LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 35

Search options

  1. Article: Public und Private Enforcement im Lebensmittelrecht

    Purnhagen, Kai P.

    Lebensmittel & Recht

    2021  Volume 25, Issue 3, Page(s) 155

    Language German
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 1414685-X
    ISSN 1434-2626
    Database Current Contents Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Book ; Online: Ein neuer Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine nachhaltige Landwirtschaft : Wege zu einer integrativen Politik für den Agrarsektor

    Feindt, Peter H. / Krämer, Christine / Früh-Müller, Andrea / Heißenhuber, Alois / Pahl-Wostl, Claudia / Purnhagen, Kai P. / Thomas, Fabian / van Bers, Caroline / Wolters, Volkmar

    2019  

    Keywords Business & the environment, 'Green' approaches to business ; International law ; Sustainability ; Law ; Law-Europe ; Industrial management-Environmental aspects ; Economic development-Environmental aspects
    Size 1 electronic resource (323 pages)
    Publisher Springer Nature
    Publishing place Berlin, Heidelberg
    Document type Book ; Online
    Note German ; Open Access
    HBZ-ID HT021027005
    ISBN 978-3-662-58656-3 ; 3-662-58656-8
    Database ZB MED Catalogue: Medicine, Health, Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Book ; Online: Ein neuer Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine nachhaltige Landwirtschaft

    Feindt, Peter H. / Krämer, Christine / Früh-Müller, Andrea / Heißenhuber, Alois / Pahl-Wostl, Claudia / Purnhagen, Kai P. / Thomas, Fabian / van Bers, Caroline / Wolters, Volkmar

    Wege zu einer integrativen Politik für den Agrarsektor

    2019  

    Author's details von Peter H. Feindt, Christine Krämer, Andrea Früh-Müller, Alois Heißenhuber, Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Kai P. Purnhagen, Fabian Thomas, Caroline van Bers, Volkmar Wolters
    Keywords Law—Europe ; Industrial management—Environmental aspects ; Economic development—Environmental aspects ; Agrarpolitik ; Umweltpolitik ; Nachhaltigkeit
    Subject Nachhaltige Entwicklung ; Langfristige Entwicklung ; Sustainable Development ; Dauerhafte Entwicklung ; Zukunftsfähige Entwicklung ; Umweltschutz ; Umweltschutzpolitik ; Landwirtschaftspolitik
    Subject code 341.2422
    Language German
    Size 1 Online-Ressource (XX, 323 S. 15 Abb., 12 Abb. in Farbe)
    Edition 1st ed. 2019
    Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg ; Imprint: Springer
    Publishing place Berlin, Heidelberg
    Document type Book ; Online
    HBZ-ID HT020260770
    ISBN 978-3-662-58656-3 ; 9783662586556 ; 3-662-58656-8 ; 366258655X
    DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-58656-3
    Database ZB MED Catalogue: Medicine, Health, Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Consumers' perception of novel foods and the impact of heuristics and biases: A systematic review.

    Monaco, Alessandro / Kotz, Johannes / Al Masri, Mirna / Allmeta, Anila / Purnhagen, Kai P / König, Laura M

    Appetite

    2024  Volume 196, Page(s) 107285

    Abstract: According to the definition adopted in the European Union, novel foods are foods that were not consumed to a significant degree within the Union before May 15, 1997. This includes cultivated meat and insects. Novel foods are meant to play a critical role ...

    Abstract According to the definition adopted in the European Union, novel foods are foods that were not consumed to a significant degree within the Union before May 15, 1997. This includes cultivated meat and insects. Novel foods are meant to play a critical role in the transition towards sustainable food systems. However, their success depends on whether and to what extent they will be incorporated into the diets at the population level. This review investigates consumers' perception of novel food products by narratively synthesising results on the influence of heuristics and biases triggered by emotions, personality traits, and socio-cultural factors. Empirical studies conducted in Western countries and published in English after 1997 were eligible, which led to 182 studies being included. Notably, most included studies focused on insects and cultivated meat. Disgust and fear are shown to be the main emotions driving rejection of novel foods, together with food neophobia and specific cultural norms common across countries included in the scope of the review. Familiarity with novel foods and curiosity both led to higher acceptance. Despite being investigated directly in a minority of studies, heuristics and related biases mostly fell under the "affect," the "natural-is-better," and the "trust" heuristics. The review also discusses to what extent consumers' perception reflects in the regulatory framework applicable to novel foods in the European Union, how it influences the regulation of insects and cultivated meat and which lessons can be drawn for the future of the regulatory framework.
    MeSH term(s) Animals ; Humans ; Heuristics ; Food ; Insecta ; Bias ; Perception ; Consumer Behavior
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-02-28
    Publishing country England
    Document type Systematic Review ; Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1461347-5
    ISSN 1095-8304 ; 0195-6663
    ISSN (online) 1095-8304
    ISSN 0195-6663
    DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107285
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Maximum vs minimum harmonization: what to expect from the institutional and legal battles in the EU on gene editing technologies.

    Purnhagen, Kai P / Wesseler, Justus Hh

    Pest management science

    2019  Volume 75, Issue 9, Page(s) 2310–2315

    Abstract: New plant-breeding technologies (NPBTs), including gene editing, are widely used and drive the development of new crops. However, these new technologies are disputed, creating uncertainty in how their application for agricultural and food uses will be ... ...

    Abstract New plant-breeding technologies (NPBTs), including gene editing, are widely used and drive the development of new crops. However, these new technologies are disputed, creating uncertainty in how their application for agricultural and food uses will be regulated. While in North America regulatory systems respond with a differentiated approach to NPBTs, the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) has in effect made most if not all NPBT subject to the same regulatory regime as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This paper discusses from a law and economics point of view different options that are available for the EU's multi-level legal order. Using an ex-ante regulation versus ex-post liability framework allows the economic implications of different options to be addressed. The results show that under current conditions, some options are more expensive than others. The least costly option encompasses regulating new crops derived from NPBTs similar to those used in 'conventional' breeding. The current regulatory situation in the EU, namely making the use of NPBTs subject to the same conditions as GMOs, is the most costly option. © 2019 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
    MeSH term(s) European Union ; Gene Editing/legislation & jurisprudence ; Government Regulation ; Plant Breeding/legislation & jurisprudence
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-03-13
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2001705-4
    ISSN 1526-4998 ; 1526-498X
    ISSN (online) 1526-4998
    ISSN 1526-498X
    DOI 10.1002/ps.5367
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: EU regulation of genetically modified microorganisms in light of new policy developments

    Wesseler, Justus / Kleter, Gijs / Meulenbroek, Marthe / Purnhagen, Kai P.

    Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy

    Possible implications for EU bioeconomy investments

    2023  Volume 45, Issue 2

    Abstract: ... them with the benefits and costs of investments in GMMs, following a modified version of the model presented in Purnhagen and ...

    Abstract Many developments in the bioeconomy depend on the use of genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs). GMMs are used in bioreactors to convert biomass into food, feed, and energy products. The recent judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union on gene editing technologies has affected the use of GMMs. A heated debate has started on whether and under what circumstances GMMs should be considered genetically modified organisms. This kind of decision is extremely relevant, as it will have a strong effect on the innovation of sustainable supply chains in the bioeconomy. The question has been raised as to whether the regulatory policies on GMMs can be justified from a sustainability perspective and, in particular, whether they do not endanger the European Green Deal, the flagship policy strategy of the new European Commission under Ursula von der Leyen. This contribution will first provide an overview of GMMs and their importance for the development of the bioeconomy, followed by a theoretical framework for assessing investments in GMMs. The third part of the article includes a discussion of four scenarios for regulating GMMs in the future, derived from the EU legal environment. The potential implications of the scenarios are assessed by linking them with the benefits and costs of investments in GMMs, following a modified version of the model presented in Purnhagen and Wesseler (2019). The results show that reforms based on the current EU legal environment do not look very promising to further support the use of GMMs. This has important implications for reaching the objectives of the Green Deal, as more radical legal changes are needed for the success of the initiative.
    Keywords EU bioeconomy ; genetically modified microorganisms ; labelling ; regulations ; sustainability
    Subject code 340
    Language English
    Publishing country nl
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 2518384-9
    ISSN 2040-5790
    ISSN 2040-5790
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Foreword

    Purnhagen, Kai P. / van Zeben, Josephine

    Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation

    2021  Volume 21

    Keywords Life Science
    Language English
    Publishing country nl
    Document type Article ; Online
    ISSN 2214-2037
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Maximum vs minimum harmonization: what to expect from the institutional and legal battles in the EU on gene editing technologies

    Purnhagen, Kai P / Wesseler, Justus HH

    Pest management science. 2019 Sept., v. 75, no. 9

    2019  

    Abstract: New plant‐breeding technologies (NPBTs), including gene editing, are widely used and drive the development of new crops. However, these new technologies are disputed, creating uncertainty in how their application for agricultural and food uses will be ... ...

    Abstract New plant‐breeding technologies (NPBTs), including gene editing, are widely used and drive the development of new crops. However, these new technologies are disputed, creating uncertainty in how their application for agricultural and food uses will be regulated. While in North America regulatory systems respond with a differentiated approach to NPBTs, the Court of Justice of the European Union (EU) has in effect made most if not all NPBT subject to the same regulatory regime as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This paper discusses from a law and economics point of view different options that are available for the EU's multi‐level legal order. Using an ex‐ante regulation versus ex‐post liability framework allows the economic implications of different options to be addressed. The results show that under current conditions, some options are more expensive than others. The least costly option encompasses regulating new crops derived from NPBTs similar to those used in ‘conventional’ breeding. The current regulatory situation in the EU, namely making the use of NPBTs subject to the same conditions as GMOs, is the most costly option. © 2019 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
    Keywords European Union ; gene editing ; genetically modified organisms ; pest management ; plant breeding ; technology ; uncertainty
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2019-09
    Size p. 2310-2315.
    Publishing place John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Document type Article
    Note JOURNAL ARTICLE
    ZDB-ID 2001705-4
    ISSN 1526-4998 ; 1526-498X
    ISSN (online) 1526-4998
    ISSN 1526-498X
    DOI 10.1002/ps.5367
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: The challenges of globalization in pharmaceutical law--is an international drug approval system modeled after the European system worth considering?

    Purnhagen, Kai P

    Food and drug law journal

    2008  Volume 63, Issue 3, Page(s) 623–645

    MeSH term(s) Culture ; Drug Approval/economics ; Drug Approval/history ; Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence ; Economic Competition ; Ethics, Medical ; Europe ; Government Regulation/history ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Internationality/history ; Internationality/legislation & jurisprudence ; Legislation, Drug ; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Risk ; Social Values ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration
    Language English
    Publishing date 2008
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Historical Article ; Journal Article
    ISSN 1064-590X
    ISSN 1064-590X
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Can Bonus Packs Mislead Consumers? A Demonstration of How Behavioural Consumer Research Can Inform Unfair Commercial Practices Law on the Example of the ECJ’s Mars Judgement

    Purnhagen, Kai P / Erica van Herpen

    Journal of consumer policy. 2017 June, v. 40, no. 2

    2017  

    Abstract: The use of psychological findings in EU internal market regulation has gained interest, particularly in the area of unfair commercial practices. This study investigates consumer perceptions of bonus packs containing an oversized indication of the “ ... ...

    Abstract The use of psychological findings in EU internal market regulation has gained interest, particularly in the area of unfair commercial practices. This study investigates consumer perceptions of bonus packs containing an oversized indication of the “extra” volume in the package, such as in the Mars case. The Mars case serves as a standard reference in EU unfair commercial practices law which is used as a benchmark to determine the “average consumer.” Our study demonstrates how an experiment can be set up to provide empirically based insights on whether a practice is “deceptive.” Results of our experiment show that consumers overestimate the extra volume when confronted with an oversized indication compared to control conditions, which is first empirical evidence that this practice is potentially deceptive.
    Keywords European Union ; consumer attitudes ; laws and regulations ; marketing
    Language English
    Dates of publication 2017-06
    Size p. 217-234.
    Publishing place Springer US
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 1477235-8
    ISSN 1573-0700 ; 0342-5843 ; 0168-7034
    ISSN (online) 1573-0700
    ISSN 0342-5843 ; 0168-7034
    DOI 10.1007/s10603-017-9345-0
    Database NAL-Catalogue (AGRICOLA)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top