LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 100

Search options

  1. Article: Functions of the Bloom Syndrome Helicase N-terminal Intrinsically Disordered Region.

    Bereda, Colleen C / Dewey, Evan B / Nasr, Mohamed A / Sekelsky, Jeff

    bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology

    2024  

    Abstract: Bloom Syndrome helicase (Blm) is a RecQ family helicase involved in DNA repair, cell-cycle progression, and development. Pathogenic variants in ... ...

    Abstract Bloom Syndrome helicase (Blm) is a RecQ family helicase involved in DNA repair, cell-cycle progression, and development. Pathogenic variants in human
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-04-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Preprint
    DOI 10.1101/2024.04.12.589165
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Centromere-Proximal Suppression of Meiotic Crossovers in

    Pazhayam, Nila M / Frazier, Leah K / Sekelsky, Jeff

    bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology

    2023  

    Abstract: Accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis depends on both the presence and regulated placement of crossovers (COs). The centromere effect (CE), or CO exclusion in pericentromeric regions of the chromosome, is a meiotic CO patterning ... ...

    Abstract Accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis depends on both the presence and regulated placement of crossovers (COs). The centromere effect (CE), or CO exclusion in pericentromeric regions of the chromosome, is a meiotic CO patterning phenomenon that helps prevent nondisjunction (NDJ), thereby protecting against chromosomal disorders and other meiotic defects. Despite being identified nearly a century ago, the mechanisms behind this fundamental cellular process remain unknown, with most studies of the
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-10-20
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Preprint
    DOI 10.1101/2023.10.17.562696
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Centromere-proximal suppression of meiotic crossovers in Drosophila is robust to changes in centromere number, repetitive DNA content, and centromere-clustering.

    Pazhayam, Nila M / Frazier, Leah K / Sekelsky, Jeff

    Genetics

    2023  Volume 226, Issue 3

    Abstract: Accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis depends on both the presence and the regulated placement of crossovers (COs). The centromere effect, or CO exclusion in pericentromeric regions of the chromosome, is a meiotic CO patterning ... ...

    Abstract Accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis depends on both the presence and the regulated placement of crossovers (COs). The centromere effect, or CO exclusion in pericentromeric regions of the chromosome, is a meiotic CO patterning phenomenon that helps prevent nondisjunction, thereby protecting against chromosomal disorders and other meiotic defects. Despite being identified nearly a century ago, the mechanisms behind this fundamental cellular process remain unknown, with most studies of the Drosophila centromere effect focusing on local influences of the centromere and pericentric heterochromatin. In this study, we sought to investigate whether dosage changes in centromere number and repetitive DNA content affect the strength of the centromere effect, using phenotypic recombination mapping. Additionally, we studied the effects of repetitive DNA function on centromere effect strength using satellite DNA-binding protein mutants displaying defective centromere-clustering in meiotic nuclei. Despite what previous studies suggest, our results show that the Drosophila centromere effect is robust to changes in centromere number, repetitive DNA content, as well as repetitive DNA function. Our study suggests that the centromere effect is unlikely to be spatially controlled, providing novel insight into the mechanisms behind the Drosophila centromere effect.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Drosophila/genetics ; Drosophila/metabolism ; Centromere/genetics ; Centromere/metabolism ; Drosophila Proteins/genetics ; Drosophila Proteins/metabolism ; Meiosis/genetics ; DNA ; Chromosome Segregation
    Chemical Substances Drosophila Proteins ; DNA (9007-49-2)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-27
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2167-2
    ISSN 1943-2631 ; 0016-6731
    ISSN (online) 1943-2631
    ISSN 0016-6731
    DOI 10.1093/genetics/iyad216
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: DNA Repair in Drosophila: Mutagens, Models, and Missing Genes.

    Sekelsky, Jeff

    Genetics

    2017  Volume 205, Issue 2, Page(s) 471–490

    Abstract: The numerous processes that damage DNA are counterbalanced by a complex network of repair pathways that, collectively, can mend diverse types of damage. Insights into these pathways have come from studies in many different organisms, including Drosophila ...

    Abstract The numerous processes that damage DNA are counterbalanced by a complex network of repair pathways that, collectively, can mend diverse types of damage. Insights into these pathways have come from studies in many different organisms, including Drosophila melanogaster Indeed, the first ideas about chromosome and gene repair grew out of Drosophila research on the properties of mutations produced by ionizing radiation and mustard gas. Numerous methods have been developed to take advantage of Drosophila genetic tools to elucidate repair processes in whole animals, organs, tissues, and cells. These studies have led to the discovery of key DNA repair pathways, including synthesis-dependent strand annealing, and DNA polymerase theta-mediated end joining. Drosophila appear to utilize other major repair pathways as well, such as base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, mismatch repair, and interstrand crosslink repair. In a surprising number of cases, however, DNA repair genes whose products play important roles in these pathways in other organisms are missing from the Drosophila genome, raising interesting questions for continued investigations.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; DNA Repair ; DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics ; Drosophila/genetics ; Drosophila Proteins/genetics ; Models, Genetic ; Mutagenesis
    Chemical Substances Drosophila Proteins ; DNA Repair Enzymes (EC 6.5.1.-)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-01-30
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2167-2
    ISSN 1943-2631 ; 0016-6731
    ISSN (online) 1943-2631
    ISSN 0016-6731
    DOI 10.1534/genetics.116.186759
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: ATM/Chk2 and ATR/Chk1 Pathways Respond to DNA Damage Induced by Movento

    González-Marín, Berenyce / Calderón-Segura, María Elena / Sekelsky, Jeff

    Toxics

    2023  Volume 11, Issue 9

    Abstract: DNA damage response (DDR) pathways in keto-enol genotoxicity have not been characterized, and few studies have reported genotoxic effects in non-target organisms. The present study shows that concentrations of 11.2, 22.4, 37.3 mg/L of ... ...

    Abstract DNA damage response (DDR) pathways in keto-enol genotoxicity have not been characterized, and few studies have reported genotoxic effects in non-target organisms. The present study shows that concentrations of 11.2, 22.4, 37.3 mg/L of Movento
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-06
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2733883-6
    ISSN 2305-6304 ; 2305-6304
    ISSN (online) 2305-6304
    ISSN 2305-6304
    DOI 10.3390/toxics11090754
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Meiotic Crossover Patterning.

    Pazhayam, Nila M / Turcotte, Carolyn A / Sekelsky, Jeff

    Frontiers in cell and developmental biology

    2021  Volume 9, Page(s) 681123

    Abstract: Proper number and placement of meiotic crossovers is vital to chromosome segregation, with failures in normal crossover distribution often resulting in aneuploidy and infertility. Meiotic crossovers are formed via homologous repair of programmed double- ... ...

    Abstract Proper number and placement of meiotic crossovers is vital to chromosome segregation, with failures in normal crossover distribution often resulting in aneuploidy and infertility. Meiotic crossovers are formed via homologous repair of programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). Although DSBs occur throughout the genome, crossover placement is intricately patterned, as observed first in early genetic studies by Muller and Sturtevant. Three types of patterning events have been identified. Interference, first described by Sturtevant in 1915, is a phenomenon in which crossovers on the same chromosome do not occur near one another. Assurance, initially identified by Owen in 1949, describes the phenomenon in which a minimum of one crossover is formed per chromosome pair. Suppression, first observed by Beadle in 1932, dictates that crossovers do not occur in regions surrounding the centromere and telomeres. The mechanisms behind crossover patterning remain largely unknown, and key players appear to act at all scales, from the DNA level to inter-chromosome interactions. There is also considerable overlap between the known players that drive each patterning phenomenon. In this review we discuss the history of studies of crossover patterning, developments in methods used in the field, and our current understanding of the interplay between patterning phenomena.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-22
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2737824-X
    ISSN 2296-634X
    ISSN 2296-634X
    DOI 10.3389/fcell.2021.681123
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: DNA polymerase theta suppresses mitotic crossing over.

    Carvajal-Garcia, Juan / Crown, K Nicole / Ramsden, Dale A / Sekelsky, Jeff

    PLoS genetics

    2021  Volume 17, Issue 3, Page(s) e1009267

    Abstract: Polymerase theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ) is a chromosome break repair pathway that is able to rescue the lethality associated with the loss of proteins involved in early steps in homologous recombination (e.g., BRCA1/2). This is due to the ability of ...

    Abstract Polymerase theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ) is a chromosome break repair pathway that is able to rescue the lethality associated with the loss of proteins involved in early steps in homologous recombination (e.g., BRCA1/2). This is due to the ability of polymerase theta (Pol θ) to use resected, 3' single stranded DNA tails to repair chromosome breaks. These resected DNA tails are also the starting substrate for homologous recombination. However, it remains unknown if TMEJ can compensate for the loss of proteins involved in more downstream steps during homologous recombination. Here we show that the Holliday junction resolvases SLX4 and GEN1 are required for viability in the absence of Pol θ in Drosophila melanogaster, and lack of all three proteins results in high levels of apoptosis. Flies deficient in Pol θ and SLX4 are extremely sensitive to DNA damaging agents, and mammalian cells require either Pol θ or SLX4 to survive. Our results suggest that TMEJ and Holliday junction formation/resolution share a common DNA substrate, likely a homologous recombination intermediate, that when left unrepaired leads to cell death. One major consequence of Holliday junction resolution by SLX4 and GEN1 is cancer-causing loss of heterozygosity due to mitotic crossing over. We measured mitotic crossovers in flies after a Cas9-induced chromosome break, and observed that this mutagenic form of repair is increased in the absence of Pol θ. This demonstrates that TMEJ can function upstream of the Holiday junction resolvases to protect cells from loss of heterozygosity. Our work argues that Pol θ can thus compensate for the loss of the Holliday junction resolvases by using homologous recombination intermediates, suppressing mitotic crossing over and preserving the genomic stability of cells.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Apoptosis/genetics ; BRCA2 Protein/genetics ; Crossing Over, Genetic ; DNA End-Joining Repair ; DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics ; DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism ; Drosophila melanogaster/genetics ; Gene Expression Regulation ; Holliday Junction Resolvases/genetics ; Homologous Recombination ; Mitosis/genetics ; Synthetic Lethal Mutations ; DNA Polymerase theta
    Chemical Substances BRCA2 Protein ; DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase (EC 2.7.7.7) ; Holliday Junction Resolvases (EC 3.1.21.-)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-03-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 2186725-2
    ISSN 1553-7404 ; 1553-7390
    ISSN (online) 1553-7404
    ISSN 1553-7390
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009267
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: The effect of repeat length on Marcal1-dependent single-strand annealing in Drosophila.

    Dewey, Evan B / Korda Holsclaw, Julie / Saghaey, Kiyarash / Wittmer, Mackenzie E / Sekelsky, Jeff

    Genetics

    2022  Volume 223, Issue 1

    Abstract: Proper repair of DNA double-strand breaks is essential to the maintenance of genomic stability and avoidance of genetic disease. Organisms have many ways of repairing double-strand breaks, including the use of homologous sequences through homology- ... ...

    Abstract Proper repair of DNA double-strand breaks is essential to the maintenance of genomic stability and avoidance of genetic disease. Organisms have many ways of repairing double-strand breaks, including the use of homologous sequences through homology-directed repair. While homology-directed repair is often error free, in single-strand annealing homologous repeats flanking a double-strand break are annealed to one another, leading to the deletion of one repeat and the intervening sequences. Studies in yeast have shown a relationship between the length of the repeat and single-strand annealing efficacy. We sought to determine the effects of homology length on single-strand annealing in Drosophila, as Drosophila uses a different annealing enzyme (Marcal1) than yeast. Using an in vivo single-strand annealing assay, we show that 50 base pairs are insufficient to promote single-strand annealing and that 500-2,000 base pairs are required for maximum efficiency. Loss of Marcal1 generally followed the same homology length trend as wild-type flies, with single-strand annealing frequencies reduced to about a third of wild-type frequencies regardless of homology length. Interestingly, we find a difference in single-strand annealing rates between 500-base pair homologies that align to the annealing target either nearer or further from the double-strand break, a phenomenon that may be explained by Marcal1 dynamics. This study gives insights into Marcal1 function and provides important information to guide the design of genome engineering strategies that use single-strand annealing to integrate linear DNA constructs into a chromosomal double-strand break.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; DNA Repair ; Drosophila/genetics ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae/genetics ; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded ; DNA
    Chemical Substances DNA (9007-49-2)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-10-27
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 2167-2
    ISSN 1943-2631 ; 0016-6731
    ISSN (online) 1943-2631
    ISSN 0016-6731
    DOI 10.1093/genetics/iyac164
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Annealing of Complementary DNA Sequences During Double-Strand Break Repair in

    Holsclaw, Julie Korda / Sekelsky, Jeff

    Genetics

    2017  Volume 206, Issue 1, Page(s) 467–480

    Abstract: DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a serious threat to genomic integrity. If unrepaired, they can lead to chromosome fragmentation and cell death. If repaired incorrectly, they can cause mutations and chromosome rearrangements. DSBs are repaired using ... ...

    Abstract DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a serious threat to genomic integrity. If unrepaired, they can lead to chromosome fragmentation and cell death. If repaired incorrectly, they can cause mutations and chromosome rearrangements. DSBs are repaired using end-joining or homology-directed repair strategies, with the predominant form of homology-directed repair being synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA). SDSA is the first defense against genomic rearrangements and information loss during DSB repair, making it a vital component of cell health and an attractive target for chemotherapeutic development. SDSA has also been proposed to be the primary mechanism for integration of large insertions during genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9. Despite the central role for SDSA in genome stability, little is known about the defining step: annealing. We hypothesized that annealing during SDSA is performed by the annealing helicase SMARCAL1, which can anneal RPA-coated single DNA strands during replication-associated DNA damage repair. We used unique genetic tools in
    MeSH term(s) Adenosine Triphosphate/genetics ; Animals ; CRISPR-Cas Systems ; DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded ; DNA Damage/genetics ; DNA End-Joining Repair/genetics ; DNA, Complementary/genetics ; DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics ; Drosophila melanogaster/genetics ; Gene Editing ; Genomic Instability/genetics ; SMARCB1 Protein/genetics
    Chemical Substances DNA, Complementary ; DNA-Binding Proteins ; SMARCB1 Protein ; Adenosine Triphosphate (8L70Q75FXE)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-03-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 2167-2
    ISSN 1943-2631 ; 0016-6731
    ISSN (online) 1943-2631
    ISSN 0016-6731
    DOI 10.1534/genetics.117.200238
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Cross-species investigation into the requirement of XPA for nucleotide excision repair.

    Kose, Cansu / Cao, Xuemei / Dewey, Evan B / Malkoç, Mustafa / Adebali, Ogün / Sekelsky, Jeff / Lindsey-Boltz, Laura A / Sancar, Aziz

    Nucleic acids research

    2023  Volume 52, Issue 2, Page(s) 677–689

    Abstract: After reconstitution of nucleotide excision repair (excision repair) with XPA, RPA, XPC, TFIIH, XPF-ERCC1 and XPG, it was concluded that these six factors are the minimal essential components of the excision repair machinery. All six factors are highly ... ...

    Abstract After reconstitution of nucleotide excision repair (excision repair) with XPA, RPA, XPC, TFIIH, XPF-ERCC1 and XPG, it was concluded that these six factors are the minimal essential components of the excision repair machinery. All six factors are highly conserved across diverse organisms spanning yeast to humans, yet no identifiable homolog of the XPA gene exists in many eukaryotes including green plants. Nevertheless, excision repair is reported to be robust in the XPA-lacking organism, Arabidopsis thaliana, which raises a fundamental question of whether excision repair could occur without XPA in other organisms. Here, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of XPA across all species with annotated genomes and then quantitatively measured excision repair in the absence of XPA using the sensitive whole-genome qXR-Seq method in human cell lines and two model organisms, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. We find that although the absence of XPA results in inefficient excision repair and UV-sensitivity in humans, flies, and worms, excision repair of UV-induced DNA damage is detectable over background. These studies have yielded a significant discovery regarding the evolution of XPA protein and its mechanistic role in nucleotide excision repair.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Humans ; DNA Damage ; DNA Repair ; DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics ; DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism ; Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism ; Excision Repair ; Nucleotides/metabolism ; Phylogeny ; Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein/genetics ; Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein/metabolism ; Plants/metabolism ; Evolution, Molecular
    Chemical Substances DNA-Binding Proteins ; Nucleotides ; Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein ; XPA protein, human
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-12-05
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 186809-3
    ISSN 1362-4962 ; 1362-4954 ; 0301-5610 ; 0305-1048
    ISSN (online) 1362-4962 ; 1362-4954
    ISSN 0301-5610 ; 0305-1048
    DOI 10.1093/nar/gkad1104
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top