LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 23

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Mentoring into productivity during fellowship: A working tripartite model.

    Akenroye, Ayobami T / Keet, Corinne A

    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology

    2021  Volume 147, Issue 5, Page(s) 1627–1628

    MeSH term(s) Efficiency ; Fellowships and Scholarships ; Humans ; Medicine/organization & administration ; Mentoring ; Models, Organizational
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-03-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Editorial ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 121011-7
    ISSN 1097-6825 ; 1085-8725 ; 0091-6749
    ISSN (online) 1097-6825 ; 1085-8725
    ISSN 0091-6749
    DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.026
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Lung function trajectories in a cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma on mepolizumab, omalizumab, or dupilumab.

    Nopsopon, Tanawin / Barrett, Nora A / Phipatanakul, Wanda / Laidlaw, Tanya M / Weiss, Scott T / Akenroye, Ayobami

    Allergy

    2024  

    Abstract: Background: Lung function is an independent predictor of mortality. We evaluated the lung function trajectories of a cohort of patients with asthma receiving biologic therapy.: Methods: We identified 229 monoclonal antibody-naïve adult patients with ... ...

    Abstract Background: Lung function is an independent predictor of mortality. We evaluated the lung function trajectories of a cohort of patients with asthma receiving biologic therapy.
    Methods: We identified 229 monoclonal antibody-naïve adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who initiated omalizumab, mepolizumab, or dupilumab between 2010 and 2022 in a large healthcare system in Boston, MA. Generalized additive mixed models were used to estimate the lung function trajectories during the 156 weeks following biologic initiation. Response was defined as an improvement in FEV
    Results: Eighty-eight patients initiated mepolizumab, 76 omalizumab, and 65 dupilumab. Baseline eosinophil count was highest in the mepolizumab group (405 cells/mcL) and lowest for omalizumab (250 cells/mcL). Both FEV
    Conclusion: In this clinical cohort, mepolizumab, omalizumab, and dupilumab had beneficial effects on FEV
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-02
    Publishing country Denmark
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 391933-x
    ISSN 1398-9995 ; 0105-4538
    ISSN (online) 1398-9995
    ISSN 0105-4538
    DOI 10.1111/all.16002
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Lower myostatin and higher MUC1 levels are associated with better response to mepolizumab and omalizumab in asthma: a protein-protein interaction analyses.

    Akenroye, Ayobami / Nopsopon, Tanawin / Cho, Laura / Moll, Matthew / Weiss, Scott T

    Respiratory research

    2023  Volume 24, Issue 1, Page(s) 305

    Abstract: Introduction: Biomarkers are needed to inform the choice of biologic therapy in patients with asthma given the increasing number of biologics. We aimed to identify proteins associated with response to omalizumab and mepolizumab.: Methods: Aptamer- ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Biomarkers are needed to inform the choice of biologic therapy in patients with asthma given the increasing number of biologics. We aimed to identify proteins associated with response to omalizumab and mepolizumab.
    Methods: Aptamer-based proteomic profiling (SomaScan) was used to assess 1437 proteins from 51 patients with moderate to severe asthma who received omalizumab (n = 29) or mepolizumab (n = 22). Response was defined as the change in asthma-related exacerbations in the 12 months following therapy initiation. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and pre-treatment exacerbation rate. Additionally, body mass index was included in the omalizumab model and eosinophil count in the mepolizumab model. We evaluated the association between molecular signatures and response using negative binomial regression correcting for the false discovery rate (FDR) and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) to identify associated pathways.
    Results: Over two-thirds of patients were female. The average age for omalizumab patients was 42 years and 57 years for mepolizumab. At baseline, the average exacerbation rate was 1.5/year for omalizumab and 2.4/year for mepolizumab. Lower levels of LOXL2 (unadjusted p: 1.93 × 10E-05, FDR-corrected: 0.028) and myostatin (unadjusted: 3.87 × 10E-05, FDR-corrected: 0.028) were associated with better response to mepolizumab. Higher levels of CD9 antigen (unadjusted: 5.30 × 10E-07, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) and MUC1 (unadjusted: 1.15 × 10E-06, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) were associated with better response to omalizumab, and LTB4R (unadjusted: 1.12 × 10E-06, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) with worse response. Protein-protein interaction network modeling showed an enrichment of the TNF- and NF-kB signaling pathways for patients treated with mepolizumab and multiple pathways involving MAPK, including the FcER1 pathway, for patients treated with omalizumab.
    Conclusions: This study provides novel fundamental data on proteins associated with response to mepolizumab or omalizumab in severe asthma and warrants further validation as potential biomarkers for therapy selection.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Female ; Adult ; Male ; Omalizumab/therapeutic use ; Omalizumab/adverse effects ; Anti-Asthmatic Agents ; Myostatin/therapeutic use ; Proteomics ; Asthma/diagnosis ; Asthma/drug therapy ; Asthma/chemically induced ; Biomarkers ; Mucin-1
    Chemical Substances Omalizumab (2P471X1Z11) ; mepolizumab (90Z2UF0E52) ; Anti-Asthmatic Agents ; Myostatin ; Biomarkers ; MUC1 protein, human ; Mucin-1
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2041675-1
    ISSN 1465-993X ; 1465-993X
    ISSN (online) 1465-993X
    ISSN 1465-993X
    DOI 10.1186/s12931-023-02620-1
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Authors' response.

    Akenroye, Ayobami T / Wood, Robert / Keet, Corinne

    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology

    2020  Volume 125, Issue 3, Page(s) 362

    MeSH term(s) Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; Asthma ; Betacoronavirus ; Biological Products ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus ; Coronavirus Infections ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; SARS-CoV-2
    Chemical Substances Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; Biological Products
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-19
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1228189-x
    ISSN 1534-4436 ; 0003-4738 ; 1081-1206
    ISSN (online) 1534-4436
    ISSN 0003-4738 ; 1081-1206
    DOI 10.1016/j.anai.2020.06.018
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Lower myostatin and higher MUC1 levels are associated with better response to mepolizumab and omalizumab in asthma

    Ayobami Akenroye / Tanawin Nopsopon / Laura Cho / Matthew Moll / Scott T. Weiss

    Respiratory Research, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    a protein–protein interaction analyses

    2023  Volume 13

    Abstract: Abstract Introduction Biomarkers are needed to inform the choice of biologic therapy in patients with asthma given the increasing number of biologics. We aimed to identify proteins associated with response to omalizumab and mepolizumab. Methods Aptamer- ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Introduction Biomarkers are needed to inform the choice of biologic therapy in patients with asthma given the increasing number of biologics. We aimed to identify proteins associated with response to omalizumab and mepolizumab. Methods Aptamer-based proteomic profiling (SomaScan) was used to assess 1437 proteins from 51 patients with moderate to severe asthma who received omalizumab (n = 29) or mepolizumab (n = 22). Response was defined as the change in asthma-related exacerbations in the 12 months following therapy initiation. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and pre-treatment exacerbation rate. Additionally, body mass index was included in the omalizumab model and eosinophil count in the mepolizumab model. We evaluated the association between molecular signatures and response using negative binomial regression correcting for the false discovery rate (FDR) and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) to identify associated pathways. Results Over two-thirds of patients were female. The average age for omalizumab patients was 42 years and 57 years for mepolizumab. At baseline, the average exacerbation rate was 1.5/year for omalizumab and 2.4/year for mepolizumab. Lower levels of LOXL2 (unadjusted p: 1.93 × 10E−05, FDR-corrected: 0.028) and myostatin (unadjusted: 3.87 × 10E−05, FDR-corrected: 0.028) were associated with better response to mepolizumab. Higher levels of CD9 antigen (unadjusted: 5.30 × 10E−07, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) and MUC1 (unadjusted: 1.15 × 10E−06, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) were associated with better response to omalizumab, and LTB4R (unadjusted: 1.12 × 10E−06, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) with worse response. Protein–protein interaction network modeling showed an enrichment of the TNF- and NF-kB signaling pathways for patients treated with mepolizumab and multiple pathways involving MAPK, including the FcER1 pathway, for patients treated with omalizumab. Conclusions This study provides novel fundamental data on proteins associated with response to mepolizumab or omalizumab in severe asthma and ...
    Keywords Asthma ; Mepolizumab ; Omalizumab ; Proteomics ; Network medicine ; Protein–protein interaction ; Diseases of the respiratory system ; RC705-779
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Asthma, biologics, corticosteroids, and coronavirus disease 2019.

    Akenroye, Ayobami T / Wood, Robert / Keet, Corinne

    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology

    2020  Volume 125, Issue 1, Page(s) 12–13

    MeSH term(s) Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use ; Asthma/complications ; Asthma/drug therapy ; Betacoronavirus ; Biological Products/therapeutic use ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/complications ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/complications ; SARS-CoV-2
    Chemical Substances Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; Biological Products
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 1228189-x
    ISSN 1534-4436 ; 0003-4738 ; 1081-1206
    ISSN (online) 1534-4436
    ISSN 0003-4738 ; 1081-1206
    DOI 10.1016/j.anai.2020.05.001
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies to Monoclonal Antibodies in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Chen, Ming-Li / Nopsopon, Tanawin / Akenroye, Ayobami

    The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice

    2023  Volume 11, Issue 5, Page(s) 1475–1484.e20

    Abstract: Background: Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) may worsen the efficacy and safety of biologics. However, little is known about the incidence of ADAs associated with the 6 biologics approved for the treatment of asthma in the United States.: Objective: To ... ...

    Abstract Background: Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) may worsen the efficacy and safety of biologics. However, little is known about the incidence of ADAs associated with the 6 biologics approved for the treatment of asthma in the United States.
    Objective: To elucidate the incidence of ADAs and their impact on reported clinical outcomes.
    Methods: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, open-label extension studies, and nonrandomized studies of biologics in patients with asthma indexed in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL between January 1, 2000, and July 9, 2022, were carried out. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent ADAs (incidence) and ADA prevalence.
    Results: A total of 46 studies met the eligibility criteria. ADA incidence over follow-up was 2.91% (95% CI, 1.60-4.55) and was highest in the benralizumab studies (8.35%), with a risk ratio of 4.9 (2.69-8.92) when compared with placebo, and lowest in the omalizumab studies (0.00%). Incidence was 7.61% in the dupilumab studies, 4.39% in reslizumab, 3.63% in mepolizumab, and 1.12% in the tezepelumab studies. Incidence of neutralizing antibodies was 0.00% to 10.74% and was highest for benralizumab (7.12%). Incidence of neutralizing antibodies was higher in the benralizumab every 8 weeks (8.17%) versus every 4 weeks arms (5.81%). Results were consistent in subgroup analyses by study type and length of follow-up.
    Conclusions: Approximately 2.9% of individuals in the included studies developed ADAs over study follow-up period. The incidence was highest in the benralizumab group and lowest in the omalizumab group. The subcutaneous route and longer dosing intervals were associated with higher ADA development.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use ; Omalizumab/therapeutic use ; Incidence ; Asthma/drug therapy ; Asthma/epidemiology ; Biological Products/therapeutic use ; Antibodies, Neutralizing/therapeutic use ; Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use
    Chemical Substances Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Omalizumab (2P471X1Z11) ; Biological Products ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Anti-Asthmatic Agents
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-01-28
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review ; Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2843237-X
    ISSN 2213-2201 ; 2213-2198
    ISSN (online) 2213-2201
    ISSN 2213-2198
    DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.046
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Lower Use of Biologics for the Treatment of Asthma in Publicly Insured Individuals.

    Akenroye, Ayobami T / Heyward, James / Keet, Corinne / Alexander, G Caleb

    The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice

    2021  Volume 9, Issue 11, Page(s) 3969–3976

    Abstract: Background: Despite bearing a disproportionate burden of poorly controlled asthma, publicly insured individuals are less likely to receive biologics.: Objective: To assess biologic use by payer among individuals with asthma.: Methods: We used ... ...

    Abstract Background: Despite bearing a disproportionate burden of poorly controlled asthma, publicly insured individuals are less likely to receive biologics.
    Objective: To assess biologic use by payer among individuals with asthma.
    Methods: We used IQVIA's National Disease and Therapeutic Index, a nationally representative, all-payer audit of ambulatory care in the United States, to describe the patterns of use by payer.
    Results: Asthma treatment visits in which a biologic product was reported increased from approximately 0.1% of asthma-related visits in 2003 to 1% in 2015 and doubled to 2% by 2019. Omalizumab use initially increased from 2003 to 2006 and plateaued till 2015 when its use declined modestly, coinciding with the release of additional biologic products. In 2019, omalizumab accounted for 37% of biologic treatment visits, mepolizumab 21%, benralizumab 27%, dupilumab 15%, and reslizumab <1%. Biologic treatment visits were higher for privately insured individuals (28.3 per 1000 visits) compared with publicly insured individuals (16.3 per 1000 visits). This difference persisted after accounting for age, sex, and race using nationally representative estimates. White patients accounted for a disproportionate amount of biologic treatment visits among the publicly insured (80%) despite accounting for only 60% of publicly insured asthma treatment visits. No biologic treatment visits were observed for individuals who were uninsured. Half of dupilumab visits were for publicly insured patients, compared with 22% of mepolizumab/benralizumab and 27% of omalizumab visits.
    Conclusion: Biologics were uncommonly used among patients with asthma, and the basis for disproportionately lower use of biologics among the publicly insured, where the burden of uncontrolled asthma is greatest, merits further investigation.
    MeSH term(s) Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use ; Asthma/drug therapy ; Asthma/epidemiology ; Biological Products/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Medicaid ; Omalizumab/therapeutic use
    Chemical Substances Anti-Asthmatic Agents ; Biological Products ; Omalizumab (2P471X1Z11)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-02-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2843237-X
    ISSN 2213-2201 ; 2213-2198
    ISSN (online) 2213-2201
    ISSN 2213-2198
    DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.039
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Comparative effectiveness of omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in asthma: A target trial emulation.

    Akenroye, Ayobami T / Segal, Jodi B / Zhou, Guohai / Foer, Dinah / Li, Lily / Alexander, G Caleb / Keet, Corinne A / Jackson, John W

    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology

    2023  Volume 151, Issue 5, Page(s) 1269–1276

    Abstract: Background: Multiple mAbs are currently approved for the treatment of asthma. However, there is limited evidence on their comparative effectiveness.: Objective: Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in ... ...

    Abstract Background: Multiple mAbs are currently approved for the treatment of asthma. However, there is limited evidence on their comparative effectiveness.
    Objective: Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in individuals with moderate-to-severe asthma.
    Methods: We emulated a hypothetical randomized trial using electronic health records from a large US-based academic health care system. Participants aged 18 years or older with baseline IgE levels between 30 and 700 IU/mL and peripheral eosinophil counts of at least 150 cells/μL were eligible for study inclusion. The study period extended from March 2016 to August 2021. Outcomes included the incidence of asthma-related exacerbations and change in baseline FEV
    Results: In all, 68 individuals receiving dupilumab, 68 receiving omalizumab, and 65 receiving mepolizumab met the inclusion criteria. Over 12 months of follow-up, 31 exacerbations occurred over 68 person years (0.46 exacerbations per person year) in the dupilumab group, 63 over 68 person years (0.93 per person year) in the omalizumab group, and 86 over 65 person years (1.32 per person year) in the mepolizumab group (adjusted incidence rate ratios: dupilumab vs mepolizumab, 0.28 [95% CI = 0.09-0.84]; dupilumab vs omalizumab, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.12-1.09]; and omalizumab vs mepolizumab, 0.78 [95% CI = 0.32-1.91]). The differences in the change in FEV
    Conclusions: Among patients with asthma and eosinophil counts of at least 150 cells/μL and IgE levels of 30 to 700 kU/L, dupilumab was associated with greater improvements in exacerbation and FEV
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use ; Asthma/etiology ; Immunoglobulin E/therapeutic use ; Omalizumab/therapeutic use ; Comparative Effectiveness Research
    Chemical Substances Anti-Asthmatic Agents ; dupilumab (420K487FSG) ; Immunoglobulin E (37341-29-0) ; mepolizumab (90Z2UF0E52) ; Omalizumab (2P471X1Z11)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-02-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Clinical Trial ; Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 121011-7
    ISSN 1097-6825 ; 1085-8725 ; 0091-6749
    ISSN (online) 1097-6825 ; 1085-8725
    ISSN 0091-6749
    DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.020
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top