Article ; Online: Health-system equity, egalitarian democracy and COVID-19 outcomes: An empirical analysis.
Scandinavian journal of public health
2021 Volume 49, Issue 1, Page(s) 104–113
Abstract: ... data from the Varieties of Democracy Project on health-system equity and egalitarian democracy ... the death rate from COVID-19. Broader egalitarian governance, measured as egalitarian democracy, however, shows ... on fighting COVID-19, especially when an equitable health system has been taken into account. Fighting disease ...
| Abstract | Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a spate of studies showing a close connection between inequitable access to health care, welfare services and adverse outcomes from the pandemic. Others have argued that democratic governments have generally failed relative to more autocratic ones, simply because autocrats can make the hard choices required for stemming the spread of viruses. We address this question by asking whether more 'egalitarian' forms of democracy matter, given that they contain more equitable health-care access Methods: We use standard regression techniques, including instrumental variables analysis addressing endogeneity on COVID-19 testing and deaths data as of the end of May and beginning of September. We use novel data from the Varieties of Democracy Project on health-system equity and egalitarian democracy. Results: Our results suggest that more equitable access to health care increases testing rates and lowers the death rate from COVID-19. Broader egalitarian governance, measured as egalitarian democracy, however, shows the opposite effect. Thus, factors associated with health-care capacity to reach and treat matter more than broader societal factors associated with social capital and trust. The results are robust to alternative testing procedures, including instrumental variable technique for addressing potential endogeneity. Conclusions: Despite a great deal of public health focus on how equitable governance helps fight the adverse effects of so-called neoliberal pandemics, we find that broadly egalitarian factors have had the opposite effect on fighting COVID-19, especially when an equitable health system has been taken into account. Fighting disease, thus, might be more about the capacity of health systems rather than societal factors, such as trust in government and social capital. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeSH term(s) | COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/therapy ; Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration ; Democracy ; Empirical Research ; Health Equity ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome ; United States/epidemiology | |||||
| Language | English | |||||
| Publishing date | 2021-01-09 | |||||
| Publishing country | Sweden | |||||
| Document type | Journal Article | |||||
| ZDB-ID | 1475054-5 | |||||
| ISSN | 1651-1905 ; 1403-4948 | |||||
| ISSN (online) | 1651-1905 | |||||
| ISSN | 1403-4948 | |||||
| DOI | 10.1177/1403494820982106 | |||||
| Shelf mark |
|
|||||
| Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
| Zs.A 884: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.