LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 2 of total 2

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data.

    Wei, Jia-Jin / Lin, En-Xuan / Shi, Jian-Dong / Yang, Ke / Hu, Zong-Liang / Zeng, Xian-Tao / Tong, Tie-Jun

    Military Medical Research

    2021  Volume 8, Issue 1, Page(s) 41

    Abstract: ... method to handle the zero-event studies when there are few studies in a meta-analysis, or instead use ... zero-event studies impact the estimate of the mean effect size.: Conclusions: We recommend the new ... the GLMM when the number of studies is large. The double-zero-event studies may be informative, and ...

    Abstract Background: Meta-analysis is a statistical method to synthesize evidence from a number of independent studies, including those from clinical studies with binary outcomes. In practice, when there are zero events in one or both groups, it may cause statistical problems in the subsequent analysis.
    Methods: In this paper, by considering the relative risk as the effect size, we conduct a comparative study that consists of four continuity correction methods and another state-of-the-art method without the continuity correction, namely the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). To further advance the literature, we also introduce a new method of the continuity correction for estimating the relative risk.
    Results: From the simulation studies, the new method performs well in terms of mean squared error when there are few studies. In contrast, the generalized linear mixed model performs the best when the number of studies is large. In addition, by reanalyzing recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data, it is evident that the double-zero-event studies impact the estimate of the mean effect size.
    Conclusions: We recommend the new method to handle the zero-event studies when there are few studies in a meta-analysis, or instead use the GLMM when the number of studies is large. The double-zero-event studies may be informative, and so we suggest not excluding them.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; Data Analysis ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Research Design/trends
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2768940-2
    ISSN 2054-9369 ; 2054-9369
    ISSN (online) 2054-9369
    ISSN 2054-9369
    DOI 10.1186/s40779-021-00331-6
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Meta-analysis with zero-event studies

    Jia-Jin Wei / En-Xuan Lin / Jian-Dong Shi / Ke Yang / Zong-Liang Hu / Xian-Tao Zeng / Tie-Jun Tong

    Military Medical Research, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data

    2021  Volume 11

    Abstract: ... to handle the zero-event studies when there are few studies in a meta-analysis, or instead use the GLMM ... zero-event studies impact the estimate of the mean effect size. Conclusions We recommend the new method ... when the number of studies is large. The double-zero-event studies may be informative, and so we suggest not ...

    Abstract Abstract Background Meta-analysis is a statistical method to synthesize evidence from a number of independent studies, including those from clinical studies with binary outcomes. In practice, when there are zero events in one or both groups, it may cause statistical problems in the subsequent analysis. Methods In this paper, by considering the relative risk as the effect size, we conduct a comparative study that consists of four continuity correction methods and another state-of-the-art method without the continuity correction, namely the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). To further advance the literature, we also introduce a new method of the continuity correction for estimating the relative risk. Results From the simulation studies, the new method performs well in terms of mean squared error when there are few studies. In contrast, the generalized linear mixed model performs the best when the number of studies is large. In addition, by reanalyzing recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data, it is evident that the double-zero-event studies impact the estimate of the mean effect size. Conclusions We recommend the new method to handle the zero-event studies when there are few studies in a meta-analysis, or instead use the GLMM when the number of studies is large. The double-zero-event studies may be informative, and so we suggest not excluding them.
    Keywords Continuity correction ; Coronavirus disease 2019 data ; Meta-analysis ; Relative risk ; Zero-event studies ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920 ; Military Science ; U
    Subject code 310
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top