LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 4 of total 4

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study.

    Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam / Muñoz-Perez, Maria José / Robledo-Vega, Carolina / Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda / Soto-Vega, Elena

    JMIR public health and surveillance

    2020  Volume 6, Issue 2, Page(s) e18444

    Abstract: Background: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information.: Objective: The aim ... ...

    Abstract Background: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information.
    Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability.
    Methods: The search was based on the term "Wuhan Coronavirus" on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking.
    Results: The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score.
    Conclusions: Nonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19.
    MeSH term(s) Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Communication ; Comprehension ; Consumer Health Information/standards ; Coronavirus ; Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control ; Humans ; Information Dissemination ; Information Services ; Internet ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control ; Reading ; SARS-CoV-2
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-09
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Evaluation Study ; Journal Article
    ISSN 2369-2960
    ISSN (online) 2369-2960
    DOI 10.2196/18444
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: COVID- 19 misinformation on the internet: The other epidemy

    Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam / Munoz-Perez, Maria Jose / Robledo-Vega, Carolina / Perez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda / Soto-Vega, Elena

    JMIR Public Health Surveill

    Abstract: BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide The novel Coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information OBJECTIVE: The aim of this ...

    Abstract BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide The novel Coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about Wuhan Coronavirus (actually COVID-19), which was a trending topic in the net, using validated instruments and relate the quality of information to its readability METHODS: The search was based on the term Wuhan Coronavirus on the Google website (6 February 2020) At the search time, the terms "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" did not exist yet Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using HON code, JAMA benchmark, DISCERN instrument, and Google rank RESULTS: The Google search returned 309,000,000 hits The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1 81% of the websites had the HON code seal The JAMA benchmark showed that 39% of websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool and only 10% of the websites had the 4 quality criteria required by JAMA The DISCERN score showed that 70% of the websites were evaluated as low score and none one was rated as high score CONCLUSIONS: Non-health personnel and the scientific community need to be aware of the quality of the information they read and produce respectively The Wuhan Coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media and the misinformation the users obtain from the net The use of the internet has a risk to public health and in cases like this;the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information in the internet without censuring the population By February 6, no quality information was available in the internet about COVID-19
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #40248
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study

    Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam / Muñoz-Perez, Maria José / Robledo-Vega, Carolina / Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda / Soto-Vega, Elena

    JMIR Public Health Surveill

    Abstract: BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of ... ...

    Abstract BACKGROUND: The internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability. METHODS: The search was based on the term "Wuhan Coronavirus" on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking. RESULTS: The first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score. CONCLUSIONS: Nonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #32250960
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet

    Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam / Muñoz-Perez, Maria José / Robledo-Vega, Carolina / Pérez-Zepeda, Maria Fernanda / Soto-Vega, Elena

    JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, Vol 6, Iss 2, p e

    Infodemiology Study

    2020  Volume 18444

    Abstract: BackgroundThe internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. ObjectiveThe aim of this ... ...

    Abstract BackgroundThe internet has become an important source of health information for users worldwide. The novel coronavirus caused a pandemic search for information with broad dissemination of false or misleading health information. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and readability of online information about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was a trending topic on the internet, using validated instruments and relating the quality of information to its readability. MethodsThe search was based on the term “Wuhan Coronavirus” on the Google website (February 6, 2020). At the search time, the terms “COVID-19” or “SARS-CoV-2” (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) did not exist. Critical analysis was performed on the first 110 hits using the Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, the DISCERN instrument, and Google ranking. ResultsThe first 110 websites were critically analyzed, and only 1.8% (n=2) of the websites had the HONcode seal. The JAMA benchmark showed that 39.1% (n=43) of the websites did not have any of the categories required by this tool, and only 10.0% (11/110) of the websites had the four quality criteria required by JAMA. The DISCERN score showed that 70.0% (n=77) of the websites were evaluated as having a low score and none were rated as having a high score. ConclusionsNonhealth personnel and the scientific community need to be aware about the quality of the information they read and produce, respectively. The Wuhan coronavirus health crisis misinformation was produced by the media, and the misinformation was obtained by users from the internet. The use of the internet has a risk to public health, and, in cases like this, the governments should be developing strategies to regulate health information on the internet without censuring the population. By February 6, 2020, no quality information was available on the internet about COVID-19.
    Keywords Public aspects of medicine ; RA1-1270
    Subject code 303
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher JMIR Publications
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top