LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Your last searches

  1. AU=Nunciaroni Andressa Teoli
  2. AU="Balakrishnan Rema, Anoop"

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 10

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Development and validation of instructional material on health self-care for professionals working in social projects / Desenvolvimento e validação de material instrucional sobre autocuidado em saúde para profissionais atuantes em projetos sociais

    Thalia Jardim Dourado / Cristiane Rodrigues da Rocha / Édira Castelo Branco de Andrade Gonçalves / Vinicius Pinheiro Israel / Andressa Teoli Nunciaroni

    Revista de Pesquisa : Cuidado é Fundamental Online, Vol

    2023  Volume 15

    Abstract: Objetivo: realizar a validação de conteúdo e de aparência de um e-book sobre autocuidado relacionado à saúde, voltado para profissionais que atuam em projetos sociais. Métodos: estudo metodológico de validação de conteúdo e de aparência. Para ... ...

    Abstract Objetivo: realizar a validação de conteúdo e de aparência de um e-book sobre autocuidado relacionado à saúde, voltado para profissionais que atuam em projetos sociais. Métodos: estudo metodológico de validação de conteúdo e de aparência. Para desenvolvimento do material, uma revisão de literatura foi realizada. Participaram 10 juízes especialistas atuantes em um projeto social. Foram considerados válidos os resultados cujo Índice de Validade foi igual ou maior que 0,8. Resultados: O e-book foi dividido em quatro dimensões compostas por um conjunto de cuidados e por sugestões de atividades recreativas a serem desenvolvidas junto aos participantes: 1. física; 2. mental; 3. emocional; e 4. social. A estratégia de Ativação da Intenção foi descrita para apoiar a mudança de comportamento. Conclusão: O e-book inova na articulação entre o autocuidado e a saúde, caracterizando-se como tecnologia potencializadora do desenvolvimento de ações intersetoriais. A sua validação contribui para a aplicabilidade do material.
    Keywords Autocuidado ; Estudo de validação ; Qualidade de vida ; Participação da comunidade ; Saúde pública ; Medicine ; R ; Nursing ; RT1-120
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-07-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: New Coronavirus: (Re)thinking the care process in Primary Health and Nursing.

    Nunciaroni, Andressa Teoli / Cunha, Fátima Teresinha Scarparo / Vargas, Liliana Angel / Corrêa, Vanessa de Almeida Ferreira

    Revista brasileira de enfermagem

    2020  Volume 73, Issue suppl 2, Page(s) e20200256

    Abstract: Objective: to reflect on the challenges and power of the nursing care process in Primary Health Care in the face of the New Coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brazilian scenario.: Method: reflective study, based on the discursive formulation in the ... ...

    Abstract Objective: to reflect on the challenges and power of the nursing care process in Primary Health Care in the face of the New Coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brazilian scenario.
    Method: reflective study, based on the discursive formulation in the context of COVID-19 in Primary Health Care, based on theoretical foundations and practical effects of neoliberal policy, the care process, and Nursing.
    Results: in Brazil, COVID-19, has caused the need for challenges for strengthening primary care in the face of neoliberal policy, but it presents the potential of dialogue with communities and the (re)creation of the nursing care process through solidary collaborative networks.
    Final considerations: reflecting on the nursing care process in primary care restores the strength present in the cooperation between health teams and community solidarity networks to change social and health circumstances, despite the challenge imposed by underfunding aggravated by neoliberalism.
    MeSH term(s) Betacoronavirus ; Brazil/epidemiology ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology ; Coronavirus Infections/nursing ; Global Health ; Humans ; Nursing Process/economics ; Nursing Process/organization & administration ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology ; Pneumonia, Viral/nursing ; Politics ; Primary Health Care/economics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Socioeconomic Factors
    Keywords covid19
    Language Portuguese
    Publishing date 2020-09-18
    Publishing country Brazil
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 731983-6
    ISSN 1984-0446 ; 0034-7167
    ISSN (online) 1984-0446
    ISSN 0034-7167
    DOI 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0256
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Are shared decision making studies well enough described to be replicated? Secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.

    Agbadjé, Titilayo Tatiana / Riganti, Paula / Adisso, Évèhouénou Lionel / Adekpedjou, Rhéda / Boucher, Alexandrine / Nunciaroni, Andressa Teoli / Franco, Juan Victor Ariel / Yanzi, Maria Victoria Ruiz / Légaré, France

    PloS one

    2022  Volume 17, Issue 3, Page(s) e0265401

    Abstract: Background: Interventions to change health professionals' behaviour are often difficult to replicate. Incomplete reporting is a key reason and a source of waste in health research. We aimed to assess the reporting of shared decision making (SDM) ... ...

    Abstract Background: Interventions to change health professionals' behaviour are often difficult to replicate. Incomplete reporting is a key reason and a source of waste in health research. We aimed to assess the reporting of shared decision making (SDM) interventions.
    Methods: We extracted data from a 2017 Cochrane systematic review whose aim was to determine the effectiveness of interventions to increase the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. In a secondary analysis, we used the 12 items of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist to analyze quantitative data. We used a conceptual framework for implementation fidelity to analyze qualitative data, which added details to various TIDieR items (e.g. under "what materials?" we also reported on ease of access to materials). We used SAS 9.4 for all analyses.
    Results: Of the 87 studies included in the 2017 Cochrane review, 83 were randomized trials, three were non-randomized trials, and one was a controlled before-and-after study. Items most completely reported were: "brief name" (87/87, 100%), "why" (rationale) (86/87, 99%), and "what" (procedures) (81/87, 93%). The least completely reported items (under 50%) were "materials" (29/87, 33%), "who" (23/87, 26%), and "when and how much" (18/87, 21%), as well as the conditional items: "tailoring" (8/87, 9%), "modifications" (3/87, 4%), and "how well (actual)" (i.e. delivered as planned?) (3/87, 3%). Interventions targeting patients were better reported than those targeting health professionals or both patients and health professionals, e.g. 84% of patient-targeted intervention studies reported "How", (delivery modes), vs. 67% for those targeting health professionals and 32% for those targeting both. We also reported qualitative analyses for most items. Overall reporting of items for all interventions was 41.5%.
    Conclusions: Reporting on all groups or components of SDM interventions was incomplete in most SDM studies published up to 2017. Our results provide guidance for authors on what elements need better reporting to improve the replicability of their SDM interventions.
    MeSH term(s) Checklist ; Decision Making ; Decision Making, Shared ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Systematic Reviews as Topic
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-03-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 2267670-3
    ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    ISSN 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0265401
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Are shared decision making studies well enough described to be replicated? Secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review

    Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé / Paula Riganti / Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso / Rhéda Adekpedjou / Alexandrine Boucher / Andressa Teoli Nunciaroni / Juan Victor Ariel Franco / Maria Victoria Ruiz Yanzi / France Légaré

    PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss

    2022  Volume 3

    Abstract: Background Interventions to change health professionals’ behaviour are often difficult to replicate. Incomplete reporting is a key reason and a source of waste in health research. We aimed to assess the reporting of shared decision making (SDM) ... ...

    Abstract Background Interventions to change health professionals’ behaviour are often difficult to replicate. Incomplete reporting is a key reason and a source of waste in health research. We aimed to assess the reporting of shared decision making (SDM) interventions. Methods We extracted data from a 2017 Cochrane systematic review whose aim was to determine the effectiveness of interventions to increase the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. In a secondary analysis, we used the 12 items of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist to analyze quantitative data. We used a conceptual framework for implementation fidelity to analyze qualitative data, which added details to various TIDieR items (e.g. under “what materials?” we also reported on ease of access to materials). We used SAS 9.4 for all analyses. Results Of the 87 studies included in the 2017 Cochrane review, 83 were randomized trials, three were non-randomized trials, and one was a controlled before-and-after study. Items most completely reported were: “brief name” (87/87, 100%), “why” (rationale) (86/87, 99%), and “what” (procedures) (81/87, 93%). The least completely reported items (under 50%) were “materials” (29/87, 33%), “who” (23/87, 26%), and “when and how much” (18/87, 21%), as well as the conditional items: “tailoring” (8/87, 9%), “modifications” (3/87, 4%), and “how well (actual)” (i.e. delivered as planned?) (3/87, 3%). Interventions targeting patients were better reported than those targeting health professionals or both patients and health professionals, e.g. 84% of patient-targeted intervention studies reported “How”, (delivery modes), vs. 67% for those targeting health professionals and 32% for those targeting both. We also reported qualitative analyses for most items. Overall reporting of items for all interventions was 41.5%. Conclusions Reporting on all groups or components of SDM interventions was incomplete in most SDM studies published up to 2017. Our results provide guidance for authors on what elements ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 796
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Are shared decision making studies well enough described to be replicated? Secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.

    Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé / Paula Riganti / Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso / Rhéda Adekpedjou / Alexandrine Boucher / Andressa Teoli Nunciaroni / Juan Victor Ariel Franco / Maria Victoria Ruiz Yanzi / France Légaré

    PLoS ONE, Vol 17, Iss 3, p e

    2022  Volume 0265401

    Abstract: Background Interventions to change health professionals' behaviour are often difficult to replicate. Incomplete reporting is a key reason and a source of waste in health research. We aimed to assess the reporting of shared decision making (SDM) ... ...

    Abstract Background Interventions to change health professionals' behaviour are often difficult to replicate. Incomplete reporting is a key reason and a source of waste in health research. We aimed to assess the reporting of shared decision making (SDM) interventions. Methods We extracted data from a 2017 Cochrane systematic review whose aim was to determine the effectiveness of interventions to increase the use of SDM by healthcare professionals. In a secondary analysis, we used the 12 items of the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist to analyze quantitative data. We used a conceptual framework for implementation fidelity to analyze qualitative data, which added details to various TIDieR items (e.g. under "what materials?" we also reported on ease of access to materials). We used SAS 9.4 for all analyses. Results Of the 87 studies included in the 2017 Cochrane review, 83 were randomized trials, three were non-randomized trials, and one was a controlled before-and-after study. Items most completely reported were: "brief name" (87/87, 100%), "why" (rationale) (86/87, 99%), and "what" (procedures) (81/87, 93%). The least completely reported items (under 50%) were "materials" (29/87, 33%), "who" (23/87, 26%), and "when and how much" (18/87, 21%), as well as the conditional items: "tailoring" (8/87, 9%), "modifications" (3/87, 4%), and "how well (actual)" (i.e. delivered as planned?) (3/87, 3%). Interventions targeting patients were better reported than those targeting health professionals or both patients and health professionals, e.g. 84% of patient-targeted intervention studies reported "How", (delivery modes), vs. 67% for those targeting health professionals and 32% for those targeting both. We also reported qualitative analyses for most items. Overall reporting of items for all interventions was 41.5%. Conclusions Reporting on all groups or components of SDM interventions was incomplete in most SDM studies published up to 2017. Our results provide guidance for authors on what elements ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 796
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: New Coronavirus

    Nunciaroni, Andressa Teoli / Cunha, Fátima Teresinha Scarparo / Vargas, Liliana Angel / Corrêa, Vanessa de Almeida Ferreira

    Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 suppl.2 2020

    (Re)thinking the care process in Primary Health and Nursing

    2020  

    Abstract: ABSTRACT Objective: to reflect on the challenges and power of the nursing care process in Primary Health Care in the face of the New Coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brazilian scenario. Method: reflective study, based on the discursive formulation in the ... ...

    Abstract ABSTRACT Objective: to reflect on the challenges and power of the nursing care process in Primary Health Care in the face of the New Coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brazilian scenario. Method: reflective study, based on the discursive formulation in the context of COVID-19 in Primary Health Care, based on theoretical foundations and practical effects of neoliberal policy, the care process, and Nursing. Results: in Brazil, COVID-19, has caused the need for challenges for strengthening primary care in the face of neoliberal policy, but it presents the potential of dialogue with communities and the (re)creation of the nursing care process through solidary collaborative networks. Final considerations: reflecting on the nursing care process in primary care restores the strength present in the cooperation between health teams and community solidarity networks to change social and health circumstances, despite the challenge imposed by underfunding aggravated by neoliberalism.
    Keywords Coronavirus ; Primary Health Care ; Nursing Care ; Nursing ; Pandemics ; covid19
    Subject code 360
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-01-01
    Publisher Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
    Publishing country br
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: New Coronavirus: (Re)thinking the care process in Primary Health and Nursing

    Nunciaroni, Andressa Teoli / Cunha, Fátima Teresinha Scarparo / Vargas, Liliana Angel / Corrêa, Vanessa de Almeida Ferreira

    Rev Bras Enferm

    Abstract: OBJECTIVE: to reflect on the challenges and power of the nursing care process in Primary Health Care in the face of the New Coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brazilian scenario. METHOD: reflective study, based on the discursive formulation in the context of ... ...

    Abstract OBJECTIVE: to reflect on the challenges and power of the nursing care process in Primary Health Care in the face of the New Coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brazilian scenario. METHOD: reflective study, based on the discursive formulation in the context of COVID-19 in Primary Health Care, based on theoretical foundations and practical effects of neoliberal policy, the care process, and Nursing. RESULTS: in Brazil, COVID-19, has caused the need for challenges for strengthening primary care in the face of neoliberal policy, but it presents the potential of dialogue with communities and the (re)creation of the nursing care process through solidary collaborative networks. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: reflecting on the nursing care process in primary care restores the strength present in the cooperation between health teams and community solidarity networks to change social and health circumstances, despite the challenge imposed by underfunding aggravated by neoliberalism.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #788928
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: A teoria da expectativa de Vroom no encontro de capacitação da equipe do projeto de extensão Esporte Sem Parar

    Cristiane Rodrigues da ROCHA / Giulia Neres PONTES / Thalia Jardim DOURADO / Andre Luis do Nascimento FERREIRA / Vinicius Antônio Alves PEREIRA / Luisa Colares RIBEIRO / Andressa Teoli NUNCIARONI / Édira Castello Branco de Andrade GONÇALVES / Vinicius Pinheiro ISRAEL

    Elo, Vol

    2021  Volume 10

    Abstract: O Esporte Sem Parar é um projeto de extensão da Secretaria Nacional de Esporte, Lazer e Inclusão Social, em parceria com a ONG Contato e a Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Este artigo objetiva relatar a experiência do encontro de ... ...

    Abstract O Esporte Sem Parar é um projeto de extensão da Secretaria Nacional de Esporte, Lazer e Inclusão Social, em parceria com a ONG Contato e a Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Este artigo objetiva relatar a experiência do encontro de capacitação presencial da equipe do projeto durante a pandemia de COVID-19, na perspectiva da Teoria da Expectativa de Vroom. Estudo qualitativo, do tipo relato de experiência. Os resultados mostram que a biossegurança, diante de estabilidade epidemiológica, viabiliza treinamentos presenciais. A expectativa encontrada foi que o esforço empregado pela equipe conduzirá à realização pessoal, criação de vínculo, inclusão social, melhora da saúde, relacionamento interpessoal, espaço de convivência e apoio às pessoas socialmente vulneráveis. Conclui-se que a melhora na qualidade de vida possui valência para estes participantes, segundo a Teoria da Expectativa de Vroom, e pode ser a motivação para profissionais e participantes continuarem as atividades
    Keywords capacitação ; esporte ; saúde ; Social Sciences ; H ; Social sciences (General) ; H1-99
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Universidade Federal de Viçosa
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Caracterização dos diagnósticos de enfermagem de pacientes internados em uma unidade de cardiologia.

    Nunciaroni, Andressa Teoli / Gallani, Maria Cecília Bueno Jayme / Agondi, Rúbia de Freitas / Rodrigues, Roberta Cunha Matheus / Castro, Lisa Trevisan

    Revista gaucha de enfermagem

    2012  Volume 33, Issue 1, Page(s) 32–41

    Abstract: This retrospective, descriptive-exploratory study aimed to formulate the most frequent nursing diagnoses (ND) among inpatients with ischemic heart disease and its association with sociodemographic and clinical data. Data collection was carried out by an ... ...

    Title translation Characterization of nursing diagnoses of patients in a cardiology unit.
    Abstract This retrospective, descriptive-exploratory study aimed to formulate the most frequent nursing diagnoses (ND) among inpatients with ischemic heart disease and its association with sociodemographic and clinical data. Data collection was carried out by an instrument based on defining characteristics and risk factors (Taxonomy II, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International) and submitted to descriptive and inferential analyses to test the association between ND and demographic and clinical data. Seventy-seven ND were formulated, and 18 ND were above 75 percentile. From those ND, 15 were associated to at least one sociodemographic or clinical variable as gender, age, marital status, professional activity and associated clinical condition.
    MeSH term(s) Data Collection ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Nursing Diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors
    Language Portuguese
    Publishing date 2012-06-30
    Publishing country Brazil
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2639673-7
    ISSN 1983-1447 ; 0102-6933
    ISSN (online) 1983-1447
    ISSN 0102-6933
    DOI 10.1590/s1983-14472012000100005
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Caracterização dos diagnósticos de enfermagem de pacientes internados em uma unidade de cardiologia Caracterización de diagnósticos de enfermería de pacientes en una unidad de cardiología Characterization of nursing diagnoses of patients in a cardiology unit

    Andressa Teoli Nunciaroni / Maria Cecília Bueno Jayme Gallani / Rúbia de Freitas Agondi / Roberta Cunha Matheus Rodrigues / Lisa Trevisan Castro

    Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem , Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 32-

    2012  Volume 41

    Abstract: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo, descritivo-exploratório, com objetivo de formular os diagnósticos de enfermagem (DE) mais frequentes no subgrupo de pacientes portadores de doenças isquêmicas do coração, internados em unidade de cardiologia e ... ...

    Abstract Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo, descritivo-exploratório, com objetivo de formular os diagnósticos de enfermagem (DE) mais frequentes no subgrupo de pacientes portadores de doenças isquêmicas do coração, internados em unidade de cardiologia e verificar sua associação com características sociodemográficas e clínicas. Os dados foram coletados a partir de instrumento baseado nas características definidoras e fatores de risco (Taxonomia II, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International) e submetidos à análise descritiva simples e inferencial para verificar a associação entre os DE e as características sociodemográficas e clínicas. Foram formulados 77 DE, dos quais 18 encontravam-se acima do percentil 75. Destes, 15 foram associados a alguma característica sociodemográfica ou clínica como sexo, idade, estado civil, atividade profissional e condições clínicas associadas. Este es un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo-exploratorio, con el objetivo de formular diagnósticos de enfermería (DE) más frecuentes en el subgrupo de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica admitidos en una unidad de cardiología y su asociación con los datos demográficos y clínicos. Los datos fueron recopilados mediante la aplicación de un instrumento creado a partir de definir las características y factores de riesgo (Taxonomía II, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International) y sometidos a análisis descriptivo e inferencial para evaluar las asociaciones entre los diagnósticos y datos demográficos y clínicos. Se han encontrado 77 DE, de los cuales 18 por encima del percentil 75. De éstos, 15 estaban asociados con todas las características demográficas o clínicas, tales como sexo, edad, estado civil, actividad profesional y otras condiciones clínicas. This retrospective, descriptive-exploratory study aimed to formulate the most frequent nursing diagnoses (ND) among inpatients with ischemic heart disease and its association with sociodemographic and clinical data. Data collection was carried out by an instrument based on defining characteristics and risk factors (Taxonomy II, North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International) and submitted to descriptive and inferential analyses to test the association between ND and demographic and clinical data. Seventy-seven ND were formulated, and 18 ND were above 75 percentile. From those ND, 15 were associated to at least one sociodemographic or clinical variable as gender, age, marital status, professional activity and associated clinical condition.
    Keywords Diagnóstico de enfermería ; Clasificación ; Enfermedades cardiovasculares ; Diagnóstico de enfermagem ; Classificação ; Doenças cardiovasculares ; Nursing diagnosis ; Classification ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Nursing ; RT1-120 ; Medicine ; R ; DOAJ:Nursing ; DOAJ:Health Sciences
    Language Portuguese
    Publishing date 2012-03-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

To top