Article ; Online: Core Competency Self-Assessment Enhances Critical Review of Complications and Entrustable Activities.
The Journal of surgical research
2020 Volume 257, Page(s) 221–226
Abstract: Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has defined six core competencies (CCs) that every successful physician should possess. However, the assessment of CC achievement among trainees is difficult. This project was designed ...
Abstract | Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has defined six core competencies (CCs) that every successful physician should possess. However, the assessment of CC achievement among trainees is difficult. This project was designed to prospectively evaluate the impact of resident identification of CC as a component of morbidity review on error identification and standard of care (SOC) assessments. The platform was assessed for its reliability as a measure of resident critical analysis of complication causality across postgraduate year (PGY). Materials and methods: A total of 1945 general surgery cases with complications were assessed for error identification and SOC management between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. CC identification was additionally assessed between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, and included 708 general surgery cases. Data were evaluated for error assessments and overall SOC management. PGY4 and 5 residents were compared for number of cases and complications reviewed, severity, error causation, and CC relevance. Results: Study groups were equivalent by Clavien-Dindo scores. Error identification significantly increased in all categories: diagnostic (P < 0.001), technical (P < 0.05), judgment (P < 0.001), system (P < 0.001), and communication (P < 0.001). Overall SOC assessments validated by a supervising surgical quality officer were unchanged. An increased exposure to cases with severe complications, error causation, and CC relevance was noted across PGY. Conclusions: The addition of CC assessment into morbidity review appears to improve the critical thinking of evaluating residents by increasing the identification of management errors. Used as an element of prospective self-assessment, teaching residents to identify CC principles in cases with complications may assist in learner progression toward clinical competence and critical thinking. |
---|---|
MeSH term(s) | Clinical Competence ; Competency-Based Education/methods ; Follow-Up Studies ; General Surgery/education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Medical Errors/adverse effects ; Medical Errors/prevention & control ; Patient Harm/prevention & control ; Postoperative Complications/diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control ; Program Evaluation ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self-Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgeons/psychology ; Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects ; Surgical Procedures, Operative/education |
Language | English |
Publishing date | 2020-08-25 |
Publishing country | United States |
Document type | Journal Article |
ZDB-ID | 80170-7 |
ISSN | 1095-8673 ; 0022-4804 |
ISSN (online) | 1095-8673 |
ISSN | 0022-4804 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.064 |
Database | MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE |
More links
Kategorien
In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter
Zs.A 178: Show issues | Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG) |
Order via subito
This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.