LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 13

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Disparities in Maternal and Infant Outcomes: What's a Neurologist to Do?

    Langer-Gould, Annette / Igbinosa, Irogue I

    Neurology

    2024  Volume 102, Issue 4, Page(s) e209207

    MeSH term(s) Humans ; Infant ; Health Status Disparities ; Maternal Health ; Infant Health
    Language English
    Publishing date 2024-01-23
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 207147-2
    ISSN 1526-632X ; 0028-3878
    ISSN (online) 1526-632X
    ISSN 0028-3878
    DOI 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209207
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: Editorial: How COVID-19 has affected maternal-fetal medicine and obstetrics?

    Igbinosa, Irogue / Lyell, Deirdre J

    Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology

    2021  Volume 33, Issue 5, Page(s) 416–418

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; Female ; Humans ; Obstetrics/trends ; Perinatology/trends ; Pregnancy ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Telemedicine
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-08-26
    Publishing country England
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 1049382-7
    ISSN 1473-656X ; 1040-872X
    ISSN (online) 1473-656X
    ISSN 1040-872X
    DOI 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000741
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: Iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy.

    Igbinosa, Irogue / Berube, Caroline / Lyell, Deirdre J

    Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology

    2022  Volume 34, Issue 2, Page(s) 69–76

    Abstract: Purpose of review: Anemia in pregnancy is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. There is increasing awareness amongst obstetricians about the need to screen for iron deficiency anemia (IDA), as well as growing literature on ... ...

    Abstract Purpose of review: Anemia in pregnancy is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. There is increasing awareness amongst obstetricians about the need to screen for iron deficiency anemia (IDA), as well as growing literature on diagnosis and treatment. This review aims to summarize causes, consequences, treatment, and evaluation of IDA in pregnancy.
    Recent findings: National guidelines provide varying guidance on diagnosis and treatment of IDA in pregnancy. Serum ferritin is a helpful adjunct for the diagnosis of IDA. Oral iron remains an option for treatment; absorption is improved with every other day dosing and is effective for patients able to tolerate. Emerging studies on modern generations of intravenous (IV) iron demonstrate shorter infusion times and improved safety profiles. Notably, recent UK guidelines provide consideration for universal IV iron supplementation for treatment of anemia beyond 34 weeks of pregnancy.
    Summary: Iron, in dietary, oral, and IV forms, has been found effective in resolving anemia in pregnancy. Pregnant people with IDA in the third trimester are more likely to benefit from IV iron. Future studies designed and powered to assess maternal and perinatal morbidity indicators and blood transfusion rates can strengthen recommendations.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Iron/therapeutic use ; Iron Deficiencies ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Trimester, Third
    Chemical Substances Iron (E1UOL152H7)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-02-20
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Review
    ZDB-ID 1049382-7
    ISSN 1473-656X ; 1040-872X
    ISSN (online) 1473-656X
    ISSN 1040-872X
    DOI 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000772
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Anemia and Severe Maternal Morbidity.

    Igbinosa, Irogue I / Leonard, Stephanie A / Noelette, Francecsa / Davies-Balch, Shantay / Carmichael, Suzan L / Main, Elliott / Lyell, Deirdre J

    Obstetrics and gynecology

    2023  Volume 142, Issue 4, Page(s) 845–854

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate antepartum anemia prevalence by race and ethnicity, to assess whether such differences contribute to severe maternal morbidity (SMM), and to estimate the contribution of antepartum anemia to SMM and nontransfusion SMM by race and ... ...

    Abstract Objective: To evaluate antepartum anemia prevalence by race and ethnicity, to assess whether such differences contribute to severe maternal morbidity (SMM), and to estimate the contribution of antepartum anemia to SMM and nontransfusion SMM by race and ethnicity.
    Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked vital record and birth hospitalization data for singleton births at or after 20 weeks of gestation in California from 2011 through 2020. Pregnant patients with hereditary anemias, out-of-hospital births, unlinked records, and missing variables of interest were excluded. Antepartum anemia prevalence and trends were estimated by race and ethnicity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were used for SMM and nontransfusion SMM indicators. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) for SMM and nontransfusion SMM by race and ethnicity after sequential adjustment for social determinants, parity, obstetric comorbidities, delivery, and antepartum anemia. Population attributable risk percentages were calculated to assess the contribution of antepartum anemia to SMM and nontransfusion SMM by race and ethnicity.
    Results: In total, 3,863,594 births in California were included. In 2020, Black pregnant patients had the highest incidence of antepartum anemia (21.5%), followed by Pacific Islander (18.2%), American Indian-Alaska Native (14.1%), multiracial (14.0%), Hispanic (12.6%), Asian (10.6%), and White pregnant patients (9.6%). From 2011 to 2020, the prevalence of anemia increased more than100% among Black patients, and there was a persistent gap in prevalence among Black compared with White patients. Compared with White patients, the adjusted risk for SMM was high among most racial and ethnic groups; adjustment for anemia after sequential modeling for known confounders decreased SMM risk most for Black pregnant patients (approximated RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.42-1.53 to approximated RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.22-1.37). Compared with White patients, the full adjusted nontransfusion SMM risk remained high for most groups except Hispanic and multiracial patients. Within each racial and ethnic group, the population attributable risk percentage for antepartum anemia and SMM was highest for multiracial patients (21.4%, 95% CI 17.5-25.0%), followed by Black (20.9%, 95% CI 18.1-23.4%) and Hispanic (20.9%, 95% CI 19.9-22.1%) patients. The nontransfusion SMM population attributable risk percentages for Asian, Black, and White pregnant patients were less than 8%.
    Conclusion: Antepartum anemia, most prevalent among Black pregnant patients, contributed to disparities in SMM by race and ethnicity. Nearly one in five to six SMM cases among Black, Hispanic, American Indian-Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, and multiracial pregnant patients is attributable in part to antepartum anemia.
    MeSH term(s) Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Anemia/epidemiology ; Cohort Studies ; Ethnicity ; United States/epidemiology ; Health Status Disparities ; Racial Groups
    Language English
    Publishing date 2023-09-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
    ZDB-ID 207330-4
    ISSN 1873-233X ; 0029-7844
    ISSN (online) 1873-233X
    ISSN 0029-7844
    DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005325
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Comparison of rapid immunoassays for rupture of fetal membranes.

    Igbinosa, Irogue / Moore, Ferney A / Johnson, Cheri / Block, Jon E

    BMC pregnancy and childbirth

    2017  Volume 17, Issue 1, Page(s) 128

    Abstract: Background: Rupture of membranes (ROM) before the onset of uterine contractions, particularly in pregnancies less than 37 weeks gestational age, is a common diagnostic problem in obstetrical practice. Timely detection of ROM is vital to support ... ...

    Abstract Background: Rupture of membranes (ROM) before the onset of uterine contractions, particularly in pregnancies less than 37 weeks gestational age, is a common diagnostic problem in obstetrical practice. Timely detection of ROM is vital to support gestational age-specific interventions to optimize perinatal outcomes and minimize the risk of serious complications such as preterm delivery, fetal distress and maternal/fetal infections. Rapid bedside immunoassay tests designed to detect amniotic fluid proteins in cervicovaginal fluids have emerged as valuable clinical tools to provide timely ROM diagnosis.
    Methods: In this prospective observational study, two commercially-available immunoassay tests (ROM Plus®, AmniSure®) were evaluated concurrently in 111 pregnant women who presented with the chief complaint of ROM. Immunoassay results were compared to clinical parameters for determining ROM via comprehensive, retrospective clinical chart review. Diagnostic performance characteristics were calculated including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy.
    Results: Overall, diagnostic performance characteristics were robust and similar between ROM Plus® and AmniSure®, respectively: sensitivity (96.4 and 89.3%), specificity (98.8 and 100%), PPV (96.4 and 100%), NPV (98.8% and 96.5) and accuracy (98.2 and 97.3%). For term patients (≥37 weeks gestation), the sensitivities were 93.8 and 81.3% and specificities were 97.1 and 100% for ROM Plus® and AmniSure®, respectively. For preterm patients (<37 weeks gestation), both immunoassay tests provided exact concordance with clinical confirmation of ROM resulting in 100% diagnostic accuracy.
    Conclusions: Both rapid immunoassay tests provided similarly excellent diagnostic accuracy for the rapid detection of ROM with only two discrepant results for ROM Plus® and three discrepant results for AmniSure® compared to clinical confirmation. The findings from this study recommend these tests for pregnant women presenting with suspected ROM to guide correct clinical management decisions to improve obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
    Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02208011 (1 August 2014).
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-04-26
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 1471-2393
    ISSN (online) 1471-2393
    DOI 10.1186/s12884-017-1311-y
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: Zika Virus: Common Questions and Answers.

    Igbinosa, Irogue I / Rabe, Ingrid B / Oduyebo, Titilope / Rasmussen, Sonja A

    American family physician

    2017  Volume 95, Issue 8, Page(s) 507–513

    Abstract: Since local mosquito-borne transmission of Zika virus was first reported in Brazil in early 2015, the virus has spread rapidly, with active transmission reported in at least 61 countries and territories worldwide, including the United States. Zika virus ... ...

    Abstract Since local mosquito-borne transmission of Zika virus was first reported in Brazil in early 2015, the virus has spread rapidly, with active transmission reported in at least 61 countries and territories worldwide, including the United States. Zika virus infection during pregnancy is a cause of microcephaly and other severe brain anomalies. The virus is transmitted primarily through the bite of an infected Aedes mosquito, but other routes of transmission include sexual, mother-to-fetus during pregnancy, mother-to-infant at delivery, laboratory exposure, and, possibly, transfusion of blood products. Most persons with Zika virus infection are asymptomatic or have only mild symptoms; hospitalizations and deaths are rare. When symptoms are present, maculopapular rash, fever, arthralgia, and conjunctivitis are most common. Zika virus testing is recommended for persons with possible exposure (those who have traveled to or live in an area with active transmission, or persons who had sex without a condom with a person with possible exposure) if they have symptoms consistent with Zika virus disease. Testing is also recommended for pregnant women with possible exposure, regardless of whether symptoms are present. Treatment is supportive, and no vaccine is currently available. The primary methods of prevention include avoiding bites of infected Aedes mosquitoes and reducing the risk of sexual transmission. Pregnant women should not travel to areas with active Zika virus transmission, and men and women who are planning to conceive in the near future should consider avoiding nonessential travel to these areas. Condoms can reduce the risk of sexual transmission.
    MeSH term(s) Aedes ; Animals ; Condoms/utilization ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; Exanthema/virology ; Female ; Fever/virology ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology ; Risk Factors ; Travel ; Zika Virus/isolation & purification ; Zika Virus Infection/complications ; Zika Virus Infection/diagnosis ; Zika Virus Infection/prevention & control ; Zika Virus Infection/transmission
    Language English
    Publishing date 2017-04-15
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 412694-4
    ISSN 1532-0650 ; 0002-838X ; 0572-3612
    ISSN (online) 1532-0650
    ISSN 0002-838X ; 0572-3612
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Use of remdesivir for pregnant patients with severe novel coronavirus disease 2019.

    Igbinosa, Irogue / Miller, Sarah / Bianco, Katherine / Nelson, Joanna / Kappagoda, Shanthi / Blackburn, Brian G / Grant, Philip / Subramanian, Aruna / Lyell, Deirdre J / El-Sayed, Yasser Y / Aziz, Natali

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology

    2020  Volume 223, Issue 5, Page(s) 768–770

    MeSH term(s) Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives ; Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use ; Adult ; Alanine/analogs & derivatives ; Alanine/therapeutic use ; Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy ; Treatment Outcome
    Chemical Substances Antiviral Agents ; remdesivir (3QKI37EEHE) ; Adenosine Monophosphate (415SHH325A) ; Alanine (OF5P57N2ZX)
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-08-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Case Reports ; Letter
    ZDB-ID 80016-8
    ISSN 1097-6868 ; 0002-9378
    ISSN (online) 1097-6868
    ISSN 0002-9378
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.001
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article: Use of remdesivir for pregnant patients with severe novel coronavirus disease 2019

    Igbinosa, Irogue / Miller, Sarah / Bianco, Katherine / Nelson, Joanna / Kappagoda, Shanthi / Blackburn, Brian G / Grant, Philip / Subramanian, Aruna / Lyell, Deirdre J / El-Sayed, Yasser Y / Aziz, Natali

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    Keywords covid19
    Publisher WHO
    Document type Article
    Note WHO #Covidence: #702215
    Database COVID19

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: The obstetrical research landscape: a cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials from 2007-2020.

    Steinberg, Jecca R / Weeks, Brannon T / Reyes, Griselda A / Conway Fitzgerald, Alison / Zhang, Wendy Y / Lindsay, Sarah E / Anderson, Jill N / Chan, Katelyn / Richardson, Michael T / Magnani, Christopher J / Igbinosa, Irogue / Girsen, Anna / El-Sayed, Yasser Y / Turner, Brandon E / Lyell, Deirdre J

    American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM

    2020  Volume 3, Issue 1, Page(s) 100253

    Abstract: Background: Obstetrical complications affect more than a third of women globally, but are underrepresented in clinical research. Little is known about the comprehensive obstetrical clinical trial landscape, how it compares with other fields, or factors ... ...

    Abstract Background: Obstetrical complications affect more than a third of women globally, but are underrepresented in clinical research. Little is known about the comprehensive obstetrical clinical trial landscape, how it compares with other fields, or factors associated with the successful completion of obstetrical trials.
    Objective: This study aimed to characterize obstetrical clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the primary objective of identifying features associated with early discontinuation and results reporting.
    Study design: This is a cross-sectional study with descriptive, logistic regression and Cox regression analyses of clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Our primary exposure variables were trial focus (obstetrical or nonobstetrical) and trial funding (industry, United States government, or academic). We conducted additional exploratory analyses of other trial features including design, enrollment, and therapeutic focus. We examined the associations of exposure variables and other trial features with 2 primary outcomes: early discontinuation and results reporting.
    Results: We downloaded data for all studies (N=332,417) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from October 1, 2007, to March 9, 2020, from the Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. We excluded studies with a noninterventional design (n=63,697) and those registered before October 1, 2007 (n=45,209). A total of 4276 obstetrical trials (1.9%) (ie, interventional studies) and 219,235 nonobstetric trials (98.1%) were compared. Among all trials, 2.8% of academic-funded trials, 1.9% of United States government-funded trials, and 0.4% of industry-funded trials focused on obstetrics. The quantity of obstetrical trials increased over time (10.8% annual growth rate). Compared with nonobstetrical trials, obstetrical trials had a greater risk of early discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.62;
    Conclusion: Obstetrical trials represent only 1.9% of all clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and have comparatively poor completion. All stakeholders should commit to increasing the number of obstetrical trials and improving their completion and dissemination to ensure clinical research reflects the obstetrical burden of disease and advances maternal health.
    MeSH term(s) Cross-Sectional Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Humans ; Obstetrics ; Odds Ratio ; Registries ; United States/epidemiology
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-10-06
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ISSN 2589-9333
    ISSN (online) 2589-9333
    DOI 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100253
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Preventing Transmission of Zika Virus in Labor and Delivery Settings Through Implementation of Standard Precautions - United States, 2016.

    Olson, Christine K / Iwamoto, Martha / Perkins, Kiran M / Polen, Kara N D / Hageman, Jeffrey / Meaney-Delman, Dana / Igbinosa, Irogue I / Khan, Sumaiya / Honein, Margaret A / Bell, Michael / Rasmussen, Sonja A / Jamieson, Denise J

    MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report

    2016  Volume 65, Issue 11, Page(s) 290–292

    Abstract: Zika virus transmission was detected in the Region of the Americas (Americas) in Brazil in May 2015, and as of March 21, 2016, local mosquito-borne transmission of Zika virus had been reported in 32 countries and territories in the Americas, including ... ...

    Abstract Zika virus transmission was detected in the Region of the Americas (Americas) in Brazil in May 2015, and as of March 21, 2016, local mosquito-borne transmission of Zika virus had been reported in 32 countries and territories in the Americas, including Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.* Most persons infected with Zika virus have a mild illness or are asymptomatic. However, increasing evidence supports a link between Zika virus infection during pregnancy and adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes (1), and a possible association between recent Zika virus infection and Guillain-Barré syndrome has been reported (2). Although Zika virus is primarily transmitted through the bite of Aedes species of mosquitoes, sexual transmission also has been documented (3). Zika virus RNA has been detected in a number of body fluids, including blood, urine, saliva, and amniotic fluid (3-5), and whereas transmission associated with occupational exposure to these body fluids is theoretically possible, it has not been documented. Although there are no reports of transmission of Zika virus from infected patients to health care personnel or other patients, minimizing exposures to body fluids is important to reduce the possibility of such transmission. CDC recommends Standard Precautions in all health care settings to protect both health care personnel and patients from infection with Zika virus as well as from blood-borne pathogens (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] and hepatitis C virus [HCV]) (6). Because of the potential for exposure to large volumes of body fluids during the labor and delivery process and the sometimes unpredictable and fast-paced nature of obstetrical care, the use of Standard Precautions in these settings is essential to prevent possible transmission of Zika virus from patients to health care personnel.
    MeSH term(s) Delivery of Health Care/standards ; Delivery, Obstetric ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; Female ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Infection Control/standards ; Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control ; Occupational Diseases/prevention & control ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control ; Teaching ; United States ; Zika Virus Infection/prevention & control ; Zika Virus Infection/transmission
    Language English
    Publishing date 2016-03-25
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 412775-4
    ISSN 1545-861X ; 0149-2195
    ISSN (online) 1545-861X
    ISSN 0149-2195
    DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6511e3
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top