LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 1334

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Goertz et al-In Support of Scientific Dialogue: A Note From the Editor.

    Johnson, Claire D

    Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics

    2021  Volume 44, Issue 6, Page(s) 504

    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-29
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 761054-3
    ISSN 1532-6586 ; 0161-4754
    ISSN (online) 1532-6586
    ISSN 0161-4754
    DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.06.010
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article: Chiropractic Day: A Historical Review of a Day Worth Celebrating.

    Johnson, Claire D

    Journal of chiropractic humanities

    2020  Volume 27, Page(s) 1–10

    Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss historical concepts about the celebration of Chiropractic Day.: Discussion: Daniel David Palmer attributed September 18, 1895 to be the day that he delivered the first chiropractic ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss historical concepts about the celebration of Chiropractic Day.
    Discussion: Daniel David Palmer attributed September 18, 1895 to be the day that he delivered the first chiropractic adjustment. As the chiropractic profession grew, the celebration of Chiropractic Day became more widespread throughout the United States and the world. This paper offers suggestions about how to celebrate Chiropractic Day. Activities include educating, learning, honoring, volunteering, and engaging.
    Conclusion: The chiropractic profession celebrates its birth on September 18. Regardless of the many different names used over the past 125 years, including Chiropractic Founder's Day, Chiropractic Rally Day, Chiropractic Anniversary, and Chiropractic Discovery Day, the celebration of this special day provides an opportunity to reflect on how far the profession has come and how chiropractors continue to help and serve their patients.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 1556-3499
    ISSN 1556-3499
    DOI 10.1016/j.echu.2020.11.001
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article: Education Descriptive Reports: How to Publish Pragmatic Studies in Education.

    Johnson, Claire D / Green, Bart N

    Journal of chiropractic humanities

    2022  Volume 29, Page(s) 15–21

    Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe the contents of an education descriptive report and to provide a useful publication format for educators in the health professions.: Discussion: The education descriptive report is a pragmatic, ... ...

    Abstract Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe the contents of an education descriptive report and to provide a useful publication format for educators in the health professions.
    Discussion: The education descriptive report is a pragmatic, empirical study that can contribute to the literature. Education descriptive reports describe an event or situation in an education setting, the resulting outcomes, and what new information can be learned. These reports may use quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods and may be from organizational, academic, instructional, programmatic, or other educational perspectives.
    Conclusion: The education descriptive report gives educators in the health professions a mechanism to introduce their scholarly efforts and observations in education environments in a manner that is consistent with the academic literature. This article describes the structure of an education descriptive report and includes a helpful template for academic authors to develop their own report so they may publish observational, reflective, and hypothesis-generating articles.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-07-30
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ISSN 1556-3499
    ISSN 1556-3499
    DOI 10.1016/j.echu.2022.06.001
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession: Authors' introduction.

    Johnson, Claire D / Green, Bart N

    The Journal of chiropractic education

    2021  Volume 35, Issue S1, Page(s) 5–8

    Abstract: This paper provides the authors' introduction to Looking Back: A Historical Review of the Lawsuit That Transformed the Chiropractic Profession, which is a series of papers that reviews events surrounding the federal antitrust lawsuit Wilk v American ... ...

    Abstract This paper provides the authors' introduction to Looking Back: A Historical Review of the Lawsuit That Transformed the Chiropractic Profession, which is a series of papers that reviews events surrounding the federal antitrust lawsuit Wilk v American Medical Association. Information in this series describes the events before, during, and after the lawsuit and the relevant issues related to the transformation of American mainstream health care and chiropractic. These papers give insight into many of the factors that shaped the chiropractic profession that we know today.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-17
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2261817-X
    ISSN 1042-5055
    ISSN 1042-5055
    DOI 10.7899/JCE-21-21
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Book ; Online: The Anthology of Babel

    Zille, Tom / Speese, James / Sarfan, Austin / Newcomb, Matthew / Neira, Raul / Mendez, Maria-Josee / McLoone, Katherine / Marnane, Ryan / Ligo, Seth / Lehman, Eric D. / Krajewski, Bruce / Johnson, Reed / Hock, Stephen / Falk, Em K. / Daigle, Claire / Engel, Stephen David / Coursey, Julia / Ben-Merre, David / Simon, Ed

    2020  

    Abstract: Why should there only be literary scholarship about authors who actually lived, and texts which exist? Where are the articles on Enoch Campion, Linus Withold, Redondo Panza, Darshan Singh, or Heidi B. Morton? That none of these are real authors should be ...

    Abstract Why should there only be literary scholarship about authors who actually lived, and texts which exist? Where are the articles on Enoch Campion, Linus Withold, Redondo Panza, Darshan Singh, or Heidi B. Morton? That none of these are real authors should be no impediment to interpreting their invented writings. In the first collection of its kind, The Anthology of Babel publishes academic articles by scholars on authors, books, and movements that are completely invented. Blurring the lines between scholarship and creative writing, The Anthology of Babel inaugurates a completely new literary genre perfectly attuned to the era we live in, a project evocative of Jorge-Louis Borges, Umberto Eco, and Italo Calvino
    Keywords Literature (General)
    Size 1 electronic resource (398 pages)
    Publisher punctum books
    Document type Book ; Online
    Note English ; Open Access
    HBZ-ID HT020395144
    ISBN 9781950192472 ; 9781950192489 ; 1950192474 ; 1950192482
    DOI 10.21983/P3.0254.1.00
    Database ZB MED Catalogue: Medicine, Health, Nutrition, Environment, Agriculture

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article: Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 6: Preparing for the lawsuit.

    Johnson, Claire D / Green, Bart N

    The Journal of chiropractic education

    2021  Volume 35, Issue S1, Page(s) 85–96

    Abstract: Objective: This is the sixth article in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical ... ...

    Abstract Objective: This is the sixth article in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of the plaintiffs, lead lawyer, and the events immediately before the lawsuit was filed.
    Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 articles following a successive timeline. This article, the sixth of the series, explores the plaintiffs' stories.
    Results: Because of the AMA's boycott on chiropractic, chiropractors were not able to collaborate with medical physicians or refer patients to medical facilities, which resulted in restricted trade and potential harm to patients' well-being. The plaintiffs, Patricia Arthur, James Bryden, Michael Pedigo, and Chester Wilk, came from different regions of the United States. Each had unique experiences and were compelled to seek justice. The lead lawyer, Mr George McAndrews, was the son of a chiropractor and had witnessed the effect that the AMA's attacks on chiropractic had on his father. It took several years to gather enough resources to file the suit, which was submitted in 1976.
    Conclusion: The conflicts that the plaintiffs experienced stimulated them to pursue a lawsuit against the AMA and other organized political medicine groups.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2261817-X
    ISSN 1042-5055
    ISSN 1042-5055
    DOI 10.7899/JCE-21-27
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 3: Chiropractic growth.

    Johnson, Claire D / Green, Bart N

    The Journal of chiropractic education

    2021  Volume 35, Issue S1, Page(s) 45–54

    Abstract: Objective: This is the third paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical ... ...

    Abstract Objective: This is the third paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the growth of chiropractic, its public relations campaigns, and infighting that contributed to the events surrounding the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.
    Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive timeline. This paper is the third of the series that explores the growth the chiropractic profession.
    Results: By the 1930s, the AMA was already under investigation for violation of antitrust laws and the National Chiropractic Association was suggesting that the AMA was establishing a health care monopoly. Chiropractic schools grew and the number of graduates rose quickly. Public relations campaigns and publications in the popular press attempted to educate the public about chiropractic. Factions within the profession polarized around differing views of how they thought that chiropractic should be practiced and portrayed to the public. The AMA leaders noted the infighting and used it to their advantage to subvert chiropractic.
    Conclusion: Chiropractic grew rapidly and established its presence with the American public through public relations campaigns and popular press. However, infighting would give the AMA material to further its efforts to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2261817-X
    ISSN 1042-5055
    ISSN 1042-5055
    DOI 10.7899/JCE-21-24
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 1: Origins of the conflict.

    Johnson, Claire D / Green, Bart N

    The Journal of chiropractic education

    2021  Volume 35, Issue S1, Page(s) 9–24

    Abstract: Objective: This paper is the first in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical ... ...

    Abstract Objective: This paper is the first in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief review of the history of the AMA and the origins of chiropractic and to explore how the AMA began its monopoly of health care in the United States, possible reasons that organized medicine acted against chiropractic, and how these events influenced the chiropractic profession.
    Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. We used primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers that follow a successive time line. This paper is the first of the series and explores the origins of the aversion of organized American medicine to other health professions and the origins of the chiropractic profession.
    Results: The AMA began in the mid-1800s to unify like-minded "regular" medical physicians who developed a code of ethics and promoted higher educational standards. Their efforts to unify had excluded other types of health care providers, which they called "irregular" practitioners. However, Americans were seeking more natural alternatives to the harsh methods that regular medical physicians offered at that time. Nearly 50 years after the AMA began, the chiropractic profession attempted to emerge during a time when many patients valued vitalism and their freedom to choose what health care provider they would access.
    Conclusion: During the years that chiropractic developed as a healing profession, organized medicine was already well established and developing a monopoly in American health care. These events created the foundation on which the tensions between these professions were built and ultimately resulted in the Wilk v AMA lawsuit.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-17
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2261817-X
    ISSN 1042-5055
    ISSN 1042-5055
    DOI 10.7899/JCE-21-22
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article: Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 7: Lawsuit and decisions.

    Johnson, Claire D / Green, Bart N

    The Journal of chiropractic education

    2021  Volume 35, Issue S1, Page(s) 97–116

    Abstract: Objective: This is the seventh paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical ... ...

    Abstract Objective: This is the seventh paper in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the lawsuit that was first filed in 1976 and concluded with the final denial of appeal in 1990.
    Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 papers following a successive time line. This paper, the seventh of the series, considers the information of the 2 trials and the judge's decision.
    Results: By the time the first trial began in 1980, the AMA had already changed its anti-chiropractic stance to allow medical doctors to associate with chiropractors if they wished. In the first trial, the chiropractors were not able to overcome the very stigma that organized medicine worked so hard to create over many decades, which resulted in the jury voting in favor of the AMA and other defendants. The plaintiffs, Drs Patricia Arthur, James Bryden, Michael Pedigo, and Chester Wilk, continued with their pursuit of justice. Their lawyer, Mr George McAndrews, fought for an appeal and was allowed a second trial. The second trial was a bench trial in which Judge Susan Getzendanner declared her final judgment that "the American Medical Association (AMA) and its members participated in a conspiracy against chiropractors in violation of the nation's antitrust laws." After the AMA's appeal was denied by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 1990, the decision was declared permanent. The injunction that was ordered by the judge was published in the January 1, 1988, issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
    Conclusion: The efforts by Mr McAndrews and his legal team and the persistence of the plaintiffs and countless others in the chiropractic profession concluded in Judge Getzendanner's decision, which prevented the AMA from rebuilding barriers or developing another boycott. The chiropractic profession was ready to move into its next century.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2261817-X
    ISSN 1042-5055
    ISSN 1042-5055
    DOI 10.7899/JCE-21-28
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Looking back at the lawsuit that transformed the chiropractic profession part 5: Evidence exposed.

    Johnson, Claire D / Green, Bart N

    The Journal of chiropractic education

    2021  Volume 35, Issue S1, Page(s) 74–84

    Abstract: Objective: This is the fifth article in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical ... ...

    Abstract Objective: This is the fifth article in a series that explores the historical events surrounding the Wilk v American Medical Association (AMA) lawsuit in which the plaintiffs argued that the AMA, the American Hospital Association, and other medical specialty societies violated antitrust law by restraining chiropractors' business practices. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief review of events surrounding the eventual end of the AMA's Committee on Quackery and the exposure of evidence of the AMA's efforts to boycott the chiropractic profession.
    Methods: This historical research study used a phenomenological approach to qualitative inquiry into the conflict between regular medicine and chiropractic and the events before, during, and after a legal dispute at the time of modernization of the chiropractic profession. Our methods included obtaining primary and secondary data sources. The final narrative recount was developed into 8 articles following a successive timeline. This article, the fifth of the series, explores the exposure of what the AMA had been doing, which provided evidence that was eventually used in the Wilk v AMA antitrust lawsuit.
    Results: The prime mission of the AMA's Committee on Quackery was "first, the containment of chiropractic and, ultimately, the elimination of chiropractic." However, the committee did not complete its mission and quietly disbanded in 1974. This was the same year that the chiropractic profession finally gained licensure in all 50 of the United States; received recognition from the US Commissioner of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare; and was successfully included in Medicare. In 1975, documents reportedly obtained by the Church of Scientology covert operatives under Operation AMA Doom revealed the extent to which the AMA and its Committee on Quackery had been working to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession. The AMA actions included influencing mainstream media, decisions made by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, and the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Other actions included publishing propaganda against chiropractic and implementing an anti-chiropractic program aimed at medical students, medical societies, and the American public.
    Conclusion: After more than a decade of overt and covert actions, the AMA chose to end its Committee on Quackery. The following year, documents exposed the extent of AMA's efforts to enact its boycott of chiropractic.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-09-11
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2261817-X
    ISSN 1042-5055
    ISSN 1042-5055
    DOI 10.7899/JCE-21-26
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top