LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 102

Search options

  1. Article: Revisiting the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Difficulty Classification of Laparoscopic Liver Resection with the Data from a Personal Series-Evaluations for the Difficulty of Left Medial Sectionectomy and Length of Hospital Stay.

    Morise, Zenichi

    Journal of personalized medicine

    2024  Volume 14, Issue 3

    Abstract: The IMM (Institut Mutualiste Montsouris) difficulty classification for laparoscopic liver resection is based only on the type of surgical procedure. It is useful for assessing outcomes and setting benchmarks in a group sharing the same indications. There ...

    Abstract The IMM (Institut Mutualiste Montsouris) difficulty classification for laparoscopic liver resection is based only on the type of surgical procedure. It is useful for assessing outcomes and setting benchmarks in a group sharing the same indications. There is, however, no left medial sectionectomy in the system. Its difficulty was evaluated using the same methodology as IMM with the data from a personal series. Furthermore, length of hospital stay was evaluated as the representative of short-term outcomes. IMM scores of our right and left hemihepatectomies, right anterior sectionectomy, and segment 7 or 8 segmentectomies are 3. That of left medial sectionectomies is 2, the same as right posterior sectionectomy and segment or less anatomical resections. Those of left lateral sectionectomy and partial resection are 0. The group with a score of 3 was divided into two groups-with and without extended hospital stays (extended only for right hemihepatectomies and right anterior sectionectomies). The difficulty of medial sectionectomy was positioned at the same level as posterior sectionectomy and segment or less anatomical resections. The result from the second evaluation may indicate that there are other factors with an impact on difficulty related to short-term outcomes, other than intraoperative surgical difficulty from the procedure itself.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-22
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2662248-8
    ISSN 2075-4426
    ISSN 2075-4426
    DOI 10.3390/jpm14030232
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Editorial (Preface) for the Special Issue on Advances in Minimally Invasive Liver Resection for Cancer Therapies.

    Morise, Zenichi

    Cancers

    2023  Volume 15, Issue 13

    Abstract: After the initial reports of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the early 1990s, minimally invasive liver resection has been rapidly developing based on technical and instrumental improvements [ ... ]. ...

    Abstract After the initial reports of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the early 1990s, minimally invasive liver resection has been rapidly developing based on technical and instrumental improvements [...].
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-07-06
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 2527080-1
    ISSN 2072-6694
    ISSN 2072-6694
    DOI 10.3390/cancers15133520
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Current status of minimally invasive liver surgery for cancers.

    Morise, Zenichi

    World journal of gastroenterology

    2022  Volume 28, Issue 43, Page(s) 6090–6098

    Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have chronic liver disease with functional deterioration and multicentric oncogenicity. Liver surgeries for the patients should be planned on both oncological effects and sparing liver function. In colorectal ... ...

    Abstract Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients have chronic liver disease with functional deterioration and multicentric oncogenicity. Liver surgeries for the patients should be planned on both oncological effects and sparing liver function. In colorectal patients with post-chemotherapy liver injury and multiple bilateral tumors, handling multiple tumors in a fragile/easy-to-bleed liver is an important issue. Liver surgery for biliary tract cancers is often performed as a resection of large-volume functioning liver with extensive lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection/reconstruction. Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) for HCC is applied with the advantages of laparoscopic for cases of cirrhosis or repeat resections. Small anatomical resections using the Glissonian, indocyanine green-guided, and hepatic vein-guided approaches are under discussion. In many cases of colorectal liver metastases, MILS is applied combined with chemotherapy owing to its advantage of better hemostasis. Two-stage hepatectomy and indocyanine green-guided tumor identification for multiple bilateral tumors are under discussion. In the case of biliary tract cancers, MILS with extensive lymphadenectomy and bile duct resection/reconstruction are developing. A robot-assisted procedure for dissection of major vessels and handling fragile livers may have advantages, and well-simulated robot-assisted procedure may decrease the difficulty for biliary tract cancers.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery ; Indocyanine Green ; Liver Neoplasms/surgery ; Biliary Tract Neoplasms
    Chemical Substances Indocyanine Green (IX6J1063HV)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-12-02
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2185929-2
    ISSN 2219-2840 ; 1007-9327
    ISSN (online) 2219-2840
    ISSN 1007-9327
    DOI 10.3748/wjg.v28.i43.6090
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Laparoscopic repeat liver resection.

    Morise, Zenichi

    Annals of gastroenterological surgery

    2020  Volume 4, Issue 5, Page(s) 485–489

    Abstract: Recurrence of liver cancers inside the liver are often treated with liver resection (LR). However, increased risks of complications and conversion during operation were reported in laparoscopic repeat LR (LRLR). The indication is still controversial. One ...

    Abstract Recurrence of liver cancers inside the liver are often treated with liver resection (LR). However, increased risks of complications and conversion during operation were reported in laparoscopic repeat LR (LRLR). The indication is still controversial. One multi-institutional propensity score matching analysis of LRLR vs open repeat LR for hepatocellular carcinoma, two propensity score matching analyses for colorectal metastases, and two meta-analyses including hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastases, and other tumors have been reported to date. LRLR was reported with better to comparable short-term and similar long-term outcomes. Furthermore, the shorter operation time and the smaller amount of intraoperative bleeding for LRLR was reported for the patients who had undergone laparoscopic rather than open LR as an earlier procedure. The speculations are presented, that complete dissection of adhesion can be dodged and laparoscopic minor repeated LR can minimize the liver functional deterioration in cirrhotic patients. LRLR, as a powerful local therapy, could contribute to the long-term outcomes of those with deteriorated liver function. However, the procedure is now in its developing stage worldwide and further accumulation of experiences and evaluation are needed.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-10
    Publishing country Japan
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 2475-0328
    ISSN (online) 2475-0328
    DOI 10.1002/ags3.12363
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Developments and perspectives of laparoscopic liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Morise, Zenichi

    Surgery today

    2019  Volume 49, Issue 8, Page(s) 649–655

    Abstract: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was introduced in the early 1990s, initially for partial resection of the anterolateral segments, from where it has expanded in a stepwise fashion. Movement restriction makes bleeding control demanding. Managing ... ...

    Abstract Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was introduced in the early 1990s, initially for partial resection of the anterolateral segments, from where it has expanded in a stepwise fashion. Movement restriction makes bleeding control demanding. Managing pneumoperitoneum pressure with inflow control can inhibit venous bleeding and create a dry surgical field for easier hemostasis. Since the lack of overview leads to disorientation, simulation and navigation with imaging studies have become important. Improved direct access to the liver inside the rib cage can be obtained in LLR, reducing destruction of the associated structures and decreasing the risk of refractory ascites and liver failure, especially in patients with a cirrhotic liver. Although LLR can be performed as bridging therapy to transplantation for severe cirrhosis, its impact on expanding the indications of liver resection (LR) and the consequent survival benefits must be evaluated. For repeat LR, LLR is advantageous by producing fewer adhesions and reducing the need for adhesiolysis. The laparoscopic approach facilitates better access in a small operative field between adhesions. Further evaluations are needed for repeat anatomical resection, since alterations of the anatomy and surrounding scars and adhesions of major vessels have a larger impact.
    MeSH term(s) Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery ; Hepatectomy/methods ; Hepatectomy/trends ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Laparoscopy/trends ; Liver/surgery ; Liver Cirrhosis/surgery ; Liver Failure/prevention & control ; Liver Neoplasms/surgery ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control ; Reoperation ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-01-16
    Publishing country Japan
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1115435-4
    ISSN 1436-2813 ; 0941-1291
    ISSN (online) 1436-2813
    ISSN 0941-1291
    DOI 10.1007/s00595-019-1765-9
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Status and perspective of laparoscopic repeat liver resection.

    Morise, Zenichi

    World journal of hepatology

    2018  Volume 10, Issue 7, Page(s) 479–484

    Abstract: Liver resection (LR) is now actively applied to intrahepatic recurrence of liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although indications of laparoscopic LR (LLR) have been expanded, there are increased risks of intraoperative complications and ... ...

    Abstract Liver resection (LR) is now actively applied to intrahepatic recurrence of liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although indications of laparoscopic LR (LLR) have been expanded, there are increased risks of intraoperative complications and conversion in repeat LLR. Controversy still exists for the indication. There are 16 reports of small series to date. These studies generally reported that repeat LLR has better short-term outcomes than open (reduced bleedings, less or similar morbidity and shorter hospital stay) without compromising the long-term outcomes. The fact that complete adhesiolysis can be avoided in repeat LLR is also reported. In the comparison of previous procedures, it is reported that the operation time for repeat LLR was shorter for the patients previously treated with LLR than open. Furthermore, it is speculated that LLR for minor repeat LR of cirrhotic liver can be minimized the deterioration of liver function by LR. However, further experience and evaluation of anatomical resection or resections exposing major vessels as repeat LLR, especially after previous anatomical resection, are needed. There should be a chance to prolong the overall survival of the patients by using LLR as a powerful local therapy which can be applied repeatedly with minimal deterioration of liver function.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-05-24
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 2573703-X
    ISSN 1948-5182
    ISSN 1948-5182
    DOI 10.4254/wjh.v10.i7.479
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: Laparoscopic liver resection for the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.

    Morise, Zenichi

    Translational gastroenterology and hepatology

    2018  Volume 3, Page(s) 41

    Abstract: Liver resection (LR), liver transplantation (LT), transarterial chemoembolization, and local ablation therapy are the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although LR, LT and local ablation therapy (only for small tumor) provide the best ...

    Abstract Liver resection (LR), liver transplantation (LT), transarterial chemoembolization, and local ablation therapy are the treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although LR, LT and local ablation therapy (only for small tumor) provide the best hope for cure, most patients with HCC have also chronic liver disease (CLD) backgrounds, including HCV-liver cirrhosis. Therefore, they are at high risk for development of postoperative complications-sometimes fatal-and metachronous multicentric recurrent tumors occurring from the preneoplastic CLD background. Appropriate treatment is selected for HCC patients, on the combined evaluations of tumor condition and liver function. However, not small number of patients cannot undergo any treatment option due to poor liver function and/or complicated tumor condition. After repeated treatments, it can happen more often. It is thought that the features of laparoscopic LR could lead to the expansion of the LR indication to those patients, in the settings of severe CLD, repeat LR and bridging to LT. In our experience, Child-Pugh (CP) score is one of the promising candidates as a selection indicator which correlates well to our indication criteria of surface small laparoscopic LR to severe CLD patients, patient's performance status, and prognosis. Portal hypertension should be also counted in the selection criteria.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-07-16
    Publishing country China
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 2415-1289
    ISSN 2415-1289
    DOI 10.21037/tgh.2018.07.01
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior tumors using caudal approach and postural changes: A new technical approach.

    Morise, Zenichi

    World journal of gastroenterology

    2016  Volume 22, Issue 47, Page(s) 10267–10274

    Abstract: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for tumors in the posterosuperior liver [segment (S) 7 and deep S6] is a challenging clinical procedure. This area is located in the bottom of the small subphrenic space (rib cage), with the large and heavy right liver ... ...

    Abstract Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for tumors in the posterosuperior liver [segment (S) 7 and deep S6] is a challenging clinical procedure. This area is located in the bottom of the small subphrenic space (rib cage), with the large and heavy right liver on it when the patient is in the supine position. Thus, LLR of this area is technically demanding because of the handling of the right liver which is necessary to obtain a fine surgical view, secure hemostasis and conduct the resection so as to achieve an appropriate surgical margin in the cage. Handling of the right liver may be performed by the hand-assisted approach, robotic liver resection or by using spacers, such as a sterile glove pouch. In addition, the operative field of posterosuperior resection is in the deep bottom area of the subphrenic cage, with the liver S6 obstructing the laparoscopic caudal view of lesions. The use of intercostal ports facilitates the direct lateral approach into the cage and to the target area, with the combination of mobilization of the liver. Postural changes during the LLR procedure have also been reported to facilitate the LLR for this area, such as left lateral positioning for posterior sectionectomy and semi-prone positioning for tumors in the posterosuperior segments. In our hospital, LLR procedures for posterosuperior tumors are performed
    MeSH term(s) Hepatectomy/adverse effects ; Hepatectomy/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects ; Liver Neoplasms/pathology ; Liver Neoplasms/surgery ; Patient Positioning ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Prone Position ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-12-21
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 2185929-2
    ISSN 2219-2840 ; 1007-9327
    ISSN (online) 2219-2840
    ISSN 1007-9327
    DOI 10.3748/wjg.v22.i47.10267
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Is laparoscopic surgery beneficial and minimally invasive? How does the approach work and where does it lead?

    Zenichi Morise

    Fujita Medical Journal, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 22-

    2016  Volume 24

    Abstract: Since the first introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the field of laparoscopic surgery has expanded rapidly to include surgery for other organs, and more complex and technically demanding abdominal surgery. The reduced invasiveness of ... ...

    Abstract Since the first introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the field of laparoscopic surgery has expanded rapidly to include surgery for other organs, and more complex and technically demanding abdominal surgery. The reduced invasiveness of laparoscopic surgery is seen clinically in the rapid recovery and return to normal activities that results from reduced patient pain, destruction of the abdominal wall, and damage to organs and peritoneum when exposed to air. However, the exact procedure being performed in the abdominal cavity is sometimes a more important factor affecting the invasiveness of the surgery. Complicated and technically demanding procedures, which often increase the operation time and bleeding, and alter organ function, are sometimes more invasive by their nature, which diminishes the merits of laparoscopic surgery. For example, laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) under different settings have different results with or without the merits of laparoscopic surgery. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with the background chronic liver disease, LLR allows the surgeon to resect the tumor-bearing area with minimal damage to the liver and the surrounding environment, and to lower the risks of postoperative ascites and liver failure. However, these findings apply specifically to this setting and results differ for others. As indications expand, the true advantages and disadvantages of specific procedures in laparoscopic surgery should be reconsidered depending on the setting of each procedure.
    Keywords laparoscopic surgery ; laparoscopic liver resection ; indication ; hepatocellular carcinoma ; chronic liver disease ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Fujita Medical Society
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Perspective of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Morise, Zenichi

    World journal of gastrointestinal surgery

    2015  Volume 7, Issue 7, Page(s) 102–106

    Abstract: Liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is associated with high risks of developing significant postoperative complications and multicentric metachronous lesions, which can result in the need ... ...

    Abstract Liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is associated with high risks of developing significant postoperative complications and multicentric metachronous lesions, which can result in the need for repeated treatments. Studies comparing laparoscopic procedures to open LR consistently report reduced blood loss and transfusions requirements, lower postoperative morbidity, and shorter hospital stays, with no differences in oncologic outcomes. In addition, laparoscopic LR is associated with reduced postoperative ascites and a lower incidence of liver failure for HCC patients with CLD, due to the reduced surgery-induced parenchymal injury to the residual liver and limited destruction of the collateral blood/lymphatic flow around the liver. Finally, this procedure facilitates subsequent repeat LR due to minimal adhesion formation and improved vision/manipulation between adhesions. These characteristics of laparoscopic LR may lead to an expansion of the indications for LR. This editorial is based on the review and meta-analysis presented at the 2(nd) International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Iwate, Japan, in October 2014 (Chairperson of the congress is Professor Go Wakabayashi from the Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine), which is published in the Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2015-07-30
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2573700-4
    ISSN 1948-9366
    ISSN 1948-9366
    DOI 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i7.102
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top