LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 45

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Ethics of Advocacy.

    Reid, Lynette

    Rhode Island medical journal (2013)

    2022  Volume 105, Issue 3, Page(s) 13–16

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Patient Advocacy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-04-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 419430-5
    ISSN 2327-2228 ; 0363-7913
    ISSN (online) 2327-2228
    ISSN 0363-7913
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice.

    Reid, Lynette

    Journal of medical ethics

    2020  Volume 46, Issue 8, Page(s) 526–530

    Abstract: Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome- ... ...

    Abstract Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.
    MeSH term(s) Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections ; Critical Care ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; Resource Allocation ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Social Justice ; Triage
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-06-16
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 194927-5
    ISSN 1473-4257 ; 0306-6800
    ISSN (online) 1473-4257
    ISSN 0306-6800
    DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106320
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Is an indistinct picture "exactly what we need"? Objectivity, accuracy, and harm in imaging for cancer.

    Reid, Lynette

    Journal of evaluation in clinical practice

    2018  Volume 24, Issue 5, Page(s) 1055–1064

    Abstract: Assumptions about the epistemic ideal of objectivity, closely related to ontological assumptions about the nature of disease as pathophysiological abnormality, lead us into oversimplified ways of thinking about medical imaging. This is illustrated by ... ...

    Abstract Assumptions about the epistemic ideal of objectivity, closely related to ontological assumptions about the nature of disease as pathophysiological abnormality, lead us into oversimplified ways of thinking about medical imaging. This is illustrated by current controversies in the early detection of cancer. Improvements in the technical quality of imaging failed to address the problem of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening and exacerbate the problem in thyroid cancer diagnosis. Drawing on Douglas and on Daston and Galison, I distinguish 3 dimensions of objectivity (accuracy, reliability, and precision) and demonstrate ways they may be at odds, as illustrated in the early detection of cancer. Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic imaging are insufficiently sensitive to this complexity. Improving imaging quality may raise epistemic issues, place disease definitions in question, and lead to overall harm or to changes in the distribution of harms and benefits among population subgroups. With a nod to Wittgenstein, I argue that we cannot take for granted that "an indistinct picture" is not "exactly what we need."
    MeSH term(s) Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging ; Diagnostic Imaging/standards ; Early Detection of Cancer/methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Overuse/prevention & control ; Preventive Medicine ; Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
    Language English
    Publishing date 2018-07-02
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1327355-3
    ISSN 1365-2753 ; 1356-1294
    ISSN (online) 1365-2753
    ISSN 1356-1294
    DOI 10.1111/jep.12965
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article: Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice

    Reid, Lynette

    J Med Ethics

    Abstract: Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome- ... ...

    Abstract Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.
    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #600893
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  5. Book ; Online: Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19

    Reid, Lynette

    a stronger role for justice

    2020  

    Abstract: Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome- ... ...

    Abstract Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.
    Keywords Original research ; covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-01 00:00:00.0
    Publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
    Publishing country us
    Document type Book ; Online
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19

    Reid, Lynette

    Journal of Medical Ethics

    a stronger role for justice

    2020  Volume 46, Issue 8, Page(s) 526–530

    Abstract: Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome- ... ...

    Abstract Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.
    Keywords Health Policy ; Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ; Issues, ethics and legal aspects ; Health(social science) ; covid19
    Language English
    Publisher BMJ
    Publishing country uk
    Document type Article ; Online
    ZDB-ID 194927-5
    ISSN 1473-4257 ; 0306-6800
    ISSN (online) 1473-4257
    ISSN 0306-6800
    DOI 10.1136/medethics-2020-106320
    Database BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article: Les questions éthiques dans la philanthropie en santé.

    Reid, Lynette

    Healthcare management forum

    2017  Volume 30, Issue 6, Page(s) 302–305

    Abstract: Les leaders en santé du Canada affrontent une foule de défis dans le secteur de la philanthropie en santé. Ces défis ne se limitent pas à l'aspect pratique des mesures à prendre pour réussir, mais également à des questions éthiques. Est-ce que la ... ...

    Abstract Les leaders en santé du Canada affrontent une foule de défis dans le secteur de la philanthropie en santé. Ces défis ne se limitent pas à l'aspect pratique des mesures à prendre pour réussir, mais également à des questions éthiques. Est-ce que la collecte de fonds est acceptable si elle donne lieu à des partenariats avec des entreprises qui participent à l'apparition de maladies causées par le mode de vie? Quand la reconnaissance méritée envers les donateurs ou les bénévoles dépasse-t-elle les bornes et favorise-t-elle un accès privilégié aux soins? Les décisions éthiques de la philanthropie en santé doivent opposer les témoignages de reconnaissance ou les partenariats avec les donateurs au bien public, qui s'inscrit dans le mandat des établissements de santé et qui fait partie et des obligations fiduciaires des hôpitaux et des cliniciens envers les patients.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-11-10
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2140831-2
    ISSN 2352-3883 ; 0840-4704
    ISSN (online) 2352-3883
    ISSN 0840-4704
    DOI 10.1177/0840470417741696
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Introduction to the Special Issue: Precarious Solidarity-Preferential Access in Canadian Health Care.

    Reid, Lynette

    Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy

    2017  Volume 25, Issue 2, Page(s) 107–113

    Abstract: Systems of universal health coverage may aspire to provide care based on need and not ability to pay; the complexities of this aspiration (conceptual, practical, and ethical) call for normative analysis. This special issue arises in the wake of a ... ...

    Abstract Systems of universal health coverage may aspire to provide care based on need and not ability to pay; the complexities of this aspiration (conceptual, practical, and ethical) call for normative analysis. This special issue arises in the wake of a judicial inquiry into preferential access in the Canadian province of Alberta, the Vertes Commission. I describe this inquiry and set out a taxonomy of forms of differential and preferential access. Papers in this special issue focus on the conceptual specification of health system boundaries (the concept of medical need) and on the normative questions raised by complex models of funding and delivery of care, where patients, providers, and services cross system boundaries.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-06
    Publishing country Netherlands
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 1160541-8
    ISSN 1573-3394 ; 1065-3058
    ISSN (online) 1573-3394
    ISSN 1065-3058
    DOI 10.1007/s10728-016-0338-y
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Truth or Spin? Disease Definition in Cancer Screening.

    Reid, Lynette

    The Journal of medicine and philosophy

    2017  Volume 42, Issue 4, Page(s) 385–404

    Abstract: Are the small and indolent cancers found in abundance in cancer screening normal variations, risk factors, or disease? Naturalists in philosophy of medicine turn to pathophysiological findings to decide such questions objectively. To understand the role ... ...

    Abstract Are the small and indolent cancers found in abundance in cancer screening normal variations, risk factors, or disease? Naturalists in philosophy of medicine turn to pathophysiological findings to decide such questions objectively. To understand the role of pathophysiological findings in disease definition, we must understand how they mislead in diagnostic reasoning. Participants on all sides of the definition of disease debate attempt to secure objectivity via reductionism. These reductivist routes to objectivity are inconsistent with the Bayesian nature of clinical reasoning; when they appeal to the sciences, they are inconsistent with what philosophy of biology tells us about its natural kinds. Proposals that we narrow the scope of our claims in the disease definition debates (proposing adoption of a specific disease paradigm for a specific context) are useful, but paradigms can still distort our reasoning in particular cases, even when we are self-conscious about their status.
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-08-01
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 197282-0
    ISSN 1744-5019 ; 0360-5310
    ISSN (online) 1744-5019
    ISSN 0360-5310
    DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhx006
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article: Ethical issues in health philanthropy.

    Reid, Lynette

    Healthcare management forum

    2017  Volume 30, Issue 6, Page(s) 298–301

    Abstract: Health leaders in Canada face a myriad of challenges with healthcare philanthropy-not just the practical question of how to be successful but also ethical questions. Is fundraising in partnership with companies that are implicated in the so-called ... ...

    Abstract Health leaders in Canada face a myriad of challenges with healthcare philanthropy-not just the practical question of how to be successful but also ethical questions. Is fundraising in partnership with companies that are implicated in the so-called lifestyle diseases appropriate? When does appropriate recognition for donors or volunteers cross the line into facilitating preferential access to care? Ethical decision-making in health philanthropy considers appropriate recognition or partnership in donor relations in the context of the public good with which healthcare institutions are entrusted and the fiduciary responsibilities of hospitals and clinicians to patients.
    MeSH term(s) Administrative Personnel/ethics ; Decision Making/ethics ; Ethics, Professional ; Fund Raising/ethics ; Humans ; Organizational Policy
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-10-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 2140831-2
    ISSN 2352-3883 ; 0840-4704
    ISSN (online) 2352-3883
    ISSN 0840-4704
    DOI 10.1177/0840470417733360
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top