LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 53

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Why Do Reoperation Rates Vary So Much After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer? Examining the Reoperation Puzzle at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

    Landercasper, Jeffrey

    Annals of surgical oncology

    2018  Volume 25, Issue 9, Page(s) 2506–2508

    MeSH term(s) Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Massachusetts ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Reoperation ; Surgeons
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-07-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Editorial ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1200469-8
    ISSN 1534-4681 ; 1068-9265
    ISSN (online) 1534-4681
    ISSN 1068-9265
    DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6609-0
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: ASO Author Reflections: Nudging Surgeon Stewards of Breast Cancer Quality Measurement Programs Toward More Patient-Centeredness.

    Landercasper, Jeffrey

    Annals of surgical oncology

    2018  Volume 25, Issue Suppl 3, Page(s) 661–662

    MeSH term(s) Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Humans ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Patient Preference ; Reoperation ; Surgeons
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-10-17
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 1200469-8
    ISSN 1534-4681 ; 1068-9265
    ISSN (online) 1534-4681
    ISSN 1068-9265
    DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6923-6
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Correction to: Why Do Reoperation Rates Vary So Much After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer? Examining the Reoperation Puzzle.

    Landercasper, Jeffrey

    Annals of surgical oncology

    2018  Volume 25, Issue Suppl 3, Page(s) 997

    Abstract: In the original article the correct citation for where Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) is mentioned throughout the text. ...

    Abstract In the original article the correct citation for where Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) is mentioned throughout the text.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-09-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Published Erratum
    ZDB-ID 1200469-8
    ISSN 1534-4681 ; 1068-9265
    ISSN (online) 1534-4681
    ISSN 1068-9265
    DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6748-3
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: ASO Author Reflections: Rapid Uptake of the SSO ASTRO Margin Guideline and Decreased Reoperations After Lumpectomy: A Success Story.

    Havel, Liska / Landercasper, Jeffrey

    Annals of surgical oncology

    2019  Volume 26, Issue 5, Page(s) 1245–1246

    MeSH term(s) Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Margins of Excision ; Mastectomy, Segmental/methods ; Mastectomy, Segmental/standards ; Neoplasm Staging ; Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards ; Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-03-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1200469-8
    ISSN 1534-4681 ; 1068-9265
    ISSN (online) 1534-4681
    ISSN 1068-9265
    DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07289-9
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article: Can a seed-sized tool from Texas spare clinically node positive breast cancer patients from a complete axillary dissection?

    Fedor, David M / Landercasper, Jeffrey

    Gland surgery

    2016  Volume 5, Issue 4, Page(s) 450–452

    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-07-19
    Publishing country China (Republic : 1949- )
    Document type Comment ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 3016969-0
    ISSN 2227-8575 ; 2227-684X
    ISSN (online) 2227-8575
    ISSN 2227-684X
    DOI 10.21037/gs.2016.07.02
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Impact of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guideline on Rates of Re-excision After Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

    Havel, Liska / Naik, Himani / Ramirez, Luis / Morrow, Monica / Landercasper, Jeffrey

    Annals of surgical oncology

    2019  Volume 26, Issue 5, Page(s) 1238–1244

    Abstract: Background: One in five patients undergoing initial lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer subsequently undergoes re-excision or mastectomy. A lack of clarity of when to re-excise based on lumpectomy margin width contributes to this high rate of ... ...

    Abstract Background: One in five patients undergoing initial lumpectomy for invasive breast cancer subsequently undergoes re-excision or mastectomy. A lack of clarity of when to re-excise based on lumpectomy margin width contributes to this high rate of reoperation. We sought to determine the impact of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) and American Society of Radiation Oncologist (ASTRO) margin guideline on reoperation rates after lumpectomy. The guideline recommended omission of routine re-excision in specimens with "no ink on tumor".
    Methods: A systematic literature review was performed. For eligible studies, a random-effects model was used for a meta-analysis of lumpectomy re-excision prevalence before and after publication of the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline. Study heterogeneity was measured by the Cochran's Q test.
    Results: Five institutional, one population-based, and one national registry study met inclusion requirements. Sample size per study ranged from 237 to 26,102. There was significant interstudy heterogeneity (Q = 19.779; p = 0.003). Pooled re-excision prevalence was 22% (confidence interval [CI] 20-23) before and 14% (CI 12-15) after guideline publication. With the pre-guideline re-excision prevalence used as the reference value, the associated odds ratio for re-excision after the guideline was 0.65 (CI 0.54-0.78; p < 0.0001).
    Conclusions: The findings of a 35% reduction in the odds of re-excision after the guideline publication and a reduction in re-excision prevalence from 22 to 14% supports the notion that the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline was impactful. These findings are congruent with the projected reductions in re-excision at the time of guideline publication.
    MeSH term(s) Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Female ; Guideline Adherence/standards ; Humans ; Margins of Excision ; Mastectomy/standards ; Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards ; Radiation Oncologists ; Reoperation ; Surgical Oncology ; United States
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-02-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis
    ZDB-ID 1200469-8
    ISSN 1534-4681 ; 1068-9265
    ISSN (online) 1534-4681
    ISSN 1068-9265
    DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07247-5
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Opportunities to reduce reoperations and to improve inter-facility profiling after initial breast-conserving surgery for cancer. A report from the NCDB.

    Landercasper, Jeffrey / Bennie, Barbara / Ahmad, Humera F / Linebarger, Jared H

    European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology

    2019  Volume 45, Issue 11, Page(s) 2026–2036

    Abstract: Background: Repeat operations after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer have been termed "epidemic." To aid improvement activities, we sought to identify those National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) characteristics that were associated with ... ...

    Abstract Background: Repeat operations after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for cancer have been termed "epidemic." To aid improvement activities, we sought to identify those National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) characteristics that were associated with reoperations.
    Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing initial BCS in the NCDB from 2004 to 2015 were identified. Univariate, multivariate, ranking (effect size and R
    Results: In 1226 facilities, 84,462 (16.1%) of 524,594 patients underwent reoperations after BCS [range 0-75%; 10th/90th performance percentiles = 6.6%/25%]. Of 18 factors associated with reoperations, facility ID was the highest-ranked. Its estimated impact on the odds of reoperation was more than 10 times greater than any other factor considered, followed by tumor size, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy receipt, patient age, cancer histology, and nodal status. Reoperations after the year of the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline declined significantly compared with prior years. Significant inter-facility reoperation variability persisted after risk adjustment for more than a dozen distinct patient, facility, tumor, and treatment characteristics.
    Conclusion: In the NCDB, significant inter-facility variability exists regardless of case volume, case mix, and risk adjustment. There were fewer reoperations after the SSO-ASTRO guideline. An endorsed target rate of 10% was achieved by only 1 in 4 facilities. The most impactful determinant of reoperation was the facility itself. Thus, all stakeholders should consider participation in improvement activities. Such activities will benefit from risk-adjusted profiling; the relevant adjustors were identified.
    MeSH term(s) Academic Medical Centers ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use ; Breast Neoplasms/metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Cancer Care Facilities ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery ; Carcinoma, Lobular/metabolism ; Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology ; Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery ; Female ; Hospitals/statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals, Community ; Hospitals, High-Volume ; Hospitals, Low-Volume ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes/pathology ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data ; Neoplasm Staging ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism ; Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism ; Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism ; Reoperation/statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tumor Burden
    Chemical Substances Antineoplastic Agents ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal ; Receptors, Estrogen ; Receptors, Progesterone ; ERBB2 protein, human (EC 2.7.10.1) ; Receptor, ErbB-2 (EC 2.7.10.1)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-07-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 632519-1
    ISSN 1532-2157 ; 0748-7983
    ISSN (online) 1532-2157
    ISSN 0748-7983
    DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.002
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.

    McEvoy, Maureen P / Landercasper, Jeffrey / Naik, Himani R / Feldman, Sheldon

    Gland surgery

    2018  Volume 7, Issue 6, Page(s) 536–553

    Abstract: In 2015, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) convened a multidisciplinary consensus conference, the Collaborative Attempt to Lower Lumpectomy Reoperation Rates (CALLER). The CALLER conference endorsed a "toolbox" of multiple processes of care ...

    Abstract In 2015, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) convened a multidisciplinary consensus conference, the Collaborative Attempt to Lower Lumpectomy Reoperation Rates (CALLER). The CALLER conference endorsed a "toolbox" of multiple processes of care for which there was evidence that they were associated with fewer reoperations. We present an update of the toolbox taking into consideration the latest advances in decreasing re excision rates. In this review, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature from 2015-2018 using search terms for each tool. The original ten tools were updated with the latest evidence from the literature and our strength of recommendation. We added an additional section looking at new tools and techniques that may provide more accurate intraoperative assessment of margins. The updates on the CALLER Toolbox for lumpectomy will help guide surgeons to various resources to aid in the removal of breast cancer, while being aware of cosmesis and decreasing re excision rates.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-10-24
    Publishing country China (Republic : 1949- )
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 3016969-0
    ISSN 2227-8575 ; 2227-684X
    ISSN (online) 2227-8575
    ISSN 2227-684X
    DOI 10.21037/gs.2018.11.03
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Is it time to reconsider the term "cancer survivor"?

    Berry, Leonard L / Davis, Scott W / Godfrey Flynn, Andrea / Landercasper, Jeffrey / Deming, Katie A

    Journal of psychosocial oncology

    2019  Volume 37, Issue 4, Page(s) 413–426

    Abstract: Purpose: To improve understanding of how people diagnosed with cancer perceive the term "cancer survivor" and what influences those perceptions.: Design: Patients' reactions to the term were surveyed quantitatively and qualitatively.: Sample: ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: To improve understanding of how people diagnosed with cancer perceive the term "cancer survivor" and what influences those perceptions.
    Design: Patients' reactions to the term were surveyed quantitatively and qualitatively.
    Sample: Women who have primarily experienced breast cancer belonging to The Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation's Army of Women.
    Methods: An online survey including fixed-alternative and open-ended questions.
    Conclusions: Using the blanket term "survivor" to label a diverse group is problematic; although the term offers a positive identity for some, others reject it or find it offensive, at least for patients like those represented in this study. If cancer patients are going to be labeled, they should choose the one that is most empowering and reflective of their experience. Implications for Psychosocial Providers: Language used in providing care or describing patients is controllable. If evidence exists that a particular term has the potential to inflict psychological harm, why use the term?
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms/therapy ; Cancer Survivors/psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms/diagnosis ; Neoplasms/therapy ; Qualitative Research ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Terminology as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-01-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 605892-9
    ISSN 1540-7586 ; 0734-7332
    ISSN (online) 1540-7586
    ISSN 0734-7332
    DOI 10.1080/07347332.2018.1522411
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: A Statewide Approach to Reducing Re-excision Rates for Women With Breast-conserving Surgery.

    Schumacher, Jessica R / Lawson, Elise H / Kong, Amanda L / Weber, Joseph J / May, Jeanette / Landercasper, Jeffrey / Hanlon, Bret / Marka, Nicholas / Venkatesh, Manasa / Cartmill, Randi S / Pavuluri Quamme, Sudha / Nikolay, Connor / Greenberg, Caprice C

    Annals of surgery

    2022  Volume 276, Issue 4, Page(s) 665–672

    Abstract: Objective: Test the effectiveness of benchmarked performance reports based on existing discharge data paired with a statewide intervention to implement evidence-based strategies on breast re-excision rates.: Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) ...

    Abstract Objective: Test the effectiveness of benchmarked performance reports based on existing discharge data paired with a statewide intervention to implement evidence-based strategies on breast re-excision rates.
    Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a common breast cancer surgery performed in a range of hospital settings. Studies have demonstrated variations in post-BCS re-excision rates, identifying it as a high-value improvement target.
    Methods: Wisconsin Hospital Association discharge data (2017-2019) were used to compare 60-day re-excision rates following BCS for breast cancer. The analysis estimated the difference in the average change preintervention to postintervention between Surgical Collaborative of Wisconsin (SCW) and nonparticipating hospitals using a logistic mixed-effects model with repeated measures, adjusting for age, payer, and hospital volume, including hospitals as random effects. The intervention included 5 collaborative meetings in 2018 to 2019 where surgeon champions shared guideline updates, best practices/challenges, and facilitated action planning. Confidential benchmarked performance reports were provided.
    Results: In 2017, there were 3692 breast procedures in SCW and 1279 in nonparticipating hospitals; hospital-level re-excision rates ranged from 5% to >50%. There was no statistically significant baseline difference in re-excision rates between SCW and nonparticipating hospitals (16.1% vs. 17.1%, P =0.47). Re-excision significantly decreased for SCW but not for nonparticipating hospitals (odds ratio=0.69, 95% confidence interval=0.52-0.91).
    Conclusions: Benchmarked performance reports and collaborative quality improvement can decrease post-BCS re-excisions, increase quality, and decrease costs. Our study demonstrates the effective use of administrative data as a platform for statewide quality collaboratives. Using existing data requires fewer resources and offers a new paradigm that promotes participation across practice settings.
    MeSH term(s) Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Mastectomy ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-07-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 340-2
    ISSN 1528-1140 ; 0003-4932
    ISSN (online) 1528-1140
    ISSN 0003-4932
    DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005590
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top