LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 31

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Introduction: Evidence for the Safe Return to School With COVID-19 Testing.

    Lee, Sonia / Lindsey, Christopher C / Cernich, Alison N

    Pediatrics

    2023  Volume 152, Issue Suppl 1

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; COVID-19 Testing ; COVID-19 ; Return to School ; Schools
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-07-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 207677-9
    ISSN 1098-4275 ; 0031-4005
    ISSN (online) 1098-4275
    ISSN 0031-4005
    DOI 10.1542/peds.2022-060352B
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Leadership of the ultimate interdisciplinary team: Rehabilitation science at NIH.

    Cernich, Alison N

    Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation

    2020  Volume 17, Issue 1, Page(s) 67

    Abstract: Background: Support for rehabilitation research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is robust and evolving. Since the time of its Blue Ribbon Panel on Rehabilitation Research, NIH has participated in several initiatives to coordinate the science ... ...

    Abstract Background: Support for rehabilitation research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is robust and evolving. Since the time of its Blue Ribbon Panel on Rehabilitation Research, NIH has participated in several initiatives to coordinate the science and advance the field.
    Discussion: Collaborative teams must continue to address key limitations in the field, including the desire for broad application of rehabilitation interventions, the need for basic science and translational research, the support of clinical trials and standard approaches, and the integration of technology.
    Conclusion: Rehabilitation medicine is poised for critical advancements if interdisciplinary teams continue to work collaboratively to understand and address the needs of people with temporary or permanent functional limitations.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Leadership ; National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/organization & administration ; Rehabilitation Research/organization & administration ; Translational Research, Biomedical/organization & administration ; United States
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-29
    Publishing country England
    Document type Letter ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 2164377-5
    ISSN 1743-0003 ; 1743-0003
    ISSN (online) 1743-0003
    ISSN 1743-0003
    DOI 10.1186/s12984-020-00696-0
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Leadership of the ultimate interdisciplinary team

    Alison N. Cernich

    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    Rehabilitation science at NIH

    2020  Volume 4

    Abstract: Abstract Background Support for rehabilitation research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is robust and evolving. Since the time of its Blue Ribbon Panel on Rehabilitation Research, NIH has participated in several initiatives to coordinate the ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Background Support for rehabilitation research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is robust and evolving. Since the time of its Blue Ribbon Panel on Rehabilitation Research, NIH has participated in several initiatives to coordinate the science and advance the field. Discussion Collaborative teams must continue to address key limitations in the field, including the desire for broad application of rehabilitation interventions, the need for basic science and translational research, the support of clinical trials and standard approaches, and the integration of technology. Conclusion Rehabilitation medicine is poised for critical advancements if interdisciplinary teams continue to work collaboratively to understand and address the needs of people with temporary or permanent functional limitations.
    Keywords Rehabilitation ; NIH ; Basic science ; Clinical trials ; Technology ; Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ; RC321-571
    Subject code 300
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: National Institutes of Health Research Plan on Rehabilitation: Analysis and Progress.

    Jackson, Jennifer N / Cernich, Alison N

    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation

    2020  Volume 101, Issue 8, Page(s) 1313–1321

    Abstract: Objective: To summarize the progress toward the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Plan on Rehabilitation goals and the methods by which tracking occurred.: Design: Each grant award was manually coded by NIH staff for research plan goals, ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To summarize the progress toward the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Plan on Rehabilitation goals and the methods by which tracking occurred.
    Design: Each grant award was manually coded by NIH staff for research plan goals, type of science categories (eg, basic, applied, infrastructure, etc), and if applicable, training, and then validated by NIH institute and center (IC) experts. Data for years 2015 through 2017 were used to develop a coding algorithm to automatically code grants in 2018 for validation by NIH IC experts. Additional data for all years (2015-2018) were also analyzed to track changes and progress.
    Setting: The research utilized administrative data from NIH Reporter and internal NIH databases.
    Participants: The data sample included research grants and programs funded from fiscal years 2015 through 2018. The year 2015 was considered a baseline year as the research plan was published in 2016.
    Interventions: Not applicable.
    Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were substantial growth in NIH funding and numbers of awards for rehabilitation research, across most research plan goals and types of science, as well as validation of an automatic algorithm for coding grants.
    Results: Number of grants, funding dollars, funding mechanisms, patent data, scientific influence and translational science, research plan goals, and type of science categories were tracked across years (2015-2018). Algorithm validation is presented for 2018 data.
    Conclusions: NIH advanced the goals stated in the Research Plan on Rehabilitation, but gap areas remain. Though funding in this portfolio is growing, continued focus and participation by the field is needed to advance rehabilitation science.
    MeSH term(s) Abstracting and Indexing ; Algorithms ; Biomedical Research/trends ; Biomedical Technology/trends ; Financing, Organized/trends ; Goals ; Government Programs/trends ; Humans ; National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/trends ; Publications/trends ; Rehabilitation/instrumentation ; Rehabilitation/methods ; Rehabilitation/trends ; Research Design/trends ; Translational Medical Research/trends ; United States
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Validation Study
    ZDB-ID 80057-0
    ISSN 1532-821X ; 0003-9993
    ISSN (online) 1532-821X
    ISSN 0003-9993
    DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.005
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Building the Evidence for Safe Return to School During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Cernich, Alison N / Lee, Sonia / Bianchi, Diana W

    Pediatrics

    2021  Volume 149, Issue 12 Suppl 2

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/diagnosis ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19 Testing ; Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Return to School ; United States
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-14
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 207677-9
    ISSN 1098-4275 ; 0031-4005
    ISSN (online) 1098-4275
    ISSN 0031-4005
    DOI 10.1542/peds.2021-054268B
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Involving Pregnant Individuals in Clinical Research on COVID-19 Vaccines.

    Bianchi, Diana W / Kaeser, Lisa / Cernich, Alison N

    JAMA

    2021  Volume 325, Issue 11, Page(s) 1041–1042

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/prevention & control ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics ; Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence ; Female ; Government Regulation ; Humans ; Lactation ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control ; Therapeutic Human Experimentation/ethics
    Chemical Substances COVID-19 Vaccines
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-02-20
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2958-0
    ISSN 1538-3598 ; 0254-9077 ; 0002-9955 ; 0098-7484
    ISSN (online) 1538-3598
    ISSN 0254-9077 ; 0002-9955 ; 0098-7484
    DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.1865
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Response to Harris et al. re: "The Intersection of Disability and Pregnancy: Risks for Maternal Morbidity and Mortality".

    Signore, Caroline / Davis, Maurice / Tingen, Candace M / Cernich, Alison N

    Journal of women's health (2002)

    2021  Volume 30, Issue 9, Page(s) 1364

    MeSH term(s) Disabled Persons ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-14
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1139774-3
    ISSN 1931-843X ; 1059-7115 ; 1540-9996
    ISSN (online) 1931-843X
    ISSN 1059-7115 ; 1540-9996
    DOI 10.1089/jwh.2021.0392
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Risk of adverse neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with disabilities.

    Gleason, Jessica L / Grewal, Jagteshwar / Chen, Zhen / Cernich, Alison N / Grantz, Katherine L

    International journal of epidemiology

    2022  Volume 52, Issue 1, Page(s) 203–213

    Abstract: Background: To compare risk of neonatal morbidities between women with and without documented disability and to evaluate mediation of these associations by pre-term birth and caesarean delivery.: Methods: Using data from the Consortium on Safe Labor ( ...

    Abstract Background: To compare risk of neonatal morbidities between women with and without documented disability and to evaluate mediation of these associations by pre-term birth and caesarean delivery.
    Methods: Using data from the Consortium on Safe Labor (2002-2008; n = 223 385), we evaluated risk of 22 neonatal outcomes among singleton deliveries using ICD-9 codes to define physical (n = 1733), sensory (n = 250) and intellectual disability (n = 91). Adjusted relative risk (aRR) was estimated for each outcome among each category of disability, and among women with any disability using Poisson regression models with robust variance. Causal mediation methods evaluated pre-term birth and caesarean delivery as mediators.
    Results: Compared with no disability, neonates of women with any disability had higher risk of nearly all neonatal outcomes, including pre-term birth (aRR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.62-1.94), small for gestational age (SGA) (aRR = 1.25; CI 1.11-1.41), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (aRR = 1.70; CI 1.54-1.87), seizures (aRR = 2.81; CI 1.54-5.14), cardiomyopathy (aRR = 4.92; CI 1.15-20.95), respiratory morbidities (aRR ranged from 1.33-2.08) and death (aRR = 2.31; CI 1.38-3.87). Women with disabilities were more likely to have a maternal indication for pre-term delivery, including pre-pregnancy diabetes (aRR = 3.80; CI 2.84-5.08), chronic hypertension (aRR = 1.46; CI 0.95-2.25) and severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (aRR = 1.47; CI 1.19-1.81). Increased risk varied but was generally consistent across all disability categories. Most outcomes were partially mediated by pre-term birth, except SGA, and heightened risk remained for NICU admissions, respiratory distress syndrome, anaemia and a composite of any adverse outcome (aRR = 1.21; CI 1.10-1.32).
    Conclusion: Neonates of women with disabilities were at higher risk of a broad range of adverse neonatal outcomes, including death. Risks were not fully explained by pre-term birth.
    MeSH term(s) Infant, Newborn ; Pregnancy ; Female ; Humans ; Pregnant Women ; Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology ; Cesarean Section ; Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology ; Fetal Growth Retardation ; Disabled Persons ; Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-09-30
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
    ZDB-ID 187909-1
    ISSN 1464-3685 ; 0300-5771
    ISSN (online) 1464-3685
    ISSN 0300-5771
    DOI 10.1093/ije/dyac183
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: The Intersection of Disability and Pregnancy: Risks for Maternal Morbidity and Mortality.

    Signore, Caroline / Davis, Maurice / Tingen, Candace M / Cernich, Alison N

    Journal of women's health (2002)

    2020  Volume 30, Issue 2, Page(s) 147–153

    Abstract: It is estimated that 1 in 4 women in the United States live with a disability, and using population-based estimates, 10-12% of women of childbearing age have a disability. There are limited data to suggest that women with disabilities experience higher ... ...

    Abstract It is estimated that 1 in 4 women in the United States live with a disability, and using population-based estimates, 10-12% of women of childbearing age have a disability. There are limited data to suggest that women with disabilities experience higher rates of or risks for adverse outcomes related to pregnancy, delivery, and access to appropriate postpartum care. Research on specific disabling conditions demonstrates variable risk for syndromes that threaten the health of the mother, such as preeclampsia, infection, and coagulation disorders. Much of the literature suggests that normal, healthy pregnancy is possible but points to the need for tailored information for patients and providers about the intersection of their condition with pregnancy and specific care needs. Given the lack of systematic evidence in this area across conditions and functional impairments, more research is needed to clarify the interaction of specific disabilities with pregnancy and provide evidence-based information to the field to decrease the risks to mothers and their infants. This article will provide an overview of conditions that contribute to maternal morbidity and mortality as they relate to pregnancy in women with disabilities and provide resources to the field to further the investigation of this area.
    MeSH term(s) Disabled Persons ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Maternal Mortality ; Mothers ; Pre-Eclampsia ; Pregnancy ; United States/epidemiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-19
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1139774-3
    ISSN 1931-843X ; 1059-7115 ; 1540-9996
    ISSN (online) 1931-843X
    ISSN 1059-7115 ; 1540-9996
    DOI 10.1089/jwh.2020.8864
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Risk of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Disabilities.

    Gleason, Jessica L / Grewal, Jagteshwar / Chen, Zhen / Cernich, Alison N / Grantz, Katherine L

    JAMA network open

    2021  Volume 4, Issue 12, Page(s) e2138414

    Abstract: Importance: Women with disabilities have a higher risk of preterm birth, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery; however, their risk of other obstetric interventions, adverse maternal outcomes, and clinical indications for increased ... ...

    Abstract Importance: Women with disabilities have a higher risk of preterm birth, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and cesarean delivery; however, their risk of other obstetric interventions, adverse maternal outcomes, and clinical indications for increased cesarean delivery is unclear.
    Objective: To evaluate risk of a range of obstetric interventions and adverse maternal outcomes, including severe maternal morbidities (SMM) and mortality, among women with and without disabilities.
    Design, setting, and participants: The Consortium on Safe Labor was a retrospective cohort that included comprehensive medical chart review for deliveries between January 2002 and January 2008. Data were collected from 12 clinical sites, which included 19 hospitals across the United States. This secondary analysis was conducted in February to July 2021.
    Exposures: Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes and a validated algorithm to define disability, participants were classified as having physical, intellectual, sensory, or any disability, and compared with women with no documented disability.
    Main outcomes and measures: The relative risk (RR) of 23 obstetric interventions and adverse maternal outcomes, including SMM and mortality, was evaluated.
    Results: Of the 223 385 women in the study, 9206 (4.1%) were Asian or Pacific Islander, 50 235 (22.5%) were Black, 39 039 (17.5%) were Hispanic, and 110 443 (49.4%) were White, with a mean (SD) age of 27.6 (6.2) years. There were 2074 (0.9%) women with disability and 221 311 (99.1%) without. Among women with disabilities, 1733 (83.5%) were physical, 91 (4.4%) were intellectual, and 250 (12.1%) were sensory. Compared with women with no disability, women with disabilities had higher risk of gestational diabetes, placenta previa, premature rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum fever as well as maternal death (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 11.19; 95% CI, 2.40-52.19) and individual SMMs: severe preeclampsia/eclampsia (aRR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.80-2.56), hemorrhage (aRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.49), and fever (aRR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03-1.67), with the highest risk observed for thromboembolism (aRR, 6.08; 95% CI, 4.03-9.16), cardiovascular events (aRR, 4.02; 95% CI, 2.87-5.63), and infection (aRR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.97-3.67). Women with any disability also had higher risk of interventions, including oxytocin augmentation, operative vaginal delivery, and cesarean delivery (aRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.25-1.42), with the cesarean indication less likely to be medically indicated (aRR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89). Risk of adverse outcomes and interventions remained consistent across disability categories.
    Conclusions and relevance: In this study, women with physical, intellectual, and sensory disability during pregnancy were at higher risk of adverse outcomes, including a broad range of SMM and maternal mortality.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Maternal Mortality ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology ; Pregnancy Complications/mortality ; Pregnant Women ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; United States/epidemiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-12-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
    ISSN 2574-3805
    ISSN (online) 2574-3805
    DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38414
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top