LIVIVO - The Search Portal for Life Sciences

zur deutschen Oberfläche wechseln
Advanced search

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 57

Search options

  1. Article ; Online: Rapid and Living Guidance for COVID-19.

    Elliott, Julian H / Jeppesen, Britta Tendal

    Annals of internal medicine

    2021  Volume 174, Issue 8, Page(s) 1171–1172

    MeSH term(s) COVID-19 ; Humans ; SARS-CoV-2
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-05-25
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Editorial ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 336-0
    ISSN 1539-3704 ; 0003-4819
    ISSN (online) 1539-3704
    ISSN 0003-4819
    DOI 10.7326/M21-2245
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  2. Article ; Online: [No title information]

    Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou / Jeppesen, Britta Tendal / Møller, Morten Hylander / Jørgensen, Karsten Juhl / Fally, Markus / Brorson, Stig

    Ugeskrift for laeger

    2024  Volume 186, Issue 6

    Abstract: Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study ... ...

    Title translation Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines.
    Abstract Ten questions to assess to what degree a clinical practice guideline is likely to be trustworthy: 1) Do the authors have conflicts of interests? 2) Is the clinical question relevant? 3) Have relevant stakeholders been involved? 4) Have methods for study selection been described? 5) Is there a link between evidence and recommendations (transparent methods)? 6) Has the certainty of evidence been assessed? 7) Have the methods for reaching recommendations been described? 8) Are the recommendations unambiguous? 9) Are the recommendations relevant in your situation? 10) Is there an implementation strategy?
    Language Danish
    Publishing date 2024-02-05
    Publishing country Denmark
    Document type English Abstract ; Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 124102-3
    ISSN 1603-6824 ; 0041-5782
    ISSN (online) 1603-6824
    ISSN 0041-5782
    DOI 10.61409/V09230579
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  3. Article ; Online: [No title information]

    Schroll, Jeppe Bennekou / Jeppesen, Britta Tendal

    Ugeskrift for laeger

    2019  Volume 181, Issue 6

    Title translation Automatiske reviews.
    Language Danish
    Publishing date 2019-02-07
    Publishing country Denmark
    Document type Editorial
    ZDB-ID 124102-3
    ISSN 1603-6824 ; 0041-5782
    ISSN (online) 1603-6824
    ISSN 0041-5782
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  4. Article ; Online: COVID-19: living guidelines help fix cracks in evidence pipeline.

    Vandvik, Per Olav / Askie, Lisa / Glen, Fiona / Tendal, Britta / Agoritsas, Thomas

    Nature

    2021  Volume 595, Issue 7866, Page(s) 172

    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-07-06
    Publishing country England
    Document type Letter ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 120714-3
    ISSN 1476-4687 ; 0028-0836
    ISSN (online) 1476-4687
    ISSN 0028-0836
    DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-01821-2
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  5. Article ; Online: Breathing life into Australian diabetes clinical guidelines.

    White, Heath / Tendal, Britta / Elliott, Julian / Turner, Tari / Andrikopoulos, Sofianos / Zoungas, Sophia

    The Medical journal of Australia

    2020  Volume 212, Issue 6, Page(s) 250–251.e1

    MeSH term(s) Australia ; Cost of Illness ; Diabetes Mellitus/economics ; Government Regulation ; Humans ; Practice Guidelines as Topic
    Keywords covid19
    Language English
    Publishing date 2020-02-14
    Publishing country Australia
    Document type Journal Article
    ZDB-ID 186082-3
    ISSN 1326-5377 ; 0025-729X
    ISSN (online) 1326-5377
    ISSN 0025-729X
    DOI 10.5694/mja2.50509
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  6. Article ; Online: The Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: What worked, what didn't and why, a mixed methods process evaluation.

    Turner, Tari / Elliott, Julian / Tendal, Britta / Vogel, Joshua P / Norris, Sarah / Tate, Rhiannon / Green, Sally

    PloS one

    2022  Volume 17, Issue 1, Page(s) e0261479

    Abstract: Introduction: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is producing living, evidence-based, national guidelines for treatment of people with COVID-19 which are updated each week. To continually improve the process and outputs of the ... ...

    Abstract Introduction: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is producing living, evidence-based, national guidelines for treatment of people with COVID-19 which are updated each week. To continually improve the process and outputs of the Taskforce, and inform future living guideline development, we undertook a concurrent process evaluation examining Taskforce activities and experience of team members and stakeholders during the first 5 months of the project.
    Methods: The mixed-methods process evaluation consisted of activity and progress audits, an online survey of all Taskforce participants; and semi-structured interviews with key contributors. Data were collected through five, prospective 4-weekly timepoints (beginning first week of May 2020) and three, fortnightly retrospective timepoints (March 23, April 6 and 20). We collected and analysed quantitative and qualitative data.
    Results: An updated version of the guidelines was successfully published every week during the process evaluation. The Taskforce formed in March 2020, with a nominal start date of March 23. The first version of the guideline was published two weeks later and included 10 recommendations. By August 24, in the final round of the process evaluation, the team of 11 staff, working with seven guideline panels and over 200 health decision-makers, had developed 66 recommendations addressing 58 topics. The Taskforce website had received over 200,000 page views. Satisfaction with the work of the Taskforce remained very high (>90% extremely or somewhat satisfied) throughout. Several key strengths, challenges and methods questions for the work of the Taskforce were identified.
    Conclusions: In just over 5 months of activity, the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce published 20 weekly updates to the evidence-based national treatment guidelines for COVID-19. This process evaluation identified several factors that enabled this achievement (e.g. an extant skill base in evidence review and convening), along with challenges that needed to be overcome (e.g. managing workloads, structure and governance) and methods questions (pace of updating, and thresholds for inclusion of evidence) which may be useful considerations for other living guidelines projects. An impact evaluation is also being conducted separately to examine awareness, acceptance and use of the guidelines.
    MeSH term(s) Australia ; COVID-19/therapy ; Health Policy/trends ; Humans ; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends ; Process Assessment, Health Care/methods ; SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity ; Stakeholder Participation
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-01-07
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Guideline ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ISSN 1932-6203
    ISSN (online) 1932-6203
    DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0261479
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  7. Article ; Online: Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation.

    Millard, Tanya / Elliott, Julian H / Green, Sally / Tendal, Britta / Vogel, Joshua P / Norris, Sarah / Tate, Rhiannon / Turner, Tari

    Journal of clinical epidemiology

    2021  Volume 143, Page(s) 11–21

    Abstract: Background and objective: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is developing living, evidence-based, national guidelines for treatment of people with COVID-19. These living guidelines are updated each week. We undertook an impact ...

    Abstract Background and objective: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is developing living, evidence-based, national guidelines for treatment of people with COVID-19. These living guidelines are updated each week. We undertook an impact evaluation to understand the extent to which health professionals providing treatment to people with COVID 19 were aware of, valued and used the guidelines, and the factors that enabled or hampered this.
    Methods: A mixed methods approach was used for the evaluation. Surveys were conducted to collect both quantitative and qualitative data and were supplemented with qualitative interviews. Australian healthcare practitioners potentially providing care to individuals with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were invited to participate. Data were collected on guideline awareness, relevance, ease of use, trustworthiness, value, importance of updating, use, and strengths and opportunities for improvement.
    Results: A total of 287 people completed the surveys and 10 interviews were conducted during November 2020. Awareness of the work of the Taskforce was high and the vast majority of respondents reported that the guidelines were very or extremely relevant, easy to use, trustworthy and valuable. More than 50% of respondents had used the guidelines to support their own clinical decision-making; and 30% were aware of other examples of the guidelines being used. Qualitative data revealed that amongst an overwhelming morass of evidence and opinions during the COVID-19 pandemic, the guidelines have been a reliable, united source of evidence-based advice; participants felt the guidelines built confidence and provided reassurance in clinical decision-making. Opportunities to improve awareness and accessibility to the guidelines were also explored.
    Conclusions: As of June 2021, the guidelines have been published and updated more than 40 times, include more than 140 recommendations and are being used to inform clinical decisions. The findings of this impact evaluation will be used to improve processes and outputs of the Taskforce and guidelines project, and to inform future living guideline projects.
    MeSH term(s) Australia/epidemiology ; COVID-19/epidemiology ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Pandemics
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-11-28
    Publishing country United States
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 639306-8
    ISSN 1878-5921 ; 0895-4356
    ISSN (online) 1878-5921
    ISSN 0895-4356
    DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.035
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  8. Article ; Online: Efficacy and Safety of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Supplementation in the Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

    Händel, Mina Nicole / Rohde, Jeanett Friis / Rimestad, Marie Louise / Bandak, Elisabeth / Birkefoss, Kirsten / Tendal, Britta / Lemcke, Sanne / Callesen, Henriette Edemann

    Nutrients

    2021  Volume 13, Issue 4

    Abstract: Based on epidemiological and animal studies, the rationale for using polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) as a treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) seems promising. Here, the objective was to systematically identify and critically ...

    Abstract Based on epidemiological and animal studies, the rationale for using polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) as a treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) seems promising. Here, the objective was to systematically identify and critically assess the evidence from clinical trials. The primary outcome was ADHD core symptoms. The secondary outcomes were behavioral difficulties, quality of life, and side effects. We performed a systematic search in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2020. The overall certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). We identified 31 relevant randomized controlled trials including 1755 patients. The results showed no effect on ADHD core symptoms rated by parents (k = 23; SMD: -0.17; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.02) or teachers (k = 10; SMD: -0.06; 95% CI: -0.31, 0.19). There was no effect on behavioral difficulties, rated by parents (k = 7; SMD: -0.02; 95% CI: -0.17, 0.14) or teachers (k = 5; SMD: -0.04; 95% CI: -0.35, 0.26). There was no effect on quality of life (SMD: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.29, 0.31). PUFA did not increase the occurrence of side effects. For now, there seems to be no benefit of PUFA in ADHD treatment; however, the certainty of evidence is questionable, and thus no conclusive guidance can be made. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO ID: CRD42020158453.
    MeSH term(s) Adolescent ; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy ; Child ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Dietary Supplements ; Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/adverse effects ; Fatty Acids, Unsaturated/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome
    Chemical Substances Fatty Acids, Unsaturated
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-04-08
    Publishing country Switzerland
    Document type Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Systematic Review
    ZDB-ID 2518386-2
    ISSN 2072-6643 ; 2072-6643
    ISSN (online) 2072-6643
    ISSN 2072-6643
    DOI 10.3390/nu13041226
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  9. Article ; Online: Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis.

    Elliott, Julian / Lawrence, Rebecca / Minx, Jan C / Oladapo, Olufemi T / Ravaud, Philippe / Tendal Jeppesen, Britta / Thomas, James / Turner, Tari / Vandvik, Per Olav / Grimshaw, Jeremy M

    Nature

    2021  Volume 600, Issue 7889, Page(s) 383–385

    MeSH term(s) Decision Making ; Evidence-Based Medicine
    Language English
    Publishing date 2021-12-15
    Publishing country England
    Document type Journal Article ; Comment
    ZDB-ID 120714-3
    ISSN 1476-4687 ; 0028-0836
    ISSN (online) 1476-4687
    ISSN 0028-0836
    DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-03690-1
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

  10. Article ; Online: Care for adults with COVID-19: living guidelines from the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce.

    White, Heath / McDonald, Steve J / Barber, Bridget / Davis, Joshua / Burr, Lucy / Nair, Priya / Mukherjee, Sutapa / Tendal, Britta / Elliott, Julian / McGloughlin, Steven / Turner, Tari

    The Medical journal of Australia

    2022  Volume 217, Issue 7, Page(s) 368–378

    Abstract: Introduction: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce was established in March 2020 to maintain up-to-date recommendations for the treatment of people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The original guideline (April 2020) has ...

    Abstract Introduction: The Australian National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce was established in March 2020 to maintain up-to-date recommendations for the treatment of people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The original guideline (April 2020) has been continuously updated and expanded from nine to 176 recommendations, facilitated by the rapid identification, appraisal, and analysis of clinical trial findings and subsequent review by expert panels.
    Main recommendations: In this article, we describe the recommendations for treating non-pregnant adults with COVID-19, as current on 1 August 2022 (version 61.0). The Taskforce has made specific recommendations for adults with severe/critical or mild disease, including definitions of disease severity, recommendations for therapy, COVID-19 prophylaxis, respiratory support, and supportive care.
    Changes in management as a result of the guideline: The Taskforce currently recommends eight drug treatments for people with COVID-19 who do not require supplemental oxygen (inhaled corticosteroids, casirivimab/imdevimab, molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, regdanvimab, remdesivir, sotrovimab, tixagevimab/cilgavimab) and six for those who require supplemental oxygen (systemic corticosteroids, remdesivir, tocilizumab, sarilumab, baricitinib, casirivimab/imdevimab). Based on evidence of their achieving no or only limited benefit, ten drug treatments or treatment combinations are not recommended; an additional 42 drug treatments should only be used in the context of randomised trials. Additional recommendations include support for the use of continuous positive airway pressure, prone positioning, and endotracheal intubation in patients whose condition is deteriorating, and prophylactic anticoagulation for preventing venous thromboembolism. The latest updates and full recommendations are available at www.covid19evidence.net.au.
    MeSH term(s) Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use ; Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Anticoagulants ; Australia/epidemiology ; COVID-19/therapy ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G ; Oxygen ; Ritonavir/therapeutic use ; SARS-CoV-2
    Chemical Substances Adrenal Cortex Hormones ; Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Anticoagulants ; Immunoglobulin G ; tixagevimab ; cilgavimab (1KUR4BN70F) ; sotrovimab (1MTK0BPN8V) ; imdevimab (2Z3DQD2JHM) ; regdanvimab (I0BGE6P6I6) ; casirivimab (J0FI6WE1QN) ; Ritonavir (O3J8G9O825) ; Oxygen (S88TT14065)
    Language English
    Publishing date 2022-09-20
    Publishing country Australia
    Document type Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
    ZDB-ID 186082-3
    ISSN 1326-5377 ; 0025-729X
    ISSN (online) 1326-5377
    ISSN 0025-729X
    DOI 10.5694/mja2.51718
    Database MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

    More links

    Kategorien

To top