LIVIVO - Search results -

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 14

Search options

Conference proceedings: QuickPubMed – Diabetes: Development of a tool for easy information searching for clinicians

Norgaard, Ole / Rasmussen, Lauge Neimann / Helms Andersen, Tue

2022 , Page(s) 22irm17

Event/congress	Information Retrieval Meeting (IRM 2022); Cologne; 2022
Keywords	Medizin, Gesundheit ; PubMed ; searching ; development ; implementation ; E-utilities
Publishing date	2022-06-08
Publisher	German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; Düsseldorf
Document type	Conference proceedings
DOI	10.3205/22irm17
Database	German Medical Science

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Details ▾

Article ; Online: The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews: a survey and meta-epidemiological study.

Neimann Rasmussen, Lauge / Montgomery, Paul

Systematic reviews

2018 Volume 7, Issue 1, Page(s) 129

Abstract: Background: Studies published in languages other than English are often neglected when research teams conduct systematic reviews. Literature on how to deal with non-English studies when conducting reviews have focused on the importance of including such ...

Abstract	Background: Studies published in languages other than English are often neglected when research teams conduct systematic reviews. Literature on how to deal with non-English studies when conducting reviews have focused on the importance of including such studies, while less attention has been paid to the practical challenges of locating and assessing relevant non-English studies. We investigated the factors which might predict the inclusion of non-English studies in systematic reviews in the social sciences, to better understand how, when and why these are included/excluded. Methods: We appraised all Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews (n = 123) published to July 2016, categorising each by its language inclusiveness. We sought additional information from review authors via a questionnaire and received responses concerning 47 reviews. Data were obtained for 17 factors and we explored correlations with the number of non-English studies in the reviews via statistical regression models. Additionally, we asked authors to identify factors that support or hinder the inclusion of non-English studies. Results: Of 123 reviews, 108 did not explicitly exclude, and of these, 17 included non-English language studies. One factor correlated with the number of included non-English studies across all models: the number of countries in which the members of the review team work (B-value = 0.56; SE B = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.07-1.03; p = 0.02). This indicates that reviews which included non-English studies were more likely to be produced by international review teams. Our survey showed a dominance of researchers from English-speaking countries (52.9%) and review teams consisting only of team members from these countries (65.9%). The most frequently mentioned challenge to including non-English studies was a lack of resources (funding and time) followed by a lack of language resources (e.g. professional translators). Conclusion: Our findings may indicate a connection between the limited inclusion of non-English studies and a lack of resources, which forces review teams to rely on their limited language skills rather than the support of professional translators. If unaddressed, review teams risk ignoring key data and introduce bias in otherwise high-quality reviews. However, the validity and interpretation of our findings should be further assessed if we are to tackle the challenges of dealing with non-English studies.
MeSH term(s)	Bias ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Humans ; Language ; Prevalence ; Research ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translating
Language	English
Publishing date	2018-08-23
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article ; Systematic Review
ZDB-ID	2662257-9
ISSN	2046-4053 ; 2046-4053
ISSN (online)	2046-4053
ISSN	2046-4053
DOI	10.1186/s13643-018-0786-6
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

Article ; Online: Authors' Reply to: Redundancy of Terms in Search Strategies. Comment on "Searching PubMed to Retrieve Publications on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Search Strings".

Rasmussen, Lauge Neimann / Norgaard, Ole / Andersen, Tue Helms / Palayew, Adam / Nicholson, Joey / Lazarus, Jeffrey V

Journal of medical Internet research

2021 Volume 23, Issue 5, Page(s) e29507

MeSH term(s)	COVID-19 ; Humans ; Pandemics ; PubMed ; SARS-CoV-2
Language	English
Publishing date	2021-05-28
Publishing country	Canada
Document type	Journal Article ; Comment
ZDB-ID	2028830-X
ISSN	1438-8871 ; 1439-4456
ISSN (online)	1438-8871
ISSN	1439-4456
DOI	10.2196/29507
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Article ; Online: The prevalence of and factors associated with inclusion of non-English language studies in Campbell systematic reviews

Lauge Neimann Rasmussen / Paul Montgomery

Systematic Reviews, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-

a survey and meta-epidemiological study

2018 Volume 12

Abstract: Abstract Background Studies published in languages other than English are often neglected when research teams conduct systematic reviews. Literature on how to deal with non-English studies when conducting reviews have focused on the importance of ... ...

Abstract	Abstract Background Studies published in languages other than English are often neglected when research teams conduct systematic reviews. Literature on how to deal with non-English studies when conducting reviews have focused on the importance of including such studies, while less attention has been paid to the practical challenges of locating and assessing relevant non-English studies. We investigated the factors which might predict the inclusion of non-English studies in systematic reviews in the social sciences, to better understand how, when and why these are included/excluded. Methods We appraised all Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews (n = 123) published to July 2016, categorising each by its language inclusiveness. We sought additional information from review authors via a questionnaire and received responses concerning 47 reviews. Data were obtained for 17 factors and we explored correlations with the number of non-English studies in the reviews via statistical regression models. Additionally, we asked authors to identify factors that support or hinder the inclusion of non-English studies. Results Of 123 reviews, 108 did not explicitly exclude, and of these, 17 included non-English language studies. One factor correlated with the number of included non-English studies across all models: the number of countries in which the members of the review team work (B-value = 0.56; SE B = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.07–1.03; p = 0.02). This indicates that reviews which included non-English studies were more likely to be produced by international review teams. Our survey showed a dominance of researchers from English-speaking countries (52.9%) and review teams consisting only of team members from these countries (65.9%). The most frequently mentioned challenge to including non-English studies was a lack of resources (funding and time) followed by a lack of language resources (e.g. professional translators). Conclusion Our findings may indicate a connection between the limited inclusion of non-English studies and a lack ...
Keywords	Systematic reviews ; Language bias ; Location bias ; Country bias ; Campbell Collaboration ; Medicine ; R
Subject code	420
Language	English
Publishing date	2018-08-01T00:00:00Z
Publisher	BMC
Document type	Article ; Online
Database	BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

Full text online

Full text

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article ; Online: Effect of adjunctive glucose-lowering drugs on body weight in people with type 1 diabetes

Christian Laugesen / Ajenthen G. Ranjan / Lauge Neimann Rasmussen / Ole Nørgaard

BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss

a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

2020 Volume 11

Abstract: Introduction Obesity increases the risk of comorbidities and diabetes-related complications and, consequently, efforts to prevent and reduce excess weight in people with type 1 diabetes are essential. The aim of this systematic review and network meta- ... ...

Abstract	Introduction Obesity increases the risk of comorbidities and diabetes-related complications and, consequently, efforts to prevent and reduce excess weight in people with type 1 diabetes are essential. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to assess the effect of adjunctive glucose-lowering drugs on body weight and other important health outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes.Methods and analysis This systematic review and network meta-analysis will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of adjunctive glucose-lowering drugs for treatment of people with type 1 diabetes. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform will be searched from inception to present. Key eligibility criteria include: RCT study design; adult participants with type 1 diabetes; treatment with a glucose-lowering drug for ≥24 weeks; and comparison of the intervention to placebo, usual care or another glucose-lowering drug. The primary outcome is change in body weight. Other major outcomes include change in HbA1c and total daily insulin dose and risk of hypoglycaemia and other adverse events. Dual study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be performed. Results from the meta-analysis will be presented as weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes. Sources of heterogeneity will be explored by subgroup and sensitivity analysis. A network meta-analysis for the primary outcome will be performed using an arm-based random-effects model based on the Bayesian framework while assessing for transitivity across studies and consistency between direct and indirect estimates. The overall quality of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for each outcome.Ethics and dissemination No ethical assessment is required. The results of this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentation.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020158676
Keywords	Medicine ; R
Subject code	310
Language	English
Publishing date	2020-11-01T00:00:00Z
Publisher	BMJ Publishing Group
Document type	Article ; Online
Database	BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

Full text online

Full text

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article ; Online: Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus (CODIAC) 2021: User involvement in diabetes care, prevention and research.

Bloch, Paul / Dadaczynski, Kevin / Grabowski, Dan / Lomborg, Kirsten / Olesen, Kasper / Rasmussen, Lauge Neimann / Rossing, Peter / Varming, Annemarie / Willaing, Ingrid / Harris, Janet / Holt, Richard I G / Jensen, Bjarne Bruun

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association

2023 Volume 41, Issue 1, Page(s) e15160

Abstract: Aims: User involvement is pivotal for health development, but there are significant gaps in our understanding of the concept. The Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus on User Involvement in Diabetes Care, Prevention and Research (CODIAC) was established to ... ...

Abstract	Aims: User involvement is pivotal for health development, but there are significant gaps in our understanding of the concept. The Copenhagen Diabetes Consensus on User Involvement in Diabetes Care, Prevention and Research (CODIAC) was established to address these gaps, share knowledge and develop best practices. Methods: A literature review of user involvement was undertaken in diabetes care, prevention and research. Moreover, a Group Concept Mapping (GCM) survey synthesized the knowledge and opinions of researchers, healthcare professionals and people with diabetes and their carers to identify gaps between what is important for user involvement and what is being done in practice. Finally, a consensus conference discussed the main gaps in knowledge and practice while developing plans to address the shortcomings. Results: The literature review demonstrated that user involvement is an effective strategy for diabetes care, prevention and research, given the right support and conditions, but gaps and key challenges regarding the value and impact of user involvement approaches were found. The GCM process identified 11 major gaps, where important issues were not being sufficiently practised. The conference considered these gaps and opportunities to develop new collaborative initiatives under eight overall themes. Conclusions: User involvement is effective and adds value to diabetes care, prevention and research when used under the right circumstances. CODIAC developed new learning about the way in which academic and research knowledge can be transferred to more practice-oriented knowledge and concrete collaborative initiatives. This approach may be a potential new framework for initiatives in which coherence of process can lead to coherent outputs.
MeSH term(s)	Humans ; Health Personnel ; Caregivers ; Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control ; Consensus ; Learning
Language	English
Publishing date	2023-06-20
Publishing country	England
Document type	Review ; Journal Article
ZDB-ID	605769-x
ISSN	1464-5491 ; 0742-3071 ; 1466-5468
ISSN (online)	1464-5491
ISSN	0742-3071 ; 1466-5468
DOI	10.1111/dme.15160
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 1954: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

Details ▾
- See ZB MED holdings
- Order with fees

Article ; Online: Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge.

Palayew, Adam / Norgaard, Ole / Safreed-Harmon, Kelly / Andersen, Tue Helms / Rasmussen, Lauge Neimann / Lazarus, Jeffrey V

Nature human behaviour

2020 Volume 4, Issue 7, Page(s) 666–669

MeSH term(s)	Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; Coronavirus Infections ; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Periodicals as Topic ; Pneumonia, Viral ; Publishing/statistics & numerical data ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Time Factors
Keywords	covid19
Language	English
Publishing date	2020-06-22
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ISSN	2397-3374
ISSN (online)	2397-3374
DOI	10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article ; Online: Education programmes for persons with type 1 diabetes using an insulin pump: A systematic review.

Rytter, Karen / Schmidt, Signe / Rasmussen, Lauge Neimann / Pedersen-Bjergaard, Ulrik / Nørgaard, Kirsten

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews

2020 Volume 37, Issue 5, Page(s) e3412

Abstract: Education is essential in insulin pump therapy, but literature in the field is limited. We systematically reviewed insulin pump education programmes and their effects in two situations as follows: (1) basic education at the start of insulin pump therapy, ...

Abstract	Education is essential in insulin pump therapy, but literature in the field is limited. We systematically reviewed insulin pump education programmes and their effects in two situations as follows: (1) basic education at the start of insulin pump therapy, providing the study design enabled us to separate the effects of insulin pump therapy itself from the effects of education and (2) re-education of experienced pump users. Population: individuals ≥16 years with type 1 diabetes using insulin pumps with or without continuous glucose monitoring. Systematic searches were run in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and ERIC. Original studies reporting an effect of insulin pump education programmes were included if published in English between January 1999 and May 2019. Of 988 potentially relevant studies, 48 were assessed in full text. Nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including one randomised controlled trial. Educational approaches and settings were sparsely described in all studies, and the content was usually reported as teaching points. Two studies considered basic education, reporting evaluations of knowledge and application skills, and programme satisfaction. The remaining seven studies referred to re-education. Two studies measured severe hypoglycaemic events before and after a re-education intervention, both reporting a significant event reduction. HbA1c decreased significantly in three of four studies. Two studies reported increased knowledge and improved application skills. In conclusion, this review indicates benefits from basic education and from re-education. The strength of the conclusions is limited by the low number of studies and study designs. High-quality studies are needed comparing different approaches for insulin pump education.
MeSH term(s)	Blood Glucose ; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy ; Humans ; Insulin/therapeutic use ; Insulin Infusion Systems
Chemical Substances	Blood Glucose ; Insulin
Language	English
Publishing date	2020-10-19
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Systematic Review
ZDB-ID	1470192-3
ISSN	1520-7560 ; 1520-7552
ISSN (online)	1520-7560
ISSN	1520-7552
DOI	10.1002/dmrr.3412
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Full text online

Accessible to users with ZB MED library card

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 2119: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG)
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

Details ▾

Article ; Online: Searching PubMed to Retrieve Publications on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Search Strings.

Lazarus, Jeffrey V / Palayew, Adam / Rasmussen, Lauge Neimann / Andersen, Tue Helms / Nicholson, Joey / Norgaard, Ole

Journal of medical Internet research

2020 Volume 22, Issue 11, Page(s) e23449

Abstract: Background: Since it was declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020, COVID-19 has dominated headlines around the world and researchers have generated thousands of scientific articles about the disease. The fast speed of publication has challenged researchers ...

Abstract	Background: Since it was declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020, COVID-19 has dominated headlines around the world and researchers have generated thousands of scientific articles about the disease. The fast speed of publication has challenged researchers and other stakeholders to keep up with the volume of published articles. To search the literature effectively, researchers use databases such as PubMed. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of different searches for COVID-19 records in PubMed and to assess the complexity of searches required. Methods: We tested PubMed searches for COVID-19 to identify which search string performed best according to standard metrics (sensitivity, precision, and F-score). We evaluated the performance of 8 different searches in PubMed during the first 10 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic to investigate how complex a search string is needed. We also tested omitting hyphens and space characters as well as applying quotation marks. Results: The two most comprehensive search strings combining several free-text and indexed search terms performed best in terms of sensitivity (98.4%/98.7%) and F-score (96.5%/95.7%), but the single-term search COVID-19 performed best in terms of precision (95.3%) and well in terms of sensitivity (94.4%) and F-score (94.8%). The term Wuhan virus performed the worst: 7.7% for sensitivity, 78.1% for precision, and 14.0% for F-score. We found that deleting a hyphen or space character could omit a substantial number of records, especially when searching with SARS-CoV-2 as a single term. Conclusions: Comprehensive search strings combining free-text and indexed search terms performed better than single-term searches in PubMed, but not by a large margin compared to the single term COVID-19. For everyday searches, certain single-term searches that are entered correctly are probably sufficient, whereas more comprehensive searches should be used for systematic reviews. Still, we suggest additional measures that the US National Library of Medicine could take to support all PubMed users in searching the COVID-19 literature.
MeSH term(s)	COVID-19 ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval/methods ; Medical Subject Headings ; PubMed ; Publications ; SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification ; Search Engine/methods
Keywords	covid19
Language	English
Publishing date	2020-11-26
Publishing country	Canada
Document type	Journal Article
ZDB-ID	2028830-X
ISSN	1438-8871 ; 1439-4456
ISSN (online)	1438-8871
ISSN	1439-4456
DOI	10.2196/23449
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Article: Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge

Palayew, Adam / Norgaard, Ole / Safreed-Harmon, Kelly / Andersen, Tue Helms / Rasmussen, Lauge Neimann / Lazarus, Jeffrey V

Nat Hum Behav

Keywords	covid19
Publisher	WHO
Document type	Article
Note	WHO #Covidence: #612996
Database	COVID19

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Details ▾

To top

More links

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED