LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 402

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Recognizing the complexities of co-prescriptions and life-style factors in opioid agonist treatment: A response from Eleni Domzaridou, Matthew J. Carr, Tim Millar, Roger T. Webb and Darren M. Ashcroft.

    Domzaridou, Eleni / Carr, Matthew J / Millar, Tim / Webb, Roger T / Ashcroft, Darren M

    Addiction (Abingdon, England)

    2024  Volume 119, Issue 5, Page(s) 967–968

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use ; Prescriptions ; Drug Overdose/drug therapy ; Benzodiazepines ; Retrospective Studies
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid ; Benzodiazepines (12794-10-4)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-05
    Publishing country England
    Document type Letter
    ZDB-ID 1141051-6
    ISSN 1360-0443 ; 0965-2140
    ISSN (online) 1360-0443
    ISSN 0965-2140
    DOI 10.1111/add.16447
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Methodological Concerns and Potential Confounding Factors-Reply.

    Tsang, Jung Yin / Kontopantelis, Evangelos / Ashcroft, Darren M

    JAMA ophthalmology

    2024  

    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-04-25
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2701705-9
    ISSN 2168-6173 ; 2168-6165
    ISSN (online) 2168-6173
    ISSN 2168-6165
    DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.1030
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Understanding the informal aspects of medication processes to maintain patient safety in hospitals: a sociotechnical ethnographic study in paediatric units.

    Sutherland, Adam B / Phipps, Denham L / Grant, Suzanne / Hughes, Joanne / Tomlin, Stephen / Ashcroft, Darren M

    Ergonomics

    2024  , Page(s) 1–15

    Abstract: Adverse drug events (ADEs) are common in hospitals, affecting one in six child in-patients. Medication processes are complex systems. This study aimed to explore the work-as-done of medication safety in three English paediatric units using direct ... ...

    Abstract Adverse drug events (ADEs) are common in hospitals, affecting one in six child in-patients. Medication processes are complex systems. This study aimed to explore the work-as-done of medication safety in three English paediatric units using direct observation and semi-structured interviews. We found that a combination of the physical environment, traditional work systems and team norms were among the systemic barriers to medicines safety. The layout of wards discouraged teamworking and reinforced professional boundaries. Workspaces were inadequate, and interruptions were uncontrollable. A less experienced workforce undertook prescribing and verification while more experienced nurses undertook administration. Guidelines were inadequate, with actors muddling through together. Formal controls against ADEs included checking (of prescriptions and administration) and barcode administration systems, but these did not integrate into workflows. Families played an important part in the safe administration of medication and provision of information about their children but were isolated from other parts of the system.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-04-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1920-3
    ISSN 1366-5847 ; 0014-0139
    ISSN (online) 1366-5847
    ISSN 0014-0139
    DOI 10.1080/00140139.2024.2333396
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Development of prescribing indicators related to opioid-related harm in patients with chronic pain in primary care-a modified e-Delphi study.

    Bansal, Neetu / Campbell, Stephen M / Lin, Chiu-Yi / Ashcroft, Darren M / Chen, Li-Chia

    BMC medicine

    2024  Volume 22, Issue 1, Page(s) 5

    Abstract: Background: Long-term opioid use is associated with dependency, addiction, and serious adverse events. Although a framework to reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing exists, there is no consensus on prescribing indicators for preventable opioid-related ...

    Abstract Background: Long-term opioid use is associated with dependency, addiction, and serious adverse events. Although a framework to reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing exists, there is no consensus on prescribing indicators for preventable opioid-related problems in patients with chronic pain in primary care in the UK. This study aimed to identify opioid prescription scenarios for developing indicators for prescribing opioids to patients with chronic pain in primary care.
    Methods: Scenarios of opioid prescribing indicators were identified from a literature review, guidelines, and government reports. Twenty-one indicators were identified and presented in various opioid scenarios concerning opioid-related harm and adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and drug-disease interactions in certain disease conditions. After receiving ethics approval, two rounds of electronic Delphi panel technique surveys were conducted with 24 expert panellists from the UK (clinicians, pharmacists, and independent prescribers) from August 2020 to February 2021. Each indicator was rated on a 1-9 scale from inappropriate to appropriate. The score's median, 30th and 70th percentiles, and disagreement index were calculated.
    Results: The panel unanimously agreed that 15 out of the 21 opioid prescribing scenarios were inappropriate, primarily due to their potential for causing harm to patients. This consensus was reflected in the low appropriateness scores (median ranging from 1 to 3). There were no scenarios with a high consensus that prescribing was appropriate. The indicators were considered inappropriate due to drug-disease interactions (n = 8), drug-drug interactions (n = 2), adverse effects (n = 3), and prescribed dose and duration (n = 2). Examples included prescribing opioids during pregnancy, concurrently with benzodiazepines, long-term without a laxative prescription and prescribing > 120-mg morphine milligram equivalent per day or long-term duration over 3 months after surgery.
    Conclusions: The high agreement on opioid prescribing indicators indicates that these potentially hazardous consequences are relevant and concerning to healthcare practitioners. Future research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and implementation of these indicators within primary care settings. This research will provide valuable insights and evidence to support opioid prescribing and deprescribing strategies. Moreover, the findings will be crucial in informing primary care practitioners and shaping quality outcome frameworks and other initiatives to enhance the safety and quality of care in primary care settings.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects ; Chronic Pain/drug therapy ; Delphi Technique ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' ; Drug Prescriptions ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control ; Primary Health Care
    Chemical Substances Analgesics, Opioid
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-02
    Publishing country England
    Document type Review ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2131669-7
    ISSN 1741-7015 ; 1741-7015
    ISSN (online) 1741-7015
    ISSN 1741-7015
    DOI 10.1186/s12916-023-03213-x
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Development of prescribing indicators related to opioid-related harm in patients with chronic pain in primary care—a modified e-Delphi study

    Neetu Bansal / Stephen M. Campbell / Chiu-Yi Lin / Darren M. Ashcroft / Li-Chia Chen

    BMC Medicine, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    2024  Volume 15

    Abstract: Abstract Background Long-term opioid use is associated with dependency, addiction, and serious adverse events. Although a framework to reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing exists, there is no consensus on prescribing indicators for preventable opioid- ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Background Long-term opioid use is associated with dependency, addiction, and serious adverse events. Although a framework to reduce inappropriate opioid prescribing exists, there is no consensus on prescribing indicators for preventable opioid-related problems in patients with chronic pain in primary care in the UK. This study aimed to identify opioid prescription scenarios for developing indicators for prescribing opioids to patients with chronic pain in primary care. Methods Scenarios of opioid prescribing indicators were identified from a literature review, guidelines, and government reports. Twenty-one indicators were identified and presented in various opioid scenarios concerning opioid-related harm and adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, and drug-disease interactions in certain disease conditions. After receiving ethics approval, two rounds of electronic Delphi panel technique surveys were conducted with 24 expert panellists from the UK (clinicians, pharmacists, and independent prescribers) from August 2020 to February 2021. Each indicator was rated on a 1–9 scale from inappropriate to appropriate. The score’s median, 30th and 70th percentiles, and disagreement index were calculated. Results The panel unanimously agreed that 15 out of the 21 opioid prescribing scenarios were inappropriate, primarily due to their potential for causing harm to patients. This consensus was reflected in the low appropriateness scores (median ranging from 1 to 3). There were no scenarios with a high consensus that prescribing was appropriate. The indicators were considered inappropriate due to drug-disease interactions (n = 8), drug-drug interactions (n = 2), adverse effects (n = 3), and prescribed dose and duration (n = 2). Examples included prescribing opioids during pregnancy, concurrently with benzodiazepines, long-term without a laxative prescription and prescribing > 120-mg morphine milligram equivalent per day or long-term duration over 3 months after surgery. Conclusions The high agreement on opioid ...
    Keywords Primary care ; Chronic pain ; Prescribing quality indicators ; Opioid-related harms ; Preventable medication problems ; Medicine ; R
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies: An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA).

    Ashour, Ahmed / Phipps, Denham L / Ashcroft, Darren M

    PloS one

    2022  Volume 17, Issue 1, Page(s) e0261672

    Abstract: Introduction: The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safety action hierarchy tool.
    Method: Focus group discussions and non-participant observations were undertaken to develop a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and subsequent focus group discussions applied the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) focusing on the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies. Remedial measures identified through the SHERPA analysis were then categorised as strong, intermediate, or weak based on the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Non-participant observations were conducted at 3 pharmacies, totalling 12 hours, based in England. Additionally, 7 community pharmacists, with experience ranging from 8 to 38 years, participated in a total of 4 focus groups, each lasting between 57 to 85 minutes, with one focus group discussing the HTA and three applying SHERPA. A HTA was produced consisting of 10 sub-tasks, with further levels of sub-tasks within each of them.
    Results: Overall, 88 potential errors were identified, with a total of 35 remedial solutions proposed to avoid these errors in practice. Sixteen (46%) of these remedial measures were categorised as weak, 14 (40%) as intermediate and 5 (14%) as strong according to the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Sub-tasks with the most potential errors were identified, which included 'producing medication labels' and 'final checking of medicines'. The most common type of error determined from the SHERPA analysis related to omitting a check during the dispensing process which accounted for 19 potential errors.
    Discussion: This work applies both HTA and SHERPA for the first time to the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies, detailing the complexity of the task and highlighting potential errors and remedial measures specific to this task. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the proposed remedial solutions to improve patient safety.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2267670-3
    ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    ISSN 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0261672
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: A Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for improving and measuring medication safety for intensive care patients on transfer to a hospital ward.

    Bourne, Richard S / Jennings, Jennifer K / Ashcroft, Darren M

    International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

    2022  Volume 34, Issue 4

    Abstract: Background: Intensive care patients surviving to transfer to a lower-acuity hospital ward experience ongoing challenges to their recovery and lack a well-defined and developed care pathway. The transfer process to a hospital ward exposes intensive care ... ...

    Abstract Background: Intensive care patients surviving to transfer to a lower-acuity hospital ward experience ongoing challenges to their recovery and lack a well-defined and developed care pathway. The transfer process to a hospital ward exposes intensive care patients to high rates of medication errors, which increase their risk of adverse drug events.
    Objective: The aims of this study were to identify priorities for medication-related intervention components and outcome measures for improving medication safety for intensive care patients transferring to a hospital ward.
    Methods: Three panels involving 129 participants covering (i) intensive care, (ii) hospital ward health-care professionals and (iii) public representatives completed an electronic Delphi survey conducted over three phases. The Delphi process comprised three sections (medication-related intervention components, medication outcomes and patient outcomes). Items were graded in their level of importance, with predefined important criteria. Item agreement required consensus across all three panels. Intervention barriers and facilitators identified in participant comments were categorized according to a socio-technical systems approach to the patient journey and patient safety (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety 3.0 model).
    Results: Of the 129 (84.5%) participants, 109 completed all three Delphi phases. Consensus was achieved for 48 intervention components, 13 medication outcome measures and 11 patient outcome measures. Phase 1 provided 158 comments comprising >200 individual barriers and facilitators to intervention delivery. Frequently cited facilitators included clearly specified roles and responsibilities (10.7% (organizational conditions)), patient and family as agents (8.8% (care team)), medicines-related information easily accessible (7.8% (tools and technologies)) and clear medication plan and communication (7.3% (tasks)).
    Conclusions: Our findings provide identification of priorities for medication-related intervention components to improve medication safety for intensive care patients transferring to a hospital ward. Prioritization is complemented by the identification and socio-technical categorization of barriers and facilitators to intervention delivery. The identified important medication and patient outcomes to measure will inform the design of a future patient medication safety intervention study.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Delphi Technique ; Consensus ; Medication Errors/prevention & control ; Hospitals ; Critical Care
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-10-26
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1194150-9
    ISSN 1464-3677 ; 1353-4505
    ISSN (online) 1464-3677
    ISSN 1353-4505
    DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzac082
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies

    Ahmed Ashour / Denham L. Phipps / Darren M. Ashcroft

    PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss

    An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA)

    2022  Volume 1

    Abstract: Introduction The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, ...

    Abstract Introduction The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safety action hierarchy tool. Method Focus group discussions and non-participant observations were undertaken to develop a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and subsequent focus group discussions applied the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) focusing on the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies. Remedial measures identified through the SHERPA analysis were then categorised as strong, intermediate, or weak based on the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Non-participant observations were conducted at 3 pharmacies, totalling 12 hours, based in England. Additionally, 7 community pharmacists, with experience ranging from 8 to 38 years, participated in a total of 4 focus groups, each lasting between 57 to 85 minutes, with one focus group discussing the HTA and three applying SHERPA. A HTA was produced consisting of 10 sub-tasks, with further levels of sub-tasks within each of them. Results Overall, 88 potential errors were identified, with a total of 35 remedial solutions proposed to avoid these errors in practice. Sixteen (46%) of these remedial measures were categorised as weak, 14 (40%) as intermediate and 5 (14%) as strong according to the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Sub-tasks with the most potential errors were identified, which included ‘producing medication labels’ and ‘final checking of medicines’. The most common type of error determined from the SHERPA analysis related to omitting a check during the dispensing process which accounted for 19 potential errors. Discussion This work applies both HTA and SHERPA for the first time to the task of dispensing medication in community ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 420
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Identifying prior signals of bipolar disorder using primary care electronic health records: a nested case-control study.

    Morgan, Catharine / Ashcroft, Darren M / Chew-Graham, Carolyn A / Sperrin, Matthew / Webb, Roger T / Francis, Anya / Scott, Jan / Yung, Alison R

    The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

    2024  

    Abstract: Background: Bipolar disorders are serious mental illnesses, yet evidence suggests that the diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder can be delayed by around 6 years.: Aim: To identify signals of undiagnosed bipolar disorder using routinely ... ...

    Abstract Background: Bipolar disorders are serious mental illnesses, yet evidence suggests that the diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder can be delayed by around 6 years.
    Aim: To identify signals of undiagnosed bipolar disorder using routinely collected electronic health records.
    Design and setting: A nested case-control study conducted using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD dataset, an anonymised electronic primary care patient database linked with hospital records. 'Cases' were adult patients with incident bipolar disorder diagnoses between 1 January 2010 and 31 July 2017.
    Method: The patients with bipolar disorder (the bipolar disorder group) were matched by age, sex, and registered general practice to 20 'controls' without recorded bipolar disorder (the control group). Annual episode incidence rates were estimated and odds ratios from conditional logistic regression models were reported for recorded health events before the index (diagnosis) date.
    Results: There were 2366 patients with incident bipolar disorder diagnoses and 47 138 matched control patients (median age 40 years and 60.4% female:
    Conclusion: Psychiatric diagnoses, psychotropic prescriptions, and health service use patterns might be signals of unreported bipolar disorder. Recognising these signals could prompt further investigation for undiagnosed significant psychopathology, leading to timely referral, assessment, and initiation of appropriate treatments.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-07
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1043148-2
    ISSN 1478-5242 ; 0035-8797 ; 0960-1643
    ISSN (online) 1478-5242
    ISSN 0035-8797 ; 0960-1643
    DOI 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0286
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Predicting dispensing errors in community pharmacies

    Ahmed Ashour / Denham L Phipps / Darren M Ashcroft

    PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss 1, p e

    An application of the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA).

    2022  Volume 0261672

    Abstract: Introduction The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, ...

    Abstract Introduction The objective of this study was to use a prospective error analysis method to examine the process of dispensing medication in community pharmacy settings and identify remedial solutions to avoid potential errors, categorising them as strong, intermediate, or weak based on an established patient safety action hierarchy tool. Method Focus group discussions and non-participant observations were undertaken to develop a Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), and subsequent focus group discussions applied the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA) focusing on the task of dispensing medication in community pharmacies. Remedial measures identified through the SHERPA analysis were then categorised as strong, intermediate, or weak based on the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Non-participant observations were conducted at 3 pharmacies, totalling 12 hours, based in England. Additionally, 7 community pharmacists, with experience ranging from 8 to 38 years, participated in a total of 4 focus groups, each lasting between 57 to 85 minutes, with one focus group discussing the HTA and three applying SHERPA. A HTA was produced consisting of 10 sub-tasks, with further levels of sub-tasks within each of them. Results Overall, 88 potential errors were identified, with a total of 35 remedial solutions proposed to avoid these errors in practice. Sixteen (46%) of these remedial measures were categorised as weak, 14 (40%) as intermediate and 5 (14%) as strong according to the Veteran Affairs National Centre for Patient Safety action hierarchy. Sub-tasks with the most potential errors were identified, which included 'producing medication labels' and 'final checking of medicines'. The most common type of error determined from the SHERPA analysis related to omitting a check during the dispensing process which accounted for 19 potential errors. Discussion This work applies both HTA and SHERPA for the first time to the task of dispensing medication in community ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 420
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top