LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 137

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: "Is It Safe for Me to Go to Work?" Risk Stratification for Workers during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

    Larochelle, Marc R

    The New England journal of medicine

    2020  Volume 383, Issue 5, Page(s) e28

    MeSH term(s) Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology ; Employment ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology ; Return to Work ; Risk Assessment ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Safety ; Workplace
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-26
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 207154-x
    ISSN 1533-4406 ; 0028-4793
    ISSN (online) 1533-4406
    ISSN 0028-4793
    DOI 10.1056/NEJMp2013413
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Change in opioid and buprenorphine prescribers and prescriptions by specialty, 2016-2021.

    Larochelle, Marc R / Jones, Christopher M / Zhang, Kun

    Drug and alcohol dependence

    2023  Volume 248, Page(s) 109933

    Abstract: Background: Safer opioid analgesic prescribing and increasing use of medications for opioid use disorder, including buprenorphine, are strategies prioritized to reduce opioid overdose deaths in the United States. Specialty-specific trends in the number ... ...

    Abstract Background: Safer opioid analgesic prescribing and increasing use of medications for opioid use disorder, including buprenorphine, are strategies prioritized to reduce opioid overdose deaths in the United States. Specialty-specific trends in the number of prescribers and prescriptions for opioid analgesics and buprenorphine are not well characterized.
    Methods: We used data from the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription database for January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2021. We identified opioid and buprenorphine prescriptions based on NDC codes. We classified prescribers into one of 14 mutually exclusive specialty groups. We calculated the number of prescribers and number of prescriptions for opioids and buprenorphine by specialty and year.
    Results: From 2016 to 2021, the total number of opioid analgesic prescriptions dispensed decreased by 32% to 121,693,308 and the number of unique opioid analgesic prescribers decreased 7% to 966,369. Over the same time period, the number of buprenorphine prescriptions dispensed increased 36% to 13,909,724 and unique number of buprenorphine prescribers increased 86% to 59,090. Across most specialties we identified a contraction in the number of opioid prescriptions dispensed and opioid prescribers and an expansion in the number of buprenorphine prescriptions dispensed. Among high-volume opioid prescribing specialties, the largest decrease in opioid prescribers was 32% among Pain Medicine clinicians. By 2021, Advanced Practice Practitioners overtook Primary Care clinicians as the highest volume buprenorphine prescribers.
    Conclusions: More work is needed to understand the impact of clinicians who stop prescribing opioids. While the trend in buprenorphine prescribing is encouraging, further expansion is warranted to meet the underlying need.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; United States ; Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use ; Buprenorphine/therapeutic use ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy ; Prescriptions ; Drug Prescriptions
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid ; Buprenorphine (40D3SCR4GZ)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-05-18
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 519918-9
    ISSN 1879-0046 ; 0376-8716
    ISSN (online) 1879-0046
    ISSN 0376-8716
    DOI 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109933
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Commentary on Karnik et al.: Harmonization now-the need for consistent, validated measures to identify opioid use disorder in observational data.

    Morgan, Jake R / LaRochelle, Marc R

    Addiction (Abingdon, England)

    2022  Volume 117, Issue 9, Page(s) 2448–2449

    MeSH term(s) Analgesics, Opioid ; Humans ; Opioid-Related Disorders
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-06-28
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1141051-6
    ISSN 1360-0443 ; 0965-2140
    ISSN (online) 1360-0443
    ISSN 0965-2140
    DOI 10.1111/add.15977
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Among opioid-naive patients receiving opioids, more intensive opioid prescribing in the first month is associated with transition to long-term opioid use.

    Larochelle, Marc R

    Evidence-based medicine

    2017  Volume 22, Issue 3, Page(s) 112

    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1324346-9
    ISSN 1473-6810 ; 1356-5524
    ISSN (online) 1473-6810
    ISSN 1356-5524
    DOI 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110710
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Out-of-pocket spending and health care utilization associated with initiation of different medications for opioid use disorder: Findings from a national commercially insured cohort.

    McCann, Nicole C / LaRochelle, Marc R / Morgan, Jake R

    Journal of substance use and addiction treatment

    2023  Volume 159, Page(s) 209281

    Abstract: Introduction: Buprenorphine and naltrexone are effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Naltrexone requires complete detoxification from opioids before initiation while buprenorphine does not, which leads to a differential clinical ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Buprenorphine and naltrexone are effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Naltrexone requires complete detoxification from opioids before initiation while buprenorphine does not, which leads to a differential clinical induction challenge. Few studies have evaluated economic costs associated with MOUD initiation.
    Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the 2014-2019 Merative MarketScan database. We included individuals diagnosed with opioid use, abuse, or dependence from 2014 to 2019 who initiated one of three MOUD types: 1) buprenorphine, 2) extended-release naltrexone, or 3) oral naltrexone. We calculated total and monthly out-of-pocket spending, for overall and MOUD-specific claims, for the three months prior through three months after MOUD initiation. We also calculated utilization of detoxification, inpatient, and outpatient services monthly over this period.
    Results: Our cohort included 27,133 individuals; 19,536, 1886, and 5711 initiated buprenorphine, extended-release naltrexone, and oral naltrexone, respectively. Individuals who initiated naltrexone had the highest out-of-pocket spending over the study period. MOUD-specific spending did not contribute substantially to total out-of-pocket spending. Difference in overall spending by MOUD type was driven by a subset of individuals who initiated naltrexone and had very high out-of-pocket spending in the month prior to MOUD initiation. In this month, mean monthly out-of-pocket spending for high-spenders (above 90th percentile within MOUD type category) was $5734 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: $5181-$6286) and $4622 (95 % CI: $4161-$5082) for those who initiated oral and extended-release naltrexone, respectively, compared with $1852 (95 % CI: $1754-$1950) for those who initiated buprenorphine. In the month prior to MOUD initiation, those who initiated naltrexone also had higher detoxification, inpatient, and outpatient episode/visit frequency. In the month prior to initiation, 28.8 % (95 % CI: 27.7 %-30.0 %) and 25.5 % (95 % CI: 23.6 %-27.5 %) of individuals who initiated oral and extended-release naltrexone had detoxification episodes, compared with 9.7 % (95 % CI: 9.3 %-10.1 %) of those who initiated buprenorphine.
    Conclusion: Findings suggest that individuals who initiated naltrexone utilized more intensive health services, including detoxification, in the period prior to MOUD initiation, resulting in significantly higher out-of-pocket spending. Out-of-pocket spending is a patient-centered outcome reflecting potential patient burden. Our results should be considered as part of the shared decision-making process between patients and providers when choosing treatment for OUD.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Naltrexone/therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Health Expenditures ; Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods ; Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy ; Buprenorphine/therapeutic use ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care
    Chemical Substances Naltrexone (5S6W795CQM) ; Buprenorphine (40D3SCR4GZ)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-18
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2949-8759
    ISSN (online) 2949-8759
    DOI 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209281
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Prior Incarceration Is Associated with Poor Mental Health at Midlife: Findings from a National Longitudinal Cohort Study.

    Bovell-Ammon, Benjamin J / Fox, Aaron D / LaRochelle, Marc R

    Journal of general internal medicine

    2023  Volume 38, Issue 7, Page(s) 1664–1671

    Abstract: Background: People with mental illnesses and people living in poverty have higher rates of incarceration than others, but relatively little is known about the long-term impact that incarceration has on an individual's mental health later in life.: ... ...

    Abstract Background: People with mental illnesses and people living in poverty have higher rates of incarceration than others, but relatively little is known about the long-term impact that incarceration has on an individual's mental health later in life.
    Objective: To evaluate prior incarceration's association with mental health at midlife.
    Design: Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Participants from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79)-a nationally representative age cohort of individuals 15 to 22 years of age in 1979-who remained in follow-up through age 50.
    Main measures: Midlife mental health outcomes were measured as part of a health module administered once participants reached 50 years of age (2008-2019): any mental health history, any depression history, past-year depression, severity of depression symptoms in the past 7 days (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression [CES-D] scale), and mental health-related quality of life in the past 4 weeks (SF-12 Mental Component Score [MCS]). The main exposure was any incarceration prior to age 50.
    Key results: Among 7889 participants included in our sample, 577 (5.4%) experienced at least one incarceration prior to age 50. Prior incarceration was associated with a greater likelihood of having any mental health history (predicted probability 27.0% vs. 16.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.9 [95%CI: 1.4, 2.5]), any history of depression (22.0% vs. 13.3%; aOR 1.8 [95%CI: 1.3, 2.5]), past-year depression (16.9% vs. 8.6%; aOR 2.2 [95%CI: 1.5, 3.0]), and high CES-D score (21.1% vs. 15.4%; aOR 1.5 [95%CI: 1.1, 2.0]) and with a lower (worse) SF-12 MCS (-2.1 points [95%CI: -3.3, -0.9]; standardized mean difference -0.24 [95%CI: -0.37, -0.10]) at age 50, when adjusting for early-life demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors.
    Conclusions: Prior incarceration was associated with worse mental health at age 50 across five measured outcomes. Incarceration is a key social-structural driver of poor mental health.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Longitudinal Studies ; Mental Health ; Retrospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Cohort Studies
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-01-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 639008-0
    ISSN 1525-1497 ; 0884-8734
    ISSN (online) 1525-1497
    ISSN 0884-8734
    DOI 10.1007/s11606-022-07983-7
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Trends in Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Prescriptions in the United States, 2016 to 2019.

    Zhang, Kun / Strahan, Andrea E / Guy, Gery P / Larochelle, Marc R

    Annals of internal medicine

    2022  Volume 175, Issue 7, Page(s) 1051–1053

    MeSH term(s) Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use ; Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use ; Drug Overdose/drug therapy ; Drug Prescriptions ; Humans ; Prescriptions ; Retrospective Studies ; United States
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid ; Benzodiazepines (12794-10-4)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-06-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. ; Letter
    ZDB-ID 336-0
    ISSN 1539-3704 ; 0003-4819
    ISSN (online) 1539-3704
    ISSN 0003-4819
    DOI 10.7326/M21-4656
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Validating opioid use disorder diagnoses in administrative data: a commentary on existing evidence and future directions.

    Scherrer, Jeffrey F / Sullivan, Mark D / LaRochelle, Marc R / Grucza, Richard

    Addiction science & clinical practice

    2023  Volume 18, Issue 1, Page(s) 49

    Abstract: Background: A valid opioid use disorder (OUD) identification algorithm for use in administrative medical record data would enhance investigators' ability to study consequences of OUD, OUD treatment seeking and treatment outcomes.: Main body: Existing ...

    Abstract Background: A valid opioid use disorder (OUD) identification algorithm for use in administrative medical record data would enhance investigators' ability to study consequences of OUD, OUD treatment seeking and treatment outcomes.
    Main body: Existing studies indicate ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for opioid abuse and dependence do not accurately measure OUD. However, critical appraisal of existing literature suggests alternative validation methods would improve the validity of OUD identification algorithms in administrative data. Chart abstraction may not be sufficient to validate OUD, and primary data collection via structured diagnostic interviews might be an ideal gold standard.
    Conclusion and commentary: Generating valid OUD identification algorithms is critical for OUD research and quality measurement in real world health care settings.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Algorithms ; Data Collection ; Opioid-Related Disorders/diagnosis ; Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology ; Research Design
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-17
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2492632-2
    ISSN 1940-0640 ; 1940-0640
    ISSN (online) 1940-0640
    ISSN 1940-0640
    DOI 10.1186/s13722-023-00405-x
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Removal of Medicaid Prior Authorization Requirements and Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.

    Christine, Paul J / Larochelle, Marc R / Lin, Lewei Allison / McBride, Jonathon / Tipirneni, Renuka

    JAMA health forum

    2023  Volume 4, Issue 10, Page(s) e233549

    Abstract: Importance: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. Despite its effectiveness, buprenorphine uptake has been limited relative to the burden of OUD. Prior authorization (PA) policies may ...

    Abstract Importance: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. Despite its effectiveness, buprenorphine uptake has been limited relative to the burden of OUD. Prior authorization (PA) policies may present a barrier to treatment, though research is limited, particularly in Medicaid populations.
    Objective: To assess whether removal of Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine to treat OUD is associated with changes in buprenorphine prescriptions for Medicaid enrollees.
    Design, setting, and participants: This state-level, serial cross-sectional study used quarterly data from 2015 through the first quarter (January-March) of 2019 to compare buprenorphine prescriptions in states that did and did not remove Medicaid PAs. Analyses were conducted between June 10, 2021, and August 15, 2023. The study included 23 states with active Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine in 2015 that required similar PA policies in fee-for-service and managed care plans and had at least 2 quarters of pre- and postperiod buprenorphine prescribing data.
    Exposures: Removal of Medicaid PA for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine for OUD.
    Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was number of quarterly buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees.
    Results: Between 2015 and the first quarter of 2019, 6 states in the sample removed Medicaid PAs for at least 1 formulation of buprenorphine and had at least 2 quarters of pre- and postpolicy change data. Seventeen states maintained buprenorphine PAs throughout the study period. At baseline, relative to states that repealed PAs, states that maintained PAs had lower buprenorphine prescribing per 1000 Medicaid enrollees (median, 6.6 [IQR, 2.6-13.9] vs 24.1 [IQR, 8.7-27.5] prescriptions) and lower Medicaid managed care penetration (median, 38.5% [IQR, 0.0%-74.1%] vs 79.5% [IQR, 78.1%-83.5%] of enrollees) but similar opioid overdose rates and X-waivered buprenorphine clinicians per 100 000 population. In fully adjusted difference-in-differences models, removal of Medicaid PAs for buprenorphine was not associated with buprenorphine prescribing (1.4% decrease; 95% CI, -31.2% to 41.4%). For states with below-median baseline buprenorphine prescribing, PA removal was associated with increased buprenorphine prescriptions per 1000 Medicaid enrollees (40.1%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 95.1%), while states with above-median prescribing showed no change (-20.7%; 95% CI, -41.0% to 6.6%).
    Conclusions and relevance: In this serial cross-sectional study of Medicaid PA policies for buprenorphine for OUD, removal of PAs was not associated with overall changes in buprenorphine prescribing among Medicaid enrollees. Given the ongoing burden of opioid overdoses, continued multipronged efforts are needed to remove barriers to buprenorphine care and increase availability of this lifesaving treatment.
    MeSH term(s) United States/epidemiology ; Humans ; Buprenorphine/therapeutic use ; Medicaid ; Prior Authorization ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy ; Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology ; Opiate Overdose/drug therapy
    Chemical Substances Buprenorphine (40D3SCR4GZ)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-10-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2689-0186
    ISSN (online) 2689-0186
    DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3549
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top