Article ; Online: Diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM antibody tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA in COVID-19 patients.
2020 Volume 26, Issue 8, Page(s) 1082–1087
Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM tests and the Euroimmun ... for all seven LFAs compared to 89.5% for the IgG ELISA. The results for IgM varied significantly, and including ... Sensitivity and time to seropositivity was evaluated in 167 samples from 94 patients with COVID-19 confirmed ...
Abstract | Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of seven rapid IgG/IgM tests and the Euroimmun IgA/IgG ELISA for antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in COVID-19 patients. Methods: Specificity was evaluated in 103 samples collected before January 2020. Sensitivity and time to seropositivity was evaluated in 167 samples from 94 patients with COVID-19 confirmed with RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab. Results: Specificity (confidence interval) of lateral flow assays (LFAs) was ≥91.3% (84.0-95.5) for IgM, ≥90.3% (82.9-94.8) for IgG, and ≥85.4% (77.2-91.1) for the combination IgM OR IgG. Specificity of the ELISA was 96.1% (90.1-98.8) for IgG and only 73.8% (64.5-81.4) for IgA. Sensitivity 14-25 days after the onset of symptoms was between ≥92.1% (78.5-98.0) and 100% (95.7-100) for IgG LFA compared to 89.5% (75.3-96.4) for IgG ELISA. Positivity of IgM OR IgG for LFA resulted in a decrease in specificity compared to IgG alone without a gain in diagnostic performance, except for VivaDiag. The results for IgM varied significantly between the LFAs with an average overall agreement of only 70% compared to 89% for IgG. The average dynamic trend to seropositivity for IgM was not shorter than for IgG. At the time of hospital admission the sensitivity of LFA was <60%. Conclusions: Sensitivity for the detection of IgG antibodies 14-25 days after the onset of symptoms was ≥92.1% for all seven LFAs compared to 89.5% for the IgG ELISA. The results for IgM varied significantly, and including IgM antibodies in addition to IgG for the interpretation of LFAs did not improve the diagnostic performance. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibodies, Viral/analysis ; Antigens, Viral/immunology ; Betacoronavirus/immunology ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis ; Coronavirus Infections/immunology ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin A/metabolism ; Immunoglobulin G/metabolism ; Immunoglobulin M/metabolism ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Viral/immunology ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors ; Young Adult |
Chemical Substances | Antibodies, Viral ; Antigens, Viral ; Immunoglobulin A ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulin M |
Keywords | covid19 |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2020-05-28 |
Publishing country | England |
Document type | Comparative Study ; Journal Article |
ZDB-ID | 1328418-6 |
ISSN | 1469-0691 ; 1470-9465 ; 1198-743X |
ISSN (online) | 1469-0691 |
ISSN | 1470-9465 ; 1198-743X |
DOI | 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.05.023 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Zs.A 4541: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (2.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
|||
Zs.MO 284: Show issues |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.