LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 14

Search options

  1. Article: Comparing Cortical Bone Trajectory and Traditional Pedicle Screws in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study of One-Year Outcomes.

    Gutierrez, Juanmarco / Erwood, Andrew M / Malcolm, James G / Grogan, Dayton P / Greven, Alexander C / Gary, Matthew F / Rodts, Gerald E / Stricsek, Geoffrey P / Refai, Daniel

    Cureus

    2023  Volume 15, Issue 8, Page(s) e43237

    Abstract: Introduction: This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at a single institution. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term results associated with cortical bone ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at a single institution. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term results associated with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and traditional pedicle screw (TPS) via posterolateral approach in TLIF.
    Methods: Consecutive patients treated from November 2014 to March 2019 were included in the CBT TLIF group, while consecutive patients treated from October 2010 to August 2017 were included in the TPS TLIF group. Inclusion criteria comprised single-level or two-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis and at least one year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Variables of interest included pertinent preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data. Non-parametric evaluation was performed using the Wilcoxon test. Fisher's exact test was used to assess group differences for nominal data.
    Results: Overall, 140 patients met the inclusion criteria; 69 patients had CBT instrumentation (mean follow-up 526 days) and 71 patients underwent instrumentation placement via TPS (mean follow-up 825 days). Examination of perioperative and postoperative outcomes demonstrate comparable results between the groups with perioperative complications, length of stay, discharge destination, surgical revision rate, and fusion rates all being similar between groups (p = 0.1; p = 0.53; p = 0.091; p = 0.61; p = 0.665, respectively).
    Conclusions: CBT in the setting of TLIF offer equivalent outcomes to TPS with TLIF at both short- and long-term intervals of care.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-08-09
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2747273-5
    ISSN 2168-8184
    ISSN 2168-8184
    DOI 10.7759/cureus.43237
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Letter: Neurosurgical Management of Spinal Pathology Via Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Early Experience and Unique Challenges.

    Greven, Alexander C M / Rich, Christopher W / Malcolm, James G / Bray, David P / Rodts, Gerald E / Refai, Daniel / Gary, Matthew F

    Neurosurgery

    2020  Volume 87, Issue 2, Page(s) E192–E196

    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-28
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 135446-2
    ISSN 1524-4040 ; 0148-396X
    ISSN (online) 1524-4040
    ISSN 0148-396X
    DOI 10.1093/neuros/nyaa165
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Telemedicine in Spine Surgery: Outcomes for 138 Patients With Virtual Preoperative Assessment Compared to Historical Controls.

    Greven, Alexander C M / McGinley, Beau M / Nakirikanti, Anudeep S / Couceyro, Jordan D / Malcolm, James G / Rodts, Gerald E / Refai, Daniel / Gary, Matthew F

    World neurosurgery

    2022  Volume 161, Page(s) e495–e499

    Abstract: Introduction: COVID-19 has accelerated the use of telemedicine in all aspects of health care delivery, including initial surgical evaluation. No existing literature investigates the safety and efficacy of telemedicine to preoperatively evaluate spine ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: COVID-19 has accelerated the use of telemedicine in all aspects of health care delivery, including initial surgical evaluation. No existing literature investigates the safety and efficacy of telemedicine to preoperatively evaluate spine surgery candidates. Our objectives were: (1) Compare the change in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the telemedicine preoperative visit and in-person preoperative visit groups. (2) Compare the average surgical time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), rates of intraoperative complications, rates of readmission, and rates of reoperation between the telemedicine preoperative visit and in-person preoperative visit groups.
    Methods: The previously stated metrics were collected for 276 patients, 138 who were exclusively evaluated preoperatively with telemedicine and 138 historical controls who were evaluated preoperatively in person. We used χ
    Results: There were no significant differences in the mean change in VAS scores (-2.7 ± 3.1 telemedicine vs. -2.2 ± 3.7 in-person, P = 0.317), mean percentage change in VAS scores (-40.5% ± 54.3% vs. -39.5% ± 66.6%, P = 0.811), mean surgical time (2.4 ± 1.4 hours vs. 2.3 ± 1.3 ours, P = 0.527), mean EBL (150.4 ± 173.3 mL vs. 156.7 ± 255.0 mL, P = 0.811), mean LOS (3.3 ± 2.4 days vs. 3.3 ± 2.5 days, P = 0.954), intraoperative complication rates (0.7% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.558), reoperation rates (7.9% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.208), or readmission rates (10.1% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.091) between the telemedicine preoperative visit and in-person preoperative visit groups.
    Conclusions: Preoperative evaluation via telemedicine leads to the same short-term surgical outcomes as in-person evaluation with no increased risk of surgical complications.
    MeSH term(s) Benchmarking ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; Length of Stay ; Telemedicine
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-19
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2534351-8
    ISSN 1878-8769 ; 1878-8750
    ISSN (online) 1878-8769
    ISSN 1878-8750
    DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.041
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Correction to: Low-chloride- versus high-chloride-containing hypertonic solution for the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage-related complications: The ACETatE (A low ChloriE hyperTonic solution for brain Edema) randomized trial.

    Sadan, Ofer / Singbartl, Kai / Kraft, Jacqueline / Plancher, Joao McONeil / Greven, Alexander C M / Kandiah, Prem / Pimentel, Cederic / Hall, C L / Papangelou, Alexander / Asbury, William H / Hanfelt, John J / Samuels, Owen

    Journal of intensive care

    2020  Volume 8, Page(s) 66

    Abstract: This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40560-020-00449-0.]. ...

    Abstract [This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40560-020-00449-0.].
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-09-01
    Publishing country England
    Document type Published Erratum
    ZDB-ID 2739853-5
    ISSN 2052-0492
    ISSN 2052-0492
    DOI 10.1186/s40560-020-00485-w
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article: Low-chloride- versus high-chloride-containing hypertonic solution for the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage-related complications: The ACETatE (A low ChloriE hyperTonic solution for brain Edema) randomized trial.

    Sadan, Ofer / Singbartl, Kai / Kraft, Jacqueline / Plancher, Joao McONeil / Greven, Alexander C M / Kandiah, Prem / Pimentel, Cederic / Hall, C L / Papangelou, Alexander / Asbury, William H / Hanfelt, John J / Samuels, Owen

    Journal of intensive care

    2020  Volume 8, Page(s) 32

    Abstract: Background: Recent reports have demonstrated that among patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated with hypertonic NaCl, resultant hyperchloremia has been associated with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). We report a trial comparing ...

    Abstract Background: Recent reports have demonstrated that among patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated with hypertonic NaCl, resultant hyperchloremia has been associated with the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). We report a trial comparing the effect of two hypertonic solutions with different chloride contents on the resultant serum chloride concentrations in SAH patients, with a primary outcome aimed at limiting chloride elevation.
    Methods: A low ChloridE hyperTonic solution for brain Edema (ACETatE) trial is a single-center, double-blinded, double-dummy, randomized pilot trial comparing bolus infusions of 23.4% NaCl and 16.4% NaCl/Na-acetate for the treatment of cerebral edema in patients with SAH. Randomization occurred when patients developed hyperchloremia (serum Cl
    Results: We enrolled 59 patients, of which 32 developed hyperchloremia and required hyperosmolar treatment. 15 patients were randomized to the 23.4% NaCl group, and 17 patients were randomized to the 16.4% NaCl/Na-acetate group. Although serum chloride levels increased similarly in both groups, the NaCl/Acetate group showed a significantly lower Cl
    Conclusions: Our pilot trial showed the feasibility and safety of replacing 23.4% NaCl infusions with 16.4% NaCl/Na-acetate infusions to treat cerebral edema in patients with SAH. The degree of hyperchloremia was similar in the two groups. 16.4% NaCl/Na-acetate infusions led to lower Cl
    Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03204955, registered on 6/28/2017.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-05-04
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2739853-5
    ISSN 2052-0492
    ISSN 2052-0492
    DOI 10.1186/s40560-020-00449-0
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Complication rate of overlapping versus nonoverlapping functional and stereotactic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

    Greven, Alexander C M / Douglas, J Miller / Nakirikanti, Anudeep S / Malcolm, James G / Campbell, Melissa / Easley, Kirk A / Laxpati, Nealen G / Lamanna, Jason J / Bray, David P / Howard, Brian M / Willie, Jon T / Boulis, Nicholas M / Gross, Robert E

    Journal of neurosurgery

    2022  Volume 138, Issue 4, Page(s) 1043–1049

    Abstract: Objective: Overlapping surgery, in which one attending surgeon manages two overlapping operating rooms (ORs) and is present for all the critical portions of each procedure, is an important policy that improves healthcare access for patients and case ... ...

    Abstract Objective: Overlapping surgery, in which one attending surgeon manages two overlapping operating rooms (ORs) and is present for all the critical portions of each procedure, is an important policy that improves healthcare access for patients and case volumes for surgeons and surgical trainees. Despite several studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy of overlapping neurosurgical operations, the practice of overlapping surgery remains controversial. To date, there are no studies that have investigated long-term complication rates of overlapping functional and stereotactic neurosurgical procedures. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the 1-year complication rates and OR times for nonoverlapping versus overlapping functional procedures. The secondary objective was to gain insight into what types of complications are the most prevalent and test for differences between groups.
    Methods: Seven hundred eighty-three functional neurosurgical cases were divided into two cohorts, nonoverlapping (n = 342) and overlapping (n = 441). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scale score was used to compare the preoperative risk for both cohorts. A complication was defined as any surgically related reason that required readmission, reoperation, or an unplanned emergency department or clinic visit that required intervention. Complications were subdivided into infectious and noninfectious. Chi-square tests, independent-samples t-tests, and uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine significance.
    Results: There were no significant differences in mean ASA scale score (2.7 ± 0.6 for both groups, p = 0.997) or overall complication rates (8.8% nonoverlapping vs 9.8% overlapping, p = 0.641) between the two cohorts. Infections accounted for the highest percentage of complications in both cohorts (46.6% vs 41.8%, p = 0.686). There were no statistically significant differences between mean in-room OR time (187.5 ± 141.7 minutes vs 197.1 ± 153.0 minutes, p = 0.373) or mean open-to-close time (112.2 ± 107.9 minutes vs 121.0 ± 123.1 minutes, p = 0.300) between nonoverlapping and overlapping cases.
    Conclusions: There was no increased risk of 1-year complications or increased OR time for overlapping functional and stereotactic neurosurgical procedures compared with nonoverlapping procedures.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications/etiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects ; Neurosurgical Procedures/methods ; Reoperation/adverse effects ; Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-09-30
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 3089-2
    ISSN 1933-0693 ; 0022-3085
    ISSN (online) 1933-0693
    ISSN 0022-3085
    DOI 10.3171/2022.8.JNS212363
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: Letter: Neurosurgical Management of Spinal Pathology Via Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Early Experience and Unique Challenges

    Greven, Alexander C M / Rich, Christopher W / Malcolm, James G / Bray, David P / Rodts, Gerald E / Refai, Daniel / Gary, Matthew F

    Neurosurgery

    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #133322
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Letter

    Greven, Alexander C M / Rich, Christopher W / Malcolm, James G / Bray, David P / Rodts, Gerald E / Refai, Daniel / Gary, Matthew F

    Neurosurgery

    Neurosurgical Management of Spinal Pathology Via Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Early Experience and Unique Challenges

    2020  Volume 87, Issue 2, Page(s) E192–E196

    Keywords Surgery ; Clinical Neurology ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publishing country uk
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 135446-2
    ISSN 1524-4040 ; 0148-396X
    ISSN (online) 1524-4040
    ISSN 0148-396X
    DOI 10.1093/neuros/nyaa165
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Telemedicine in the Evaluation and Management of Neurosurgical Spine Patients: Questionnaire Assessment of 346 Consecutive Patients.

    Greven, Alexander C M / McGinley, Beau M / Guisse, Ndeye F / McGee, Lynessa J / Pirkle, Sarah / Malcolm, James G / Rodts, Gerald E / Refai, Daniel / Gary, Matthew F

    Spine

    2020  Volume 46, Issue 7, Page(s) 472–477

    Abstract: Study design: Retrospective questionnaire study of all patients seen via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large academic institution.: Objective: This aim of this study was to compare patient satisfaction of telemedicine clinic to in- ... ...

    Abstract Study design: Retrospective questionnaire study of all patients seen via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large academic institution.
    Objective: This aim of this study was to compare patient satisfaction of telemedicine clinic to in-person visits; to evaluate the preference for telemedicine to in-person visits; to assess patients' willingness to proceed with major surgery and/or a minor procedure based on a telemedicine visit alone.
    Summary of background data: One study showed promising utility of mobile health applications for spine patients. No studies have investigated telemedicine in the evaluation and management of spine patients.
    Methods: An 11-part questionnaire was developed to assess the attitudes toward telemedicine for all patients seen within a 7-week period during the COVID-19 crisis. Patients were called by phone to participate in the survey. χ2 and the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test were performed to determine significance.
    Results: Ninety-five percent were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their telemedicine visit, with 62% stating it was "the same" or "better" than previous in-person appointments. Patients saved a median of 105 minutes by using telemedicine compared to in-person visits. Fifty-two percent of patients have to take off work for in-person visits, compared to 7% for telemedicine. Thirty-seven percent preferred telemedicine to in-person visits. Patients who preferred telemedicine had significantly longer patient-reported in-person visit times (score mean of 171) compared to patients who preferred in-person visits (score mean of 137, P = 0.0007). Thirty-seven percent of patients would proceed with surgery and 73% would proceed with a minor procedure based on a telemedicine visit alone.
    Conclusion: Telemedicine can increase access to specialty care for patients with prolonged travel time to in-person visits and decrease the socioeconomic burden for both patients and hospital systems. The high satisfaction with telemedicine and willingness to proceed with surgery suggest that remote visits may be useful for both routine management and initial surgical evaluation for spine surgery candidates.Level of Evidence: 3.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; COVID-19 ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pandemics ; Patient Satisfaction ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Diseases/surgery ; Spine/surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telemedicine ; Young Adult
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-11-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 752024-4
    ISSN 1528-1159 ; 0362-2436
    ISSN (online) 1528-1159
    ISSN 0362-2436
    DOI 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003821
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Telemedicine in the Evaluation and Management of Neurosurgical Spine Patients: Questionnaire Assessment of 346 Consecutive Patients

    Greven, Alexander C M / McGinley, Beau M / Guisse, Ndeye F / McGee, Lynessa J / Pirkle, Sarah / Malcolm, James G / Rodts, Gerald E / Refai, Daniel / Gary, Matthew F

    Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective questionnaire study of all patients seen via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large academic institution. OBJECTIVE: This study was to compare patient satisfaction of telemedicine clinic to in-person visits; to ... ...

    Abstract STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective questionnaire study of all patients seen via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large academic institution. OBJECTIVE: This study was to compare patient satisfaction of telemedicine clinic to in-person visits; to evaluate the preference for telemedicine to in-person visits; to assess patients' willingness to proceed with major surgery and/or a minor procedure based on a telemedicine visit alone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: One study showed promising utility of mobile health applications for spine patients. No studies have investigated telemedicine in the evaluation and management of spine patients. METHODS: An 11-part questionnaire was developed to assess the attitudes towards telemedicine for all patients seen within a 7-week period during the COVID-19 crisis. Patients were called by phone to participate in the survey. Chi squared and the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test were performed to determine significance. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their telemedicine visit, with 62% stating it was "the same" or "better" than previous in-person appointments. Patients saved a median of 105 minutes by using telemedicine compared to in-person visits. Fifty-two percent of patients have to take off work for in-person visits, compared to 7% for telemedicine. Thirty-seven percent preferred telemedicine to in-person visits. Patients who preferred telemedicine had significantly longer patient reported in-person visit times (score mean of 171) compared to patients who preferred in-person visits (score mean of 137), p = 0.0007. Thirty-seven percent of patients would proceed with surgery and 73% would proceed with a minor procedure based on a telemedicine visit alone. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine can increase access to specialty care for patients with prolonged travel time to in-person visits and decrease the socioeconomic burden for both patients and hospital systems. The high satisfaction with telemedicine and willingness to proceed with surgery suggest that remote visits may be useful for both routine management and initial surgical evaluation for spine surgery candidates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #927287
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

To top