LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU=Verrills Paul
  2. AU="Chaudhari, Amol"
  3. AU="Planagumà, Jesús"
  4. AU="de Rezende, Grazielli Rocha"
  5. AU="Mohadeseh NEZAM"
  6. AU="Daniel Pecos-Martín"
  7. AU="Gentle, Popular"
  8. AU=Wang Jirui
  9. AU="Bielik, Martin"
  10. AU="Simon A.F. Darroch"
  11. AU="Suzuki, Kenichi G N"
  12. AU="Hu, Yizhong"
  13. AU=Sasaki Kotaro
  14. AU=Abd-Elsayed Alaa
  15. AU="Jung, Hee-Jun"
  16. AU="Struckmann, Stephan"
  17. AU=Coward Richard
  18. AU="Ghazizadeh, Shabnam"
  19. AU="Rebecca A Butcher"
  20. AU="Kimberlyn Roosa"
  21. AU=Chian Ri-Cheng
  22. AU="Alzalzalah, Sayed"
  23. AU=Kaufman Jonathan J
  24. AU="Kim, Jin K"
  25. AU="Zevakov, S A"
  26. AU="Sui Phang"
  27. AU="Kolomeichuk, Lilia V"
  28. AU="Sabuj Kanti Mistry"
  29. AU="Basurto-Lozada, Daniela"
  30. AU="Takashima, Shin-Ichiro"
  31. AU="Teresinha Leal"
  32. AU="Angélique B van 't Wout"
  33. AU="Roberts, Nicholas J"
  34. AU="Chauhan, Gaurav B"
  35. AU=Hanjaya-Putra Donny
  36. AU=Powell James
  37. AU="Russell, Todd"
  38. AU=Forth Scott
  39. AU="Kreutzer, Susanne" AU="Kreutzer, Susanne"
  40. AU="St John, Maie"
  41. AU=Gerhardy A
  42. AU="Qi, Huixin"
  43. AU="Dobosiewicz, May"
  44. AU="Srivastava, Rakesh"
  45. AU="Grevtsov K.I."

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 10 von insgesamt 45

Suchoptionen

  1. Artikel ; Online: First evidence of a biomarker-based dose-response relationship in chronic pain using physiological closed-loop spinal cord stimulation.

    Muller, Leah / Pope, Jason / Verrills, Paul / Petersen, Erika / Kallewaard, Jan Willem / Gould, Ian / Karantonis, Dean M

    Regional anesthesia and pain medicine

    2024  

    Abstract: Background and objectives: In spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy, electricity is the medication delivered to the spinal cord for pain relief. In contrast to conventional medication where dose is determined by desired therapeutic plasma concentration, ...

    Abstract Background and objectives: In spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy, electricity is the medication delivered to the spinal cord for pain relief. In contrast to conventional medication where dose is determined by desired therapeutic plasma concentration, there is lack of equivalent means of determining dose delivery in SCS. In open-loop (OL) SCS, due to the dynamic nature of the epidural space, the activating electric field delivered is inconsistent at the level of the dorsal columns. Recent Food and Drug Administration guidance suggests accurate and consistent therapy delivered using physiologic closed-loop control (PCLC) devices can minimize underdosage or overdosage and enhance medical care. PCLC-based evoked compound action potential (ECAP)-controlled technology provides the ability to prescribe a precise stimulation dose unique to each patient, continuously measure neural activation, and objectively inform SCS therapy optimization.
    Methods: Neurophysiological indicator metrics of therapy dose, usage above neural activation threshold, and accuracy of SCS therapy were assessed for relationship with pain reduction in over 600 SCS patients.
    Results: Significant relationships between objective metrics and pain relief across the patient population are shown, including first evidence for a dose-response relationship in SCS.
    Conclusions: Higher dose, more time over ECAP threshold, and higher accuracy are associated with better outcomes across patients. There is potential to optimize individual patient outcomes based on unique objective measurable electrophysiological inputs.
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2024-03-19
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1425299-5
    ISSN 1532-8651 ; 1098-7339 ; 0146-521X
    ISSN (online) 1532-8651
    ISSN 1098-7339 ; 0146-521X
    DOI 10.1136/rapm-2024-105346
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  2. Artikel: Treating Chronic, Intractable Pain with a Miniaturized Spinal Cord Stimulation System: 1-Year Outcomes from the AUS-nPower Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Salmon, John / Bates, Daniel / Du Toit, Neels / Verrills, Paul / Yu, James / Taverner, Murray G / Mohabbati, Vahid / Green, Matthew / Heit, Gary / Levy, Robert / Staats, Peter / Kottalgi, Shilpa / Makous, James / Mitchell, Bruce

    Journal of pain research

    2024  Band 17, Seite(n) 293–304

    Abstract: Purpose: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a highly effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Despite recent advances in technology, treatment gaps remain. A small SCS system with a miniaturized implantable pulse generator (micro-IPG; <1.5 cm: ... ...

    Abstract Purpose: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a highly effective treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. Despite recent advances in technology, treatment gaps remain. A small SCS system with a miniaturized implantable pulse generator (micro-IPG; <1.5 cm
    Patients and methods: This was a prospective, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate this SCS system, in the treatment of chronic, intractable leg and low-back pain. Consented subjects who passed screening continued on to the long-term phase of the study. One-year, patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) such as pain (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), functional disability, quality of life, and mood were captured.
    Results: Twenty-six (26) evaluable subjects with permanent implants were included in this analysis. The average leg pain NRS score decreased from 6.8 ± 1.2 at baseline to 1.1 ± 1.2 at the end of the study (p < 0.001), while the average low-back pain NRS score decreased from 6.8 ± 1.2 to 1.5 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001). The responder rate (proportion with ≥50% pain relief) was 91% in the leg(s) and 82% in the low back. There were significant improvements in functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index) and in mood (Beck Depression Inventory), demonstrating a 46% and 62% improvement, respectively (p < 0.001). Eleven-point Likert scales demonstrated the wearable to be very comfortable and very easy to use.
    Conclusion: There were considerable challenges conducting a clinical study during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as missed study programming visits. Nevertheless, subjects had significant PRO improvements through 1-year. The small size of the implanted device, along with a proprietary waveform, may allow for improved SCS outcomes and a drop in incidence of IPG-pocket pain.
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2024-01-21
    Erscheinungsland New Zealand
    Dokumenttyp Case Reports ; Clinical Trial
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S436889
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  3. Artikel ; Online: The impact of a regionally based translational cancer research collaborative in Australia using the FAIT methodology.

    Paul, Christine L / Verrills, Nicole M / Ackland, Stephen / Scott, Rodney / Goode, Susan / Thomas, Ann / Lukeman, Sarah / Nielsen, Sarah / Weidenhofer, Judith / Lynam, James / Fradgley, Elizabeth A / Martin, Jarad / Greer, Peter / Smith, Stephen / Griffin, Cassandra / Avery-Kiejda, Kelly A / Zdenkowski, Nick / Searles, Andrew / Ramanathan, Shanthi

    BMC health services research

    2024  Band 24, Heft 1, Seite(n) 320

    Abstract: Background: Translating research, achieving impact, and assessing impact are important aspirations for all research collaboratives but can prove challenging. The Hunter Cancer Research Alliance (HCRA) was funded from 2014 to 2021 to enhance capacity and ...

    Abstract Background: Translating research, achieving impact, and assessing impact are important aspirations for all research collaboratives but can prove challenging. The Hunter Cancer Research Alliance (HCRA) was funded from 2014 to 2021 to enhance capacity and productivity in cancer research in a regional centre in Australia. This study aimed to assess the impact and benefit of the HCRA to help inform future research investments of this type.
    Method: The Framework to Assess the Impact from Translational health research (FAIT) was selected as the preferred methodology. FAIT incorporates three validated methodologies for assessing impact: 1) Modified Payback; 2) Economic Analysis; and 3) Narrative overview and case studies. All three FAIT methods are underpinned by a Program Logic Model. Data were collected from HCRA and the University of Newcastle administrative records, directly from HCRA members, and website searches.
    Results: In addition to advancing knowledge and providing capacity building support to members via grants, fellowships, scholarships, training, events and targeted translation support, key impacts of HCRA-member research teams included: (i) the establishment of a regional biobank that has distributed over 13,600 samples and became largely self-sustaining; (ii) conservatively leveraging $43.8 M (s.a.$20.5 M - $160.5 M) in funding and support from the initial $9.7 M investment; (iii) contributing to clinical practice guidelines and securing a patent for identification of stem cells for endometrial cell regeneration; (iv) shifting the treatment paradigm for all tumour types that rely on nerve cell innervation, (v) development and implementation of the world's first real-time patient treatment verification system (Watchdog); (vi) inventing the effective 'EAT' psychological intervention to improve nutrition and outcomes in people experiencing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer; (vi) developing effective interventions to reduce smoking rates among priority groups, currently being rolled out to disadvantaged populations in NSW; and (vii) establishing a Consumer Advisory Panel and Consumer Engagement Committee to increase consumer involvement in research.
    Conclusion: Using FAIT methodology, we have demonstrated the significant impact and downstream benefits that can be achieved by the provision of infrastructure-type funding to regional and rural research collaboratives to help address inequities in research activity and health outcomes and demonstrates a positive return on investment.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Humans ; Program Evaluation/methods ; Translational Research, Biomedical ; Australia ; Translational Science, Biomedical ; Neoplasms/therapy
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2024-03-11
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2050434-2
    ISSN 1472-6963 ; 1472-6963
    ISSN (online) 1472-6963
    ISSN 1472-6963
    DOI 10.1186/s12913-024-10680-2
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  4. Artikel: Chronic Abdominal Discomfort Syndrome (CADS): Defining and Discussing a Novel Diagnosis.

    Gupta, Mayank / Patil, Anand S / Chitneni, Ahish / Schatman, Michael E / Kalia, Hemant / Deer, Timothy R / Sayed, Dawood / Soin, Amol / Baranidharan, Ganesan / Staats, Peter / Kapural, Leonardo / Attaluri, Phani Ashok / Verrills, Paul / Diwan, Sudhir / Levin, Danielle / Halder, Nimisha / Abd-Elsayed, Alaa A

    Journal of pain research

    2024  Band 17, Seite(n) 975–979

    Abstract: In this article, we propose a new diagnostic paradigm known as Chronic Abdominal Discomfort Syndrome (CADS). Patient's presentation centers around chronic abdominal pain not explained by acute pathology with or without accompanying dyspepsia, bloating, ... ...

    Abstract In this article, we propose a new diagnostic paradigm known as Chronic Abdominal Discomfort Syndrome (CADS). Patient's presentation centers around chronic abdominal pain not explained by acute pathology with or without accompanying dyspepsia, bloating, nausea and vomiting among other symptoms. The pathophysiology is noted to be neurogenic, possibly stemming from visceral sympathetic nerves or abdominal wall afferent nerves. Diagnosis is supported by signs or symptoms traversing clinical, diagnostic and functional criteria. Included is a tool which can assist clinicians in diagnosing patients with CADS per those domains. We hope to facilitate primary care physicians' and gastroenterologists' utilization of our criteria to provide guidance for selecting which patients may benefit from further interventions or evaluation by a pain physician. The pain physician may then offer interventions to provide the patient with relief.
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2024-03-11
    Erscheinungsland New Zealand
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S450008
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  5. Artikel ; Online: Clinical Longevity of 106,462 Rechargeable and Primary Cell Spinal Cord Stimulators: Real World Study in the Medicare Population.

    Deer, Timothy R / Pope, Jason E / Falowski, Steven M / Pilitsis, Julie G / Hunter, Corey W / Burton, Allen W / Connolly, Allison T / Verrills, Paul

    Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society

    2022  

    Abstract: Introduction: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are available with either primary cell (PC) or rechargeable cell (RC) batteries. Although RC systems are proposed to have a battery longevity upward of nine years, in comparison with four years for PC systems, ...

    Abstract Introduction: Spinal cord stimulators (SCS) are available with either primary cell (PC) or rechargeable cell (RC) batteries. Although RC systems are proposed to have a battery longevity upward of nine years, in comparison with four years for PC systems, there are few studies of longevity of SCS in the real world.
    Materials and methods: This was an observational, nonrandomized, retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries who received neurostimulator implants in the outpatient hospital. This study used Medicare fee-for-service claims data from 2013 to 2020. The clinical longevity of the implantable pulse generator (IPG), defined as the duration from implant until removal for any reason, was compared between PC and RC devices. Life distribution analysis was used to approximate device lifespan. The secondary analysis separated removals into explant or replacements. The statistics were adjusted for relevant clinical covariates.
    Results: A total of 25,856 PC and 79,606 RC systems were included in the study. At seven years after implant, 53.8% of PC IPGs and 55.0% of RC IPGs remained in use. The life distribution modeling analysis projected a median lifespan of 8.2 years for PC and 9.0 years for RC devices. The rate of explant was lower for PC devices (19.2%) than for RC devices (22.0%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96, p = 0.082), whereas the rate of replacements was higher for PC devices (33.7%) than for RC devices (29.5%, HR = 1.31, p < 0.001). An analysis of the battery type used in device replacements showed an increasing adoption of PC devices over time.
    Conclusions: This large, retrospective, real-world analysis of Medicare claims data demonstrated that the clinical longevity of neurostimulator devices is similar for PC and RC batteries. In the past, clinicians may have defaulted to RC devices based on the assumption that they provided extended battery life. Considering this longevity data, clinicians should now consider the choice between PC and RC devices based on other individual factors pertinent to the patient experience and not on purported longevity claims.
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2022-06-08
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1500372-3
    ISSN 1525-1403 ; 1094-7159
    ISSN (online) 1525-1403
    ISSN 1094-7159
    DOI 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.046
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  6. Artikel ; Online: Re: Thanks But No Thanks.

    FitzGerald, James J / Lubenow, Timothy J / Verrills, Paul

    Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)

    2017  Band 18, Heft 9, Seite(n) 1820

    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2017-09-19
    Erscheinungsland England
    Dokumenttyp Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 2015903-1
    ISSN 1526-4637 ; 1526-2375
    ISSN (online) 1526-4637
    ISSN 1526-2375
    DOI 10.1093/pm/pnx202
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  7. Artikel ; Online: Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Back Pain.

    Verrills, Paul / Russo, Marc

    Progress in neurological surgery

    2015  Band 29, Seite(n) 127–138

    Abstract: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) generally refers to stimulation of a named nerve via direct placement of a lead next to the nerve either via a percutaneous or open approach; in peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS), leads are subcutaneously placed ...

    Abstract Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) generally refers to stimulation of a named nerve via direct placement of a lead next to the nerve either via a percutaneous or open approach; in peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS), leads are subcutaneously placed to stimulate the region of affected nerves, cutaneous afferents, or the dermatomal distribution of the nerves which converge back to the spinal cord. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in using the PNS approach for many otherwise refractory pain conditions; however, PNFS appears to be more effective for the management of low back pain and therefore more attractive. Here we discuss procedural details of PNFS trial and implant, and provide scientific and clinical rationale for placing PNFS electrodes at a certain depth under the skin. We also summarize results of published studies on use of PNFS in the management of low back pain and list the criteria that are used for proper patient selection. Our experience and the published studies provide evidence that PNFS is a safe and well-tolerated pain control option for intractable pain conditions, including chronic low back pain. Notably, achieving efficacious pain relief relies on correct patient selection and the optimal placement of the leads, ensuring, in particular, a lead depth of 10-12 mm from the surface to maximize the target sensation (mediated by fast-adapting Aβ fibers) of PNFS, which is believed to be most effective for the pain relief.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Back Pain/diagnosis ; Back Pain/surgery ; Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation ; Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Humans ; Implantable Neurostimulators ; Pain Management/instrumentation ; Pain Management/methods ; Peripheral Nerves/physiology ; Peripheral Nerves/surgery
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2015
    Erscheinungsland Switzerland
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 1662-3924 ; 0079-6492
    ISSN (online) 1662-3924
    ISSN 0079-6492
    DOI 10.1159/000434666
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  8. Artikel ; Online: Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Is Paresthesia-Independent: A Retrospective Study.

    Verrills, Paul / Mitchell, Bruce / Vivian, David / Cusack, William / Kramer, Jeffery

    Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society

    2019  Band 22, Heft 8, Seite(n) 937–942

    Abstract: Introduction: Neuromodulation is an important tool for achieving pain relief in otherwise-intractable neuropathic pain conditions. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, in which primary sensory neurons are stimulated prior to their entry into the ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: Neuromodulation is an important tool for achieving pain relief in otherwise-intractable neuropathic pain conditions. Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation, in which primary sensory neurons are stimulated prior to their entry into the spinal canal, provides treatment with high levels of dermatomal specificity and can provide advantages compared to conventional spinal cord stimulation. Although DRG stimulation can produce perceptible paresthesias, many patients operate their systems at subthreshold amplitudes that do not elicit this sensation. Pain relief both with and without paresthesia was investigated in this retrospective analysis.
    Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all qualifying permanent DRG stimulation systems at a single center over more than a three-year period was completed. Pain (0-10 numeric rating scale) was assessed at baseline, at the end of the trial, and after three, six, and twelve months of treatment. Patients were categorized based on their usage of the stimulator at amplitudes that either did or did not produce paresthesias.
    Results: Of the 39 patients, 34 (87%) reported having no-paresthesias at any of the follow-up visits. Average pain relief was 73.9% after the trial period and 63.1% after 12 months of treatment. The responder rate (50% or better pain relief) after three months of treatment was more than 80%. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that similar degrees of pain relief were achieved in numerous body regions and with various pain etiologies. The five patients who reported paresthesias during treatment had pain relief similar to those of the group that did not experience paresthesias.
    Discussion: Clinically significant and sustained pain relief over more than a period of 12 months was achieved with DRG stimulation programmed at amplitudes below the perceptual level. Thus, the reported analgesia was paresthesia-independent. That good clinical outcomes were observed independent of the generation of paresthesia in DRG stimulation suggests several mechanisms of action, including the inhibition of supraspinal regions involved in somatic paresthesia sensation. The retrospective results presented here posit that future prospective study of DRG stimulation delivered at below the threshold of perceptible paresthesias is warranted.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Adult ; Causalgia/therapy ; Female ; Ganglia, Spinal ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Management/adverse effects ; Pain Management/methods ; Pain Measurement ; Pain Perception ; Paresthesia/epidemiology ; Paresthesia/etiology ; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy/therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Cord Stimulation/adverse effects ; Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods ; Treatment Outcome
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2019-01-30
    Erscheinungsland United States
    Dokumenttyp Comparative Study ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1500372-3
    ISSN 1525-1403 ; 1094-7159
    ISSN (online) 1525-1403
    ISSN 1094-7159
    DOI 10.1111/ner.12921
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  9. Artikel: Best Practices from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) for Clinical Research During a Pandemic or Emergency.

    Petersen, Erika A / Deer, Timothy R / Bojanic, Stana / Sankary, Lauren R / Strand, Natalie H / Al Kaisy, Adnan / Huygen, Frank / Sayed, Dawood / Steegers, Monique / Verrills, Paul / Schatman, Michael E

    Journal of pain research

    2023  Band 16, Seite(n) 327–339

    Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic caught many areas of medicine in a state of unpreparedness for conducting research and completing ongoing projects during a global crisis, including the field of pain medicine. Waves of infection led to a disjointed ability to ... ...

    Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic caught many areas of medicine in a state of unpreparedness for conducting research and completing ongoing projects during a global crisis, including the field of pain medicine. Waves of infection led to a disjointed ability to provide care and conduct clinical research. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Research Group has created guidance for pragmatic and ethical considerations for research during future emergency or disaster situations. This analysis uses governmental guidance, scientific best practices, and expert opinion to address procedure-based or device-based clinical trials during such times. Current literature offers limited recommendations on this important issue, and the findings of this group fill a void for protocols to improve patient safety and efficacy, especially as we anticipate the impact of future disasters and spreading global infectious diseases. We recommend local adaptations to best practices and innovations to enable continued research while respecting the stressors to the research subjects, investigator teams, health-care systems, and to local infrastructure.
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2023-02-01
    Erscheinungsland New Zealand
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2495284-9
    ISSN 1178-7090
    ISSN 1178-7090
    DOI 10.2147/JPR.S393539
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

  10. Artikel ; Online: 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for chronic upper limb and neck pain: Australian experience.

    Verrills, Paul / Salmon, John / Russo, Marc / Gliner, Bradford / Barnard, Adele / Caraway, David

    European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society

    2020  Band 29, Heft 11, Seite(n) 2786–2794

    Abstract: Purpose: Intractable upper limb and neck pain has traditionally been a challenging pain condition to treat, with conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) often inducing positional variation in paraesthesia and/or inadequate coverage of axial neck pain. ...

    Abstract Purpose: Intractable upper limb and neck pain has traditionally been a challenging pain condition to treat, with conventional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) often inducing positional variation in paraesthesia and/or inadequate coverage of axial neck pain. The purpose of this Australian multi-centre prospective, clinical trial was to assess the safety and effectiveness of paraesthesia-independent 10 kHz SCS for the treatment of upper limb and neck pain.
    Methods: Subjects with chronic, intractable neck and/or upper limb pain of ≥ 5 cm (on a 0-10-cm visual analogue scale) were enrolled (ACTRN12614000153617) following human research ethics committee approval. Subjects were implanted with two epidural leads spanning C2-C6 vertebral bodies. Subjects with successful trial stimulation were implanted with a Senza
    Results: Overall, 31/38 (82.6%) subjects reported a successful 10 kHz SCS trial and proceeded to a permanent implant. Twenty-three of 30 subjects (76.7%) met the PEA. Subjects reported a reduction in neck pain and upper limb pain from baseline at the PEA (8.1 ± 0.2 cm vs. 2.9 ± 0.5 cm, 7.3 ± 0.3 cm vs. 2.5 ± 0.5 cm, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001). Disability, as measured by pain disability index score, decreased from 42.6 ± 2.6 at baseline to 22.7 ± 3.2 at PEA. Results were maintained 12 months post-implant. No neurological deficits, nor reports of paraesthesia, were observed.
    Conclusions: Stable, long-term results demonstrated that 10 kHz SCS is a promising therapy option for intractable chronic upper limb and neck pain.
    Mesh-Begriff(e) Australia ; Chronic Pain/therapy ; Humans ; Neck Pain/therapy ; Pain Management ; Prospective Studies ; Spinal Cord ; Spinal Cord Stimulation ; Treatment Outcome ; Upper Extremity
    Sprache Englisch
    Erscheinungsdatum 2020-06-30
    Erscheinungsland Germany
    Dokumenttyp Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1115375-1
    ISSN 1432-0932 ; 0940-6719
    ISSN (online) 1432-0932
    ISSN 0940-6719
    DOI 10.1007/s00586-020-06480-x
    Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    Zusatzmaterialien

    Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang