Article ; Online: Update on incidence of inpatient tubal ligation and long-acting reversible contraception in the United States.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
2022 Volume 227, Issue 3, Page(s) 477.e1–477.e7
Abstract: Background: Inpatient insertion of long-acting reversible contraception and immediate postpartum tubal ligation allow women to initiate highly effective contraception before hospital discharge.: Objective: We measured rates of intrauterine device and ...
Abstract | Background: Inpatient insertion of long-acting reversible contraception and immediate postpartum tubal ligation allow women to initiate highly effective contraception before hospital discharge. Objective: We measured rates of intrauterine device and contraceptive implant initiation and tubal ligations performed during delivery hospitalizations from 2016 to 2018 from a representative sample of US hospital discharges. Study design: We used the 2016 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample database, a 20% sample of all community hospital discharges in the United States, to identify delivery hospitalizations with concomitant intrauterine device insertion, contraceptive implant insertion, or tubal ligation. We performed weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between possible predictors (age, delivery mode, payer, geographic region, and year) and odds of long-acting reversible contraception and tubal ligation, and to compare characteristics of users. Results: This sample included 2,216,638 discharges, representing 20% of 11,083,180 delivery hospitalizations across the United States. Intrauterine device insertion increased from 2.2 per 1000 deliveries (2016) to approximately 5.0 per 1000 deliveries (2018; P<.0001); implant insertion increased from 0.3 per 1000 deliveries (2016) to 2.5 per 1000 deliveries (2018; P<.0001); tubal ligation procedures decreased (64.2 to 62.1 per 1000 deliveries; P<.0001). Women who underwent a cesarean delivery had higher odds of having a tubal ligation than those who had a vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 8.83; 95% confidence interval, 8.73-8.97). Women aged <25 years had 7 times higher odds of receiving long-acting reversible contraception than of receiving tubal ligation (adjusted odds ratio, 7.38; 95% confidence interval, 6.90-7.90). Women with public insurance had almost 5 times the odds of receiving long-acting reversible contraception compared with those with commercial insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 4.83; 95% confidence interval, 4.59-5.06). Conclusion: Rates of long-acting reversible contraception insertion continue to increase while the rates of inpatient postpartum tubal ligations slowly decline. Variations in patient characteristics are associated with receiving long-acting reversible contraception or tubal ligation. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Adult ; Contraception/methods ; Contraceptive Agents, Female ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Inpatients ; Intrauterine Devices ; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception ; Pregnancy ; Sterilization, Tubal ; United States/epidemiology |
Chemical Substances | Contraceptive Agents, Female |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2022-05-13 |
Publishing country | United States |
Document type | Journal Article |
ZDB-ID | 80016-8 |
ISSN | 1097-6868 ; 0002-9378 |
ISSN (online) | 1097-6868 |
ISSN | 0002-9378 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.021 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Um I Zs.152: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.