Article ; Online: Tracking the effects of COVID-19 in rural China over time.
International journal for equity in health
2021 Volume 20, Issue 1, Page(s) 35
Abstract: ... to assess the socioeconomic effect of the measures on rural communities over time.: Methods: We conducted ... of China's overall rural population. The survey collected data on rural quarantine implementation; COVID-19 ... Background: China issued strict nationwide guidelines to combat the COVID-19 outbreak in January ...
| Abstract | Background: China issued strict nationwide guidelines to combat the COVID-19 outbreak in January 2020 and gradually loosened the restrictions on movement in early March. Little is known about how these disease control measures affected the 600 million people who live in rural China. The goal of this paper is to document the quarantine measures implemented in rural China outside the epicenter of Hubei Province and to assess the socioeconomic effect of the measures on rural communities over time. Methods: We conducted three rounds of interviews with informants from 726 villages in seven provinces, accounting for over 25% of China's overall rural population. The survey collected data on rural quarantine implementation; COVID-19 infections and deaths in the survey villages; and effects of the quarantine on employment, income, education, health care, and government policies to address any negative impacts. The empirical findings of the work established that strict quarantine measures were implemented in rural villages throughout China in February. Results: There was little spread of COVID-19 in rural communities: an infection rate of 0.001% and zero deaths reported in our sample. However, there were negative social and economic outcomes, including high rates of unemployment, falling household income, rising prices, and disrupted student learning. Health care was generally accessible, but many delayed their non-COVID-19 health care due to the quarantine measures. Only 20% of villagers received any form of local government aid, and only 11% of villages received financial subsidies. There were no reports of national government aid programs that targeted rural villagers in the sample areas. Conclusions: By examining the economic and social effects of the COVID-19 restrictions in rural communities, this study will help to guide other middle- and low-income countries in their containment and restorative processes. Without consideration for economically vulnerable populations, economic hardships and poverty will likely continue to have a negative impact on the most susceptible communities. |
|---|---|
| MeSH term(s) | COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; China/epidemiology ; Humans ; Quarantine ; Rural Population/statistics & numerical data ; Socioeconomic Factors |
| Language | English |
| Publishing date | 2021-01-14 |
| Publishing country | England |
| Document type | Journal Article |
| ZDB-ID | 2092056-8 |
| ISSN | 1475-9276 ; 1475-9276 |
| ISSN (online) | 1475-9276 |
| ISSN | 1475-9276 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-020-01369-z |
| Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.