LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 12

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Effective contact tracing for COVID-19: A systematic review.

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Briand, Anne-Sara / Collazzo, Pablo / Siebert, Uwe / Pueyo, Tomas

    Global epidemiology

    2023  Volume 5, Page(s) 100103

    Abstract: Contact tracing is commonly recommended to control outbreaks of COVID-19, but its effectiveness is unclear. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched four databases using a range of terms related to contact tracing effectiveness for COVID-19. We found 343 ...

    Abstract Contact tracing is commonly recommended to control outbreaks of COVID-19, but its effectiveness is unclear. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched four databases using a range of terms related to contact tracing effectiveness for COVID-19. We found 343 papers; 32 were included. All were observational or modelling studies. Observational studies (
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-09
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 2590-1133
    ISSN (online) 2590-1133
    DOI 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100103
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Lessons from past pandemics

    Carl-Etienne Juneau / Tomas Pueyo / Matt Bell / Genevieve Gee / Pablo Collazzo / Louise Potvin

    Systematic Reviews, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-

    a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19

    2022  Volume 17

    Abstract: Abstract Background In an unparalleled global response, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 90 countries asked 3.9 billion people to stay home. Yet other countries avoided lockdowns and focused on other strategies, like contact tracing. How effective and cost- ... ...

    Abstract Abstract Background In an unparalleled global response, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 90 countries asked 3.9 billion people to stay home. Yet other countries avoided lockdowns and focused on other strategies, like contact tracing. How effective and cost-effective are these strategies? We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence on past pandemic controls, with a focus on cost-effectiveness. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE (1946 to April week 2, 2020) and EMBASE (1974 to April 17, 2020) were searched using a range of terms related to pandemic control. Articles reporting on the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of at least one intervention were included. Results We found 1653 papers; 62 were included. The effectiveness of hand-washing and face masks was supported by randomized trials. These measures were highly cost-effective. For other interventions, only observational and modelling studies were found. They suggested that (1) the most cost-effective interventions are swift contact tracing and case isolation, surveillance networks, protective equipment for healthcare workers, and early vaccination (when available); (2) home quarantines and stockpiling antivirals are less cost-effective; (3) social distancing measures like workplace and school closures are effective but costly, making them the least cost-effective options; (4) combinations are more cost-effective than single interventions; and (5) interventions are more cost-effective when adopted early. For 2009 H1N1 influenza, contact tracing was estimated to be 4363 times more cost-effective than school closure ($2260 vs. $9,860,000 per death prevented). Conclusions and contributions For COVID-19, a cautious interpretation suggests that (1) workplace and school closures are effective but costly, especially when adopted late, and (2) scaling up as early as possible a combination of interventions that includes hand-washing, face masks, ample protective equipment for healthcare workers, and swift contact tracing and case isolation is ...
    Keywords Non-pharmaceutical interventions ; Epidemic interventions ; Outbreak control ; Pandemic control ; Cost-effectiveness ; COVID-19 ; Medicine ; R
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-05-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher BMC
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Lessons from past pandemics: a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19.

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Pueyo, Tomas / Bell, Matt / Gee, Genevieve / Collazzo, Pablo / Potvin, Louise

    Systematic reviews

    2022  Volume 11, Issue 1, Page(s) 90

    Abstract: Background: In an unparalleled global response, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 90 countries asked 3.9 billion people to stay home. Yet other countries avoided lockdowns and focused on other strategies, like contact tracing. How effective and cost- ... ...

    Abstract Background: In an unparalleled global response, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 90 countries asked 3.9 billion people to stay home. Yet other countries avoided lockdowns and focused on other strategies, like contact tracing. How effective and cost-effective are these strategies? We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence on past pandemic controls, with a focus on cost-effectiveness.
    Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE (1946 to April week 2, 2020) and EMBASE (1974 to April 17, 2020) were searched using a range of terms related to pandemic control. Articles reporting on the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of at least one intervention were included.
    Results: We found 1653 papers; 62 were included. The effectiveness of hand-washing and face masks was supported by randomized trials. These measures were highly cost-effective. For other interventions, only observational and modelling studies were found. They suggested that (1) the most cost-effective interventions are swift contact tracing and case isolation, surveillance networks, protective equipment for healthcare workers, and early vaccination (when available); (2) home quarantines and stockpiling antivirals are less cost-effective; (3) social distancing measures like workplace and school closures are effective but costly, making them the least cost-effective options; (4) combinations are more cost-effective than single interventions; and (5) interventions are more cost-effective when adopted early. For 2009 H1N1 influenza, contact tracing was estimated to be 4363 times more cost-effective than school closure ($2260 vs. $9,860,000 per death prevented).
    Conclusions and contributions: For COVID-19, a cautious interpretation suggests that (1) workplace and school closures are effective but costly, especially when adopted late, and (2) scaling up as early as possible a combination of interventions that includes hand-washing, face masks, ample protective equipment for healthcare workers, and swift contact tracing and case isolation is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy.
    MeSH term(s) COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/prevention & control ; Communicable Disease Control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Humans ; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; SARS-CoV-2
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-05-12
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review ; Systematic Review ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2662257-9
    ISSN 2046-4053 ; 2046-4053
    ISSN (online) 2046-4053
    ISSN 2046-4053
    DOI 10.1186/s13643-022-01958-9
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid systematic review

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Pueyo, Toma / Bell, Matt / Gee, Genevieve / Potvin, Louise

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background: Countries vary in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some emphasise social distancing, while others focus on other interventions. Evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is urgently needed to guide ... ...

    Abstract Background: Countries vary in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some emphasise social distancing, while others focus on other interventions. Evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is urgently needed to guide public health policy and avoid unnecessary damage to the economy and other harms. We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence on epidemic control, with a focus on cost-effectiveness. Methods: MEDLINE (1946 to March week 3, 2020) and Embase (1974 to March 27, 2020) were searched using a range of terms related to epidemic control. Reviews, randomized trials, observational studies, and modelling studies were included. Articles reporting on the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of at least one intervention were included and grouped into higher-quality (randomized trials) and lower-quality evidence (other study designs). Findings: We found 1,653 papers; 34 were included. Higher-quality evidence was only available to support the effectiveness of hand washing and face masks. Modelling studies suggested that these measures are highly cost-effective. For other interventions, only evidence from observational and modelling studies was available. A cautious interpretation of this body of lower-quality evidence suggests that: (1) the most cost-effective interventions are swift contact tracing and case isolation, surveillance networks, protective equipment for healthcare workers, and early vaccination (when available); (2) home quarantines and stockpiling antivirals are less cost-effective; (3) social distancing measures like workplace and school closures are effective but costly, making them the least cost-effective options; (4) combinations are more cost-effective than single interventions; (5) interventions are more cost-effective when adopted early and for severe viruses like SARS-CoV-2. For H1N1 influenza, contact tracing was estimated to be 4,363 times more cost-effective than school closures ($2,260 vs. $9,860,000 per death prevented). Conclusions: A cautious interpretation of this body of evidence suggests that for COVID-19: (1) social distancing is effective but costly, especially when adopted late and (2) adopting as early as possible a combination of interventions that includes hand washing, face masks, swift contact tracing and case isolation, and protective equipment for healthcare workers is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-24
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.04.20.20054726
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Effective Contact Tracing for COVID-19: A Systematic Review

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Briand, Anne-Sara / Pueyo, Tomas / Collazzo, Pablo / Potvin, Louise

    medRxiv

    Abstract: Background: Contact tracing is commonly recommended to control outbreaks of COVID-19, but its effectiveness is unclear. This systematic review aimed to examine contact tracing effectiveness in the context of COVID-19. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, ...

    Abstract Background: Contact tracing is commonly recommended to control outbreaks of COVID-19, but its effectiveness is unclear. This systematic review aimed to examine contact tracing effectiveness in the context of COVID-19. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and All EBM Reviews were searched using a range of terms related to contact tracing for COVID-19. Articles were included if they reported on the ability of contact tracing to slow or stop the spread of COVID-19 or on characteristics of effective tracing efforts. Two investigators screened all studies. Results: A total of 32 articles were found. All were observational or modelling studies, so the quality of the evidence was low. Observational studies (n=14) all reported that contact tracing (alone or in combination with other interventions) was associated with better control of COVID-19. Results of modelling studies (n=18) depended on their assumptions. Under assumptions of prompt and thorough tracing with no further transmission, they found that contact tracing could stop an outbreak (e.g. by reducing the reproduction number from 2.2 to 0.57) or that it could reduce infections (e.g. by 24%-71% with a mobile tracing app). Under assumptions of slower, less efficient tracing, modelling studies suggested that tracing could slow, but not stop COVID-19. Conclusions: Observational and modelling studies suggest that contact tracing is associated with better control of COVID-19. Its effectiveness likely depends on a number of factors, including how many and how fast contacts are traced and quarantined, and how effective quarantines are at preventing further transmission. A cautious interpretation suggests that to stop the spread of COVID-19, public health practitioners have 2-3 days from the time a new case develops symptoms to isolate the case and quarantine at least 80% of its contacts, and that once isolated, cases and contacts should infect zero new cases. Less efficient tracing may slow, but not stop, the spread of COVID-19. Inefficient tracing (with delays of 4-5+ days or less than 60% of contacts quarantined with no further transmission) may not contribute meaningfully to control of COVID-19.
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-07-25
    Publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.07.23.20160234
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid systematic review

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Pueyo, Toma / Bell, Matt / Gee, Genevieve / Potvin, Louise

    Abstract: Background: Countries vary in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some emphasise social distancing, while others focus on other interventions. Evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is urgently needed to guide ... ...

    Abstract Background: Countries vary in their response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some emphasise social distancing, while others focus on other interventions. Evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is urgently needed to guide public health policy and avoid unnecessary damage to the economy and other harms. We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence on epidemic control, with a focus on cost-effectiveness. Methods: MEDLINE (1946 to March week 3, 2020) and Embase (1974 to March 27, 2020) were searched using a range of terms related to epidemic control. Reviews, randomized trials, observational studies, and modelling studies were included. Articles reporting on the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of at least one intervention were included and grouped into higher-quality (randomized trials) and lower-quality evidence (other study designs). Findings: We found 1,653 papers; 34 were included. Higher-quality evidence was only available to support the effectiveness of hand washing and face masks. Modelling studies suggested that these measures are highly cost-effective. For other interventions, only evidence from observational and modelling studies was available. A cautious interpretation of this body of lower-quality evidence suggests that: (1) the most cost-effective interventions are swift contact tracing and case isolation, surveillance networks, protective equipment for healthcare workers, and early vaccination (when available); (2) home quarantines and stockpiling antivirals are less cost-effective; (3) social distancing measures like workplace and school closures are effective but costly, making them the least cost-effective options; (4) combinations are more cost-effective than single interventions; (5) interventions are more cost-effective when adopted early and for severe viruses like SARS-CoV-2. For H1N1 influenza, contact tracing was estimated to be 4,363 times more cost-effective than school closures ($2,260 vs. $9,860,000 per death prevented). Conclusions: A cautious interpretation of this body of evidence suggests that for COVID-19: (1) social distancing is effective but costly, especially when adopted late and (2) adopting as early as possible a combination of interventions that includes hand washing, face masks, swift contact tracing and case isolation, and protective equipment for healthcare workers is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher MedRxiv; WHO
    Document type Article ; Online
    DOI 10.1101/2020.04.20.20054726
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Trends in leisure-, transport-, and work-related physical activity in Canada 1994-2005.

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Potvin, Louise

    Preventive medicine

    2010  Volume 51, Issue 5, Page(s) 384–386

    Abstract: Background: In Canada, data show adults had a lower energy intake in 2004 than in 1972. Data also show adults expended more energy through leisure-time physical activity in 2000 than in 1981. On the other hand, the prevalence of overweight and obesity ( ... ...

    Abstract Background: In Canada, data show adults had a lower energy intake in 2004 than in 1972. Data also show adults expended more energy through leisure-time physical activity in 2000 than in 1981. On the other hand, the prevalence of overweight and obesity (combined) rose from 49.2% to 59.1% between 1978 and 2004.
    Purpose: This study aimed to chart trends in leisure-, transport-, and work-related physical activity in Canada between 1994 and 2005.
    Methods: We used nationally representative data from the three National Population Health Surveys (1994, 1996, and 1998) and the three Canadian Community Health Surveys (2000, 2003, and 2005) (a repeated cross-sectional design). Sample sizes ranged from n=17626 (in 1994) to n=132,221 (in 2005).
    Results: Between 1994 and 2005, men became less inactive during leisure time (-9.94% [9.89%-9.98%]), less inactive during transports (-15.31% [15.26%-15.35%]), and more inactive at work (+5.18% [5.14%-5.22%]). Similar results were found for women.
    Conclusions: Declining levels of physical activity at work may help explain the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity in Canada.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Canada/epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Employment/trends ; Energy Intake ; Exercise/physiology ; Female ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Leisure Activities ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Obesity/epidemiology ; Obesity/etiology ; Prevalence ; Public Health ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2010-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 184600-0
    ISSN 1096-0260 ; 0091-7435
    ISSN (online) 1096-0260
    ISSN 0091-7435
    DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.09.002
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: How is evidence used for planning, implementation and evaluation of health promotion? A global collection of case studies.

    Potvin, Louise / Juneau, Carl-Étienne / Jones, Catherine M / McQueen, David V

    Global health promotion

    2011  Volume 18, Issue 1, Page(s) 7–8, 92–4, 136–8

    MeSH term(s) Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Health Promotion/organization & administration
    Language Spanish
    Publishing date 2011-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Editorial ; Introductory Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2502036-5
    ISSN 1757-9767 ; 1757-9759
    ISSN (online) 1757-9767
    ISSN 1757-9759
    DOI 10.1177/1757975910393161
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Social class across the life course and physical activity at age 34 years in the 1970 British birth cohort.

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Sullivan, Alice / Dodgeon, Brian / Côté, Sylvana / Ploubidis, George B / Potvin, Louise

    Annals of epidemiology

    2014  Volume 24, Issue 9, Page(s) 641–7, 647.e1

    Abstract: Purpose: To examine the associations between social class at ages 0, 5, 10, 30, and 34 years and physical activity at age 34 years using a novel approach to analysis of life course data.: Methods: We used structural equation modeling to compare three ...

    Abstract Purpose: To examine the associations between social class at ages 0, 5, 10, 30, and 34 years and physical activity at age 34 years using a novel approach to analysis of life course data.
    Methods: We used structural equation modeling to compare three competing models in life course epidemiology: the accumulation of risk model with additive effects, the accumulation of risk model with trigger effect, and the critical period model. Data were from a nationally representative prospective cohort of 16,571 British men and women born in 1970. Outcomes were physical activity during leisure time, during transports, and at work.
    Results: For all three domains of physical activity, for men and women, the accumulation of risk model with additive effects fit the data best. In this model, social class at ages 0, 5, 10, 30, and 34 years were associated with physical activity at age 34 years, although the magnitude and the direction of the associations for social class at each age varied by physical activity outcome and by sex.
    Conclusions: Structural equation modeling appears to be a helpful tool in selecting among competing models in life course epidemiology.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; European Continental Ancestry Group/statistics & numerical data ; Exercise ; Female ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Leisure Activities ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Motor Activity ; Multivariate Analysis ; Prospective Studies ; Social Class ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; United Kingdom ; Young Adult
    Language English
    Publishing date 2014-09
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1074355-8
    ISSN 1873-2585 ; 1047-2797
    ISSN (online) 1873-2585
    ISSN 1047-2797
    DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.06.096
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Evidence-based health promotion: an emerging field.

    Juneau, Carl-Etienne / Jones, Catherine M / McQueen, David V / Potvin, Louise

    Global health promotion

    2011  Volume 18, Issue 1, Page(s) 79–89, 122–33, 157–68

    Abstract: There is much debate around the use of evidence in health promotion practice. This article aims to sharpen our understanding of this matter by reviewing and analyzing the 26 case studies presented in this special issue. These case studies suggest that ... ...

    Abstract There is much debate around the use of evidence in health promotion practice. This article aims to sharpen our understanding of this matter by reviewing and analyzing the 26 case studies presented in this special issue. These case studies suggest that health promotion practitioners are using a wide range of research evidence in interventions for high-risk individuals, entire populations, and vulnerable groups according to all five strategies for action described in the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. In nearly every case, practitioners had to mediate and adapt research evidence for their case. Eight key levers helped practitioners embed research evidence into practice: local and cultural relevance of the evidence, community capacity-building, sustained dialogue from the outset with all stakeholders, established academic-supported partnerships, communication that responds to organizational and political readiness, acknowledgement and awareness of gaps between evidence and practice, advocacy, and adequate earmarked resources. These case studies provide some evidence that there is an evidence-based health promotion, that this evidence base is broad, and that practitioners use different strategies to adapt it for their case.
    MeSH term(s) Evidence-Based Practice ; Health Promotion/methods ; Health Promotion/standards ; Humans
    Language Spanish
    Publishing date 2011-03
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2502036-5
    ISSN 1757-9767 ; 1757-9759
    ISSN (online) 1757-9767
    ISSN 1757-9759
    DOI 10.1177/1757975910394035
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top