LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 36

Search options

  1. Article: Acute myocardial infarction in an untreated patient with acute myeloid leukemia.

    Kamoga, Doreen / Desikan, Sai / Desikan, Raman / Musuuza, Jackson

    Clinical case reports

    2024  Volume 12, Issue 3, Page(s) e8601

    Abstract: Key clinical message: Acute leukemia, particularly AML, is closely associated with thrombotic events, driven by complex factors like coagulation system changes, endothelial dysfunction, and leukemic cell interactions with the vascular system. Certain ... ...

    Abstract Key clinical message: Acute leukemia, particularly AML, is closely associated with thrombotic events, driven by complex factors like coagulation system changes, endothelial dysfunction, and leukemic cell interactions with the vascular system. Certain chemotherapy drugs can exacerbate the prothrombotic state. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective thromboprophylaxis in carefully selected patients with leukemia.
    Abstract: Thrombosis is a significant complication of acute leukemia. Thrombotic events mostly occur at diagnosis or during induction therapy. Here we report the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) before initiation of therapy, in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia not otherwise specified (AML NOS) who had no other significant risk factors for coronary artery disease. The occurrence of MI in this patient limited the choice of induction therapy and resulted in mortality. We discuss the pathogenesis and risk factors associated with increased thrombosis in AML and advocate for risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis in this patient population.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-03-13
    Publishing country England
    Document type Case Reports
    ZDB-ID 2740234-4
    ISSN 2050-0904
    ISSN 2050-0904
    DOI 10.1002/ccr3.8601
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Cold Agglutinin Disease and COVID-19: A Scoping Review of Treatments and Outcomes.

    Musuuza, Jackson S / Kumar, Silpa / Posa, Dheeraj Kumar / Hans, Aakash / Nayyar, Sankett / Christensen, Leslie / Kamoga, Gilbert-Roy

    Journal of clinical medicine research

    2024  Volume 16, Issue 1, Page(s) 8–14

    Abstract: Background: Reports suggest that patients with both acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and cold agglutinin disease (CAD) may experience poorer survival when treated with rituximab. We conducted a scoping review to evaluate ... ...

    Abstract Background: Reports suggest that patients with both acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and cold agglutinin disease (CAD) may experience poorer survival when treated with rituximab. We conducted a scoping review to evaluate severe outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality, in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with CAD on various treatments, including rituximab.
    Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Four literature databases were searched on December 19, 2023, for studies reporting lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and CAD, excluding rheumatological conditions.
    Results: Of the 741 screened articles, 19 were included. Studies, predominantly case reports (17/19) or case series (2/19), were mainly from the USA (8/19) and India (3/19), with others across Europe and Asia. Among 23 patients (61% female, median age 61 years), 21/23 had a new CAD diagnosis; only two had pre-existing CAD. Overall, 74% recovered, 21% died, and outcomes for one were unreported. Nine (39%) were ICU-admitted. Of rituximab-treated patients (n = 4), 25% were ICU-admitted, none died. Non-rituximab treatments (n = 19) saw 42% ICU admissions and 26% mortality.
    Conclusions: This review found no increased risk of severe outcomes in CAD and COVID-19 patients treated with rituximab.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-31
    Publishing country Canada
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2548987-2
    ISSN 1918-3011 ; 1918-3003
    ISSN (online) 1918-3011
    ISSN 1918-3003
    DOI 10.14740/jocmr5102
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Every other day bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate: what is the evidence?

    Musuuza, Jackson S / Safdar, Nasia

    Annals of translational medicine

    2017  Volume 4, Issue 24, Page(s) 506

    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-01-18
    Publishing country China
    Document type Editorial ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 2893931-1
    ISSN 2305-5847 ; 2305-5839
    ISSN (online) 2305-5847
    ISSN 2305-5839
    DOI 10.21037/atm.2016.11.83
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Prevalence and outcomes of co-infection and superinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Musuuza, Jackson S / Watson, Lauren / Parmasad, Vishala / Putman-Buehler, Nathan / Christensen, Leslie / Safdar, Nasia

    PloS one

    2021  Volume 16, Issue 5, Page(s) e0251170

    Abstract: Introduction: The recovery of other pathogens in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported, either at the time of a SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis (co-infection) or subsequently (superinfection). However, data on the prevalence, microbiology, ...

    Abstract Introduction: The recovery of other pathogens in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported, either at the time of a SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis (co-infection) or subsequently (superinfection). However, data on the prevalence, microbiology, and outcomes of co-infection and superinfection are limited. The purpose of this study was to examine the occurrence of co-infections and superinfections and their outcomes among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Patients and methods: We searched literature databases for studies published from October 1, 2019, through February 8, 2021. We included studies that reported clinical features and outcomes of co-infection or superinfection of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. We followed PRISMA guidelines, and we registered the protocol with PROSPERO as: CRD42020189763.
    Results: Of 6639 articles screened, 118 were included in the random effects meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of co-infection was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14%-25%, I2 = 98%) and that of superinfection was 24% (95% CI: 19%-30%). Pooled prevalence of pathogen type stratified by co- or superinfection were: viral co-infections, 10% (95% CI: 6%-14%); viral superinfections, 4% (95% CI: 0%-10%); bacterial co-infections, 8% (95% CI: 5%-11%); bacterial superinfections, 20% (95% CI: 13%-28%); fungal co-infections, 4% (95% CI: 2%-7%); and fungal superinfections, 8% (95% CI: 4%-13%). Patients with a co-infection or superinfection had higher odds of dying than those who only had SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.82-5.99). Compared to those with co-infections, patients with superinfections had a higher prevalence of mechanical ventilation (45% [95% CI: 33%-58%] vs. 10% [95% CI: 5%-16%]), but patients with co-infections had a greater average length of hospital stay than those with superinfections (mean = 29.0 days, standard deviation [SD] = 6.7 vs. mean = 16 days, SD = 6.2, respectively).
    Conclusions: Our study showed that as many as 19% of patients with COVID-19 have co-infections and 24% have superinfections. The presence of either co-infection or superinfection was associated with poor outcomes, including increased mortality. Our findings support the need for diagnostic testing to identify and treat co-occurring respiratory infections among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    MeSH term(s) Bacterial Infections/epidemiology ; Bacterial Infections/mortality ; Bacterial Infections/therapy ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; COVID-19/mortality ; COVID-19/therapy ; Coinfection/epidemiology ; Coinfection/mortality ; Coinfection/therapy ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Mycoses/epidemiology ; Mycoses/mortality ; Mycoses/therapy ; Prevalence ; SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification ; Superinfection/epidemiology ; Superinfection/mortality ; Superinfection/therapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Virus Diseases/epidemiology ; Virus Diseases/mortality ; Virus Diseases/therapy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2267670-3
    ISSN 1932-6203 ; 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    ISSN 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0251170
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Using a Systems Engineering Framework to Evaluate Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescribing in Critically Ill Patients.

    Tischendorf, Jessica S / Knobloch, Mary J / Musuuza, Jackson S / Safdar, Nasia

    Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

    2019  Volume 42, Issue 4, Page(s) e39–e49

    Abstract: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a risk factor for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Much PPI use is inappropriate, and interventions to reduce PPI use, such as for stress ulcer prophylaxis in all critically ill patients, are ... ...

    Abstract Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a risk factor for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Much PPI use is inappropriate, and interventions to reduce PPI use, such as for stress ulcer prophylaxis in all critically ill patients, are essential to reduce CDI rates. This mixed-methods study in a combined medical-surgical intensive care unit at a tertiary academic medical center used a human factors engineering approach to understand barriers and facilitators to optimizing PPI prescribing in these patients. We performed chart review of patients for whom PPIs were prescribed to evaluate prescribing practices. Semistructured provider interviews were conducted to determine barriers and facilitators to reducing unnecessary PPI use. Emergent themes from provider interviews were classified according to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. In our intensive care unit, 25% of PPI days were not clinically indicated. Barriers to optimizing PPI prescribing included inadequate provider education, lack of institutional guidelines for stress ulcer prophylaxis, and strong institutional culture favoring PPI use. Potential facilitators included increased pharmacy oversight, provider education, and embedded decision support in the electronic medical record. Interventions addressing barriers noted by front line providers are needed to reduce unnecessary PPI use, and future studies should assess the impact of such interventions on CDI rates.
    MeSH term(s) Aged ; Clostridium Infections/prevention & control ; Critical Care Nursing/standards ; Critical Illness/therapy ; Cross Infection/prevention & control ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Midwestern United States ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/standards ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors
    Chemical Substances Proton Pump Inhibitors
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-06-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 1472097-8
    ISSN 1945-1474 ; 1062-2551
    ISSN (online) 1945-1474
    ISSN 1062-2551
    DOI 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000209
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Prevalence and outcomes of co-infection and superinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens

    Jackson S Musuuza / Lauren Watson / Vishala Parmasad / Nathan Putman-Buehler / Leslie Christensen / Nasia Safdar

    PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e

    A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    2021  Volume 0251170

    Abstract: Introduction The recovery of other pathogens in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported, either at the time of a SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis (co-infection) or subsequently (superinfection). However, data on the prevalence, microbiology, ... ...

    Abstract Introduction The recovery of other pathogens in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported, either at the time of a SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis (co-infection) or subsequently (superinfection). However, data on the prevalence, microbiology, and outcomes of co-infection and superinfection are limited. The purpose of this study was to examine the occurrence of co-infections and superinfections and their outcomes among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients and methods We searched literature databases for studies published from October 1, 2019, through February 8, 2021. We included studies that reported clinical features and outcomes of co-infection or superinfection of SARS-CoV-2 and other pathogens in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. We followed PRISMA guidelines, and we registered the protocol with PROSPERO as: CRD42020189763. Results Of 6639 articles screened, 118 were included in the random effects meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of co-infection was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14%-25%, I2 = 98%) and that of superinfection was 24% (95% CI: 19%-30%). Pooled prevalence of pathogen type stratified by co- or superinfection were: viral co-infections, 10% (95% CI: 6%-14%); viral superinfections, 4% (95% CI: 0%-10%); bacterial co-infections, 8% (95% CI: 5%-11%); bacterial superinfections, 20% (95% CI: 13%-28%); fungal co-infections, 4% (95% CI: 2%-7%); and fungal superinfections, 8% (95% CI: 4%-13%). Patients with a co-infection or superinfection had higher odds of dying than those who only had SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.82-5.99). Compared to those with co-infections, patients with superinfections had a higher prevalence of mechanical ventilation (45% [95% CI: 33%-58%] vs. 10% [95% CI: 5%-16%]), but patients with co-infections had a greater average length of hospital stay than those with superinfections (mean = 29.0 days, standard deviation [SD] = 6.7 vs. mean = 16 days, SD = 6.2, respectively). Conclusions Our study showed that as many as 19% of ...
    Keywords Medicine ; R ; Science ; Q
    Subject code 610
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
    Publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
    Document type Article ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant Organism Susceptibility to Chlorhexidine Under Usual Clinical Care.

    Musuuza, Jackson S / Sethi, Ajay K / Roberts, Tonya J / Safdar, Nasia

    Infection control and hospital epidemiology

    2017  Volume 38, Issue 6, Page(s) 729–731

    Abstract: Increasing use of daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing can potentially lead to selection for organisms with reduced susceptibility to CHG, limiting the utility of CHG. We examined reduced susceptibility to CHG of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram- ... ...

    Abstract Increasing use of daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing can potentially lead to selection for organisms with reduced susceptibility to CHG, limiting the utility of CHG. We examined reduced susceptibility to CHG of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. No evidence suggested reduced susceptibility to CHG. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:729-731.
    MeSH term(s) Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology ; Chlorhexidine/pharmacology ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Feces/microbiology ; Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology ; Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects ; Humans ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Mouth/microbiology ; Nose/microbiology ; Skin/microbiology
    Chemical Substances Anti-Infective Agents, Local ; Fluoroquinolones ; Chlorhexidine (R4KO0DY52L)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-04-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 639378-0
    ISSN 1559-6834 ; 0195-9417 ; 0899-823X
    ISSN (online) 1559-6834
    ISSN 0195-9417 ; 0899-823X
    DOI 10.1017/ice.2017.53
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Implementation of daily chlorhexidine bathing to reduce colonization by multidrug-resistant organisms in a critical care unit.

    Musuuza, Jackson S / Sethi, Ajay K / Roberts, Tonya J / Safdar, Nasia

    American journal of infection control

    2017  Volume 45, Issue 9, Page(s) 1014–1017

    Abstract: Background: Colonized patients are a reservoir for transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Not many studies have examined the effectiveness of daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing under routine care conditions. We present a ... ...

    Abstract Background: Colonized patients are a reservoir for transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Not many studies have examined the effectiveness of daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing under routine care conditions. We present a descriptive analysis of the trends of MDRO colonization following implementation of daily CHG bathing under routine clinical conditions in an intensive care unit (ICU).
    Methods: From May 2010-January 2011, we screened patients admitted to a 24-bed ICU for and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli (FQRGNB). We calculated and plotted monthly incidence and prevalence of colonization of these MDROs.
    Results: Prevalence decreased in the immediate aftermath of daily CHG bathing implementation and generally remained at that level throughout the observation period. We observed low rates of incidence of MDRO colonization with VRE>FQRGNB>MRSA. Monthly prevalence of colonization and incidence for the composite of MRSA, VRE, and/or FQRGNB was 1.9%-27.9% and 0-1.1/100 patient-days, respectively.
    Conclusions: Following the implementation of daily CHG bathing, the incidence of MDROs remained low and constant over time, whereas the prevalence decreased immediately after the implementation.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology ; Baths ; Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives ; Chlorhexidine/pharmacology ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Critical Illness ; Dermatologic Agents/pharmacology ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Female ; Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology ; Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects ; Gram-Negative Bacteria/growth & development ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/growth & development ; Middle Aged ; Periodicity ; Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/drug effects ; Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/growth & development
    Chemical Substances Anti-Infective Agents, Local ; Dermatologic Agents ; Fluoroquinolones ; chlorhexidine gluconate (MOR84MUD8E) ; Chlorhexidine (R4KO0DY52L)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-04-18
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 392362-9
    ISSN 1527-3296 ; 0196-6553
    ISSN (online) 1527-3296
    ISSN 0196-6553
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.038
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Jasper, Annie S / Musuuza, Jackson S / Tischendorf, Jessica S / Stevens, Vanessa W / Gamage, Shantini D / Osman, Fauzia / Safdar, Nasia

    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    2020  Volume 72, Issue 11, Page(s) 1979–1989

    Abstract: Background: The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends either a fluoroquinolone or a macrolide as a first-line antibiotic treatment for Legionella pneumonia, but it is unclear which antibiotic leads to optimal clinical outcomes. We compared ... ...

    Abstract Background: The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends either a fluoroquinolone or a macrolide as a first-line antibiotic treatment for Legionella pneumonia, but it is unclear which antibiotic leads to optimal clinical outcomes. We compared the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone versus macrolide monotherapy in Legionella pneumonia using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Methods: We conducted a systematic search of literature in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 1 June 2019. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing macrolide with fluoroquinolone monotherapy using clinical outcomes in patients with Legionella pneumonia were included. Twenty-one publications out of an initial 2073 unique records met the selection criteria. Following PRISMA guidelines, 2 reviewers participated in data extraction. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure, time to apyrexia, length of hospital stay (LOS), and the occurrence of complications. The review and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019132901).
    Results: Twenty-one publications with 3525 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age of the population was 60.9 years and 67.2% were men. The mortality rate for patients treated with fluoroquinolones was 6.9% (104/1512) compared with 7.4% (133/1790) among those treated with macrolides. The pooled odds ratio assessing risk of mortality for patients treated with fluoroquinolones versus macrolides was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, .71-1.25, I2 = 0%, P = .661). Clinical cure, time to apyrexia, LOS, and the occurrence of complications did not differ for patients treated with fluoroquinolones versus macrolides.
    Conclusions: We found no difference in the effectiveness of fluoroquinolones versus macrolides in reducing mortality among patients with Legionella pneumonia.
    MeSH term(s) Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use ; Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy ; Fluoroquinolones ; Humans ; Legionella ; Macrolides ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pneumonia/drug therapy
    Chemical Substances Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Fluoroquinolones ; Macrolides
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-04-17
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 1099781-7
    ISSN 1537-6591 ; 1058-4838
    ISSN (online) 1537-6591
    ISSN 1058-4838
    DOI 10.1093/cid/ciaa441
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Assessing the sustainability of daily chlorhexidine bathing in the intensive care unit of a Veteran's Hospital by examining nurses' perspectives and experiences.

    Musuuza, Jackson S / Roberts, Tonya J / Carayon, Pascale / Safdar, Nasia

    BMC infectious diseases

    2017  Volume 17, Issue 1, Page(s) 75

    Abstract: Background: Daily bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) of intensive care unit (ICU) patients has been shown to reduce healthcare-associated infections and colonization by multidrug resistant organisms. The objective of this project was to describe ...

    Abstract Background: Daily bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) of intensive care unit (ICU) patients has been shown to reduce healthcare-associated infections and colonization by multidrug resistant organisms. The objective of this project was to describe the process of daily CHG bathing and identify the barriers and facilitators that can influence its successful adoption and sustainability in an ICU of a Veterans Administration Hospital.
    Methods: We conducted 26 semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 4 nurse managers (NMs), 13 registered nurses (RNs) and 9 health care technicians (HCTs) working in the ICU. We used qualitative content analysis to code and analyze the data. Dedoose software was used to facilitate data management and coding. Trustworthiness and scientific integrity of the data were ensured by having two authors corroborate the coding process, conducting member checks and keeping an audit trail of all the decisions made.
    Results: Duration of the interviews was 15 to 39 min (average = 26 min). Five steps of bathing were identified: 1) decision to give a bath; 2) ability to give a bath; 3) decision about which soap to use; 4) delegation of a bath; and 5) getting assistance to do a bath. The bathing process resulted in one of the following three outcomes: 1) complete bath; 2) interrupted bath; and 3) bath not done. The outcome was influenced by a combination of barriers and facilitators at each step. Most barriers were related to perceived workload, patient factors, and scheduling. Facilitators were mainly organizational factors such as the policy of daily CHG bathing, the consistent supply of CHG soap, and support such as reminders to conduct CHG baths by nurse managers.
    Conclusions: Patient bathing in ICUs is a complex process that can be hindered and interrupted by numerous factors. The decision to use CHG soap for bathing was only one of 5 steps of bathing and was largely influenced by scheduling/workload and patient factors such as clinical stability, hypersensitivity to CHG, patient refusal, presence of IV lines and general hygiene. Interventions that address the organizational, provider, and patient barriers to bathing could improve adherence to a daily CHG bathing protocol.
    MeSH term(s) Allied Health Personnel ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Baths ; Chlorhexidine/adverse effects ; Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives ; Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use ; Cross Infection/prevention & control ; Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology ; Hospitals, Veterans ; Humans ; Hygiene ; Intensive Care Units ; Nurse Administrators ; Nurses ; Qualitative Research ; Time Factors ; Workload
    Chemical Substances Anti-Infective Agents, Local ; chlorhexidine gluconate (MOR84MUD8E) ; Chlorhexidine (R4KO0DY52L)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-01-14
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 1471-2334
    ISSN (online) 1471-2334
    DOI 10.1186/s12879-017-2180-8
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top