LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 5 of total 5

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Comparison of spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China.

    Zhang, Xi / Rao, Huaxiang / Wu, Yuwan / Huang, Yubei / Dai, Hongji

    BMC infectious diseases

    2020  Volume 20, Issue 1, Page(s) 805

    Abstract: ... whether COVID-19 and SARS exhibited similar spatial and temporal features at provincial level in mainland China ... spatiotemporal patterns of the COVID-19 and SARS epidemics using spatial statistics such as Moran's I and ... 135.08, 95% CI: 128.36-142.08) for COVID-19 and 4 clusters (mainly in Northern China; the highest RR ...

    Abstract Background: Both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) are caused by coronaviruses and have infected people in China and worldwide. We aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 and SARS exhibited similar spatial and temporal features at provincial level in mainland China.
    Methods: The number of people infected by COVID-19 and SARS were extracted from daily briefings on newly confirmed cases during the epidemics, as of Mar. 4, 2020 and Aug. 3, 2003, respectively. We depicted spatiotemporal patterns of the COVID-19 and SARS epidemics using spatial statistics such as Moran's I and the local indicators of spatial association (LISA).
    Results: Compared to SARS, COVID-19 had a higher overall incidence. We identified 3 clusters (predominantly located in south-central China; the highest RR = 135.08, 95% CI: 128.36-142.08) for COVID-19 and 4 clusters (mainly in Northern China; the highest RR = 423.51, 95% CI: 240.96-722.32) for SARS. Fewer secondary clusters were identified after the "Wuhan lockdown". The LISA cluster map detected a significantly high-low (Hubei) and low-high spatial clustering (Anhui, Hunan, and Jiangxi, in Central China) for COVID-19. Two significant high-high (Beijing and Tianjin) and low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected for SARS.
    Conclusions: COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks exhibited distinct spatiotemporal clustering patterns at the provincial levels in mainland China, which may be attributable to changes in social and demographic factors, local government containment strategies or differences in transmission mechanisms.
    MeSH term(s) Betacoronavirus/physiology ; COVID-19 ; China/epidemiology ; Cluster Analysis ; Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology ; Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control ; Coronavirus Infections/transmission ; Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Incidence ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology ; Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control ; Pneumonia, Viral/transmission ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/physiology ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/transmission ; Spatio-Temporal Analysis
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-30
    Publishing country England
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2041550-3
    ISSN 1471-2334 ; 1471-2334
    ISSN (online) 1471-2334
    ISSN 1471-2334
    DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-05537-y
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Comparison of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China

    Zhang, Xi / Rao, Hua-Xiang / Wu, Yuwan / Huang, Yubei / Dai, Hongji

    medRxiv

    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-03-26
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.03.23.20034058
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Comparison of spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China

    Xi Zhang / Huaxiang Rao / Yuwan Wu / Yubei Huang / Hongji Dai

    BMC Infectious Diseases, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    2020  Volume 7

    Abstract: ... in mainland China. Methods The number of people infected by COVID-19 and SARS were extracted from daily ... Tianjin) and low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected for SARS. Conclusions COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks ... s I and the local indicators of spatial association (LISA). Results Compared to SARS, COVID-19 had ...

    Abstract Abstract Background Both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) are caused by coronaviruses and have infected people in China and worldwide. We aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 and SARS exhibited similar spatial and temporal features at provincial level in mainland China. Methods The number of people infected by COVID-19 and SARS were extracted from daily briefings on newly confirmed cases during the epidemics, as of Mar. 4, 2020 and Aug. 3, 2003, respectively. We depicted spatiotemporal patterns of the COVID-19 and SARS epidemics using spatial statistics such as Moran’s I and the local indicators of spatial association (LISA). Results Compared to SARS, COVID-19 had a higher overall incidence. We identified 3 clusters (predominantly located in south-central China; the highest RR = 135.08, 95% CI: 128.36–142.08) for COVID-19 and 4 clusters (mainly in Northern China; the highest RR = 423.51, 95% CI: 240.96–722.32) for SARS. Fewer secondary clusters were identified after the “Wuhan lockdown”. The LISA cluster map detected a significantly high-low (Hubei) and low-high spatial clustering (Anhui, Hunan, and Jiangxi, in Central China) for COVID-19. Two significant high-high (Beijing and Tianjin) and low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected for SARS. Conclusions COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks exhibited distinct spatiotemporal clustering patterns at the provincial levels in mainland China, which may be attributable to changes in social and demographic factors, local government containment strategies or differences in transmission mechanisms.
    Keywords Coronavirus ; COVID-19 ; SARS ; Epidemic ; Spatial clustering ; Infectious and parasitic diseases ; RC109-216 ; covid19
    Subject code 950
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Comparison of spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China

    Zhang, Xi / Rao, Huaxiang / Wu, Yuwan / Huang, Yubei / Dai, Hongji

    BMC Infect Dis

    Abstract: ... whether COVID-19 and SARS exhibited similar spatial and temporal features at provincial level in mainland China ... low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected for SARS. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks exhibited ... spatiotemporal patterns of the COVID-19 and SARS epidemics using spatial statistics such as Moran's I and ...

    Abstract BACKGROUND: Both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) are caused by coronaviruses and have infected people in China and worldwide. We aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 and SARS exhibited similar spatial and temporal features at provincial level in mainland China. METHODS: The number of people infected by COVID-19 and SARS were extracted from daily briefings on newly confirmed cases during the epidemics, as of Mar. 4, 2020 and Aug. 3, 2003, respectively. We depicted spatiotemporal patterns of the COVID-19 and SARS epidemics using spatial statistics such as Moran's I and the local indicators of spatial association (LISA). RESULTS: Compared to SARS, COVID-19 had a higher overall incidence. We identified 3 clusters (predominantly located in south-central China; the highest RR = 135.08, 95% CI: 128.36-142.08) for COVID-19 and 4 clusters (mainly in Northern China; the highest RR = 423.51, 95% CI: 240.96-722.32) for SARS. Fewer secondary clusters were identified after the "Wuhan lockdown". The LISA cluster map detected a significantly high-low (Hubei) and low-high spatial clustering (Anhui, Hunan, and Jiangxi, in Central China) for COVID-19. Two significant high-high (Beijing and Tianjin) and low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected for SARS. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks exhibited distinct spatiotemporal clustering patterns at the provincial levels in mainland China, which may be attributable to changes in social and demographic factors, local government containment strategies or differences in transmission mechanisms.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #894993
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Comparison of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the COVID-19 and SARS outbreaks in mainland China

    Zhang, Xi / Rao, Hua-Xiang / Wu, Yuwan / Huang, Yubei / Dai, Hongji

    Abstract: ... 08) for COVID-19 and 4 clusters (mainly in Northern China, highest RR=423.51) for SARS. Fewer ... whether COVID-19 and SARS exhibited similar spatial and temporal features at the provincial level in mainland ... China. Methods: The number of people infected by COVID-19 and SARS were extracted from daily briefings ...

    Abstract Background: Both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) are caused by coronaviruses and have infected people in China and worldwide. We aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 and SARS exhibited similar spatial and temporal features at the provincial level in mainland China. Methods: The number of people infected by COVID-19 and SARS were extracted from daily briefings on newly confirmed cases during the epidemics, as of Mar. 4, 2020 and Aug. 3, 2003, respectively. We depicted the spatiotemporal patterns of the COVID-19 and SARS epidemics using spatial statistics such as Moran's I and the local indicators of spatial association (LISA). Results: Compared to SARS, COVID-19 had a higher incidence. We identified 3 clusters (predominantly located in south-central China, highest RR=135.08) for COVID-19 and 4 clusters (mainly in Northern China, highest RR=423.51) for SARS. Fewer secondary clusters were identified after the “Wuhan lockdown”. The LISA cluster map detected a significantly high-low (Hubei) and low-high spatial clustering (Anhui, Hunan, and Jiangxi, in Central China) for COVID-19. Two significant high-high (Beijing and Tianjin) and low-high (Hebei) clusters were detected for SARS, although the global Moran's I value was not significant. Conclusions: The different spatiotemporal clustering patterns between COVID-19 and SARS could point to changes in social and demographic factors, local government containment strategies or differences in transmission mechanisms between these coronaviruses.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher MedRxiv; WHO
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.03.23.20034058
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top