LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 9168

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: James Foulis Duncan - psychiatry in history.

    Kelly, Brendan D

    The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science

    2017  Volume 210, Issue 2, Page(s) 118

    Language English
    Publishing date 2017
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 218103-4
    ISSN 1472-1465 ; 0007-1250
    ISSN (online) 1472-1465
    ISSN 0007-1250
    DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.190538
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: The top 10 research priorities in psoriatic arthritis: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

    Hailey, Louise / Bundy, Chris / Burstow, Helen / Chandler, David / Cowper, Russ / Helliwell, Philip / Joannes, Lucille / Kelly, Andy / Kennedy, Bronagh / Kinsella, Suzannah / McAteer, Helen / Mukherjee, Sandeep / Packham, Jon / Wise, Elspeth / Young, Helen / Coates, Laura C

    Rheumatology (Oxford, England)

    2022  Volume 62, Issue 8, Page(s) 2716–2723

    Abstract: ... of people living with PsA, carers and clinicians, supported by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). This PSP ...

    Abstract Objectives: To identify and prioritize the top 10 research questions for PsA.
    Methods: The British Psoriatic Arthritis Consortium (BritPACT) formed a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) comprising of people living with PsA, carers and clinicians, supported by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). This PSP followed the established three-stage JLA process: first, an online survey of people living with PsA, carers and clinicians to identify PsA questions, asking, 'What do you think are the most important unanswered questions in psoriatic arthritis research?' The questions were checked against existing evidence to establish 'true uncertainties' and grouped as 'indicative questions' reflecting the overarching themes. Then a second online survey ranked the 'true uncertainties' by importance. Finally, a workshop including people living with PsA and clinician stakeholders finalized the top 10 research priorities.
    Results: The initial survey attracted 317 respondents (69% people living with PsA, 15% carers), with 988 questions. This generated 46 indicative questions. In the second survey, 422 respondents (78% people living with PsA, 4% carers) prioritized these. Eighteen questions were taken forward to the final online workshop. The top unanswered PsA research question was 'What is the best strategy for managing patients with psoriatic arthritis including non-drug and drug treatments?' Other top 10 priorities covered diagnosis, prognosis, outcome assessment, flares, comorbidities and other aspects of treatment (https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk).
    Conclusion: The top 10 priorities will guide PsA research and enable PsA researchers and those who fund research to know the most important questions for people living with PsA.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Arthritis, Psoriatic/therapy ; Health Priorities ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Caregivers ; Biomedical Research
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-11-30
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 1464822-2
    ISSN 1462-0332 ; 1462-0324
    ISSN (online) 1462-0332
    ISSN 1462-0324
    DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/keac676
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Identifying the top research priorities in postmastectomy breast cancer reconstruction: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership.

    Zhong, Toni / Mahajan, Anisha / Cowan, Katherine / Temple-Oberle, Claire / Porter, Geoff / LeBlanc, Martin / Metcalfe, Kelly

    BMJ open

    2021  Volume 11, Issue 8, Page(s) e047589

    Abstract: ... industry led with minimal input from patients and caregivers. The aim of this study is to use the James ...

    Abstract Background: Major improvements in breast cancer treatment in the last decade include advancements in postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). Unfortunately, the studies in PMBR are primarily researcher or industry led with minimal input from patients and caregivers. The aim of this study is to use the James Lind Alliance (JLA) approach to bring together the patients, caregivers and clinicians in a priority setting partnership to identify the most important unanswered research questions in PMBR.
    Methods: The JLA priority setting methodology involved four key stages: gathering research questions on PMBR from patients, caregivers and clinicians; checking these research questions against existing evidence; interim prioritisation and a final consensus meeting to determine the top 10 unanswered research questions using the modified nominal group methodology.
    Results: In stage 1, 3168 research questions were submitted from 713 respondents across Canada, of which 73% of the participants were patients or caregivers. Stage 2 confirmed that there were a total of 48 unique unanswered questions. In stage three, 488 individuals completed the interim prioritisation survey and the top 25 questions were taken to a final consensus meeting. In the final stage, the top 10 unanswered research questions were determined. They cover a breadth of topics including personalised surgical treatment, safety of implants and newer techniques, access to PMBR, breast cancer recurrence and rehabilitation.
    Interpretation: Identification of the top 10 unanswered research questions is an important first step to generating relevant and impactful research that will ultimately improve the PMBR experience for patients with breast cancer.
    MeSH term(s) Breast Neoplasms/surgery ; Female ; Health Priorities ; Humans ; Mammaplasty ; Mastectomy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Research
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-08-30
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2599832-8
    ISSN 2044-6055 ; 2044-6055
    ISSN (online) 2044-6055
    ISSN 2044-6055
    DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047589
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Reply to Bernardo Rocco and Maria Chiara Sighinolfi's Letter to the Editor re: James W.F. Catto, Pramit Khetrapal, Federico Ricciardi, et al. Effect of Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients with Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022;327:2092-103: Lacking the Evidence for Neobladder Use After Radical Cystectomy.

    Catto, James W F / Khetrapal, Pramit / Ambler, Gareth / Williams, Norman R / Brew-Graves, Chris / Kelly, John D

    European urology

    2022  Volume 82, Issue 6, Page(s) e167–e168

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Cystectomy ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery ; Robotics ; Urinary Diversion ; Morbidity
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-09-14
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Randomized Controlled Trial ; Letter
    ZDB-ID 193790-x
    ISSN 1873-7560 ; 1421-993X ; 0302-2838
    ISSN (online) 1873-7560 ; 1421-993X
    ISSN 0302-2838
    DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.035
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: MSJAMA. James.

    Brogan, Kelly V

    JAMA

    2003  Volume 290, Issue 9, Page(s) 1221–1222

    MeSH term(s) Attitude to Death ; Attitude to Health ; Friends ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Neoplasms/psychology
    Language English
    Publishing date 2003-09-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2958-0
    ISSN 1538-3598 ; 0254-9077 ; 0002-9955 ; 0098-7484
    ISSN (online) 1538-3598
    ISSN 0254-9077 ; 0002-9955 ; 0098-7484
    DOI 10.1001/jama.290.9.1221
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: The composition, extraction, functionality and applications of rice proteins: A review by Luca Amagliani, Jonathan O'Regan, Alan L. Kelly and James A. O'Mahony

    Amagliani, Luca / O'Regan, Jonathan / Kelly, Alan L. / O'Mahony, James A.

    Trends in food science & technology

    2017  Volume 64, Issue -, Page(s) 1

    Language English
    Document type Article
    ZDB-ID 1049246-x
    ISSN 0924-2244
    Database Current Contents Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: SIR JAMES MACKENZIE AND CELLULAR PATHOLOGY.

    Kelly, M

    Medical history

    2006  Volume 4, Issue 3, Page(s) 170–185

    Language English
    Publishing date 2006-03-22
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 214353-7
    ISSN 2048-8343 ; 0025-7273
    ISSN (online) 2048-8343
    ISSN 0025-7273
    DOI 10.1017/s0025727300025308
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Book: Essays in honour of James Patrick Carney

    Carney, James Patrick / Kelly, Fergus

    (Celtica ; 23.1999)

    1999  

    Institution School of Celtic Studies
    Author's details School of Celtic Studies, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies. Ed. by Fergus Kelly
    Series title Celtica ; 23.1999
    Language English
    Size 435 S, Ill
    Publishing place Dublin
    Document type Book
    ISBN 185500190X ; 9781855001909
    Database Former special subject collection: coastal and deep sea fishing

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Dementia priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance: using patient and public involvement and the evidence base to inform the research agenda.

    Kelly, Sarah / Lafortune, Louise / Hart, Nicola / Cowan, Katherine / Fenton, Mark / Brayne, Carol

    Age and ageing

    2015  Volume 44, Issue 6, Page(s) 985–993

    Abstract: Background: The James Lind Alliance (JLA) created an approach to elicit the views of those under ...

    Abstract Background: The James Lind Alliance (JLA) created an approach to elicit the views of those under-represented in research priority exercises. Building on this, the JLA Dementia Priority Setting Partnership was set up as an independent and evidence-based project to identify and prioritise unanswered questions ('uncertainties') about prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care relating to dementia.
    Methods: A survey was widely disseminated to stakeholders with an interest in the needs of the older population. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes from the large amount of questions collected from which research questions were developed using PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome). Each question was checked against an extensive evidence base of high-quality systematic reviews to verify whether they were true uncertainties.
    Findings: One thousand five hundred and sixty-three questionnaires were received, from people with dementia, carers/relatives, and health and care professionals; 85 uncertainties were identified from other sources. Questions were refined and formatted iteratively into 146 unique uncertainties. An interim prioritisation process involving diverse organisations identified the top 25 ranked questions. At a final face-to-face prioritisation workshop, 18 people representing the above constituencies arrived by consensus at the top 10 priority questions. The impact of patient and public involvement on the priorities is discussed.
    Interpretation: The long (146 questions) and top 10 lists of dementia research priorities provide a focus for researchers, funders and commissioners. They highlight a need for more research into care for people with dementia and carers, and a need for high-quality effectiveness trials in all aspects of dementia research.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Biomedical Research/standards ; Dementia/diagnosis ; Dementia/prevention & control ; Dementia/therapy ; Education ; Health Priorities/organization & administration ; Health Priorities/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2015-10-26
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 186788-x
    ISSN 1468-2834 ; 0002-0729
    ISSN (online) 1468-2834
    ISSN 0002-0729
    DOI 10.1093/ageing/afv143
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: The James Supportive Care Screening: integrating science and practice to meet the NCCN guidelines for distress management at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

    Wells-Di Gregorio, Sharla / Porensky, Emily K / Minotti, Matthew / Brown, Susan / Snapp, Janet / Taylor, Robert M / Adolph, Michael D / Everett, Sherman / Lowther, Kenneth / Callahan, Kelly / Streva, Devita / Heinke, Vicki / Leno, Debra / Flower, Courtney / McVey, Anne / Andersen, Barbara Lee

    Psycho-oncology

    2013  Volume 22, Issue 9, Page(s) 2001–2008

    Abstract: ... for both clinical and research purposes.: Methods: From March 2006 to August 2012, the James Supportive Care ... Conclusions: Results support use of the James SCS to quickly detect the most frequent and distressing ... symptoms and concerns of cancer patients. The James SCS is an efficient, reliable, and valid clinical and ...

    Abstract Background: Selecting a measure for oncology distress screening can be challenging. The measure must be brief, but comprehensive, capturing patients' most distressing concerns. The measure must provide meaningful coverage of multiple domains, assess symptom and problem-related distress, and ideally be suited for both clinical and research purposes.
    Methods: From March 2006 to August 2012, the James Supportive Care Screening (SCS) was developed and validated in three phases including content validation, factor analysis, and measure validation. Exploratory factor analyses were completed with 596 oncology patients followed by a confirmatory factor analysis with 477 patients.
    Results: Six factors were identified and confirmed including (i) emotional concerns; (ii) physical symptoms; (iii) social/practical problems; (iv) spiritual problems; (v) cognitive concerns; and (vi) healthcare decision making/communication issues. Subscale evaluation reveals good to excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent, divergent, and predictive validity. Specificity of individual items was 0.90 and 0.87, respectively, for identifying patients with DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of major depression and generalized anxiety disorder.
    Conclusions: Results support use of the James SCS to quickly detect the most frequent and distressing symptoms and concerns of cancer patients. The James SCS is an efficient, reliable, and valid clinical and research outcomes measure.
    MeSH term(s) Anxiety/diagnosis ; Anxiety/etiology ; Anxiety/psychology ; Cancer Care Facilities ; Cost of Illness ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Fatigue/diagnosis ; Fatigue/etiology ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms/complications ; Neoplasms/psychology ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Psychometrics/instrumentation ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stress, Psychological/diagnosis ; Stress, Psychological/etiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-02-25
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1118536-3
    ISSN 1099-1611 ; 1057-9249
    ISSN (online) 1099-1611
    ISSN 1057-9249
    DOI 10.1002/pon.3256
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top