LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 38

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Perceived efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in observational studies: Results of the confounding effect of "goals of care".

    Tleyjeh, Prof Imad M / Tlayjeh, Haytham

    International journal of antimicrobial agents

    2021  Volume 57, Issue 4, Page(s) 106308

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/drug therapy ; Coronavirus Infections ; Humans ; Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use ; SARS-CoV-2
    Chemical Substances Hydroxychloroquine (4QWG6N8QKH)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-02-17
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1093977-5
    ISSN 1872-7913 ; 0924-8579
    ISSN (online) 1872-7913
    ISSN 0924-8579
    DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106308
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Mortality Among COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Kashour, Tarek / Bin Abdulhak, Aref A / Tlayjeh, Haytham / Hassett, Leslie C / Noman, Anas / Mohsen, Ala / Al-Mallah, Mouaz H / Tleyjeh, Imad M

    American journal of therapeutics

    2020  Volume 30, Issue 4, Page(s) e336–e346

    Abstract: Background: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are known to increase the expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor, which has been shown to be the receptor for the acute severe ... ...

    Abstract Background: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are known to increase the expression of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor, which has been shown to be the receptor for the acute severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
    Areas of uncertainty: Based on these observations, speculations raised the concerns that ACEIs/ARBs users would be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and would be at higher risk for severe COVID-19 disease and death. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis of the association between prior use of ACEIs and ARBs and mortality due to COVID-19 disease.
    Data sources: A comprehensive search of several databases from November 2019 to June 18, 2020 was conducted. The databases included Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and Scopus. Medrxiv.org was also searched for unpublished data.
    Therapeutic advances: Nine studies with a total of 18,833 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 met our eligibility criteria. Prior use of ACEIs and/or ARBs was associated with reduced mortality among SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, with a pooled adjusted relative risk (aRR) from 6 studies of 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.42-0.94) (I 2 = 65%). Three studies reported separately on ACEIs or ARBs and their association with survival among SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, with a pooled adjusted relative risk of 0.78, 95% CI (0.58-1.04) (I 2 = 0%) and 0.97, 95% CI (0.73-1.30) (I 2 = 0%) respectively. The results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main analysis.
    Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that use of ACEIs/ARBs is associated with a decreased risk of death among SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. This finding provides a reassurance to the public not to stop prescribed ACEIs/ARBs because of fear of severe COVID-19.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; COVID-19/complications ; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Cause of Death ; Hypertension/drug therapy
    Chemical Substances Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1280786-2
    ISSN 1536-3686 ; 1075-2765
    ISSN (online) 1536-3686
    ISSN 1075-2765
    DOI 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001281
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Reducing Futile Acute Care Services for Terminally Ill Patients With Cancer: The Dignity Project.

    Salama, Hind / Al Mutairi, Nashmia / Damlaj, Moussab / Alolayan, Ashwaq / Binahmed, Ahmed / Salama, Hagir / Tlayjeh, Haytham / Alhejazi, Ayman / Lawrence, Myer / Shehata, Hussam / Shami, Mona / Alkaiyat, Mohammad / Jazieh, Abdul Rahman

    JCO oncology practice

    2021  Volume 17, Issue 11, Page(s) e1794–e1802

    Abstract: Purpose: Patients with terminal diseases frequently undergo interventions that are futile and may be detrimental to their quality of life. We conducted a quality improvement project aimed to reduce the utilization of futile acute care services (ACSs) ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: Patients with terminal diseases frequently undergo interventions that are futile and may be detrimental to their quality of life. We conducted a quality improvement project aimed to reduce the utilization of futile acute care services (ACSs) for patients with cancer treated with a palliative intent.
    Methods: A multidisciplinary team reviewed the records of terminally ill patients with cancer who died between November 2017 and May 2018, during their admission at our institution. The review aimed to assess the magnitude of improper utilization of ACSs and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Lack of timely documentation of the goals of care (GOCs) was the main reason for this problem. We defined timely documentation as the availability of electronic documentation of patients' GOC before the need for ACSs. Interventions were implemented to improve the process; postintervention data were captured and compared with the baseline data.
    Results: After the delivery of staff education and the implementation of mandatory documentation of the GOCs in the healthcare electronic record system, the timely documentation of the GOCs for patients with a palliative intent increased significantly from 59% at baseline to 83% in the postintervention phase. The impact of this intervention led to a decrease in admissions to the ICU from 26% to 12% and an estimated annual cost saving of $777,600 in US dollars.
    Conclusion: Our interventions resulted in improved documentation of the GOCs and decrease in the utilization of ACSs including ICU admissions and the associated cost.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Neoplasms/therapy ; Palliative Care ; Quality of Life ; Respect ; Terminally Ill
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-04-27
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 3028198-2
    ISSN 2688-1535 ; 2688-1527
    ISSN (online) 2688-1535
    ISSN 2688-1527
    DOI 10.1200/OP.20.00922
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Association of corticosteroids use and outcomes in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Tlayjeh, Haytham / Mhish, Olaa H / Enani, Mushira A / Alruwaili, Alya / Tleyjeh, Rana / Thalib, Lukman / Hassett, Leslie / Arabi, Yaseen M / Kashour, Tarek / Tleyjeh, Imad M

    Journal of infection and public health

    2020  Volume 13, Issue 11, Page(s) 1652–1663

    Abstract: Background: To systematically review the literature about the association between systemic corticosteroid therapy (CST) and outcomes of COVID-19 patients.: Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, and preprints up to ...

    Abstract Background: To systematically review the literature about the association between systemic corticosteroid therapy (CST) and outcomes of COVID-19 patients.
    Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, and preprints up to July 20, 2020. We included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) that assessed COVID-19 patients treated with CST. We pooled adjusted effect estimates of mortality and other outcomes using a random effect model, among studies at low or moderate risk for bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.
    Results: Out of 1067 citations screened for eligibility, one RCT and 19 cohort studies were included (16,977 hospitalized patients). Ten studies (1 RCT and 9 cohorts) with 10,278 patients examined the effect of CST on short term mortality. The pooled adjusted RR was 0.92 (95% CI 0.69-1.22, I
    Conclusion: In this systematic review, as of July 2020, heterogeneous and low certainty cumulative evidence based on observational studies and one RCT suggests that CST was not associated with reduction in short-term mortality but possibly with a delay in viral clearance in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 of different severities. However, the discordant results between the single RCT and observational studies as well as the heterogeneity observed across observational studies, call for caution in using observational data and suggests the need for more RCTs to identify the clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients' population that could benefit from CST.
    MeSH term(s) Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use ; Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Treatment Outcome
    Chemical Substances Adrenal Cortex Hormones
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-09-29
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2467587-8
    ISSN 1876-035X ; 1876-0341
    ISSN (online) 1876-035X
    ISSN 1876-0341
    DOI 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.008
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Tleyjeh, Imad M / Kashour, Zakariya / Damlaj, Moussab / Riaz, Muhammad / Tlayjeh, Haytham / Altannir, Mustafa / Altannir, Youssef / Al-Tannir, Mohamad / Tleyjeh, Rana / Hassett, Leslie / Kashour, Tarek

    Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

    2020  Volume 27, Issue 2, Page(s) 215–227

    Abstract: Objectives: Cytokine release syndrome with elevated interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels is associated with multiorgan damage and death in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our objective was to perform a living systematic review of the literature ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: Cytokine release syndrome with elevated interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels is associated with multiorgan damage and death in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our objective was to perform a living systematic review of the literature concerning the efficacy and toxicity of the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab in COVID-19 patients.
    Methods: Data sources were Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus up, preprint servers and Google up to October 8, 2020. Study eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies at low or moderate risk of bias. Participants were hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Interventions included tocilizumab versus placebo or standard of care. We pooled crude risk ratios (RRs) of RCTs and adjusted RRs from cohorts, separately. We evaluated inconsistency between studies with I
    Results: Of 1156 citations, 24 studies were eligible (five RCTs and 19 cohorts). Five RCTs at low risk of bias, with 1325 patients, examined the effect of tocilizumab on short-term mortality; pooled RR was 1.09 (95%CI 0.80-1.49, I
    Conclusions: Cumulative moderate-certainty evidence shows that tocilizumab reduces the risk of mechanical ventilation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. While RCTs showed that tocilizumab did not reduce short-term mortality, low-certainty evidence from cohort studies suggests an association between tocilizumab and lower mortality. We did not observe a higher risk of infections or adverse events with tocilizumab use. This review will continuously evaluate the role of tocilizumab in COVID-19 treatment.
    MeSH term(s) Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use ; COVID-19/mortality ; COVID-19/therapy ; Cytokine Release Syndrome/drug therapy ; Cytokine Release Syndrome/mortality ; Cytokine Release Syndrome/therapy ; Humans ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Odds Ratio ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Receptors, Interleukin-6/antagonists & inhibitors ; Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Safety ; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
    Chemical Substances Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Receptors, Interleukin-6 ; tocilizumab (I031V2H011)
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-05
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 1328418-6
    ISSN 1469-0691 ; 1470-9465 ; 1198-743X
    ISSN (online) 1469-0691
    ISSN 1470-9465 ; 1198-743X
    DOI 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.036
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Efficacy of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Kashour, Zakariya / Riaz, Muhammad / Garbati, Musa A / AlDosary, Oweida / Tlayjeh, Haytham / Gerberi, Dana / Murad, M Hassan / Sohail, M Rizwan / Kashour, Tarek / Tleyjeh, Imad M

    The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy

    2020  Volume 76, Issue 1, Page(s) 30–42

    Abstract: Objectives: Clinical studies of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in COVID-19 disease reported conflicting results. We sought to systematically evaluate the effect of CQ and HCQ with or without azithromycin on outcomes of COVID-19 patients.!# ...

    Abstract Objectives: Clinical studies of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in COVID-19 disease reported conflicting results. We sought to systematically evaluate the effect of CQ and HCQ with or without azithromycin on outcomes of COVID-19 patients.
    Methods: We searched multiple databases, preprints and grey literature up to 17 July 2020. We pooled only adjusted-effect estimates of mortality using a random-effect model. We summarized the effect of CQ or HCQ on viral clearance, ICU admission/mechanical ventilation and hospitalization.
    Results: Seven randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 14 cohort studies were included (20 979 patients). Thirteen studies (1 RCT and 12 cohort studies) with 15 938 hospitalized patients examined the effect of HCQ on short-term mortality. The pooled adjusted OR was 1.05 (95% CI 0.96-1.15, I2 = 0%). Six cohort studies examined the effect of the HCQ+azithromycin combination with a pooled adjusted OR of 1.32 (95% CI 1.00-1.75, I2 = 68.1%). Two cohort studies and four RCTs found no effect of HCQ on viral clearance. One small RCT demonstrated improved viral clearance with CQ and HCQ. Three cohort studies found that HCQ had no significant effect on mechanical ventilation/ICU admission. Two RCTs found no effect for HCQ on hospitalization risk in outpatients with COVID-19.
    Conclusions: Moderate certainty evidence suggests that HCQ, with or without azithromycin, lacks efficacy in reducing short-term mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 or risk of hospitalization in outpatients with COVID-19.
    MeSH term(s) Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use ; Azithromycin/therapeutic use ; COVID-19/mortality ; Chloroquine/adverse effects ; Chloroquine/therapeutic use ; Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects ; Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome ; COVID-19 Drug Treatment
    Chemical Substances Antiviral Agents ; Hydroxychloroquine (4QWG6N8QKH) ; Azithromycin (83905-01-5) ; Chloroquine (886U3H6UFF)
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-08
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 191709-2
    ISSN 1460-2091 ; 0305-7453
    ISSN (online) 1460-2091
    ISSN 0305-7453
    DOI 10.1093/jac/dkaa403
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and the Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Hospitalization With COVID-19 Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Tleyjeh, Imad M / Bin Abdulhak, Aref A / Tlayjeh, Haytham / Al-Mallah, Mouaz H / Sohail, M Rizwan / Hassett, Leslie C / Siller-Matula, Jolanta M / Kashour, Tarek

    American journal of therapeutics

    2020  Volume 29, Issue 1, Page(s) e74–e84

    Abstract: Background: SARS-CoV-2 infects its target cells via angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor, a membrane-bound protein found on the surface of many human cells. Treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptors ... ...

    Abstract Background: SARS-CoV-2 infects its target cells via angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor, a membrane-bound protein found on the surface of many human cells. Treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptors blockers (ARB) has been shown to increase angiotensin converting enzyme 2 expression by up to 5-fold.
    Areas of uncertainty: These findings coupled with observations of the high prevalence and mortality among SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with underlying cardiovascular disease have led to a speculation that ACEIs/ARBs may predispose to higher risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis of the association between prior use of ACEIs and ARBs and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or hospitalization due to COVID-19 disease.
    Data sources: We searched Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medrxiv.org preprint server until June 18, 2020.
    Therapeutic advances: Ten studies (6 cohorts and 4 case control) that enrolled a total of 23,892 patients and 853,369 controls were eligible for inclusion in our meta-analysis. One study was excluded from the analysis because of high risk of bias. Prior use of ACEIs was not associated with an increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 or hospitalization due to COVID-19 disease, odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval (0.91-1.05), I2 = 15%. Similarly, prior use of ARBs was not associated with an increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2, odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval (0.98-1.10), I2 = 0%.
    Conclusion: Cumulative evidence suggests that prior use of ACEIs or ARBs is not associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 or hospitalization due to COVID-19 disease. Our results provide a reassurance to the public not to discontinue prescribed ACEIs/ARBs because of fear of COVID-19.
    MeSH term(s) Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects ; COVID-19 ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Hypertension ; SARS-CoV-2
    Chemical Substances Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-28
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 1280786-2
    ISSN 1536-3686 ; 1075-2765
    ISSN (online) 1536-3686
    ISSN 1075-2765
    DOI 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001319
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Long-term outcomes of patients with COVID-19 treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation or usual respiratory support: follow-up study of the Helmet-COVID randomized clinical trial.

    Arabi, Yaseen M / Al-Dorzi, Hasan M / Aldekhyl, Sara / Al Qahtani, Saad / Abdukahil, Sheryl Ann / Al Qasim, Eman / Al Harbi, Mohammad Khulaif / Kharaba, Ayman / Albrahim, Talal / Alshahrani, Mohammed S / Al-Fares, Abdulrahman A / Al Bshabshe, Ali / Mady, Ahmed / Al Duhailib, Zainab / Algethamy, Haifa / Jose, Jesna / Al Mutairi, Mohammed / Al Zumai, Omar / Al Haji, Hussain /
    Alaqeily, Ahmed / Al Wehaibi, Wedyan / Al Aseri, Zohair / Al-Omari, Awad / Tlayjeh, Haytham / Al-Dawood, Abdulaziz

    Intensive care medicine

    2023  Volume 49, Issue 3, Page(s) 302–312

    Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate whether helmet noninvasive ventilation compared to usual respiratory support reduces 180-day mortality and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: To evaluate whether helmet noninvasive ventilation compared to usual respiratory support reduces 180-day mortality and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia.
    Methods: This is a pre-planned follow-up study of the Helmet-COVID trial. In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (n = 320) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were randomized to receive helmet noninvasive ventilation or usual respiratory support. The modified intention-to-treat population consisted of all enrolled patients except three who were lost at follow-up. The study outcomes were 180-day mortality, EuroQoL (EQ)-5D-5L index values, and EQ-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, non-survivors were assigned a value of 0 for EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS.
    Results: Within 180 days, 63/159 patients (39.6%) died in the helmet noninvasive ventilation group compared to 65/158 patients (41.1%) in the usual respiratory support group (risk difference - 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 12.3, 9.3, p = 0.78). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, patients in the helmet noninvasive ventilation and the usual respiratory support groups did not differ in EQ-5D-5L index values (median 0.68 [IQR 0.00, 1.00], compared to 0.67 [IQR 0.00, 1.00], median difference 0.00 [95% CI - 0.32, 0.32; p = 0.91]) or EQ-VAS scores (median 70 [IQR 0, 93], compared to 70 [IQR 0, 90], median difference 0.00 (95% CI - 31.92, 31.92; p = 0.55).
    Conclusions: Helmet noninvasive ventilation did not reduce 180-day mortality or improve HRQoL compared to usual respiratory support among patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Humans ; Noninvasive Ventilation ; COVID-19/therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Head Protective Devices ; Quality of Life ; Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology ; Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-02-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Randomized Controlled Trial ; Multicenter Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 80387-x
    ISSN 1432-1238 ; 0340-0964 ; 0342-4642 ; 0935-1701
    ISSN (online) 1432-1238
    ISSN 0340-0964 ; 0342-4642 ; 0935-1701
    DOI 10.1007/s00134-023-06981-5
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Efficacy of Corticosteroids in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Tlayjeh, Haytham / Mhish, Olaa / Enani, Mushira / Alruwaili, Alya / Tleyjeh, Rana / Thalib, Lukman / Hassett, Leslie / Arabi, Yaseen / Kashour, Tarek / Tleyjeh, Imad

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background: To systematically review the literature about the effect of systemic corticosteroid therapy (CST) on outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, and preprints up to July 20, 2020. ... ...

    Abstract Background: To systematically review the literature about the effect of systemic corticosteroid therapy (CST) on outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science, and preprints up to July 20, 2020. We included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) that assessed COVID-19 patients treated with CST. We pooled adjusted effect estimates of mortality and other outcomes using a random effect model, among studies at low or moderate risk for bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. Results: Out of 1067 citations screened for eligibility, one RCT and 19 cohort studies were included (16,977 hospitalized patients). Ten studies (1 RCT and 9 cohorts) with 10,278 patients examined the effect of CST on short term mortality. The pooled adjusted RR was 0.92 (95% CI 0.69-1.22, I2=81.94 %). This effect was observed across all stages of disease severity. Four cohort studies examined the effect of CST on composite outcome of death, ICU admission and mechanical ventilation need. The pooled adjusted RR was 0.41(0.23-0.73, I2=78.69%). Six cohort studies examined the effect of CST on delayed viral clearance. The pooled adjusted RR was 1.47(95% CI 1.11-1.93, I2=43.38%). Conclusion: Heterogeneous and low certainty cumulative evidence suggests that CST lacks efficacy in reducing short-term mortality while possibly delaying viral clearance in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Because of the discordant results between the single RCT and observational studies, more research should continue to identify the clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients population that could benefit from CST.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-14
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.08.13.20174201
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Outcome of COVID-19 : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Abdulhak, Aref A. Bin / Kashour, Tarek / Noman, Anas / Tlayjeh, Haytham / Mohsen, Ala / Al-Mallah, Mouaz H. / Tleyjeh, Imad M.

    Abstract: Importace: There is conflicting evidence about the role of angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptors blockers (ARBs) in the pathogenesis and outcome of patients infected with acute severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus ...

    Abstract Importace: There is conflicting evidence about the role of angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptors blockers (ARBs) in the pathogenesis and outcome of patients infected with acute severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SASR-CoV-2) virus and growing public concern. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis using inverse variance random effect models including all studies that evaluate the role of ACEIs/ARBs and reported adjusted odds ratio. Results: Nine studies met our eligibility criteria that enrolled a population of 58615 patients infected with SASR-CoV-2. Prior use of ACEIs/ARBs were associated with significant reduction of inpatient mortality among infected patients with SASR-CoV-2, adjusted odds ratio from 4 studies 0.33, 95% confidence interval ( 0.22,0.49) with zero in between studies heterogeneity and with significant reduction of critical or fatal outcome , pooled adjusted odds ratio from 5 studies 0.32,95% confidence interval ( 0.22,0.46) with no in between studies heterogeneity. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that prior use ACEIs /ARBs is associated with a decreased risk of death or critical outcome among SASR-CoV-2 infected patients.This findings is limited by the observational nature of included studies.However, it provides a reassurance to the public not to stop prescribed ACEIs /ARBs due to fear of severe COVID-19. It also calls upon investigators and ethics committee to reconsider the ongoing randomized trials of discontinuation of these drugs.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher MedRxiv; WHO
    Document type Article ; Online
    Note WHO #Covidence: #20093260
    DOI 10.1101/2020.05.06.20093260
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top