LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 60

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: The authors reply.

    Pun, Brenda T / Balas, Michele C / Ely, E Wesley

    Critical care medicine

    2019  Volume 47, Issue 4, Page(s) e382

    MeSH term(s) Critical Illness ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-03-18
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 197890-1
    ISSN 1530-0293 ; 0090-3493
    ISSN (online) 1530-0293
    ISSN 0090-3493
    DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003665
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: An Exploration of Critical Care Professionals' Strategies to Enhance Daily Implementation of the Assess, Prevent, and Manage Pain; Both Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials; Choice of Analgesia and Sedation; Delirium Assess, Prevent, and Manage; Early Mobility and Exercise; and Family Engagement and Empowerment: A Group Concept Mapping Study.

    Mion, Lorraine C / Tan, Alai / Brockman, Audrey / Tate, Judith A / Vasilevskis, Eduard E / Pun, Brenda T / Rosas, Scott R / Balas, Michele C

    Critical care explorations

    2023  Volume 5, Issue 3, Page(s) e0872

    Abstract: The goals of this exploratory study were to engage professionals from the Society for Critical Care Medicine ICU Liberation Collaborative ICUs to: 1) conceptualize strategies to enhance daily implementation of the Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both ... ...

    Abstract The goals of this exploratory study were to engage professionals from the Society for Critical Care Medicine ICU Liberation Collaborative ICUs to: 1) conceptualize strategies to enhance daily implementation of the Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; Choice of analgesia and sedation; Delirium assess, prevent, and manage; Early mobility and exercise; and Family engagement and empowerment (ABCDEF) bundle from different perspectives and 2) identify strategies to prioritize for implementation.
    Design: Mixed-methods group concept mapping over 8 months using an online method. Participants provided strategies in response to a prompt about what was needed for successful daily ABCDEF bundle implementation. Responses were summarized into a set of unique statements and then rated on a 5-point scale on degree of necessity (essential) and degree to which currently used.
    Setting: Sixty-eight academic, community, and federal ICUs.
    Participants: A total of 121 ICU professionals consisting of frontline and leadership professionals.
    Interventions: None.
    Measurements and main results: A final set of 76 strategies (reduced from 188 responses) were suggested: education (16 strategies), collaboration (15 strategies), processes and protocols (13 strategies), feedback (10 strategies), sedation/pain practices (nine strategies), education (eight strategies), and family (five strategies). Nine strategies were rated as very essential but infrequently used: adequate staffing, adequate mobility equipment, attention to (patient's) sleep, open discussion and collaborative problem solving, nonsedation methods to address ventilator dyssynchrony, specific expectations for night and day shifts, education of whole team on interdependent nature of the bundle, and effective sleep protocol.
    Conclusions: In this concept mapping study, ICU professionals provided strategies that spanned a number of conceptual implementation clusters. Results can be used by ICU leaders for implementation planning to address context-specific interdisciplinary approaches to improve ABCDEF bundle implementation.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-03-03
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2639-8028
    ISSN (online) 2639-8028
    DOI 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000872
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: ICU Survivorship-The Relationship of Delirium, Sedation, Dementia, and Acquired Weakness.

    Mart, Matthew F / Pun, Brenda T / Pandharipande, Pratik / Jackson, James C / Ely, E Wesley

    Critical care medicine

    2021  Volume 49, Issue 8, Page(s) 1227–1240

    Abstract: The advent of modern critical care medicine has revolutionized care of the critically ill patient in the last 50 years. The Society of Critical Care Medicine (was formed in recognition of the challenges and need for specialized treatment for these ... ...

    Abstract The advent of modern critical care medicine has revolutionized care of the critically ill patient in the last 50 years. The Society of Critical Care Medicine (was formed in recognition of the challenges and need for specialized treatment for these fragile patients. As the specialty has grown, it has achieved impressive scientific advances that have reduced mortality and saved lives. With those advances, however, came growing recognition that the burden of critical illness did not end at the doorstep of the hospital. Delirium, once thought to be a mere by-product of critical illness, was found to be an independent predictor of mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and long-lasting cognitive impairment. Similarly, deep sedation and immobility, so often used to keep patients "comfortable" and to facilitate mechanical ventilation and recovery, worsen mortality and lead to the development of ICU-acquired weakness. The realization that these outcomes are inextricably linked to one another and how we manage our patients has helped us recognize the need for culture change. We, as a specialty, now understand that although celebrating the successes of survival, we now also have a duty to focus on those who survive their diseases. Led by initiatives such as the ICU Liberation Campaign of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the natural progression of the field is now focused on getting patients back to their homes and lives unencumbered by disability and impairment. Much work remains to be done, but the futures of our most critically ill patients will continue to benefit if we leverage and build on the history of our first 50 years.
    MeSH term(s) Asthenia/etiology ; Critical Care/methods ; Critical Illness/therapy ; Delirium/etiology ; Dementia/etiology ; Frailty/etiology ; Humans ; Iatrogenic Disease/prevention & control ; Intensive Care Units ; Neuromuscular Diseases/etiology ; Risk Factors ; Survivorship
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-04-28
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
    ZDB-ID 197890-1
    ISSN 1530-0293 ; 0090-3493
    ISSN (online) 1530-0293
    ISSN 0090-3493
    DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005125
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Delirium in critical illness: clinical manifestations, outcomes, and management.

    Stollings, Joanna L / Kotfis, Katarzyna / Chanques, Gerald / Pun, Brenda T / Pandharipande, Pratik P / Ely, E Wesley

    Intensive care medicine

    2021  Volume 47, Issue 10, Page(s) 1089–1103

    Abstract: Delirium is the most common manifestation of brain dysfunction in critically ill patients. In the intensive care unit (ICU), duration of delirium is independently predictive of excess death, length of stay, cost of care, and acquired dementia. There are ... ...

    Abstract Delirium is the most common manifestation of brain dysfunction in critically ill patients. In the intensive care unit (ICU), duration of delirium is independently predictive of excess death, length of stay, cost of care, and acquired dementia. There are numerous neurotransmitter/functional and/or injury-causing hypotheses rather than a unifying mechanism for delirium. Without using a validated delirium instrument, delirium can be misdiagnosed (under, but also overdiagnosed and trivialized), supporting the recommendation to use a monitoring instrument routinely. The best-validated ICU bedside instruments are CAM-ICU and ICDSC, both of which also detect subsyndromal delirium. Both tools have some inherent limitations in the neurologically injured patients, yet still provide valuable information about delirium once the sequelae of the primary injury settle into a new post-injury baseline. Now it is known that antipsychotics and other psychoactive medications do not reliably improve brain function in critically ill delirious patients. ICU teams should systematically screen for predisposing and precipitating factors. These include exacerbations of cardiac/respiratory failure or sepsis, metabolic disturbances (hypoglycemia, dysnatremia, uremia and ammonemia) receipt of psychoactive medications, and sensory deprivation through prolonged immobilization, uncorrected vision and hearing deficits, poor sleep hygiene, and isolation from loved ones so common during COVID-19 pandemic. The ABCDEF (A2F) bundle is a means to facilitate implementation of the 2018 Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU (PADIS) Guidelines. In over 25,000 patients across nearly 100 institutions, the A2F bundle has been shown in a dose-response fashion (i.e., greater bundle compliance) to yield improved survival, length of stay, coma and delirium duration, cost, and less ICU bounce-backs and discharge to nursing homes.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; COVID-19 ; Critical Care ; Critical Illness ; Delirium/diagnosis ; Delirium/etiology ; Delirium/therapy ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-08-16
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural ; Review
    ZDB-ID 80387-x
    ISSN 1432-1238 ; 0340-0964 ; 0342-4642 ; 0935-1701
    ISSN (online) 1432-1238
    ISSN 0340-0964 ; 0342-4642 ; 0935-1701
    DOI 10.1007/s00134-021-06503-1
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Effects of a National Quality Improvement Collaborative on ABCDEF Bundle Implementation.

    Balas, Michele C / Tan, Alai / Pun, Brenda T / Ely, E Wesley / Carson, Shannon S / Mion, Lorraine / Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann / Vasilevskis, Eduard E

    American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses

    2022  Volume 31, Issue 1, Page(s) 54–64

    Abstract: Background: The ABCDEF bundle (Assess, prevent, and manage pain and Delirium; Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; Choice of analgesia/sedation; Early mobility; and Family engagement) improves intensive care unit outcomes, but adoption into ... ...

    Abstract Background: The ABCDEF bundle (Assess, prevent, and manage pain and Delirium; Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; Choice of analgesia/sedation; Early mobility; and Family engagement) improves intensive care unit outcomes, but adoption into practice is poor.
    Objective: To assess the effect of quality improvement collaborative participation on ABCDEF bundle performance.
    Methods: This interrupted time series analysis included 20 months of bundle performance data from 15 226 adults admitted to 68 US intensive care units. Segmented regression models were used to quantify complete and individual bundle element performance changes over time and compare performance patterns before (6 months) and after (14 months) collaborative initiation.
    Results: Complete bundle performance rates were very low at baseline (<4%) but increased to 12% by the end. Complete bundle performance increased by 2 percentage points (SE, 0.9; P = .06) immediately after collaborative initiation. Each subsequent month was associated with an increase of 0.6 percentage points (SE, 0.2; P = .04). Performance rates increased significantly immediately after initiation for pain assessment (7.6% [SE, 2.0%], P = .002), sedation assessment (9.1% [SE, 3.7%], P = .02), and family engagement (7.8% [SE, 3%], P = .02) and then increased monthly at the same speed as the trend in the baseline period. Performance rates were lowest for spontaneous awakening/breathing trials and early mobility.
    Conclusions: Quality improvement collaborative participation resulted in clinically meaningful, but small and variable, improvements in bundle performance. Opportunities remain to improve adoption of sedation, mechanical ventilation, and early mobility practices.
    MeSH term(s) Adult ; Critical Care/methods ; Critical Illness ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Patient Care Bundles/methods ; Quality Improvement ; Ventilator Weaning
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 1130987-8
    ISSN 1937-710X ; 1062-3264
    ISSN (online) 1937-710X
    ISSN 1062-3264
    DOI 10.4037/ajcc2022768
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Interprofessional Team Collaboration and Work Environment Health in 68 US Intensive Care Units.

    Pun, Brenda T / Jun, Jin / Tan, Alai / Byrum, Diane / Mion, Lorraine / Vasilevskis, Eduard E / Ely, E Wesley / Balas, Michele

    American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses

    2022  Volume 31, Issue 6, Page(s) 443–451

    Abstract: Background: Safe, reliable, high-quality critical care delivery depends upon interprofessional teamwork.: Objective: To describe perceptions of intensive care unit (ICU) teamwork and healthy work environments and evaluate whether perceptions vary by ... ...

    Abstract Background: Safe, reliable, high-quality critical care delivery depends upon interprofessional teamwork.
    Objective: To describe perceptions of intensive care unit (ICU) teamwork and healthy work environments and evaluate whether perceptions vary by profession.
    Methods: In August 2015, Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS) and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Healthy Work Environment Assessment Tool (HWEAT) surveys were distributed to all interprofessional members at the 68 ICUs participating in the ICU Liberation Collaborative. Overall scores range from 1 (needs improvement) to 5 (excellent).
    Results: Most of the 3586 surveys completed were from registered nurses (51.2%), followed by respiratory therapists (17.8%), attending physicians (10.5%), rehabilitation therapists (8.3%), pharmacists (4.9%), nursing assistants (3.1%), and physician trainees (4.1%). Overall, respondents rated teamwork and work environment health favorably (mean [SD] scores: AITCS, 3.92 [0.64]; HWEAT, 3.45 [0.79]). The highest-rated AITCS domain was "partnership/shared decision-making" (mean [SD], 4.00 [0.63); lowest, "coordination" (3.67 [0.80]). The highest-scoring HWEAT standard was "effective decision-making" (mean [SD], 3.60 [0.79]); lowest, "meaningful recognition" (3.30 [0.92]). Compared with attending physicians (mean [SD] scores: AITCS, 3.99 [0.54]; HWEAT, 3.48 [0.70]), AITCS scores were lower for registered nurses (3.91 [0.62]), respiratory therapists (3.86 [0.76]), rehabilitation therapists (3.84 [0.65]), and pharmacists (3.83 [0.55]), and HWEAT scores were lower for respiratory therapists (3.38 [0.86]) (all P ≤ .05).
    Conclusions: Teamwork and work environment health were rated by ICU team members as good but not excellent. Care coordination and meaningful recognition can be improved.
    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Workplace ; Medical Staff, Hospital ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Intensive Care Units ; Patient Care Team ; Interprofessional Relations ; Cooperative Behavior
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-11-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 1130987-8
    ISSN 1937-710X ; 1062-3264
    ISSN (online) 1937-710X
    ISSN 1062-3264
    DOI 10.4037/ajcc2022546
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Best Practices for Conducting Interprofessional Team Rounds to Facilitate Performance of the ICU Liberation (ABCDEF) Bundle.

    Stollings, Joanna L / Devlin, John W / Lin, John C / Pun, Brenda T / Byrum, Diane / Barr, Juliana

    Critical care medicine

    2020  Volume 48, Issue 4, Page(s) 562–570

    Abstract: Objectives: Daily ICU interprofessional team rounds, which incorporate the ICU Liberation ("A" for Assessment, Prevention, and Manage Pain; "B" for Both Spontaneous Awakening Trials and Spontaneous Breathing Trials; "C" for Choice of Analgesia and ... ...

    Abstract Objectives: Daily ICU interprofessional team rounds, which incorporate the ICU Liberation ("A" for Assessment, Prevention, and Manage Pain; "B" for Both Spontaneous Awakening Trials and Spontaneous Breathing Trials; "C" for Choice of Analgesia and Sedation; "D" for Delirium Assess, Prevent, and Manage; "E" for Early Mobility and Exercise; "F" for Family Engagement and Empowerment [ABCDEF]) Bundle, support both the care coordination and regular provider communication necessary for Bundle execution. This article describes evidence-based practices for conducting effective interprofessional team rounds in the ICU to improve Bundle performance.
    Design: Best practice synthesis.
    Methods: The authors, each extensively involved in the Society of Critical Care Medicine's ICU Liberation Campaign, reviewed the pertinent literature to identify how ICU interprofessional team rounds can be optimized to increase ICU Liberation adherence.
    Results: Daily ICU interprofessional team rounds that foster ICU Liberation Bundle use support both care coordination and regular provider communication within and between teams. Evidence-based best practices for conducting effective interprofessional team rounds in the ICU include the optimal structure for ICU interprofessional team rounds; the importance of conducting rounds at patients' bedside; essential participants in rounds; the inclusion of ICU patients and their families in rounds-based discussions; and incorporation of the Bundle into the Electronic Health Record. Interprofessional team rounds in the ICU ideally employ communication strategies to foster inclusive and supportive behaviors consistent with interprofessional collaboration in the ICU. Patient care discussions during interprofessional team rounds benefit from being patient-centered and goal-oriented. Documentation of ICU Liberation Bundle elements in the Electronic Health Record may help facilitate team communication and decision-making.
    Conclusions: Conducting high-quality interprofessional team rounds in the ICU is a key strategy to support ICU Liberation Bundle use.
    MeSH term(s) Critical Care/organization & administration ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units/organization & administration ; Interprofessional Relations ; Patient Care Bundles/methods ; Patient Care Team/organization & administration ; Quality Improvement/organization & administration ; Quality of Health Care/organization & administration
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-03-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 197890-1
    ISSN 1530-0293 ; 0090-3493
    ISSN (online) 1530-0293
    ISSN 0090-3493
    DOI 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004197
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Delirium monitoring in the ICU: strategies for initiating and sustaining screening efforts.

    Pun, Brenda T / Devlin, John W

    Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine

    2013  Volume 34, Issue 2, Page(s) 179–188

    Abstract: Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with many negative outcomes, including increased length of stay in both the ICU and the hospital, increased duration of mechanical ventilation, increased mortality, worse long-term cognitive ... ...

    Abstract Delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with many negative outcomes, including increased length of stay in both the ICU and the hospital, increased duration of mechanical ventilation, increased mortality, worse long-term cognitive impairment, and increased costs. The 2013 American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM)/Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) clinical practice guidelines for pain, agitation, and delirium (PAD), based on available evidence, strongly recommend that critically ill patients be routinely monitored for delirium in the ICU using a validated tool. After conducting a thorough psychometric review of available delirium assessment tools, the 2013 PAD guideline group concluded that the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) are the ICU delirium screening tools with the strongest validity and reliability. This article discusses the importance and feasibility of delirium screening in the ICU and compares the most commonly used critical care delirium screening instruments. Strategies needed to implement and sustain delirium screening efforts in different critically ill populations are introduced and discussed. Accurate detection is the first step in managing ICU patients who develop delirium in an attempt to reduce the negative sequelae of delirium in this population.
    MeSH term(s) Cognition Disorders/etiology ; Cognition Disorders/prevention & control ; Critical Care/methods ; Critical Illness ; Delirium/complications ; Delirium/diagnosis ; Feasibility Studies ; Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Length of Stay ; Mass Screening/methods ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Psychometrics ; Psychomotor Agitation ; Reproducibility of Results
    Language English
    Publishing date 2013-04
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Validation Studies
    ZDB-ID 1183617-9
    ISSN 1098-9048 ; 1069-3424
    ISSN (online) 1098-9048
    ISSN 1069-3424
    DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1342972
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: The Authors Respond.

    Balas, Michele C / Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann / Byrum, Diane G / Posa, Patricia J / Pun, Brenda T / Puntillo, Kathleen A

    Critical care nurse

    2019  Volume 39, Issue 3, Page(s) 14–15

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Surgical Wound Infection
    Language English
    Publishing date 2019-05-30
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 632663-8
    ISSN 1940-8250 ; 0279-5442
    ISSN (online) 1940-8250
    ISSN 0279-5442
    DOI 10.4037/ccn2019690
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Quantitative EEG During Critical Illness Correlates with Patterns of Long-Term Cognitive Impairment.

    Williams Roberson, Shawniqua / Azeez, Naureen Abdul / Taneja, Randip / Pun, Brenda T / Pandharipande, Pratik P / Jackson, James C / Ely, E Wesley

    Clinical EEG and neuroscience

    2020  Volume 53, Issue 5, Page(s) 435–442

    Abstract: Objective: Many intensive care unit (ICU) survivors suffer disabling long-term cognitive impairment (LTCI) after critical illness. We compared EEG characteristics during critical illness with patients' 1-year neuropsychological outcomes.: Methods: We ...

    Abstract Objective: Many intensive care unit (ICU) survivors suffer disabling long-term cognitive impairment (LTCI) after critical illness. We compared EEG characteristics during critical illness with patients' 1-year neuropsychological outcomes.
    Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of patients in the BRAIN-ICU study who had undergone EEG for clinical purposes during admission (n = 10). All survivors underwent formal cognitive assessments at 12-month follow-up. We evaluated EEGs by conventional visual inspection and computed 10 quantitative features. We explored associations between EEG and patterns of LTCI using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Spearman's rank correlations.
    Results: Of 521 Vanderbilt patients enrolled in the parent study, 24 had EEG recordings during admission. Ten survivors had EEG tracings available and completed follow-up cognitive testing. All but one inpatient EEG showed generalized background slowing. All patients demonstrated cognitive impairment in at least one domain at follow-up. The most common deficits occurred in delayed memory (DM-median index 62) and visuospatial/constructional (VC-median index 69) domains. Relative alpha power correlated with VC score (ρ = 0.78,
    Conclusions: Quantitative EEG features during critical illness correlated with domain-specific cognitive performance in our small cohort of ICU survivors. Further study in larger prospective cohorts is required to determine whether these relationships hold.
    Significance: EEG may serve as a prognostic biomarker predicting patterns of long-term cognitive impairment.
    MeSH term(s) Cognition Disorders/diagnosis ; Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis ; Critical Illness/psychology ; Electroencephalography ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Prospective Studies
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-12-08
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2140201-2
    ISSN 2169-5202 ; 0009-9155 ; 1550-0594
    ISSN (online) 2169-5202
    ISSN 0009-9155 ; 1550-0594
    DOI 10.1177/1550059420978009
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top