LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 32

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Clinical evaluation of the Roche distributed SD Biosensor SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Rapid Antigen Test amongst mild symptomatic people during the 2022/2023 winter season.

    Igloi, Zsofia / Velzing, Jans / Koopmans, Marion / Molenkamp, Richard

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 are seasonal respiratory illnesses with similar symptoms, however distinguishing one from the other can have benefits for the patient and have different implications in various settings. In this study we have evaluated the ... ...

    Abstract Both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 are seasonal respiratory illnesses with similar symptoms, however distinguishing one from the other can have benefits for the patient and have different implications in various settings. In this study we have evaluated the clinical performance of the Roche distributed SD Biosensor SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Rapid Antigen Test during the 2022/2023 winter season, in a non-hospitalized, mild symptomatic population, comparing results with reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Participants also filled in a short questionnaire about their symptom onset, symptoms, vaccination status for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2. We could include 290 people with complete records with female majority (72%, 209/290). Age ranged from 18 years old (minimum age for inclusion) to 71 years (mean age was 40.4 years). From the 290 inclusions 93 tested positive with SARS-CoV-2 PCR, 12 by influenza A and 6 by influenza B PCR. For SARS-CoV-2 overall sensitivity was 72.0% (confidence interval, CI 61.8-80.9%) and specificity 99.5% (CI 97.2-99.9%). SARS-CoV-2 RDT performed best up to and including PCR ct value of 25 (sensitivity 96% CI 85.8-99.5%), but could also detect samples less or equal to PCR ct 33, however with lower sensitivity (sensitivity 80.0% CI 69.6-88.1%). For influenza limited amount of samples were available; the RDT detected influenza A with 58.3% sensitivity (CI 27.7-84.8) and 100% specificity (CI 98.6-100.0%). In case of influenza B the inclusions were too low to calculate sensitivity reliably (2/6, 33.3% CI 4.3-77.7%); specificity was 98.2% (5/274, CI 95.8-99.4%). No cross reaction between SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B was experienced. As was shown before, SARS-CoV-2 could be determined with high sensitivity in recent onset and lower than ct 25 samples. In spite of performing the study throughout the influenza season, we had sub optimal inclusions for determining RDT clinical performance; further studies are needed.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-06
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2024.02.05.24302338
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Optimization of Notification Criteria for Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli Surveillance, the Netherlands

    Ingrid H.M. Friesema / Sjoerd Kuiling / Zsofia Igloi / Eelco Franz

    Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol 27, Iss 1, Pp 258-

    2021  Volume 261

    Abstract: We describe the consequences of 2 major changes in notification criteria for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli surveillance in the Netherlands. The change to reporting acute, more severe infections appears to be a good compromise between workload, ... ...

    Abstract We describe the consequences of 2 major changes in notification criteria for Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli surveillance in the Netherlands. The change to reporting acute, more severe infections appears to be a good compromise between workload, redundancy, and public health relevance, provided isolates remain available for typing and sequencing.
    Keywords Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli ; epidemiology ; public health ; incidence ; trends ; E. coli ; Medicine ; R ; Infectious and parasitic diseases ; RC109-216
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Optimization of Notification Criteria for Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Surveillance, the Netherlands.

    Friesema, Ingrid H M / Kuiling, Sjoerd / Igloi, Zsofia / Franz, Eelco

    Emerging infectious diseases

    2020  Volume 27, Issue 1, Page(s) 258–261

    Abstract: We describe the consequences of 2 major changes in notification criteria for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli surveillance in the Netherlands. The change to reporting acute, more severe infections appears to be a good compromise between workload, ... ...

    Abstract We describe the consequences of 2 major changes in notification criteria for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli surveillance in the Netherlands. The change to reporting acute, more severe infections appears to be a good compromise between workload, redundancy, and public health relevance, provided isolates remain available for typing and sequencing.
    MeSH term(s) Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis ; Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology ; Humans ; Netherlands/epidemiology ; Public Health ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/genetics
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1380686-5
    ISSN 1080-6059 ; 1080-6040
    ISSN (online) 1080-6059
    ISSN 1080-6040
    DOI 10.3201/eid2701.200339
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Community-based SARS-CoV-2 testing in low-income neighbourhoods in Rotterdam: Results from a pilot study.

    Vink, Martijn / Iglói, Zsófia / Fanoy, Ewout B / van Beek, Janko / Boelsums, Timo / de Graaf, Miranda / Voeten, Helene A C M / Molenkamp, Richard / Koopmans, Marion Pg / Mevissen, Fraukje Ef

    Journal of global health

    2022  Volume 12, Page(s) 5042

    Abstract: Background: High incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and low testing uptake were reported in low-income neighbourhoods in Rotterdam. We aimed to improve willingness and access to testing by introducing community- ... ...

    Abstract Background: High incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and low testing uptake were reported in low-income neighbourhoods in Rotterdam. We aimed to improve willingness and access to testing by introducing community-based test facilities, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a rapid antigen detection test (RDT).
    Methods: Two to eleven test facilities operated consecutively in three low-income neighbourhoods in Rotterdam, offering the options of walk-in or appointments. Background characteristics were collected at intake and one nasopharyngeal swab was taken and processed using both RDT and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Visitors were asked to join a survey for evaluation purposes.
    Results: In total, 19 773 visitors were tested - 9662 (48.9%) without an appointment. Walk-in visitors were older, lived more often in the proximity of the test facilities, and reported coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related symptoms less often than by-appointment visitors. For 67.7% of the visitors, this was the first time they got tested. A total of 1211 (6.1%) tested SARS-CoV-2-positive with RT-PCR, of whom 309 (25.5%) were asymptomatic. Test uptake increased among residents of the pilot neighbourhoods, especially in the older age groups, compared to people living in comparable neighbourhoods without community-based testing facilities. RDT detected asymptomatic individuals with 71.8% sensitivity, which was acceptable in this high prevalence setting. Visitors reported positive attitudes towards the test facilities and welcomed the easy access.
    Conclusions: Offering community-based SARS-CoV-2 testing seems a promising approach for increasing testing uptake among specific populations in low-income neighbourhoods.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; COVID-19/diagnosis ; COVID-19 Testing ; Humans ; Pilot Projects ; SARS-CoV-2
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-10-01
    Publishing country Scotland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2741629-X
    ISSN 2047-2986 ; 2047-2986
    ISSN (online) 2047-2986
    ISSN 2047-2986
    DOI 10.7189/jogh.12.05042
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Field Epidemiology and Public Health Microbiology training: capturing the alumni perspectives of the training's impact.

    Schaeffer, Justine / Hammer, Charlotte Christiane / Evlampidou, Iro / Bubba, Laura / Igloi, Zsofia / Dub, Timothée / Wendland, Annika / Whelan, Jane / Nielsen, Stine / Baidjoe, Amrish / Tostmann, Alma

    Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin

    2023  Volume 28, Issue 36

    Abstract: We present the findings from the European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET) Alumni Network (EAN) Member Survey conducted in October to December 2021. The EAN consists of field epidemiologists (EPIET) and public health ... ...

    Abstract We present the findings from the European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET) Alumni Network (EAN) Member Survey conducted in October to December 2021. The EAN consists of field epidemiologists (EPIET) and public health microbiologists (European Public Health Microbiology Training Programme (EUPHEM)) who stay connected after their 2-year fellowship. This active alumni network provides opportunities for career development, mentorship, knowledge exchange and sharing of best practices for community members, affiliated professionals and public health organisations in Europe. Overall, 281 of 732 members participated in the survey. Of the 192 European fellowship alumni respondents, 173 (90%) indicated that skills and competencies acquired during their fellowship improved performance in their role compared with their abilities before the fellowship. Reported skills and competencies that could be further strengthened included data management/analysis, communication, mathematical modelling and leadership/team management. The EAN Member Survey provides valuable feedback to the EAN, as well as the fellowship programme offices at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and affiliated field epidemiology programmes. The COVID-19 pandemic was a stark reminder of how essential cross-border collaborations are for continued European health security. Maintaining and increasing the professional, well-trained workforce remains crucial for optimal response to infectious diseases and protection of public health.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Public Health ; Pandemics ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; Communication ; Europe/epidemiology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-26
    Publishing country Sweden
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1338803-4
    ISSN 1560-7917 ; 1025-496X
    ISSN (online) 1560-7917
    ISSN 1025-496X
    DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.36.2300388
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Comparison of commercial realtime reverse transcription PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

    Iglói, Zsófia / Leven, Margareta / Abdel-Karem Abou-Nouar, Zain / Weller, Babette / Matheeussen, Veerle / Coppens, Jasmine / Koopmans, Marion / Molenkamp, Richard

    Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology

    2020  Volume 129, Page(s) 104510

    Abstract: The emergence of a new coronavirus in Wuhan China has triggered a global need for accurate diagnostic assays. Initially, mostly laboratory developed molecular tests were available but shortly thereafter different commercial assays started to appear and ... ...

    Abstract The emergence of a new coronavirus in Wuhan China has triggered a global need for accurate diagnostic assays. Initially, mostly laboratory developed molecular tests were available but shortly thereafter different commercial assays started to appear and are still increasing in number. Although independent performance evaluations are ongoing, available data is still scarce. Here we provide a direct comparison of key performance characteristics of 13 commercial RT-PCR assays. Thirteen RT-PCR assays were selected based on the criteria that they can be used following generic RNA extraction protocols, on common PCR platforms and availability. Using a 10-fold and 2-fold dilution series of a quantified SARS-CoV-2 cell-cultured virus stock, performance was assessed compared to our in house validated assay. Specificity was tested by using RNA extracted from cultured common human coronaviruses. All RT-PCR kits included in this study exhibited PCR efficiencies > 90%, except for the Sentinel Diagnostics B E-gene RUO assay (80%). Analytical sensitivity varied between 3.3 RNA copies to 330 RNA copies. Only one assay cross reacted with another human coronavirus (MERS). This study provides a technical baseline of 13 different commercial PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection that can be used by laboratories interested in purchasing any of these for further full clinical validation.
    MeSH term(s) Betacoronavirus/genetics ; Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods ; Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis ; Cross Reactions ; Humans ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis ; RNA, Viral/analysis ; RNA, Viral/genetics ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity and Specificity
    Chemical Substances RNA, Viral
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-17
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Comparative Study ; Evaluation Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1446080-4
    ISSN 1873-5967 ; 1386-6532
    ISSN (online) 1873-5967
    ISSN 1386-6532
    DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104510
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: From more testing to smart testing: data-guided SARS-CoV-2 testing choices, the Netherlands, May to September 2020.

    van Beek, Janko / Igloi, Zsofia / Boelsums, Timo / Fanoy, Ewout / Gotz, Hannelore / Molenkamp, Richard / van Kampen, Jeroen / GeurtsvanKessel, Corine / van der Eijk, Annemiek A / van de Vijver, David / Koopmans, Marion

    Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin

    2022  Volume 27, Issue 8

    Abstract: BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays are more sensitive than rapid antigen detection assays (RDT) and can detect viral RNA even after an individual is no longer infectious. RDT can reduce the time to test and the results might better correlate with ... ...

    Abstract BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assays are more sensitive than rapid antigen detection assays (RDT) and can detect viral RNA even after an individual is no longer infectious. RDT can reduce the time to test and the results might better correlate with infectiousness.AimWe assessed the ability of five RDT to identify infectious COVID-19 cases and systematically recorded the turnaround time of RT-PCR testing.MethodsSensitivity of RDT was determined using a serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 stock with known viral RNA concentration. The probability of detecting infectious virus at a given viral load was calculated using logistic regression of viral RNA concentration and matched culture results of 78 specimens from randomly selected non-hospitalised cases. The probability of each RDT to detect infectious cases was calculated as the sum of the projected probabilities for viral isolation success for every viral RNA load found at the time of diagnosis in 1,739 confirmed non-hospitalised COVID-19 cases.ResultsThe distribution of quantification cycle values and estimated RNA loads for patients reporting to drive-through testing was skewed to high RNA loads. With the most sensitive RDT (Abbott and SD Biosensor), 97.30% (range: 88.65-99.77) of infectious individuals would be detected. This decreased to 92.73% (range: 60.30-99.77) for Coris BioConcept and GenBody, and 75.53% (range: 17.55-99.77) for RapiGEN. Only 32.9% of RT-PCR results were available on the same day as specimen collection.ConclusionThe most sensitive RDT detected infectious COVID-19 cases with high sensitivity and may considerably improve containment through more rapid isolation and contact tracing.
    MeSH term(s) Antigens, Viral/analysis ; COVID-19/diagnosis ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19 Testing ; Humans ; Netherlands/epidemiology ; SARS-CoV-2/genetics ; Sensitivity and Specificity
    Chemical Substances Antigens, Viral
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-24
    Publishing country Sweden
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1338803-4
    ISSN 1560-7917 ; 1025-496X
    ISSN (online) 1560-7917
    ISSN 1025-496X
    DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.8.2100702
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Comparison of commercial realtime reverse transcription PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

    Iglói, Zsófia / leven, Margareta / Abdel-Karem Abou-Nouar, Zain / Weller, Babette / Matheeussen, Veerle / Coppens, Jasmine / Koopmans, Marion / Molenkamp, Richard

    Journal of Clinical Virology

    2020  Volume 129, Page(s) 104510

    Keywords Virology ; Infectious Diseases ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Elsevier BV
    Publishing country us
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 1446080-4
    ISSN 1873-5967 ; 1386-6532
    ISSN (online) 1873-5967
    ISSN 1386-6532
    DOI 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104510
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Comparison of commercial realtime reverse transcription PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2

    Iglói, Zsófia / Leven, Margareta / Abdel-Karem Abou-Nouar, Zain / Weller, Babette / Matheeussen, Veerle / Coppens, Jasmine / Koopmans, Marion / Molenkamp, Richard

    J Clin Virol

    Abstract: The emergence of a new coronavirus in Wuhan China has triggered a global need for accurate diagnostic assays. Initially, mostly laboratory developed molecular tests were available but shortly thereafter different commercial assays started to appear and ... ...

    Abstract The emergence of a new coronavirus in Wuhan China has triggered a global need for accurate diagnostic assays. Initially, mostly laboratory developed molecular tests were available but shortly thereafter different commercial assays started to appear and are still increasing in number. Although independent performance evaluations are ongoing, available data is still scarce. Here we provide a direct comparison of key performance characteristics of 13 commercial RT-PCR assays. Thirteen RT-PCR assays were selected based on the criteria that they can be used following generic RNA extraction protocols, on common PCR platforms and availability. Using a 10-fold and 2-fold dilution series of a quantified SARS-CoV-2 cell-cultured virus stock, performance was assessed compared to our in house validated assay. Specificity was tested by using RNA extracted from cultured common human coronaviruses. All RT-PCR kits included in this study exhibited PCR efficiencies > 90%, except for the Sentinel Diagnostics B E-gene RUO assay (80%). Analytical sensitivity varied between 3.3 RNA copies to 330 RNA copies. Only one assay cross reacted with another human coronavirus (MERS). This study provides a technical baseline of 13 different commercial PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection that can be used by laboratories interested in purchasing any of these for further full clinical validation.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #601933
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Clinical evaluation of the SD Biosensor SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen rapid test with symptomatic and asymptomatic, non-hospitalized patients.

    Igloi, Zsofia / Velzing, Jans / Huisman, Robin / Geurtsvankessel, Corine / Comvalius, Anoushka / IJpelaar, Jeroen / van Beek, Janko / Ensing, Roel / Boelsums, Timo / Koopmans, Marion / Molenkamp, Richard

    PloS one

    2021  Volume 16, Issue 12, Page(s) e0260894

    Abstract: Background: Performance of the SD Biosensor saliva antigen rapid test was evaluated at a large designated testing site in non-hospitalized patients, with or without symptoms.: Method: All eligible people over 18 years of age presenting for a booked ... ...

    Abstract Background: Performance of the SD Biosensor saliva antigen rapid test was evaluated at a large designated testing site in non-hospitalized patients, with or without symptoms.
    Method: All eligible people over 18 years of age presenting for a booked appointment at the designated SARS-CoV-2 testing site were approached for inclusion and enrolled following verbal informed consent. One nasopharyngeal swab was taken to carry out the default antigen rapid test from which the results were reported back to the patient and one saliva sample was self-taken according to verbal instruction on site. This was used for the saliva antigen rapid test, the RT-PCR and for virus culture. Sensitivity of the saliva antigen rapid test was analyzed in two ways: i, compared to saliva RT-PCR; and ii, compared to virus culture of the saliva samples. Study participants were also asked to fill in a short questionnaire stating age, sex, date of symptom onset. Recommended time of ≥30mins since last meal, drink or cigarette if applicable was also recorded. The study was carried out in February-March 2021 for 4 weeks.
    Results: We could include 789 people with complete records and results. Compared to saliva RT-PCR, overall sensitivity and specificity of the saliva antigen rapid test was 66.1% and 99.6% which increased to 88.6% with Ct ≤30 cutoff. Analysis by days post onset did not result in higher sensitivities because the large majority of people were in the very early phase of disease ie <3 days post onset. When breaking down the data for symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, sensitivity ranged from 69.2% to 50% respectively, however the total number of RT-PCR positive asymptomatic participants was very low (n = 5). Importantly, almost all culture positive samples were detected by the rapid test.
    Conclusion: Overall, the potential benefits of saliva antigen rapid test, could outweigh the lower sensitivity compared to nasopharyngeal antigen rapid test in a comprehensive testing strategy, especially for home/self-testing and in vulnerable populations like elderly, disabled or children where in intrusive testing is either not possible or causes unnecessary stress.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biosensing Techniques/methods ; COVID-19/diagnosis ; COVID-19/etiology ; COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods ; Carrier State/virology ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasopharynx/virology ; Saliva/virology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-12-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Evaluation Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2267670-3
    ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    ISSN 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0260894
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top