LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 97

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Comparing endometrial preparation methods in frozen embryo transfers - Does a previous live birth make a difference?

    Lee, Nikki / Bhaduri, Mahua / El-Toukhy, Tarek / Khalaf, Yacoub / Kopeika, Julia

    European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology

    2023  Volume 284, Page(s) 52–57

    Abstract: Research question: Does the outcome of a medicated or natural endometrial preparation for a frozen cycle differ if a patient has previously experienced a failed fresh cycle?: Design: Retrospective matched case-controlled study to investigate frozen ... ...

    Abstract Research question: Does the outcome of a medicated or natural endometrial preparation for a frozen cycle differ if a patient has previously experienced a failed fresh cycle?
    Design: Retrospective matched case-controlled study to investigate frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes in women undergone medicated or natural endometrial preparation, with adjustment to the history of previous live birth. 878 frozen cycles were included for analysis, over a period of 2 years.
    Results: After adjusting for the number of embryos transferred, endometrial thickness and the number of previous embryo transfers, there was no difference in live birth rate (LBR) between medicated-FET and natural-FET groups regardless of the previous fertility outcome (p = 0.08).
    Conclusions: A previous live birth does not affect the outcome of a subsequent frozen cycle, regardless of whether medicated- or natural endometrial preparation is used.
    MeSH term(s) Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; Live Birth ; Pregnancy Rate ; Retrospective Studies ; Ovulation Induction/methods ; Embryo Transfer/methods ; Birth Rate ; Cryopreservation/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-15
    Publishing country Ireland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 190605-7
    ISSN 1872-7654 ; 0301-2115 ; 0028-2243
    ISSN (online) 1872-7654
    ISSN 0301-2115 ; 0028-2243
    DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.010
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: The randomized clinical trial trustworthiness crisis

    Furqan A. Butt / Mohammad Fawzy / Bassel H. Al Wattar / Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas / Khalid S. Khan / Yacoub Khalaf

    Middle East Fertility Society Journal, Vol 29, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    2024  Volume 6

    Abstract: Abstract Background The rising number of retracted randomised clinical trials (RCTs) is a concern over their trustworthiness. In today's digital landscape electronic observational data is easily accessible for research purposes. This emerging perspective, ...

    Abstract Abstract Background The rising number of retracted randomised clinical trials (RCTs) is a concern over their trustworthiness. In today's digital landscape electronic observational data is easily accessible for research purposes. This emerging perspective, in tandem with the growing scrutiny of RCT credibility, may steer some researchers towards favouring non-randomized studies. It is crucial to emphasize the ongoing need for robust RCTs, shedding light on the areas within trial design that require enhancements and addressing existing gaps in trial execution. Main body Evidence-based medicine pivots on the nexus between empirical medical research and the theoretical and applied facets of clinical care. Healthcare systems regularly amass patient data, creating a vast reservoir of information. This facilitates large-scale observational studies, which may appear as potential substitutes for RCTs. These large-scale studies inherently possess biases that place them a notch below randomized evidence. Honest errors, data manipulation, lapses in professionalism, and methodological shortcomings tarnish the integrity of RCTs, compromising trust in trials. Research institutions, funding agencies, journal editors and other stakeholders have the responsibility to establish robust frameworks to prevent both deliberate and inadvertent mishandling of RCT design, conduct and analysis. Systematic reviews that collate robust RCTs are invaluable. They amalgamate superior evidence instrumental in improving patient outcomes via informed health policy decisions. For systematic reviews to continue to retain trust, validated integrity assessment tools must be developed and routinely applied. This way it will be possible to prevent false or untrustworthy research from becoming part of the recommendations based on the evidence. Conclusion High-quality RCTs and their systematic reviews play a crucial role in acquiring valid and reliable evidence that is instrumental in improving patient outcomes. They provide vital information on healthcare ...
    Keywords Randomised clinical trials ; Observational studies ; Evidence-based medicine ; Research integrity ; Clinical medicine ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920 ; Reproduction ; QH471-489
    Subject code 306
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher SpringerOpen
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review.

    Núñez-Núñez, María / Maes-Carballo, Marta / Mignini, Luciano E / Chien, Patrick F W / Khalaf, Yacoub / Fawzy, Mohamed / Zamora, Javier / Khan, Khalid S / Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora

    International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

    2023  Volume 162, Issue 3, Page(s) 860–876

    Abstract: Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are experiencing a crisis of confidence in their trustworthiness. Although a comprehensive literature search yielded several reviews on RCT integrity, an overarching overview is lacking.: Objectives: The ... ...

    Abstract Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are experiencing a crisis of confidence in their trustworthiness. Although a comprehensive literature search yielded several reviews on RCT integrity, an overarching overview is lacking.
    Objectives: The authors undertook a scoping umbrella review of the research integrity literature concerning RCTs.
    Search strategy and selection criteria: Following prospective registration (https://osf.io/3ursn), two reviewers independently searched PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, without language or time restrictions, until November 2021. The authors included systematic reviews covering any aspect of research integrity throughout the RCT lifecycle.
    Data collection and analysis: The authors assessed methodological quality using a modified AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool and collated the main findings.
    Main results: A total of 55 relevant reviews, summarizing 6001 studies (median per review, 63; range, 8-1106) from 1964 to 2021, had an overall critically low quality of 96% (53 reviews). Topics covered included general aspects (15%), design and approval (22%), conduct and monitoring (11%), reporting (38%), postpublication concerns (2%), and future research (13%). The most common integrity issues covered were ethics (18%) and transparency (18%).
    Conclusions: Low-quality reviews identified various integrity issues across the RCT lifecycle, emphasizing the importance of high ethical standards and professionalism while highlighting gaps in the integrity landscape. Multistakeholder consensus is needed to develop specific RCT integrity standards.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Consensus ; Language ; Moral Obligations ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-04-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 80149-5
    ISSN 1879-3479 ; 0020-7292
    ISSN (online) 1879-3479
    ISSN 0020-7292
    DOI 10.1002/ijgo.14762
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: A randomized, controlled, first-in-patient trial of choriogonadotropin beta added to follitropin delta in women undergoing ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol.

    Fernández Sánchez, Manuel / Višnová, Hana / Larsson, Per / Yding Andersen, Claus / Filicori, Marco / Blockeel, Christophe / Pinborg, Anja / Khalaf, Yacoub / Mannaerts, Bernadette

    Human reproduction (Oxford, England)

    2022  Volume 37, Issue 6, Page(s) 1161–1174

    Abstract: Study question: Does addition of choriogonadotropin beta (recombinant CG beta) to follitropin delta increase the number of good-quality blastocysts following ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol?: Summary answer: At the doses ... ...

    Abstract Study question: Does addition of choriogonadotropin beta (recombinant CG beta) to follitropin delta increase the number of good-quality blastocysts following ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol?
    Summary answer: At the doses investigated, the addition of CG beta reduced the number of intermediate follicles and related down-stream parameters including the number of oocytes and blastocysts.
    What is known already: CG beta is a novel recombinant hCG (rhCG) molecule expressed by a human cell line (PER.C6®) and has a different glycosylation profile compared to urinary hCG or rhCG derived from a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell line. In the first-in-human trial, the CG beta pharmacokinetics were similar between men and women. In women, the AUC and the peak serum concentration (Cmax) increased approximately dose proportionally following single and multiple daily doses. In men, a single dose of CG beta provided higher exposure with a longer half-life and proportionately higher testosterone production than CHO cell-derived rhCG.
    Study design, size, duration: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial (RAINBOW) was conducted in five European countries to explore the efficacy and safety of CG beta as add-on treatment to follitropin delta in women undergoing ovarian stimulation in a long GnRH agonist protocol. Randomization was stratified by centre and age (30-37 and 38-42 years). The primary endpoint was the number of good-quality blastocysts (Grade 3 BB or higher). Subjects were randomized to receive either placebo or 1, 2, 4, 8 or 12 µg CG beta added to the daily individualized follitropin delta dose during ovarian stimulation.
    Participants/materials, setting, methods: In total, 620 women (30-42 years) with anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels between 5 and 35 pmol/l were randomized in equal proportions to the six treatment groups and 619 subjects started treatment. All 619 subjects were treated with an individualized dose of follitropin delta determined based on AMH (Elecsys AMH Plus Immunoassay) and body weight. Triggering with rhCG was performed when 3 follicles were ≥17 mm but no more than 25 follicles ≥12 mm were reached.
    Main results and the role of chance: The demographic characteristics were comparable between the six treatment groups and the overall mean age, body weight and AMH were 35.6 ± 3.3 years, 65.3 ± 10.7 kg and 15.3 ± 7.0 pmol/l, respectively. The incidence of cycle cancellation (range 0-2.9%), total follitropin delta dose (mean 112 µg) and duration of stimulation (mean 10 days) were similar across the groups. At stimulation Day 6, the number and size of follicles was similar between the treatment groups, whereas at the end-of-stimulation dose-related decrease of the intermediate follicles between 12 and 17 mm was observed in comparison to the placebo group. In contrast, the number of follicles ≥17 mm was similar between the CG beta dose groups and the placebo group. A reduced number of intermediate follicles (12 to 17 mm) and fewer oocytes (mean range 9.7 to 11.2) were observed for all doses of CG beta compared to the follitropin delta only group (mean 12.5). The mean number of good-quality blastocysts was 3.3 in the follitropin delta group and ranged between 2.1 and 3.0 across the CG beta groups. The incidence of transfer cancellation was higher in the 4, 8 and 12 µg group, mostly as no blastocyst was available for transfer. In the group receiving only follitropin delta, the ongoing pregnancy rate (10-11 weeks after transfer) was 43% per started cycle versus 28-39% in CG beta groups and 49% per transfer versus 38-50% in the CG beta groups. There was no apparent effect of CG beta on the incidence of adverse events, which was 48.1% in the placebo group and 39.6-52.3% in the CG beta dose groups. In line with the number of collected oocytes, the overall ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome incidence remained lower following follitropin delta with CG beta (2.0-10.3%) compared with follitropin delta only treatment (11.5%). Regardless of the dose, CG beta was safe and well-tolerated with low risk of immunogenicity.
    Limitations, reasons for caution: The effect of the unique glycosylation of CG beta and its associated potency implications in women were not known prior to this trial. Further studies will be needed to evaluate optimal doses of CG beta for this and/or different indications.
    Wider implications of the findings: The high ongoing pregnancy rate in the follitropin delta group supports the use of individualized follitropin delta dosing in a long GnRH agonist protocol. The addition of CG beta reduced the presence of intermediate follicles with the investigated doses and negatively affected all down-stream parameters. Further clinical research will be needed to assess the optimal dose of CG beta in the optimal ratio to follitropin delta to develop this novel combination product containing both FSH and LH activity for ovarian stimulation.
    Study funding/competing interest(s): The study was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Copenhagen, Denmark. B.M. and P.L. are employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. M.F.S., H.V., C.Y.A., M.F., C.B., A.P. and Y.K. have received institutional clinical trial fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. C.B. has received payments for lectures from Organon, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S and Abbott. M.F.S. has received payment for lectures from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Y.K. has received payment for lectures from Merck and travel support from Gedeon Richter. H.V. has received consulting fees from Oxo and Obseva and travel support from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck. C.Y.A. has received payment for lectures from IBSA, Switzerland. M.F and C.Y.A. were reimbursed as members of the Data Monitoring Board in this trial. M.F. has an issued patent about unitary combination of FSH and hCG (EP1633389).
    Trial registration number: 2017-003810-13 (EudraCT Number).
    Trial registration date: 21 May 2018.
    Date of first patient’s enrolment: 13 June 2018.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Anti-Mullerian Hormone ; Body Weight ; CHO Cells ; Chorionic Gonadotropin ; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human ; Cricetinae ; Cricetulus ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro/methods ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone ; Humans ; Ovulation Induction/methods ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Recombinant Proteins
    Chemical Substances Chorionic Gonadotropin ; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; Recombinant Proteins ; follitropin delta (076WHW89TW) ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (33515-09-2) ; Anti-Mullerian Hormone (80497-65-0)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-22
    Publishing country England
    Document type Clinical Trial Protocol ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 632776-x
    ISSN 1460-2350 ; 0268-1161 ; 1477-741X
    ISSN (online) 1460-2350
    ISSN 0268-1161 ; 1477-741X
    DOI 10.1093/humrep/deac061
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Introduction to evidence-based reproductive medicine symposium.

    Khalaf, Yacoub / Cohen, Jacques

    Reproductive biomedicine online

    2013  Volume 26, Issue 3, Page(s) 199–200

    MeSH term(s) Evidence-Based Medicine/trends ; Reproductive Medicine/trends ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/trends
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-03
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Editorial ; Introductory Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2113823-0
    ISSN 1472-6491 ; 1472-6483
    ISSN (online) 1472-6491
    ISSN 1472-6483
    DOI 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.01.012
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Book: Fibroids and Reproduction

    Rizk, Botros R.M.B. / Khalaf, Yakoub / Borahay, Mostafa A.

    2021  

    Abstract: The most common abnormal growth of the female reproductive system, fibroids, are thought to affect the majority of women at some point during their reproductive years. This text from leading fibroid experts looks at the latest evidence on how the problem ...

    Author's details Botros R.M.B. Rizk MD, MA, FRCOG, FRCS, HCLD, FACOG, FACS is Medical Director, Elite IVF, Houston, Texas; Medical Director, Advanced Fertility Centers, Odessa Fertility Lab Director, Odessa, Texas; President, Middle East Fertility Society; Adjunct Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University Medical School, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasr El Eini Hospital, Cairo, Egypt; Formerly Professor and Head, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA§Yakoub Khalaf MBBCh, MSc, MD, FRCOG, MFFP is Professor of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital and King’s College London, and Head of Fertility Services and Director of the Assisted Conception Unit and Centre for Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK§Mostafa A. Borahay MD, PhD is Associate Professor of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Director of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery at Johns Hopki
    Abstract The most common abnormal growth of the female reproductive system, fibroids, are thought to affect the majority of women at some point during their reproductive years. This text from leading fibroid experts looks at the latest evidence on how the problem impinges on reproduction and the most up-to-date management and treatment options available to help patients with fibroids hoping to conceive. -- Print versions of this book also include access to the eBook version with links to procedural vi...
    Keywords leiomyomas ; myomas ; uterine myomas ; UAE ; Submucosal Fibroid ; Uterine Fibroids ; Intramural Fibroids ; Recurrent pregnancy loss ; Hysteroscopic Myomectomy ; Focused ultrasound treatment ; Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ; Submucosal fibroids ; Lm ; Female reproductive system ; SPRMs ; Surgical treatment ; Symptomatic Fibroids ; GnRH Agonist ; Uterine Cavity ; UPA ; Saline Infusion Sonohysterography ; Subserosal Fibroid ; Fibroid Growth ; Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding ; Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound ; RPL ; Art Outcome ; Endometrial Receptivity ; Uterine Leiomyomas ; Figo Classification ; Cesarean Delivery ; UFE ; Open Myomectomy
    Language English
    Size 130 p.
    Edition 1
    Publisher Taylor & Francis Ltd
    Document type Book
    Note PDA Manuell_7
    Format 178 x 254
    ISBN 9781138305427 ; 1138305421
    Database PDA

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Potential of human twin embryos generated by embryo splitting in assisted reproduction and research.

    Noli, Laila / Ogilvie, Caroline / Khalaf, Yacoub / Ilic, Dusko

    Human reproduction update

    2017  Volume 23, Issue 2, Page(s) 156–165

    Abstract: Background: Embryo splitting or twinning has been widely used in veterinary medicine over 20 years to generate monozygotic twins with desirable genetic characteristics. The first human embryo splitting, reported in 1993, triggered fierce ethical debate ... ...

    Abstract Background: Embryo splitting or twinning has been widely used in veterinary medicine over 20 years to generate monozygotic twins with desirable genetic characteristics. The first human embryo splitting, reported in 1993, triggered fierce ethical debate on human embryo cloning. Since Dolly the sheep was born in 1997, the international community has acknowledged the complexity of the moral arguments related to this research and has expressed concerns about the potential for reproductive cloning in humans. A number of countries have formulated bans either through laws, decrees or official statements. However, in general, these laws specifically define cloning as an embryo that is generated via nuclear transfer (NT) and do not mention embryo splitting. Only the UK includes under cloning both embryo splitting and NT in the same legislation. On the contrary, the Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine does not have a major ethical objection to transferring two or more artificially created embryos with the same genome with the aim of producing a single pregnancy, stating that 'since embryo splitting has the potential to improve the efficacy of IVF treatments for infertility, research to investigate the technique is ethically acceptable'.
    Objective and rationale: Embryo splitting has been introduced successfully to the veterinary medicine several decades ago and today is a part of standard practice. We present here an overview of embryo splitting experiments in humans and non-human primates and discuss the potential of this technology in assisted reproduction and research.
    Search methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out using PUBMED and Google Scholar databases to identify studies on embryo splitting in humans and non-human primates. 'Embryo splitting' and 'embryo twinning' were used as the keywords, alone or in combination with other search phrases relevant to the topics of biology of preimplantation embryos.
    Outcomes: A very limited number of studies have been conducted in humans and non-human primates. The published material, especially the studies with human embryos, is controversial. Some reports suggest that twinning technology will find clinical use in reproductive medicine in the future, whereas others conclude the opposite that human twin embryos created in vitro are unsuitable not only for clinical, but also for research, purposes.
    Wider implications: The blastomere biopsy technique of embryo splitting seems to be unsuitable for either clinical or research purposes; however, embryo bisection, a preferable method of cloning in veterinary medicine, has not yet been tested on human embryos.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Blastocyst ; Cattle ; Cloning, Organism/ethics ; Cloning, Organism/legislation & jurisprudence ; Embryo Transfer/methods ; Embryonic Development ; Female ; Humans ; Infertility/therapy ; Infertility/veterinary ; Primates ; Twinning, Monozygotic ; Twins
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-01-19
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1286738-x
    ISSN 1460-2369 ; 1355-4786
    ISSN (online) 1460-2369
    ISSN 1355-4786
    DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmw041
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Author Correction: Segregation of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy through a developmental genetic bottleneck in human embryos.

    Floros, Vasileios I / Pyle, Angela / Dietmann, Sabine / Wei, Wei / Tang, Walfred W C / Irie, Naoko / Payne, Brendan / Capalbo, Antonio / Noli, Laila / Coxhead, Jonathan / Hudson, Gavin / Crosier, Moira / Strahl, Henrik / Khalaf, Yacoub / Saitou, Mitinori / Ilic, Dusko / Surani, M Azim / Chinnery, Patrick F

    Nature cell biology

    2022  Volume 25, Issue 1, Page(s) 194

    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-15
    Publishing country England
    Document type Published Erratum
    ZDB-ID 1474722-4
    ISSN 1476-4679 ; 1465-7392
    ISSN (online) 1476-4679
    ISSN 1465-7392
    DOI 10.1038/s41556-022-01046-z
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Book ; Online ; E-Book: Controversies in assisted reproduction

    Rizk, Botros / Khalaf, Yakoub

    2020  

    Author's details edited by Botros Rizk, Yakoub Khalaf
    Keywords Electronic books
    Language English
    Size 1 Online-Ressource (ix, 167 Seiten), Illustrationen, Diagramme
    Publisher CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group
    Publishing place Boca Raton
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Book ; Online ; E-Book
    Remark Zugriff für angemeldete ZB MED-Nutzerinnen und -Nutzer
    HBZ-ID HT020403610
    ISBN 978-1-351-24168-7 ; 9780815374633 ; 1-351-24168-0 ; 0815374631
    Database ZB MED Catalogue: Medicine, Health, Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: ABC of subfertility. Tubal subfertility.

    Khalaf, Yacoub

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

    2003  Volume 327, Issue 7415, Page(s) 610–613

    MeSH term(s) Endosonography/methods ; Fallopian Tube Diseases/diagnosis ; Fallopian Tube Diseases/etiology ; Fallopian Tube Diseases/therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterosalpingography/methods ; Infertility, Female/diagnosis ; Infertility, Female/etiology ; Infertility, Female/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2003-09-13
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1362901-3
    ISSN 1756-1833 ; 0959-8154 ; 0959-8146 ; 0959-8138 ; 0959-535X ; 1759-2151
    ISSN (online) 1756-1833
    ISSN 0959-8154 ; 0959-8146 ; 0959-8138 ; 0959-535X ; 1759-2151
    DOI 10.1136/bmj.327.7415.610
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top