (77.2%) responding virtually by e-mail or phone call. Anxiety of cancer (6/10, interquartile range [IQR] 3-8) superseded that of COVID-19 (four/10, IQR 2-5.25, p<0.001), and patients oppose temporary treatment interruption. Of the patients, 66.0% perceive their susceptibility to COVID-19 as equal to or lower than the general population and 52.2% believe that COVID-19 will not affect their therapy. In future, patients (62.6%) prefer to maintain in-person appointments as opposed to complete remote care, but accept remote care during the pandemic (eight/10, IQR 5-9). Beyond the crisis, maintaining telehealth has low preference rates (four/10, IQR 2-7), with high acceptance for external laboratory controls (60.9%) and online visit management (48.9%), but lower acceptance for remote treatment planning including staging discussions (44.6%) and for referral to secondary care oncologists (17.4%).
    Conclusions: Despite the pandemic, cancer remains the key concern and patients are not willing to compromise on their treatment. Rapid implementation of telehealth is tolerated well during the need of social distancing, with a clear "red line" concerning changes in existing patient-physician relationships. Balancing future implementation of telehealth while considering patients' demand for personal relationships will ensure human dignity in uro-oncology.
    Patient summary: We queried patients with genitourinary cancers treated in an almost virtual setting following a local coronavirus outbreak. Acceptance of telehealth during the current situation is high; however, long-term implementation of the adapted services is less favored. We deduce that patient-physician relationship is crucial for cancer patients and needs to be balanced against measures for social distancing to forge the future management.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anxiety ; Attitude to Health ; Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms/therapy ; Male ; Medical Oncology ; Middle Aged ; Pandemics ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Preference ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology ; Program Evaluation ; Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Telemedicine ; Time-to-Treatment ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy ; Urogenital Neoplasms/therapy ; Urology
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-10
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2405-4569
    ISSN (online) 2405-4569
    DOI 10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.010
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Telehealth in Uro-oncology Beyond the Pandemic: Toll or Lifesaver?

    Rodler, Severin / Apfelbeck, Maria / Schulz, Gerald Bastian / Ivanova, Troya / Buchner, Alexander / Staehler, Michael / Heinemann, Volker / Stief, Christian / Casuscelli, Jozefina

    Eur Urol Focus

    Abstract: BACKGROUND: Telehealth services are rapidly embraced in uro-oncology due to the current coronavirus ... human dignity in uro-oncology. PATIENT SUMMARY: We queried patients with genitourinary cancers treated ... disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To determine patients' perspective on adoption of telehealth ...

    Abstract BACKGROUND: Telehealth services are rapidly embraced in uro-oncology due to the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To determine patients' perspective on adoption of telehealth as a response to the pandemic and its sustainability in the future. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Following a COVID-19 outbreak, 101 patients with advanced genitourinary cancers are currently managed "virtually" for therapy administration at our tertiary care unit. They were surveyed about the current situation, and current and long-term employment of telehealth. INTERVENTION: Rapid implementation of virtual patient management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patients' perception of anxiety of COVID-19 and cancer, perspective on telehealth measures as a reaction to the current COVID-19 pandemic, and long-term acceptance were used as outcomes. Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney U test were performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 101 patients, 92 answered the questionnaire, with 71 (77.2%) responding virtually by e-mail or phone call. Anxiety of cancer (6/10, interquartile range [IQR] 3-8) superseded that of COVID-19 (four/10, IQR 2-5.25, p<0.001), and patients oppose temporary treatment interruption. Of the patients, 66.0% perceive their susceptibility to COVID-19 as equal to or lower than the general population and 52.2% believe that COVID-19 will not affect their therapy. In future, patients (62.6%) prefer to maintain in-person appointments as opposed to complete remote care, but accept remote care during the pandemic (eight/10, IQR 5-9). Beyond the crisis, maintaining telehealth has low preference rates (four/10, IQR 2-7), with high acceptance for external laboratory controls (60.9%) and online visit management (48.9%), but lower acceptance for remote treatment planning including staging discussions (44.6%) and for referral to secondary care oncologists (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the pandemic, cancer remains the key concern and patients are not willing to compromise on their treatment. Rapid implementation of telehealth is tolerated well during the need of social distancing, with a clear "red line" concerning changes in existing patient-physician relationships. Balancing future implementation of telehealth while considering patients' demand for personal relationships will ensure human dignity in uro-oncology. PATIENT SUMMARY: We queried patients with genitourinary cancers treated in an almost virtual setting following a local coronavirus outbreak. Acceptance of telehealth during the current situation is high; however, long-term implementation of the adapted services is less favored. We deduce that patient-physician relationship is crucial for cancer patients and needs to be balanced against measures for social distancing to forge the future management.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #592041
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top