LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 280

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Consolidative Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Whole Brain Radiation in PCNSL; a Nationwide Analysis.

    Samhouri, Yazan / Mustafa Ali, Moaath K / Law, Jennie / Khan, Cyrus / Wegner, Rodney / Lee, Seung Tae / Lister, John

    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia

    2022  Volume 22, Issue 10, Page(s) 735–743

    Abstract: Background: The best consolidation strategy after induction chemotherapy in Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. Our objective is to estimate the overall survival (OS) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus whole brain ... ...

    Abstract Background: The best consolidation strategy after induction chemotherapy in Primary CNS Lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. Our objective is to estimate the overall survival (OS) for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) versus whole brain radiation (WBRT) in the consolidation setting. We also sought to evaluate the factors affecting treatment selection METHODS: We identified 1620 patients with PCNSL who received chemotherapy followed by either ASCT or WBRT between 2004 and 2015 from the National Cancer Database. A propensity score weighting methodology was used to compare survival outcomes. Factors affecting treatment selection were investigated using a logistic regression model. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to assess the trend of ASCT use.
    Results: Only 12.2% of patients received ASCT, and this proportion rose steadily between 2004 and 2015, with APC of +23%. Treatment selection was affected by age, type of area, distance from the treating facility, and level of education. With a median follow-up of 68.4 months, adjusted-median OS was 91.4 months and not reached for WBRT and ASCT groups, respectively (P < .001). 5-year OS was 74.4% in the ASCT group versus 58.7% in the WBRT group (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.60, P -value < .01).
    Conclusion: Socioeconomic factors affect the selection of consolidative treatment in patients with PCNSL which can alter outcomes. Frequency of consolidative ASCT is increasing for patients with PCNSL. This is the first and largest cohort study, to our knowledge, to show an OS advantage in favor of ASCT. This OS benefit needs to be confirmed in a randomized controlled fashion.
    MeSH term(s) Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use ; Brain/pathology ; Central Nervous System Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Cohort Studies ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods ; Humans ; Lymphoma/drug therapy ; Stem Cell Transplantation/methods ; Transplantation, Autologous
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-05-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2540992-X
    ISSN 2152-2669 ; 2152-2650
    ISSN (online) 2152-2669
    ISSN 2152-2650
    DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2022.05.007
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Patterns of treatment and their outcomes in primary breast lymphoma; a comprehensive population-based analysis.

    Mustafa Ali, Moaath K / Samhouri, Yazan / Law, Jennie Y / Khan, Cyrus / Wegner, Rodney / Lee, Seung Tae / Lister, John

    Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)

    2022  Volume 29, Issue 6, Page(s) 1022–1031

    Abstract: Background: Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is managed differently among centers, using surgery, systemic therapy and/or radiation. With data derived from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we aim to describe treatments utilized in the United States, ... ...

    Abstract Background: Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is managed differently among centers, using surgery, systemic therapy and/or radiation. With data derived from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we aim to describe treatments utilized in the United States, estimate the overall survival (OS) of different therapeutic modalities and determine the role of systemic therapy in patients with PBL.
    Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified data from the NCDB. The NCDB provided records of 4616 patients diagnosed with PBL between 2004 and 2015. We excluded patients diagnosed with HIV, with no survival data, not treated in the reporting facility, without histologic confirmation, with stage III/ IV disease and for whom surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy was contraindicated. Both propensity score weighting and Cox models were used to obtain adjusted estimates. Based on histopathology, PBL was classified into indolent (I-PBL) and aggressive (A-PBL).
    Results: In a sample size of 2063 PBL patients, the median age was 67 years (interquartile range (IQR): 57-78), and 97% were females. In 1027 patients with I-PBL, the median follow-up was 66 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 32.6-107.2) and 60% of patients had extranodal marginal zone subtype. Systemic therapy did not improve adjusted-OS (median: 154 vs. 143 months, P = 0.36) (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.60-1.25, P = 0.42). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were as follows: radiation (85%), surgery (79%), systemic & radiation (87%) and radiation & surgery (87%) (P = 0.9). In 1036 patients with A-PBL, the median follow-up was 67.4 months (95% CI: 35.9-105), and 87% of patients had diffuse large B-cell subtype. Patients with A-PBL who received systemic therapy had an improved adjusted-OS (median: 115 vs. 72 months, P < 0.01) (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53, P < 0.001). The treatment arms associated with the highest adjusted 5-year OS were: systemic (69%), systemic & radiation (77%), systemic & radiation & surgery (79%) and systemic & surgery (79%) (P = 0.4).
    Conclusions: Systemic therapy used as first-line treatment is essential in A-PBL. Local therapy in the I-PBL using surgery and/or radiation is effective in long-term disease control. There is significant variation in front-line treatment modalities utilized in PBL across the US, many associated with similar outcomes.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; United States ; Aged ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Breast Neoplasms/therapy ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Radiosurgery ; Lymphoma/pathology ; Lymphoma/therapy ; Treatment Outcome
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-07-05
    Publishing country Japan
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2052429-8
    ISSN 1880-4233 ; 1340-6868
    ISSN (online) 1880-4233
    ISSN 1340-6868
    DOI 10.1007/s12282-022-01382-w
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Development of a Supported Self-management Intervention for People With Severe Mental Illness and Type 2 Diabetes: Theory and Evidence-Based Co-design Approach.

    Carswell, Claire / Coventry, Peter A / Brown, Jennifer V E / Alderson, Sarah L / Double, Keith / Gilbody, Simon / Holt, Richard I G / Jacobs, Rowena / Lister, Jennie / Osborn, David / Shiers, David / Siddiqi, Najma / Taylor, Johanna / Kellar, Ian

    Journal of medical Internet research

    2023  Volume 25, Page(s) e43597

    Abstract: Background: Type 2 diabetes is 2 to 3 times more common among people with severe mental illness (SMI). Self-management is crucial, with additional challenges faced by people with SMI. Therefore, it is essential that any diabetes self-management program ... ...

    Abstract Background: Type 2 diabetes is 2 to 3 times more common among people with severe mental illness (SMI). Self-management is crucial, with additional challenges faced by people with SMI. Therefore, it is essential that any diabetes self-management program for people with SMI addresses the unique needs of people living with both conditions and the inequalities they experience within health care services.
    Objective: We combined theory, empirical evidence, and co-design approaches to develop a type 2 diabetes self-management intervention for people with SMI.
    Methods: The development process encompassed 4 steps: step 1 involved prioritizing the mechanisms of action (MoAs) and behavior change techniques (BCTs) for the intervention. Using findings from primary qualitative research and systematic reviews, we selected candidate MoAs to target in the intervention and candidate BCTs to use. Expert stakeholders then ranked these MoAs and BCTs using a 2-phase survey. The average scores were used to generate a prioritized list of MoAs and BCTs. During step 2, we presented the survey results to an expert consensus workshop to seek expert agreement with the definitive list of MoAs and BCTs for the intervention and identify potential modes of delivery. Step 3 involved the development of trigger films using the evidence from steps 1 and 2. We used animations to present the experiences of people with SMI managing diabetes. These films were used in step 4, where we used a stakeholder co-design approach. This involved a series of structured workshops, where the co-design activities were informed by theory and evidence.
    Results: Upon the completion of the 4-step process, we developed the DIAMONDS (diabetes and mental illness, improving outcomes and self-management) intervention. It is a tailored self-management intervention based on the synthesis of the outputs from the co-design process. The intervention incorporates a digital app, a paper-based workbook, and one-to-one coaching designed to meet the needs of people with SMI and coexisting type 2 diabetes.
    Conclusions: The intervention development work was underpinned by the MoA theoretical framework and incorporated systematic reviews, primary qualitative research, expert stakeholder surveys, and evidence generated during co-design workshops. The intervention will now be tested for feasibility before undergoing a definitive evaluation in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications ; Self-Management ; Mental Disorders/therapy ; Behavior Therapy/methods ; Health Behavior
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-05-12
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2028830-X
    ISSN 1438-8871 ; 1438-8871
    ISSN (online) 1438-8871
    ISSN 1438-8871
    DOI 10.2196/43597
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Born in Bradford's Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study: Interim cohort profile.

    Dickerson, Josie / Bridges, Sally / Willan, Kathryn / Kelly, Brian / Moss, Rachael H / Lister, Jennie / Netkitsing, Chandani / Atkinson, Amy L / Bird, Philippa K / Uphoff, Eleanora P / Mason, Dan / Newsham, Alex / Waiblinger, Dagmar / Razaq, Rifat / Ahern, Sara / Bryant, Maria / Blower, Sarah L / Pickett, Kate E / McEachan, Rosemary M /
    Wright, John

    Wellcome open research

    2023  Volume 7, Page(s) 244

    Abstract: Background: ...

    Abstract Background:
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-21
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2398-502X
    ISSN 2398-502X
    DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18394.2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long-term care.

    Woodhouse, Rebecca / Burton, Jennifer K / Rana, Namrata / Pang, Yan Ling / Lister, Jennie E / Siddiqi, Najma

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews

    2019  Volume 4, Page(s) CD009537

    Abstract: Background: Delirium is a common and distressing mental disorder. It is often caused by a combination of stressor events in susceptible people, particularly older people living with frailty and dementia. Adults living in institutional long-term care ( ... ...

    Abstract Background: Delirium is a common and distressing mental disorder. It is often caused by a combination of stressor events in susceptible people, particularly older people living with frailty and dementia. Adults living in institutional long-term care (LTC) are at particularly high risk of delirium. An episode of delirium increases risks of admission to hospital, development or worsening of dementia and death. Multicomponent interventions can reduce the incidence of delirium by a third in the hospital setting. However, it is currently unclear whether interventions to prevent delirium in LTC are effective. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2014.
    Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of interventions for preventing delirium in older people in institutional long-term care settings.
    Search methods: We searched ALOIS (www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois), the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG) 's Specialised Register of dementia trials (dementia.cochrane.org/our-trials-register), to 27 February 2019. The search was sufficiently sensitive to identify all studies relating to delirium. We ran additional separate searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), major healthcare databases, trial registers and grey literature sources to ensure that the search was comprehensive.
    Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-randomised controlled trials (cluster-RCTs) of single and multicomponent, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in older people (aged 65 years and over) in permanent LTC residence.
    Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes were prevalence, incidence and severity of delirium; and mortality. Secondary outcomes included falls, hospital admissions and other adverse events; cognitive function; new diagnoses of dementia; activities of daily living; quality of life; and cost-related outcomes. We used risk ratios (RRs) as measures of treatment effect for dichotomous outcomes, hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. For each outcome, we assessed the overall certainty of the evidence using GRADE methods.
    Main results: We included three trials with 3851 participants. All three were cluster-RCTs. Two of the trials were of complex, single-component, non-pharmacological interventions and one trial was a feasibility trial of a complex, multicomponent, non-pharmacological intervention. Risk of bias ratings were mixed across the three trials. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the interventions, we did not combine the results statistically, but produced a narrative summary.It was not possible to determine the effect of a hydration-based intervention on delirium incidence (RR 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 4.00; 1 study, 98 participants; very low-certainty evidence downgraded for risk of bias and very serious imprecision). This study did not assess delirium prevalence, severity or mortality.The introduction of a computerised system to identify medications that may contribute to delirium risk and trigger a medication review was probably associated with a reduction in delirium incidence (12-month HR 0.42, CI 0.34 to 0.51; 1 study, 7311 participant-months; moderate-certainty evidence downgraded for risk of bias) but probably had little or no effect on mortality (HR 0.88, CI 0.66 to 1.17; 1 study, 9412 participant-months; moderate-certainty evidence downgraded for imprecision), hospital admissions (HR 0.89, CI 0.72 to 1.10; 1 study, 7599 participant-months; moderate-certainty evidence downgraded for imprecision) or falls (HR 1.03, CI 0.92 to 1.15; 1 study, 2275 participant-months; low-certainty evidence downgraded for imprecision and risk of bias). Delirium prevalence and severity were not assessed.In the enhanced educational intervention study, aimed at changing practice to address key delirium risk factors, it was not possible to determine the effect of the intervention on delirium incidence (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.39; 1 study, 137 resident months; very low-certainty evidence downgraded for risk of bias and serious imprecision) or delirium prevalence (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.19; 1 study, 160 participants; very low-certainty evidence downgraded for risk of bias and serious imprecision). There was probably little or no effect on mortality (RR 0.82, CI 0.50 to 1.34; 1 study, 215 participants; moderate-certainty evidence downgraded for imprecision). The intervention was probably associated with a reduction in hospital admissions (RR 0.67, CI 0.57 to 0.79; 1 study, 494 participants; moderate-certainty evidence downgraded due to indirectness).
    Authors' conclusions: Our review identified limited evidence on interventions for preventing delirium in older people in LTC. A software-based intervention to identify medications that could contribute to delirium risk and trigger a pharmacist-led medication review, probably reduces incidence of delirium in older people in institutional LTC. This is based on one large RCT in the US and may not be practical in other countries or settings which do not have comparable information technology services available in care homes. In the educational intervention aimed at identifying risk factors for delirium and developing bespoke solutions within care homes, it was not possible to determine the effect of the intervention on delirium incidence, prevalence or mortality. This evidence is based on a small feasibility trial. Our review identified three ongoing trials of multicomponent delirium prevention interventions. We identified no trials of pharmacological agents. Future trials of multicomponent non-pharmacological delirium prevention interventions for older people in LTC are needed to help inform the provision of evidence-based care for this vulnerable group.
    MeSH term(s) Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Delirium/chemically induced ; Delirium/epidemiology ; Delirium/prevention & control ; Frail Elderly ; Humans ; Incidence ; Institutionalization ; Long-Term Care ; Medication Reconciliation ; Quality of Life ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-04-23
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Systematic Review
    ISSN 1469-493X
    ISSN (online) 1469-493X
    DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD009537.pub3
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study

    Dan Mason / John Wright / Brian Kelly / Kathryn Willan / Jennie Lister / Rachael H. Moss / Amy L. Atkinson / Chandani Netkitsing / Josie Dickerson / Eleanora P. Uphoff / Philippa K. Bird / Rifat Razaq / Sally Bridges / Alex Newsham / Sarah L. Blower / Dagmar Waiblinger / Sara Ahern / Maria Bryant / Rosemary M. McEachan /
    Kate E. Pickett

    Wellcome Open Research, Vol

    Interim cohort profile [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

    2023  Volume 7

    Abstract: Background: The Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study was designed as an innovative cohort platform for efficient evaluation of early life interventions delivered through the Better Start Bradford programme. There are ... ...

    Abstract Background: The Born in Bradford’s Better Start (BiBBS) interventional birth cohort study was designed as an innovative cohort platform for efficient evaluation of early life interventions delivered through the Better Start Bradford programme. There are a growing number of interventional cohorts being implemented internationally. This paper provides an interim analysis of BiBBS in order to share learning about the feasibility and value of this method. Methods: Recruitment began in January 2016 and will complete in December 2023 with a target sample of 5,000 pregnancies. An interim analysis was completed for all pregnancies recruited between January 2016 and November 2019 with an expected due date between 1st April 2016 and 8th March 2020. Descriptive statistics were completed on the data. Results: Of 4,823 eligible pregnancies, 2,626 (54%) pregnancies were recruited, resulting in 2,392 mothers and 2,501 children. The sample are representative of the pregnant population (61% Pakistani heritage; 12% White British; 8% other South Asian and 6% Central and Eastern European ethnicity). The majority of participants (84%) live in the lowest decile of the Index of Multiple Deprivation, and many live in vulnerable circumstances. A high proportion (85%) of BiBBS families have engaged in one or more of the Better Start Bradford interventions. Levels of participation varied by the characteristics of the interventions, such as the requirement for active participation and the length of commitment to a programme. Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting an interventional cohort that includes seldom heard families from ethnic minority and deprived backgrounds. The high level of uptake of interventions is encouraging for the goal of evaluating the process and outcomes of multiple early life interventions using the innovative interventional cohort approach. BiBBS covers a period before, during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic which adds scientific value to the cohort.
    Keywords Interventional cohort ; birth cohort ; early years interventions ; trials within cohorts ; pragmatic randomised controlled trials ; quasi-experimental designs ; eng ; Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Wellcome
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Exploring the facilitators, barriers, and strategies for self-management in adults living with severe mental illness, with and without long-term conditions: A qualitative evidence synthesis.

    Balogun-Katung, Abisola / Carswell, Claire / Brown, Jennifer V E / Coventry, Peter / Ajjan, Ramzi / Alderson, Sarah / Bellass, Sue / Boehnke, Jan R / Holt, Richard / Jacobs, Rowena / Kellar, Ian / Kitchen, Charlotte / Lister, Jennie / Peckham, Emily / Shiers, David / Siddiqi, Najma / Wright, Judy / Young, Ben / Taylor, Jo

    PloS one

    2021  Volume 16, Issue 10, Page(s) e0258937

    Abstract: Background: People living with severe mental illness (SMI) have a reduced life expectancy by around 15-20 years, in part due to higher rates of long-term conditions (LTCs) such as diabetes and heart disease. Evidence suggests that people with SMI ... ...

    Abstract Background: People living with severe mental illness (SMI) have a reduced life expectancy by around 15-20 years, in part due to higher rates of long-term conditions (LTCs) such as diabetes and heart disease. Evidence suggests that people with SMI experience difficulties managing their physical health. Little is known, however, about the barriers, facilitators and strategies for self-management of LTCs for people with SMI.
    Aim: To systematically review and synthesise the qualitative evidence exploring facilitators, barriers and strategies for self-management of physical health in adults with SMI, both with and without long-term conditions.
    Methods: CINAHL, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, HMIC, Medline, NICE Evidence and PsycInfo were searched to identify qualitative studies that explored barriers, facilitators and strategies for self-management in adults with SMI (with or without co-morbid LTCs). Articles were screened independently by two independent reviewers. Eligible studies were purposively sampled for synthesis according to the richness and relevance of data, and thematically synthesised.
    Results: Seventy-four articles met the inclusion criteria for the review; 25 articles, reporting findings from 21 studies, were included in the synthesis. Seven studies focused on co-morbid LTC self-management for people with SMI, with the remaining articles exploring self-management in general. Six analytic themes and 28 sub-themes were identified from the synthesis. The themes included: the burden of SMI; living with co-morbidities; beliefs and attitudes about self-management; support from others for self-management; social and environmental factors; and routine, structure and planning.
    Conclusions: The synthesis identified a range of barriers and facilitators to self-management, including the burden of living with SMI, social support, attitudes towards self-management and access to resources. To adequately support people with SMI with co-morbid LTCs, healthcare professionals need to account for how barriers and facilitators to self-management are influenced by SMI, and meet the unique needs of this population.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Humans ; Mental Disorders/psychology ; Mental Disorders/therapy ; Qualitative Research ; Self-Management
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-10-26
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2267670-3
    ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    ISSN 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0258937
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Living with diabetes alongside a severe mental illness: A qualitative exploration with people with severe mental illness, family members and healthcare staff.

    Bellass, Sue / Lister, Jennie / Kitchen, Charlotte Emma Wray / Kramer, Lyndsey / Alderson, Sarah Louise / Doran, Tim / Gilbody, Simon / Han, Lu / Hewitt, Catherine / Holt, Richard Ian Gregory / Jacobs, Rowena / Prady, Stephanie Louise / Shiers, David / Siddiqi, Najma / Taylor, Johanna

    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association

    2021  Volume 38, Issue 7, Page(s) e14562

    Abstract: Aims: Diabetes is two to three times more prevalent in people with severe mental illness, yet little is known about the challenges of managing both conditions from the perspectives of people living with the co-morbidity, their family members or ... ...

    Abstract Aims: Diabetes is two to three times more prevalent in people with severe mental illness, yet little is known about the challenges of managing both conditions from the perspectives of people living with the co-morbidity, their family members or healthcare staff. Our aim was to understand these challenges and to explore the circumstances that influence access to and receipt of diabetes care for people with severe mental illness.
    Methods: Framework analysis of qualitative semi-structured interviews with people with severe mental illness and diabetes, family members, and staff from UK primary care, mental health and diabetes services, selected using a maximum variation sampling strategy between April and December 2018.
    Results: In all, 39 adults with severe mental illness and diabetes (3 with type 1 diabetes and 36 with type 2 diabetes), nine family members and 30 healthcare staff participated. Five themes were identified: (a) Severe mental illness governs everyday life including diabetes management; (b) mood influences capacity and motivation for diabetes self-management; (c) cumulative burden of managing multiple physical conditions; (d) interacting conditions and overlapping symptoms and (e) support for everyday challenges. People living with the co-morbidity and their family members emphasised the importance of receiving support for the everyday challenges that impact diabetes management, and identified barriers to accessing this from healthcare providers.
    Conclusions: More intensive support for diabetes management is needed when people's severe mental illness (including symptoms of depression) or physical health deteriorates. Interventions that help people, including healthcare staff, distinguish between symptoms of diabetes and severe mental illness are also needed.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Attitude to Health ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Disease Management ; Family ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Mental Disorders/complications ; Middle Aged ; Self-Management
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-04
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 605769-x
    ISSN 1464-5491 ; 0742-3071 ; 1466-5468
    ISSN (online) 1464-5491
    ISSN 0742-3071 ; 1466-5468
    DOI 10.1111/dme.14562
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Impact of severe mental illness on healthcare use and health outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal observational study in England.

    Han, Lu / Doran, Tim / Holt, Richard Ian Gregory / Hewitt, Catherine / Jacobs, Rowena / Prady, Stephanie Louise / Alderson, Sarah Louise / Shiers, David / Wang, Han-I / Bellass, Sue / Gilbody, Simon / Kitchen, Charlotte Emma Wray / Lister, Jennie / Taylor, Johanna / Siddiqi, Najma

    The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

    2021  Volume 71, Issue 709, Page(s) e565–e573

    Abstract: Background: People with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) have reduced life expectancy compared with the general population. Diabetes is a contributor to this disparity, with higher prevalence and poorer outcomes in people with SMI.: Aim: To determine ... ...

    Abstract Background: People with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) have reduced life expectancy compared with the general population. Diabetes is a contributor to this disparity, with higher prevalence and poorer outcomes in people with SMI.
    Aim: To determine the impact of SMI on healthcare processes and outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
    Design and setting: Retrospective, observational, matched, nested, case-control study conducted in England using patient records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to Hospital Episode Statistics.
    Method: A range of healthcare processes (primary care consultations, physical health checks, and metabolic measurements) and outcomes (prevalence and hospitalisation for cardiovascular disease [CVD], and mortality risk) were compared for 2192 people with SMI and T2DM (cases) with 7773 people who had diabetes alone (controls). Sociodemographics, comorbidity, and medication prescription were covariates in regression models.
    Results: When compared with results for participants with T2DM only, SMI was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.919, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.602 to 2.300) and CVD-specific mortality (HR 2.242, 95% CI = 1.547 to 3.250), higher primary care physician consultation rates (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.149, 95% CI = 1.111 to 1.188), more-frequent checks of blood pressure (IRR 1.024, 95% CI = 1.003 to 1.046) and cholesterol (IRR 1.038, 95% CI = 1.019 to 1.058), lower prevalence of angina (odds ratio 0.671, 95% CI = 0.450 to 1.001), more emergency admissions for angina (IRR 1.532, 95% CI = 1.069 to 2.195), and fewer elective admissions for ischaemic heart disease (IRR 0.682, 95% CI = 0.508 to 0.915).
    Conclusion: Monitoring of metabolic measurements was comparable for people with T2DM who did, and did not, have SMI. Increased mortality rates observed in people with SMI may be attributable to underdiagnosis of CVD and delays in treatment.
    MeSH term(s) Case-Control Studies ; Delivery of Health Care ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology ; England/epidemiology ; Humans ; Mental Disorders/epidemiology ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Retrospective Studies
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-29
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Observational Study ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1043148-2
    ISSN 1478-5242 ; 0035-8797 ; 0960-1643
    ISSN (online) 1478-5242
    ISSN 0035-8797 ; 0960-1643
    DOI 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0884
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Identifying determinants of diabetes risk and outcomes for people with severe mental illness

    Jennie Lister / Lu Han / Sue Bellass / Jo Taylor / Sarah L Alderson / Tim Doran / Simon Gilbody / Catherine Hewitt / Richard IG Holt / Rowena Jacobs / Charlotte EW Kitchen / Stephanie L Prady / John Radford / Jemimah R Ride / David Shiers / Han-I Wang / Najma Siddiqi

    Health Services and Delivery Research, Vol 9, Iss

    a mixed-methods study

    2021  Volume 10

    Abstract: Background: People with severe mental illness experience poorer health outcomes than the general population. Diabetes contributes significantly to this health gap. Objectives: The objectives were to identify the determinants of diabetes and to explore ... ...

    Abstract Background: People with severe mental illness experience poorer health outcomes than the general population. Diabetes contributes significantly to this health gap. Objectives: The objectives were to identify the determinants of diabetes and to explore variation in diabetes outcomes for people with severe mental illness. Design: Under a social inequalities framework, a concurrent mixed-methods design combined analysis of linked primary care records with qualitative interviews. Setting: The quantitative study was carried out in general practices in England (2000–16). The qualitative study was a community study (undertaken in the North West and in Yorkshire and the Humber). Participants: The quantitative study used the longitudinal health records of 32,781 people with severe mental illness (a subset of 3448 people had diabetes) and 9551 ‘controls’ (with diabetes but no severe mental illness), matched on age, sex and practice, from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (GOLD version). The qualitative study participants comprised 39 adults with diabetes and severe mental illness, nine family members and 30 health-care staff. Data sources: The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (GOLD) individual patient data were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Office for National Statistics mortality data and the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Results: People with severe mental illness were more likely to have diabetes if they were taking atypical antipsychotics, were living in areas of social deprivation, or were of Asian or black ethnicity. A substantial minority developed diabetes prior to severe mental illness. Compared with people with diabetes alone, people with both severe mental illness and diabetes received more frequent physical checks, maintained tighter glycaemic and blood pressure control, and had fewer recorded physical comorbidities and elective admissions, on average. However, they had more emergency admissions (incidence rate ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.36) and a significantly higher risk ...
    Keywords severe mental illness ; diabetes ; schizophrenia ; bipolar disorder ; clinical practice research datalink ; mixed methods ; longitudinal analysis ; qualitative study ; interview study ; Public aspects of medicine ; RA1-1270 ; Medicine (General) ; R5-920
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher National Institute for Health Research
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top