LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 3 of total 3

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Universal rapid screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the intensive care units in a large community hospital.

    Kjonegaard, Rebecca / Fields, Willa / Peddecord, K Michael

    American journal of infection control

    2013  Volume 41, Issue 1, Page(s) 45–50

    Abstract: Background: Health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) infections constitute a significant risk for hospitalized patients. This study evaluates the costs and effects of comprehensive and state-mandated MRSA screening ... ...

    Abstract Background: Health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) infections constitute a significant risk for hospitalized patients. This study evaluates the costs and effects of comprehensive and state-mandated MRSA screening for intensive care unit (ICU) patients and subsequent contact precautions on the rate of HA-MRSA.
    Methods: A pre- and postimplementation study was conducted in a 24-bed medical intensive care unit (MICU) and a 15-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at an acute care 536-bed community hospital. This study used computerized records for all patients admitted to ICUs. Costs were estimated from financial records.
    Results: HA-MRSA infection rates did not decline after implementation of ICU screening. Regression analysis demonstrated that patients admitted from skilled nursing facilities, assisted living, and similar facilities were 12 times more likely to screen positive for MRSA as compared with patients admitted from home. The costs to identify each MRSA positive patient were $1,650 and $953 for comprehensive and state-mandated periods, respectively.
    Conclusion: In low prevalence hospitals without MRSA outbreaks, it is recommended that MRSA screening be conducted on patients admitted from skilled nursing and similar facilities because they are most likely to be colonized with MRSA. Results do not support mandates to conduct screening on all patients admitted to critical care units.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carrier State/diagnosis ; Carrier State/microbiology ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Female ; Hospitals, Community ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infection Control/economics ; Infection Control/methods ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Mass Screening/economics ; Mass Screening/methods ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification ; Middle Aged ; Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis ; Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 392362-9
    ISSN 1527-3296 ; 0196-6553
    ISSN (online) 1527-3296
    ISSN 0196-6553
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.038
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Current practice in airway management: A descriptive evaluation.

    Kjonegaard, Rebecca / Fields, Willa / King, Major L

    American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses

    2010  Volume 19, Issue 2, Page(s) 168–73; quiz 174

    Abstract: Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a common complication of mechanical ventilation, could be reduced if health care workers implemented evidence-based practices that decrease the risk for this complication.: Objectives: To determine current ...

    Abstract Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a common complication of mechanical ventilation, could be reduced if health care workers implemented evidence-based practices that decrease the risk for this complication.
    Objectives: To determine current practice and differences in practices between registered nurses and respiratory therapists in managing patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
    Methods: A descriptive comparative design was used. A convenience sample of 41 registered nurses and 25 respiratory therapists who manage critical care patients treated with mechanical ventilation at Sharp Grossmont Hospital, La Mesa, California, completed a survey on suctioning techniques and airway management practices. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.
    Results: Significant differences existed between nurses and respiratory therapists for hyperoxygenation before suctioning (P =.03). In the 2 groups, nurses used the ventilator for hyper-oxygenation more often, and respiratory therapists used a bag-valve device more often (P =.03). Respiratory therapists instilled saline (P <.001) and rinsed the closed system with saline after suctioning (P =.003) more often than nurses did. Nurses suctioned oral secretions (P <.001) and the nose of orally intubated patients (P =.01), brushed patients' teeth with a toothbrush (P<.001), and used oral swabs to clean the mouth (P <.001) more frequently than respiratory therapists did.
    Conclusion: Nurses and respiratory therapists differed significantly in the management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. To reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, both nurses and respiratory therapists must be consistent in using best practices when managing patients treated with mechanical ventilation.
    MeSH term(s) Evidence-Based Practice ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Nursing Staff, Hospital ; Patient Care Management/methods ; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/etiology ; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/nursing ; Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects ; Respiration, Artificial/methods ; Respiration, Artificial/nursing ; Respiratory Therapy/methods ; Suction/methods
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1130987-8
    ISSN 1937-710X ; 1062-3264
    ISSN (online) 1937-710X
    ISSN 1062-3264
    DOI 10.4037/ajcc2009803
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Arresting drug-resistant organisms.

    Kjonegaard, Rebecca / Myers, Frank Edward

    Nursing

    2005  Volume 35, Issue 6, Page(s) 48–50

    MeSH term(s) Communicable Diseases, Emerging/microbiology ; Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control ; Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology ; Community-Acquired Infections/prevention & control ; Cross Infection/microbiology ; Cross Infection/prevention & control ; Enterococcus ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control ; Hand Disinfection ; Humans ; Infection Control/methods ; Infection Control/standards ; Methicillin Resistance ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient Isolation ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Risk Factors ; Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology ; Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Vancomycin Resistance
    Language English
    Publishing date 2005-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 197895-0
    ISSN 0360-4039
    ISSN 0360-4039
    DOI 10.1097/00152193-200506000-00040
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top