LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 13

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Determinants of COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate in the United States: Spatial Analysis Over One Year of the Pandemic.

    Kathe, Niranjan J / Wani, Rajvi J

    Journal of health economics and outcomes research

    2021  Volume 8, Issue 1, Page(s) 51–62

    Abstract: Background: ...

    Abstract Background:
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2746906-2
    ISSN 2327-2236 ; 2327-2236
    ISSN (online) 2327-2236
    ISSN 2327-2236
    DOI 10.36469/jheor.2021.22978
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Determinants of COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate in the United States

    Niranjan J. Kathe / Rajvi J. Wani

    Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research (2021)

    Spatial Analysis Over One Year of the Pandemic

    2021  

    Abstract: Background:** The United States continues to account for the highest proportion of the global Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths. Currently, it is important to contextualize COVID-19 fatality to guide mitigation efforts. **Objectives:* ...

    Abstract **Background:** The United States continues to account for the highest proportion of the global Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths. Currently, it is important to contextualize COVID-19 fatality to guide mitigation efforts. **Objectives:** The objective of this study was to assess the ecological factors (policy, health behaviors, socio-economic, physical environment, and clinical care) associated with COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) in the United States. **Methods:** Data from the New York Times’ COVID-19 repository and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Data (01/21/2020 - 02/27/2021) were used. County-level CFR was modeled using the Spatial Durbin model (SDM). The SDM estimates were decomposed into direct and indirect impacts. **Results:** The study found percent positive for COVID-19 (0.057% point), stringency index (0.014% point), percent diabetic (0.011% point), long-term care beds (log) (0.010% point), premature age-adjusted mortality (log) (0.702 % point), income inequality ratio (0.078% point), social association rate (log) (0.014% point), percent 65 years old and over (0.055% point), and percent African Americans (0.016% point) in a given county were positively associated with its COVID-19 CFR. The study also found food insecurity, long-term beds (log), mental health-care provider (log), workforce in construction, social association rate (log), and percent diabetic of a given county as well as neighboring county were associated with given county’s COVID-19 CFR, indicating significant externalities. **Conclusion:** The spatial models identified percent positive for COVID-19, stringency index, elderly, college education, race/ethnicity, residential segregation, premature mortality, income inequality, workforce composition, and rurality as important ecological determinants of the geographic disparities in COVID-19 CFR.
    Keywords Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ; R858-859.7
    Subject code 310
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Determinants of COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate in the United States

    Niranjan J. Kathe / Rajvi J. Wani

    Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research (2021)

    Spatial Analysis Over One Year of the Pandemic

    2021  

    Abstract: Background:** The United States continues to account for the highest proportion of the global Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths. Currently, it is important to contextualize COVID-19 fatality to guide mitigation efforts. **Objectives:* ...

    Abstract **Background:** The United States continues to account for the highest proportion of the global Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths. Currently, it is important to contextualize COVID-19 fatality to guide mitigation efforts. **Objectives:** The objective of this study was to assess the ecological factors (policy, health behaviors, socio-economic, physical environment, and clinical care) associated with COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) in the United States. **Methods:** Data from the New York Times’ COVID-19 repository and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Data (01/21/2020 - 02/27/2021) were used. County-level CFR was modeled using the Spatial Durbin model (SDM). The SDM estimates were decomposed into direct and indirect impacts. **Results:** The study found percent positive for COVID-19 (0.057% point), stringency index (0.014% point), percent diabetic (0.011% point), long-term care beds (log) (0.010% point), premature age-adjusted mortality (log) (0.702 % point), income inequality ratio (0.078% point), social association rate (log) (0.014% point), percent 65 years old and over (0.055% point), and percent African Americans (0.016% point) in a given county were positively associated with its COVID-19 CFR. The study also found food insecurity, long-term beds (log), mental health-care provider (log), workforce in construction, social association rate (log), and percent diabetic of a given county as well as neighboring county were associated with given county’s COVID-19 CFR, indicating significant externalities. **Conclusion:** The spatial models identified percent positive for COVID-19, stringency index, elderly, college education, race/ethnicity, residential segregation, premature mortality, income inequality, workforce composition, and rurality as important ecological determinants of the geographic disparities in COVID-19 CFR.
    Keywords Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ; R858-859.7
    Subject code 310
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Determinants of COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in the US: Spatial Analysis

    Kathe, Niranjan / Wani, Rajvi J

    medRxiv

    Abstract: The US continues to account for the highest proportion of the global coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths. Amid the second wave, it is important to contextualize the spread and success of mitigation efforts. The objective of this study ... ...

    Abstract The US continues to account for the highest proportion of the global coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases and deaths. Amid the second wave, it is important to contextualize the spread and success of mitigation efforts. The objective of this study was to assess the ecological determinants (policy, health behaviors, socio-economic, physical environment and clinical care) of COVID-19 incidence and mortality. Data from the New York Times COVID-19 repository (01/21/2020-10/27/2020), 2020 County Health Rankings, 2016 County Presidential Election Returns, and 2018-2019 Area Health Resource File were used. County-level logged incidence and mortality rate/million were modelled using Spatial Autoregressive Combined model and spatial. Counties with higher proportions of republican voters, and racial minorities (African Americans, Native Americans and Hispanics), those not proficient in English, and higher population density, pollution-particulate matter, residential segregation between non-Whites & Whites were associated with high incidence rates. Subsequently, counties with higher republican voters, excessive drinkers, children in single-parent households, uninsured adults, racial minorities, females, and high population density, pollution-particulate matter, and residential segregation between non-Whites & Whites was associated with high COVID-19 mortality rates. The study spatial models identified length of order, population density, income, and uninsurance rate and race/ethnicity as some important determinants of the geographic disparities.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-04
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.12.02.20242685
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Predictors of Cost and Incidence of 30-Day Readmissions Following Hospitalizations for Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders: A Nationwide Analysis.

    Wani, Rajvi J / Kathe, Niranjan J / Klepser, Donald G

    Quality management in health care

    2019  Volume 28, Issue 3, Page(s) 130–138

    Abstract: Background: Schizophrenia and psychotic disorders (SPDs)-related hospitalizations are the second leading cause of 30-day readmission. This study assessed the effect of patient and hospital-level factors on readmission costs following index hospital ... ...

    Abstract Background: Schizophrenia and psychotic disorders (SPDs)-related hospitalizations are the second leading cause of 30-day readmission. This study assessed the effect of patient and hospital-level factors on readmission costs following index hospital discharges for SPDs.
    Methods: 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify SPD-related discharges between January 1, 2014, and November 30, 2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate patient and hospital-level predictors for readmissions. A two part model was used to estimate the predictors of readmission and associated cost for index hospital discharges with SPDs.
    Results: A total of 77 625 of 343 579 (22%) index hospital discharges for SPDs resulted in readmissions. The average index and readmission costs were $9285 and $8593, respectively. Being 25 to 44 years old (odds ratio: 1.14), with nonmental comorbidities (odds ratio: 1.52), and admitted in private hospitals (odds ratio: 1.24) had significantly higher odds of readmission rates. Being males ($105), 25 to 44 years of age ($99), urban residents ($312), Medicare enrollees ($713 over privately insured), high-income area residents ($393), having multiple comorbidities ($923), and those admitted in large metropolitan ($680) and government-owned hospitals ($417) had higher costs of readmission.
    Conclusion: The high SPD-related readmission rates can be reduced by providing integrated behavioral health services for this high-risk cohort.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Forecasting ; Hospital Costs/trends ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ; Patient Readmission/economics ; Psychotic Disorders ; Risk Factors ; Schizophrenia ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-07-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1162319-6
    ISSN 1550-5154 ; 1063-8628
    ISSN (online) 1550-5154
    ISSN 1063-8628
    DOI 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000223
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Assessment of Reliability and Validity of SF-12v2 among a Diabetic Population.

    Kathe, Niranjan / Hayes, Corey J / Bhandari, Naleen Raj / Payakachat, Nalin

    Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

    2018  Volume 21, Issue 4, Page(s) 432–440

    Abstract: Objectives: To validate the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form version 2 (SF-12v2) in diabetic patients.: Methods: Adults with self-reported diabetes from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2011-2013) were identified. Reliability (internal ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: To validate the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form version 2 (SF-12v2) in diabetic patients.
    Methods: Adults with self-reported diabetes from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2011-2013) were identified. Reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (construct, concurrent, criterion, and predictive) of the SF-12v2 were assessed. The SF-12v2 consists of two normalized composite scores: the physical component summary score (PCS12) and the mental component summary score (MCS12). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the instrument structure. Concurrent (convergent and discriminant) validity was assessed by a multitrait-multimethod matrix using the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Kessler Scale, and perceived health and mental health questions. The predictive validity was assessed by estimating future limitations. The concurrent validity was tested by comparing the MCS12, PCS12, and utility scores (six-dimensional health state short form) across comorbidity scores.
    Results: The final sample comprised 2214 diabetic patients with mean normalized (population mean 50; range 0-100) PCS12 and MCS12 scores of 40.81 (standard error 0.33) and 49.82 (standard error 0.26), respectively. The PCS12 and MCS12 scores showed good internal consistency (Cronbach α: PCS12 0.85; MCS12 0.83) and acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: PCS12 0.72; MCS12 0.63) and produced acceptable goodness-of-fit indices (normed fit index 0.95; comparative fit index 0.95; root mean square error of approximation 0.11 [95% confidence interval 0.1017-0.1188]). The PCS12 and MCS12 were moderately correlated with perceived health and perceived mental health. The MCS12 was highly correlated with the Patient Health Questionnaire and the Kessler Scale. Both the PCS12 and the MCS12 could predict the future health limitations. The PCS12, MCS12, and utility scores demonstrated sensitivity to the presence of comorbidity scores.
    Conclusions: The SF-12v2 is a valid generic instrument for measuring quality of life in diabetic patients.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Comorbidity ; Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis ; Diabetes Mellitus/psychology ; Diabetes Mellitus/therapy ; Female ; Health Status ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Mental Health ; Middle Aged ; Patient Health Questionnaire ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Validation Studies
    ZDB-ID 1471745-1
    ISSN 1524-4733 ; 1098-3015
    ISSN (online) 1524-4733
    ISSN 1098-3015
    DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.007
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: Reliability and Validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) in Adults with Non-Cancer Pain.

    Hayes, Corey J / Bhandari, Naleen Raj / Kathe, Niranjan / Payakachat, Nalin

    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

    2017  Volume 5, Issue 2

    Abstract: Limited evidence exists on how non-cancer pain (NCP) affects an individual's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to validate the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2), a generic measure of HRQoL, in a NCP cohort ... ...

    Abstract Limited evidence exists on how non-cancer pain (NCP) affects an individual's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to validate the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2), a generic measure of HRQoL, in a NCP cohort using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Longitudinal Files. The SF Mental Component Summary (MCS12) and SF Physical Component Summary (PCS12) were tested for reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (construct: convergent and discriminant; criterion: concurrent and predictive). A total of 15,716 patients with NCP were included in the final analysis. The MCS12 and PCS12 demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and Mosier's alpha > 0.8), and moderate and high test-retest reliability, respectively (MCS12 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.64; PCS12 ICC: 0.73). Both scales were significantly associated with a number of chronic conditions (
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-04-26
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2721009-1
    ISSN 2227-9032
    ISSN 2227-9032
    DOI 10.3390/healthcare5020022
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Reliability and Validity of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) in Adults with Non-Cancer Pain

    Corey J. Hayes / Naleen Raj Bhandari / Niranjan Kathe / Nalin Payakachat

    Healthcare, Vol 5, Iss 2, p

    2017  Volume 22

    Abstract: Limited evidence exists on how non-cancer pain (NCP) affects an individual’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to validate the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2), a generic measure of HRQoL, in a NCP cohort ... ...

    Abstract Limited evidence exists on how non-cancer pain (NCP) affects an individual’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study aimed to validate the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 Version 2 (SF-12v2), a generic measure of HRQoL, in a NCP cohort using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Longitudinal Files. The SF Mental Component Summary (MCS12) and SF Physical Component Summary (PCS12) were tested for reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (construct: convergent and discriminant; criterion: concurrent and predictive). A total of 15,716 patients with NCP were included in the final analysis. The MCS12 and PCS12 demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha and Mosier’s alpha > 0.8), and moderate and high test-retest reliability, respectively (MCS12 intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.64; PCS12 ICC: 0.73). Both scales were significantly associated with a number of chronic conditions (p < 0.05). The PCS12 was strongly correlated with perceived health (r = 0.52) but weakly correlated with perceived mental health (r = 0.25). The MCS12 was moderately correlated with perceived mental health (r = 0.42) and perceived health (r = 0.33). Increasing PCS12 and MCS12 scores were significantly associated with lower odds of reporting future physical and cognitive limitations (PCS12: OR = 0.90 95%CI: 0.89–0.90, MCS12: OR = 0.94 95%CI: 0.93–0.94). In summary, the SF-12v2 is a reliable and valid measure of HRQoL for patients with NCP.
    Keywords non-cancer pain ; SF12-v2 ; reliability ; validity ; psychometric properties ; Medicine ; R
    Subject code 150
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher MDPI AG
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Higher Rates of Preventive Health Care With Commercial Insurance Compared With Medicaid: Findings From the Arkansas Health Care Independence "Private Option" Program.

    Goudie, Anthony / Martin, Bradley / Li, Chenghui / Lewis, Kanna / Han, Xiaotong / Kathe, Niranjan / Wilson, J Craig / Thompson, Joseph

    Medical care

    2019  Volume 58, Issue 2, Page(s) 120–127

    Abstract: Background: A requirement of the Arkansas Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver was to evaluate the level of care received for Medicaid expansion eligible beneficiaries enrolled in commercial Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) in the Health Care ... ...

    Abstract Background: A requirement of the Arkansas Medicaid Section 1115 demonstration waiver was to evaluate the level of care received for Medicaid expansion eligible beneficiaries enrolled in commercial Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) in the Health Care Independence "Private Option" Program. This allowed for a direct comparison of Medicaid and commercial system performance serving similar newly covered adults.
    Research design: In 2014, assignment to either Medicaid or a QHP was made based upon a psychometrically derived continuous composite score to exceptional health care needs assessment screener using a sharp a priori threshold cutpoint. Using a regression discontinuity design we compared preventive care (flu vaccination and screening rates) services in the 2 programs over 3 years.
    Results: Compared with Medicaid enrollees, a higher percentage of QHP enrollees consistently received eligible preventive care screenings with 15.3, and 6.9% more receiving at least 1 or all eligible screenings, respectively. For individual preventive care outcomes and compared with Medicaid enrollees over the 3 years under study, a higher percentage of eligible QHP enrollees received a flu shot, cholesterol screenings, glycated hemoglobin assessment, and cervical and breast cancer periodic assessments. No differences were found for colorectal periodic assessments.
    Conclusions: These findings suggest that at least for preventive services, the Medicaid federal equal access requirement is not being met for those within Medicaid fee-for-service coverage. This persisted across all 3 years of the program. Differential payment rates for services between Medicaid and QHPs are likely a major contributing factor.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Arkansas ; Female ; Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data ; Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medicaid/statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Needs Assessment ; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislation & jurisprudence ; Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data ; Quality of Health Care ; United States ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-11-22
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 411646-x
    ISSN 1537-1948 ; 0025-7079
    ISSN (online) 1537-1948
    ISSN 0025-7079
    DOI 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001248
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Health-Related Quality of Life among Chronic Opioid Users, Nonchronic Opioid Users, and Nonopioid Users with Chronic Noncancer Pain.

    Hayes, Corey J / Li, Xiaocong / Li, Chenghui / Shah, Anuj / Kathe, Niranjan / Bhandari, Naleen Raj / Payakachat, Nalin

    Health services research

    2018  Volume 53, Issue 5, Page(s) 3329–3349

    Abstract: Objective: Evaluate the association between opioid therapy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with chronic, noncancer pain (CNCP).: Data sources: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Longitudinal, Medical Conditions, and ... ...

    Abstract Objective: Evaluate the association between opioid therapy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in participants with chronic, noncancer pain (CNCP).
    Data sources: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Longitudinal, Medical Conditions, and Prescription Files.
    Study design: Using a retrospective cohort study design, the Mental Health Component (MCS12) and Physical Health Component (PCS12) scores of the Short Form-12 Version 2 were assessed to measure mental and physical HRQoL.
    Data collection: Chronic, noncancer pain participants were classified as chronic, nonchronic, and nonopioid users. One-to-one propensity score matching was employed to match chronic opioid users to nonchronic opioid users plus nonchronic opioid users and chronic opioid users to nonopioid users.
    Principal findings: A total of 5,876 participants were identified. After matching, PCS12 was not significantly different between nonchronic versus nonopioid users (LSM Diff = -0.98, 95% CI: -2.07, 0.10), chronic versus nonopioid users (LSM Diff = -2.24, 95% CI: -4.58, 0.10), or chronic versus nonchronic opioid users (LSM Diff = -2.23, 95% CI: -4.53, 0.05). Similarly, MCS12 was not significantly different between nonchronic versus nonopioid users (LSM Diff = 0.76, 95% CI: -0.46, 1.98), chronic versus nonopioid users (LSM Diff = 1.08, 95% CI: -1.26, 3.42), or chronic versus nonchronic opioid users (LSM Diff = -0.57, 95% CI: -2.90, 1.77).
    Conclusions: Clinicians should evaluate opioid use in participants with CNCP as opioid use is not correlated with better HRQoL.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use ; Chronic Pain/drug therapy ; Chronic Pain/epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology ; Pain Measurement ; Prevalence ; Propensity Score ; Quality of Life ; Retrospective Studies ; United States/epidemiology
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-02-25
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 410435-3
    ISSN 1475-6773 ; 0017-9124
    ISSN (online) 1475-6773
    ISSN 0017-9124
    DOI 10.1111/1475-6773.12836
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top