LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Differences in the use of telephone and video telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Rodriguez, Jorge A / Betancourt, Joseph R / Sequist, Thomas D / Ganguli, Ishani

    The American journal of managed care

    2021  Volume 27, Issue 1, Page(s) 21–26

    Abstract: ... broadband access (AOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) were less likely to use video visits. Practices (38%) and ... and telephone visits as in-person visit alternatives. Although video visits offer some benefits ... should monitor video visit use across demographics and equip patients, clinicians, and practices to promote ...

    Abstract Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced health systems to offer video and telephone visits as in-person visit alternatives. Although video visits offer some benefits compared with telephone visits, they require complex setup, which may disadvantage some patients due to the "digital divide." Our objective was to determine patient and neighborhood characteristics associated with visit modality.
    Study design: This was a cross-sectional study across 1652 primary care and specialty care practices of adult patients at an integrated health system from April 23 to June 1, 2020.
    Methods: We used electronic health record and administrative data. Our primary outcome was visit modality (in-person, video, or telephone), which was captured using billing codes. We assessed predictors of using video vs telephone using multivariable logistic regression. We used hierarchical logistic regression to determine the contribution of patient-, physician-, and practice-level components of variance in the choice of video or telephone visits.
    Results: We analyzed 231,596 visits by 162,102 patients. Sixty-five percent of the visits were virtual (31.7% telephone, 33.5% video). Patients who were older than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.40-0.43), Black (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.63), Hispanic (AOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73-0.80), Spanish-speaking (AOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.61), and from areas with low broadband access (AOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) were less likely to use video visits. Practices (38%) and clinicians (26%) drove more of the variation in video visit use than patients (9%).
    Conclusions: Telemedicine access differences may compound disparities in chronic disease and COVID-19 outcomes. Institutions should monitor video visit use across demographics and equip patients, clinicians, and practices to promote telemedicine equity.
    MeSH term(s) Attitude of Health Personnel ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Managed Care Programs/organization & administration ; Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data ; Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data ; Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data ; Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2035781-3
    ISSN 1936-2692 ; 1088-0224 ; 1096-1860
    ISSN (online) 1936-2692
    ISSN 1088-0224 ; 1096-1860
    DOI 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88573
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Healthcare Utilization Differences Among Primary Care Patients Using Telemedicine in the Veterans Health Administration: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

    O'Shea, Amy M J / Mulligan, Kailey / Carlson, Paige / Haraldsson, Bjarni / Augustine, Matthew R / Kaboli, Peter J / Shimada, Stephanie L

    Journal of general internal medicine

    2024  Volume 39, Issue Suppl 1, Page(s) 109–117

    Abstract: ... telemedicine (≥ 1 telephone visit with or without in-person visits), or (3) video telemedicine (≥ 1 video visit ... only, telephone telemedicine, or video telemedicine. Compared to in-person only users, video ... with or without telephone and/or in-person visits). Healthcare utilization 7 days after index PC visit ...

    Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic encouraged telemedicine expansion. Research regarding follow-up healthcare utilization and primary care (PC) telemedicine is lacking.
    Objective: To evaluate whether healthcare utilization differed across PC populations using telemedicine.
    Design: Retrospective observational cohort study using administrative data from veterans with minimally one PC visit before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2019-February 28, 2020) and after in-person restrictions were lifted (October 1, 2020-September 30, 2021).
    Participants: All veterans receiving VHA PC services during study period.
    Main measures: Veterans' exposure to telemedicine was categorized as (1) in-person only, (2) telephone telemedicine (≥ 1 telephone visit with or without in-person visits), or (3) video telemedicine (≥ 1 video visit with or without telephone and/or in-person visits). Healthcare utilization 7 days after index PC visit were compared. Generalized estimating equations estimated odds ratios for telephone or video telemedicine versus in-person only use adjusted for patient characteristics (e.g., age, gender, race, residential rurality, ethnicity), area deprivation index, comorbidity risk, and intermediate PC visits within the follow-up window.
    Key results: Over the 2-year study, 3.4 million veterans had 12.9 million PC visits, where 1.7 million (50.7%), 1.0 million (30.3%), and 649,936 (19.0%) veterans were categorized as in-person only, telephone telemedicine, or video telemedicine. Compared to in-person only users, video telemedicine users experienced higher rates per 1000 patients of emergent care (15.1 vs 11.2; p < 0.001) and inpatient admissions (4.2 vs 3.3; p < 0.001). In adjusted analyses, video versus in-person only users experienced greater odds of emergent care (OR [95% CI]:1.18 [1.16, 1.19]) inpatient (OR [95% CI]: 1.29 [1.25, 1.32]), and ambulatory care sensitive condition admission (OR [95% CI]: 1.30 [1.27, 1.34]).
    Conclusions: Telemedicine potentially in combination with in-person care was associated with higher follow-up healthcare utilization rates compared to in-person only PC. Factors contributing to utilization differences between groups need further evaluation.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Pandemics ; Veterans Health ; Telemedicine ; Inpatients ; COVID-19 ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Primary Health Care
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Observational Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 639008-0
    ISSN 1525-1497 ; 0884-8734
    ISSN (online) 1525-1497
    ISSN 0884-8734
    DOI 10.1007/s11606-023-08472-1
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top