LIVIVO - Das Suchportal für Lebenswissenschaften

switch to English language
Erweiterte Suche

Ihre letzten Suchen

  1. AU="Adebayo, Abe"
  2. AU=Amoako Yaw Ampem
  3. AU="Khanna, Sakshum"

Suchergebnis

Treffer 1 - 1 von insgesamt 1

Suchoptionen

Artikel: Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Left Breast Post-Mastectomy Patients: Our Experience in Nigerian Sovereign Investment Authority-Lagos University Teaching Hospital Cancer Center, South-West Nigeria.

Adeneye, Samuel / Akpochafor, Michael / Adegboyega, Bolanle / Alabi, Adewumi / Adedewe, Nusirat / Joseph, Adedayo / Fatiregun, Omolara / Omojola, Akintayo / Adebayo, Abe / Oluwadara, Esther

European journal of breast health

2021  Band 17, Heft 3, Seite(n) 247–252

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric properties of treatment plans obtained from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques (IMRT) plans for left chest wall breast cancer patients.! ...

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the dosimetric properties of treatment plans obtained from three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques (IMRT) plans for left chest wall breast cancer patients.
Materials and methods: A total of 20 patients with left-sided chest wall radiotherapy were randomly selected with the dose prescriptions: 42 Gy and 45 Gy in 15 and 18 fractions, respectively. Treatment plans were obtained using 3D-CRT and IMRT for each patient. Five to seven beams were used for IMRT, while tangential beams were used for 3D-CRT. Planning target volume, D
Results: IMRT showed a significant improvement in HI compared to 3D-CRT (p<0.0001). Although there was no significant difference in sparing of the left lung between both plans for high-dose volumes (V20: 18.2 vs 30.55, p<0.0001), (V25: 11.17 vs 28.12, p<0.0001). IMRT however showed supremacy to 3D-CRT with high-dose volumes for the heart, including V20 (4.44 vs 10.29, p = 0.02), V25 (2.08 vs 8.94, p = 0.002). 3D-CRT was better than IMRT in low-dose volumes for left lung (V5: 92.23 vs 56.60, p<0.001; V10: 60.98 vs 47.20, p = 0.04) and heart (V5: 57.45 vs 30.39, p = 0.004).
Conclusion: IMRT showed better homogeneity and sparing of high-dose volumes to OAR than 3D-CRT. On the other hand, 3D-CRT showed a reduction of low-dose volumes to OARs than IMRT.
Sprache Englisch
Erscheinungsdatum 2021-06-24
Erscheinungsland Turkey
Dokumenttyp Journal Article
ISSN 2587-0831
ISSN 2587-0831
DOI 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.6357
Datenquelle MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System OnLINE

Zusatzmaterialien

Kategorien

Zum Seitenanfang