LIVIVO - Search results -

Search results

Result 1 - 10 of total 31

Search options

Article ; Online: Strategic priorities for reproducibility reform.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony

2023 Volume 21, Issue 1, Page(s) e3001943

Abstract: Increasing the reproducibility of research should be a top priority. Great work is being done, but more work is needed to combine efforts and maximize our actions to enable true reproducibility reform. ...

Abstract	Increasing the reproducibility of research should be a top priority. Great work is being done, but more work is needed to combine efforts and maximize our actions to enable true reproducibility reform.
MeSH term(s)	Health Priorities ; Reproducibility of Results
Language	English
Publishing date	2023-01-12
Publishing country	United States
Document type	Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
ZDB-ID	2126776-5
ISSN	1545-7885 ; 1544-9173
ISSN (online)	1545-7885
ISSN	1544-9173
DOI	10.1371/journal.pbio.3001943
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 6193: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

This service is chargeable due to the Delivery terms set by subito. Orders including an article and supplementary material will be classified as separate orders. In these cases, fees will be demanded for each order.

Details ▾
- See ZB MED holdings
- Order with fees

Article ; Online: Open science, done wrong, will compound inequities.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony

Nature

2022 Volume 603, Issue 7901, Page(s) 363

MeSH term(s)	Publishing
Language	English
Publishing date	2022-03-12
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article ; Comment
ZDB-ID	120714-3
ISSN	1476-4687 ; 0028-0836
ISSN (online)	1476-4687
ISSN	0028-0836
DOI	10.1038/d41586-022-00724-0
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 26: Show issues			Location: Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand) bis Jg. 1994: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular Jg. 1995 - 2021: Lesesall (1.OG) ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)
Zs.MG 9: Show issues
Zs.MO 244: Show issues

Order via subito

Details ▾
- See ZB MED holdings
- Order with fees

Article: Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers.

Cole, Nicki Lisa / Reichmann, Stefan / Ross-Hellauer, Tony

Royal Society open science

2023 Volume 10, Issue 2, Page(s) 221460

Abstract: Open Research aims to make research more accessible, transparent, reproducible, shared and collaborative. Doing so is meant to democratize and diversify access to knowledge and knowledge production, and ensure that research is useful outside of academic ... ...

Abstract	Open Research aims to make research more accessible, transparent, reproducible, shared and collaborative. Doing so is meant to democratize and diversify access to knowledge and knowledge production, and ensure that research is useful outside of academic contexts. Increasing equity is therefore a key aim of the Open Research movement, yet mounting evidence demonstrates that the practices of Open Research are implemented in ways that undermine this. In response, we convened a diverse community of researchers, research managers and funders to co-create actionable recommendations for supporting the equitable implementation of Open Research. Using a co-creative modified Delphi method, we generated consensus-driven recommendations that address three key problem areas: the resource-intensive nature of Open Research, the high cost of article processing charges, and obstructive reward and recognition practices at funders and research institutions that undermine the implementation of Open Research. In this paper, we provide an overview of these issues, a detailed description of the co-creative process, and present the recommendations and the debates that surrounded them. We discuss these recommendations in relation to other recently published ones and conclude that implementing ours requires 'global thinking' to ensure that a systemic and inclusive approach to change is taken.
Language	English
Publishing date	2023-02-01
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article
ZDB-ID	2787755-3
ISSN	2054-5703
ISSN	2054-5703
DOI	10.1098/rsos.221460
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Article ; Online: Open peer review urgently requires evidence: A call to action.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony / Bouter, Lex M / Horbach, Serge P J M

PLoS biology

2023 Volume 21, Issue 10, Page(s) e3002255

Abstract: Open Peer Review is gaining prominence in attention and use, but to responsibly open up peer review, there is an urgent need for additional evidence. Here, we propose a preliminary research agenda and issue a call to action. ...

Abstract	Open Peer Review is gaining prominence in attention and use, but to responsibly open up peer review, there is an urgent need for additional evidence. Here, we propose a preliminary research agenda and issue a call to action.
Language	English
Publishing date	2023-10-04
Publishing country	United States
Document type	Journal Article
ZDB-ID	2126776-5
ISSN	1545-7885 ; 1544-9173
ISSN (online)	1545-7885
ISSN	1544-9173
DOI	10.1371/journal.pbio.3002255
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Zs.A 6193: Show issues

Location:
Je nach Verfügbarkeit (siehe Angabe bei Bestand)
bis Jg. 2021: Bestellungen von Artikeln über das Online-Bestellformular
ab Jg. 2022: Lesesaal (EG)

Order via subito

Details ▾
- See ZB MED holdings
- Order with fees

Article ; Online: Toward equitable open research

Nicki Lisa Cole / Stefan Reichmann / Tony Ross-Hellauer

Royal Society Open Science, Vol 10, Iss

stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers

2023 Volume 2

Abstract	Open Research aims to make research more accessible, transparent, reproducible, shared and collaborative. Doing so is meant to democratize and diversify access to knowledge and knowledge production, and ensure that research is useful outside of academic contexts. Increasing equity is therefore a key aim of the Open Research movement, yet mounting evidence demonstrates that the practices of Open Research are implemented in ways that undermine this. In response, we convened a diverse community of researchers, research managers and funders to co-create actionable recommendations for supporting the equitable implementation of Open Research. Using a co-creative modified Delphi method, we generated consensus-driven recommendations that address three key problem areas: the resource-intensive nature of Open Research, the high cost of article processing charges, and obstructive reward and recognition practices at funders and research institutions that undermine the implementation of Open Research. In this paper, we provide an overview of these issues, a detailed description of the co-creative process, and present the recommendations and the debates that surrounded them. We discuss these recommendations in relation to other recently published ones and conclude that implementing ours requires ‘global thinking’ to ensure that a systemic and inclusive approach to change is taken.
Keywords	open science ; open research ; open science policy ; open science recommendations ; equity in science ; meta-science ; Science ; Q
Subject code	306
Language	English
Publishing date	2023-02-01T00:00:00Z
Publisher	The Royal Society
Document type	Article ; Online
Database	BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

Full text online

Full text

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article: What is open peer review? A systematic review.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony

F1000Research

2017 Volume 6, Page(s) 588

Abstract: ... ...

Abstract	Background
Language	English
Publishing date	2017-04-27
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article
ZDB-ID	2699932-8
ISSN	2046-1402
ISSN	2046-1402
DOI	10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Article ; Online: Guidelines for open peer review implementation.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony / Görögh, Edit

Research integrity and peer review

2019 Volume 4, Page(s) 4

Abstract: Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation. As more journals move to implement and experiment with the myriad of innovations ... ...

Abstract	Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation. As more journals move to implement and experiment with the myriad of innovations covered by this term, there is a clear need for best practice guidelines to guide implementation. This brief article aims to address this knowledge gap, reporting work based on an interactive stakeholder workshop to create best-practice guidelines for editors and journals who wish to transition to OPR. Although the advice is aimed mainly at editors and publishers of scientific journals, since this is the area in which OPR is at its most mature, many of the principles may also be applicable for the implementation of OPR in other areas (e.g., books, conference submissions).
Language	English
Publishing date	2019-02-27
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article
ISSN	2058-8615
ISSN (online)	2058-8615
DOI	10.1186/s41073-019-0063-9
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article ; Online: The limitations to our understanding of peer review.

Tennant, Jonathan P / Ross-Hellauer, Tony

Research integrity and peer review

2020 Volume 5, Page(s) 6

Abstract: Peer review is embedded in the core of our knowledge generation systems, perceived as a method for establishing quality or scholarly legitimacy for research, while also often distributing academic prestige and standing on individuals. Despite its ... ...

Abstract	Peer review is embedded in the core of our knowledge generation systems, perceived as a method for establishing quality or scholarly legitimacy for research, while also often distributing academic prestige and standing on individuals. Despite its critical importance, it curiously remains poorly understood in a number of dimensions. In order to address this, we have analysed peer review to assess where the major gaps in our theoretical and empirical understanding of it lie. We identify core themes including editorial responsibility, the subjectivity and bias of reviewers, the function and quality of peer review, and the social and epistemic implications of peer review. The high-priority gaps are focused around increased accountability and justification in decision-making processes for editors and developing a deeper, empirical understanding of the social impact of peer review. Addressing this at the bare minimum will require the design of a consensus for a minimal set of standards for what constitutes peer review, and the development of a shared data infrastructure to support this. Such a field requires sustained funding and commitment from publishers and research funders, who both have a commitment to uphold the integrity of the published scholarly record. We use this to present a guide for the future of peer review, and the development of a new research discipline based on the study of peer review.
Language	English
Publishing date	2020-04-30
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article ; Review
ISSN	2058-8615
ISSN (online)	2058-8615
DOI	10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

Article: Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony / Reichmann, Stefan / Cole, Nicki Lisa / Fessl, Angela / Klebel, Thomas / Pontika, Nancy

Royal Society open science

2022 Volume 9, Issue 1, Page(s) 211032

Abstract: Open Science holds the promise to make scientific endeavours more inclusive, participatory, understandable, accessible and re-usable for large audiences. However, making processes open will ... ...

Abstract	Open Science holds the promise to make scientific endeavours more inclusive, participatory, understandable, accessible and re-usable for large audiences. However, making processes open will not
Language	English
Publishing date	2022-01-19
Publishing country	England
Document type	Journal Article ; Review
ZDB-ID	2787755-3
ISSN	2054-5703
ISSN	2054-5703
DOI	10.1098/rsos.211032
Database	MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Order via subito

Article ; Online: Guidelines for open peer review implementation

Tony Ross-Hellauer / Edit Görögh

Research Integrity and Peer Review, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-

2019 Volume 12

Abstract: Abstract Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation. As more journals move to implement and experiment with the myriad of ... ...

Abstract	Abstract Open peer review (OPR) is moving into the mainstream, but it is often poorly understood and surveys of researcher attitudes show important barriers to implementation. As more journals move to implement and experiment with the myriad of innovations covered by this term, there is a clear need for best practice guidelines to guide implementation. This brief article aims to address this knowledge gap, reporting work based on an interactive stakeholder workshop to create best-practice guidelines for editors and journals who wish to transition to OPR. Although the advice is aimed mainly at editors and publishers of scientific journals, since this is the area in which OPR is at its most mature, many of the principles may also be applicable for the implementation of OPR in other areas (e.g., books, conference submissions).
Keywords	Peer review ; Guidelines ; Open peer review ; Scholarly publishing ; Open science ; General Works ; A
Language	English
Publishing date	2019-02-01T00:00:00Z
Publisher	BMC
Document type	Article ; Online
Database	BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (life sciences selection)

Full text online

Full text

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

Your chosen title can be delivered directly to ZB MED Cologne location if you are registered as a user at ZB MED Cologne.

To top

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

In stock of ZB MED Cologne/Königswinter

Order via subito

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Inter-library loan at ZB MED

More links

Kategorien

Order via subito

Full text online

More links

Kategorien

Inter-library loan at ZB MED